Thegreatsourceofourmistakeinthissubject,andoftheunboundedlicenceofconjecture,whichweindulge,is,thatwetacitlyconsiderourselves,asintheplaceoftheSupremeBeing,andconclude,thathewill,oneveryoccasion,observethesameconduct,whichweourselves,inhissituation,wouldhaveembracedasreasonableandeligible。But,besidesthattheordinarycourseofnaturemayconvinceus,thatalmosteverythingisregulatedbyprinciplesandmaximsverydifferentfromours;besidesthis,Isay,itmustevidentlyappearcontrarytoallrulesofanalogytoreason,fromtheintentionsandprojectsofmen,tothoseofaBeingsodifferent,andsomuchsuperior。
Inhumannature,thereisacertainexperiencedcoherenceofdesignsandinclinations;sothatwhen,fromanyfact,wehavediscoveredoneintentionofanyman,itmayoftenbereasonable,fromexperience,toinferanother,anddrawalongchainofconclusionsconcerninghispastorfutureconduct。ButthismethodofreasoningcanneverhaveplacewithregardtoaBeing,soremoteandincomprehensible,whobearsmuchlessanalogytoanyotherbeingintheuniversethanthesuntoawaxentaper,andwhodiscovershimselfonlybysomefainttracesoroutlines,beyondwhichwehavenoauthoritytoascribetohimanyattributeorperfection。
Whatweimaginetobeasuperiorperfection,mayreallybeadefect。Orwereiteversomuchaperfection,theascribingofittotheSupremeBeing,whereitappearsnottohavebeenreallyexerted,tothefull,inhisworks,savoursmoreofflatteryandpanegyric,thanofjustreasoningandsoundphilosophy。Allthephilosophy,therefore,intheworld,andallthereligion,whichisnothingbutaspeciesofphilosophy,willneverbeabletocarryusbeyondtheusualcourseofexperience,orgiveusmeasuresofconductandbehaviourdifferentfromthosewhicharefurnishedbyreflectionsoncommonlife。Nonewfactcaneverbeinferredfromthereligioushypothesis;noeventforeseenorforetold;
norewardorpunishmentexpectedordreaded,beyondwhatisalreadyknownbypracticeandobservation。SothatmyapologyforE/PICURUS\\willstillappearsolidandsatisfactory;norhavethepoliticalinterestsofsocietyanyconnexionwiththephilosophicaldisputesconcerningmetaphysicsandreligion。
Thereisstillonecircumstance,repliedI,whichyouseemtohaveoverlooked。ThoughIshouldallowyourpremises,Imustdenyyourconclusion。Youconclude,thatreligiousdoctrinesandreasonings
Andthose,whoattempttodisabusethemofsuchprejudices,may,foraughtIknow,begoodreasoners,butIcannotallowthemtobegoodcitizensandpoliticians;sincetheyfreemenfromonerestraintupontheirpassions,andmaketheinfringementofthelawsofsociety,inonerespect,moreeasyandsecure。
Afterall,Imay,perhaps,agreetoyourgeneralconclusioninfavourofliberty,thoughupondifferentpremisesfromthose,onwhichyouendeavourtofoundit。I
think,thatthestateoughttotolerateeveryprincipleofphilosophy;noristhereaninstance,thatanygovernmenthassufferedinitspoliticalinterestsbysuchindulgence。
Thereisnoenthusiasmamongphilosophers;theirdoctrinesarenotveryalluringtothepeople;andnorestraintcanbeputupontheirreasonings,butwhatmustbeofdangerousconsequencetothesciences,andeventothestate,bypavingthewayforpersecutionandoppressioninpoints,wherethegeneralityofmankindaremoredeeplyinterestedandconcerned。
Butthereoccurstome(continuedI)withregardtoyourmaintopic,adifficulty,whichIshalljustproposetoyouwithoutinsistingonit;lestitleadintoreasoningsoftooniceanddelicateanature。Inaword,Imuchdoubtwhetheritbepossibleforacausetobeknownonlybyitseffect(asyouhaveallalongsupposed)ortobeofsosingularandparticularanatureastohavenoparallelandnosimilaritywithanyothercauseorobject,thathaseverfallenunderourobservation。Itisonlywhentwo
ofobjectsarefoundtobeconstantlyconjoined,thatwecaninfertheonefromtheother;andwereaneffectpresented,whichwasentirelysingular,andcouldnotbecomprehendedunderanyknown
T/HERE\\isnotagreaternumberofphilosophicalreasonings,displayeduponanysubject,thanthose,whichprovetheexistenceofaDeity,andrefutethefallaciesof
The
Thereisaspeciesofscepticism,
C/ARTES\\andothers,asasovereignpreservativeagainsterrorandprecipitatejudgement。Itrecommendsanuniversaldoubt,notonlyofallourformeropinionsandprinciples,butalsoofourveryfaculties;ofwhoseveracity,saythey,wemustassureourselves,byachainofreasoning,deducedfromsome
originalprinciple,whichcannotpossiblybefallaciousordeceitful。Butneitheristhereanysuchoriginalprinciple,whichhasaprerogativeaboveothers,thatareself-evidentandconvincing:Oriftherewere,couldweadvanceastepbeyondit,butbytheuseofthoseveryfaculties,ofwhichwearesupposedtobealreadydiffident。TheC/ARTESIAN\\doubt,therefore,wereiteverpossibletobeattainedbyanyhumancreature(asitplainlyisnot)wouldbeentirelyincurable;andnoreasoningcouldeverbringustoastateofassuranceandconvictionuponanysubject。
Itmust,however,beconfessed,thatthisspeciesofscepticism,whenmoremoderate,maybeunderstoodinaveryreasonablesense,andisanecessarypreparativetothestudyofphilosophy,bypreservingaproperimpartialityinourjudgements,andweaningourmindfromallthoseprejudices,whichwemayhaveimbibedfromeducationorrashopinion。Tobeginwithclearandself-evidentprinciples,toadvancebytimorousandsuresteps,toreviewfrequentlyourconclusions,andexamineaccuratelyalltheirconsequences;
thoughbythesemeansweshallmakebothaslowandashortprogressinoursystems;aretheonlymethods,bywhichwecaneverhopetoreachtruth,andattainaproperstabilityandcertaintyinourdeterminations。
Thereisanotherspeciesofscepticism,
Ineednotinsistuponthemoretritetopics,employedbythescepticsinallages,againsttheevidenceof
Itseemsevident,thatmenarecarried,byanaturalinstinctorprepossession,toreposefaithintheirsenses;
andthat,withoutanyreasoning,orevenalmostbeforetheuseofreason,wealwayssupposeanexternaluniverse,whichdependsnotonourperception,butwouldexist,thoughweandeverysensiblecreaturewereabsentorannihilated。Eventheanimalcreationaregovernedbyalikeopinion,andpreservethisbeliefofexternalobjects,inalltheirthoughts,designs,andactions。
Itseemsalsoevident,that,whenmenfollowthisblindandpowerfulinstinctofnature,theyalwayssupposetheveryimages,presentedbythesenses,tobetheexternalobjects,andneverentertainanysuspicion,thattheonearenothingbutrepresentationsoftheother。Thisverytable,whichweseewhite,andwhichwefeelhard,isbelievedtoexist,independentofourperception,andtobesomethingexternaltoourmind,whichperceivesit。Ourpresencebestowsnotbeingonit:Ourabsencedoesnotannihilateit。
Itpreservesitsexistenceuniformandentire,independentofthesituationofintelligentbeings,whoperceiveorcontemplateit。
Butthisuniversalandprimaryopinionofallmenissoondestroyedbytheslightestphilosophy,whichteachesus,thatnothingcaneverbepresenttothemindbutanimageorperception,andthatthesensesareonlytheinlets,throughwhichtheseimagesareconveyed,withoutbeingabletoproduceanyimmediateintercoursebetweenthemindandtheobject。Thetable,whichwesee,seemstodiminish,asweremovefartherfromit:Buttherealtable,whichexistsindependentofus,suffersnoalteration:Itwas,therefore,nothingbutitsimage,whichwaspresenttothemind。Thesearetheobviousdictatesofreason;andnoman,whoreflects,everdoubted,thattheexistences,whichweconsider,whenwesay,
Sofar,then,arewenecessitatedbyreasoningtocontradictordepartfromtheprimaryinstinctsofnature,andtoembraceanewsystemwithregardtotheevidenceofoursenses。Butherephilosophyfindsherselfextremelyembarrassed,whenshewouldjustifythisnewsystem,andobviatethecavilsandobjectionsofthesceptics。Shecannolongerpleadtheinfallibleandirresistibleinstinctofnature:Forthatledustoaquitedifferentsystem,whichisacknowledgedfallibleandevenerroneous。Andtojustifythispretendedphilosophicalsystem,byachainofclearandconvincingargument,orevenanyappearanceofargument,exceedsthepowerofallhumancapacity。
Bywhatargumentcanitbeproved,thattheperceptionsofthemindmustbecausedbyexternalobjects,entirelydifferentfromthem,thoughresemblingthem(ifthatbepossible)andcouldnotariseeitherfromtheenergyoftheminditself,orfromthesuggestionofsomeinvisibleandunknownspirit,orfromsomeothercausestillmoreunknowntous?Itisacknowledged,that,infact,manyoftheseperceptionsarisenotfromanythingexternal,asindreams,madness,andotherdiseases。Andnothingcanbemoreinexplicablethanthemanner,inwhichbodyshouldsooperateuponmindasevertoconveyanimageofitselftoasubstance,supposedofsodifferent,andevencontraryanature。
Itisaquestionoffact,whethertheperceptionsofthesensesbeproducedbyexternalobjects,resemblingthem:
howshallthisquestionbedetermined?Byexperiencesurely;
asallotherquestionsofalikenature。Buthereexperienceis,andmustbeentirelysilent。Themindhasneveranythingpresenttoitbuttheperceptions,andcannotpossiblyreachanyexperienceoftheirconnexionwithobjects。Thesuppositionofsuchaconnexionis,therefore,withoutanyfoundationinreasoning。
TohaverecoursetotheveracityofthesupremeBeing,inordertoprovetheveracityofoursenses,issurelymakingaveryunexpectedcircuit。Ifhisveracitywereatallconcernedinthismatter,oursenseswouldbeentirelyinfallible;becauseitisnotpossiblethathecaneverdeceive。Nottomention,that,iftheexternalworldbeoncecalledinquestion,weshallbeatalosstofindarguments,bywhichwemayprovetheexistenceofthatBeingoranyofhisattributes。
Thisisatopic,therefore,inwhichtheprofounderandmorephilosophicalscepticswillalwaystriumph,whentheyendeavourtointroduceanuniversaldoubtintoallsubjectsofhumanknowledgeandenquiry。Doyoufollowtheinstinctsandpropensitiesofnature,maytheysay,inassentingtotheveracityofsense?Buttheseleadyoutobelievethattheveryperceptionorsensibleimageistheexternalobject。Doyoudisclaimthisprinciple,inordertoembraceamorerationalopinion,thattheperceptionsareonlyrepresentationsofsomethingexternal?Youheredepartfromyournaturalpropensitiesandmoreobvioussentiments;andyetarenotabletosatisfyyourreason,whichcanneverfindanyconvincingargumentfromexperiencetoprove,thattheperceptionsareconnectedwithanyexternalobjects。
Thereisanotherscepticaltopicofalikenature,derivedfromthemostprofoundphilosophy;whichmightmeritourattention,wereitrequisitetodivesodeep,inordertodiscoverargumentsandreasonings,whichcansolittleservetoanyseriouspurpose。Itisuniversallyallowedbymodernenquirers,thatallthesensiblequalitiesofobjects,suchashard,soft,hot,cold,white,black,&c。
aremerelysecondary,andexistnotintheobjectsthemselves,butareperceptionsofthemind,withoutanyexternalarchetypeormodel,whichtheyrepresent。Ifthisbeallowed,withregardtosecondaryqualities,itmustalsofollow,withregardtothesupposedprimaryqualitiesofextensionandsolidity;norcanthelatterbeanymoreentitledtothatdenominationthantheformer。Theideaofextensionisentirelyacquiredfromthesensesofsightandfeeling;andifallthequalities,perceivedbythesenses,beinthemind,notintheobject,thesameconclusionmustreachtheideaofextension,whichiswhollydependentonthesensibleideasortheideasofsecondaryqualities。
Nothingcansaveusfromthisconclusion,buttheasserting,thattheideasofthoseprimaryqualitiesareattainedby
Thusthefirstphilosophicalobjectiontotheevidenceofsenseortotheopinionofexternalexistenceconsistsinthis,thatsuchanopinion,ifrestedonnaturalinstinct,iscontrarytoreason,andifreferredtoreason,iscontrarytonaturalinstinct,andatthesametimecarriesnorationalevidencewithit,toconvinceanimpartialenquirer。Thesecondobjectiongoesfarther,andrepresentsthisopinionascontrarytoreason:Atleast,ifitbeaprincipleofreason,thatallsensiblequalitiesareinthemind,notintheobject。Bereavematterofallitsintelligiblequalities,bothprimaryandsecondary,youinamannerannihilateit,andleaveonlyacertainunknown,inexplicable
PARTII。
I/T\\mayseemaveryextravagantattemptofthescepticstodestroy
yetisthisthegrandscopeofalltheirenquiriesanddisputes。Theyendeavourtofindobjections,bothtoour
Thechiefobjectionagainstallabstractreasoningsisderivedfromtheideasofspaceandtime;ideas,which,incommonlifeandtoacarelessview,areveryclearandintelligible,butwhentheypassthroughthescrutinyoftheprofoundsciences(andtheyarethechiefobjectofthesesciences)affordprinciples,whichseemfullofabsurdityandcontradiction。Nopriestly
astheyarepompouslydisplayedbyallgeometriciansandmetaphysicians,withakindoftriumphandexultation。A
realquantity,infinitelylessthananyfinitequantity,containingquantitiesinfinitelylessthanitself,andsoon
acircleanditstangentisinfinitelylessthananyrectilinealangle,thatasyoumayincreasethediameterofthecircle
Theabsurdityofthesebolddeterminationsoftheabstractsciencesseemstobecome,ifpossible,stillmorepalpablewithregardtotimethanextension。Aninfinitenumberofrealpartsoftime,passinginsuccession,andexhaustedoneafteranother,appearssoevidentacontradiction,thatnoman,oneshouldthink,whosejudgementisnotcorrupted,insteadofbeingimproved,bythesciences,wouldeverbeabletoadmitofit。
Yetstillreasonmustremainrestless,andunquiet,evenwithregardtothatscepticism,towhichsheisdrivenbytheseseemingabsurditiesandcontradictions。Howanyclear,distinctideacancontaincircumstances,contradictorytoitself,ortoanyotherclear,distinctidea,isabsolutelyincomprehensible;andis,perhaps,asabsurdasanyproposition,whichcanbeformed。Sothatnothingcanbemoresceptical,ormorefullofdoubtandhesitation,thanthisscepticismitself,whicharisesfromsomeoftheparadoxicalconclusionsofgeometryorthescienceofquantity。[39]
Thescepticalobjectionsto
or
Theseobjectionsarebutweak。Foras,incommonlife,wereasoneverymomentconcerningfactandexistence,andcannotpossiblysubsist,withoutcontinuallyemployingthisspeciesofargument,anypopularobjections,derivedfromthence,mustbeinsufficienttodestroythatevidence。Thegreatsubverterof
Thesceptic,therefore,hadbetterkeepwithinhispropersphere,anddisplaythose
Forhereisthechiefandmostconfoundingobjectionto
C/OPERNICAN\\orP/TOLEMAIC\\,whosupportseachhisdifferentsystemofastronomy,mayhopetoproduceaconviction,whichwillremainconstantanddurable,withhisaudience。A
S/TOIC\\orE/PICUREAN\\displaysprinciples,whichmaynotbedurable,butwhichhaveaneffectonconductandbehaviour。
ButaP/YRRHONIAN\\cannotexpect,thathisphilosophywillhaveanyconstantinfluenceonthemind:Orifithad,thatitsinfluencewouldbebeneficialtosociety。Onthecontrary,hemustacknowledge,ifhewillacknowledgeanything,thatallhumanlifemustperish,werehisprinciplesuniversallyandsteadilytoprevail。Alldiscourse,allactionwouldimmediatelycease;andmenremaininatotallethargy,tillthenecessitiesofnature,unsatisfied,putanendtotheirmiserableexistence。Itistrue;sofatalaneventisverylittletobedreaded。Natureisalwaystoostrongforprinciple。AndthoughaP/YRRHONIAN\\maythrowhimselforothersintoamomentaryamazementandconfusionby
hisprofoundreasonings;thefirstandmosttrivialeventinlifewillputtoflightallhisdoubtsandscruples,andleavehimthesame,ineverypointofactionandspeculation,withthephilosophersofeveryothersect,orwiththosewhoneverconcernedthemselvesinanyphilosophicalresearches。Whenheawakesfromhisdream,hewillbethefirsttojoininthelaughagainsthimself,andtoconfess,thatallhisobjectionsaremereamusement,andcanhavenoothertendencythantoshowthewhimsicalconditionofmankind,whomustactandreasonandbelieve;
thoughtheyarenotable,bytheirmostdiligentenquiry,tosatisfythemselvesconcerningthefoundationoftheseoperations,ortoremovetheobjections,whichmayberaisedagainstthem。
PARTIII。
T/HERE\\is,indeed,amore
humanunderstanding,eveninitsmostperfectstate,andwhenmostaccurateandcautiousinitsdeterminations;suchareflectionwouldnaturallyinspirethemwithmoremodestyandreserve,anddiminishtheirfondopinionofthemselves,andtheirprejudiceagainstantagonists。Theilliteratemayreflectonthedispositionofthelearned,who,amidstalltheadvantagesofstudyandreflection,arecommonlystilldiffidentintheirdeterminations:Andifanyofthelearnedbeinclined,fromtheirnaturaltemper,tohaughtinessandobstinacy,asmalltinctureofP/YRRHONISM\\mightabatetheirpride,byshowingthem,thatthefewadvantages,whichtheymayhaveattainedovertheirfellows,arebutinconsiderable,ifcomparedwiththeuniversalperplexityandconfusion,whichisinherentinhumannature。Ingeneral,thereisadegreeofdoubt,andcaution,andmodesty,which,inallkindsofscrutinyanddecision,oughtforevertoaccompanyajustreasoner。
Anotherspeciesof
ofadvantagetomankind,andwhichmaybethenaturalresultoftheP/YRRHONIAN\\doubtsandscruples,isthelimitationofourenquiriestosuchsubjectsasarebestadaptedtothenarrowcapacityofhumanunderstanding。The
correct
doubt,andoftheimpossibility,thatanything,butthestrongpowerofnaturalinstinct,couldfreeusfromit。
Thosewhohaveapropensitytophilosophy,willstillcontinuetheirresearches;becausetheyreflect,that,besidestheimmediatepleasureattendingsuchanoccupation,philosophicaldecisionsarenothingbutthereflectionsofcommonlife,methodizedandcorrected。Buttheywillneverbetemptedtogobeyondcommonlife,solongastheyconsidertheimperfectionofthosefacultieswhichtheyemploy,theirnarrowreach,andtheirinaccurateoperations。
Whilewecannotgiveasatisfactoryreason,whywebelieve,afterathousandexperiments,thatastonewillfall,orfireburn;canweeversatisfyourselvesconcerninganydetermination,whichwemayform,withregardtotheoriginofworlds,andthesituationofnature,from,andtoeternity?
Thisnarrowlimitation,indeed,ofourenquiries,is,ineveryrespect,soreasonable,thatitsufficestomaketheslightestexaminationintothenaturalpowersofthehumanmindandtocomparethemwiththeirobjects,inordertorecommendittous。Weshallthenfindwhatarethepropersubjectsofscienceandenquiry。
Itseemstome,thattheonlyobjectsoftheabstractscienceorofdemonstrationarequantityandnumber,andthatallattemptstoextendthismoreperfectspeciesofknowledgebeyondtheseboundsaremeresophistryandillusion。Asthecomponentpartsofquantityandnumberareentirelysimilar,theirrelationsbecomeintricateandinvolved;andnothingcanbemorecurious,aswellasuseful,thantotrace,byavarietyofmediums,theirequalityorinequality,throughtheirdifferentappearances。
Butasallotherideasareclearlydistinctanddifferentfromeachother,wecanneveradvancefarther,byourutmostscrutiny,thantoobservethisdiversity,and,byanobviousreflection,pronounceonethingnottobeanother。Oriftherebeanydifficultyinthesedecisions,itproceedsentirelyfromtheundeterminatemeaningofwords,whichiscorrectedbyjusterdefinitions。That
Thispropositionis,indeed,nothingbutamoreimperfectdefinition。Itisthesamecasewithallthosepretendedsyllogisticalreasonings,whichmaybefoundineveryotherbranchoflearning,exceptthesciencesofquantityandnumber;andthesemaysafely,Ithink,bepronouncedtheonlyproperobjectsofknowledgeanddemonstration。
Allotherenquiriesofmenregardonlymatteroffactandexistence;andtheseareevidentlyincapableofdemonstration。Whatever
Theexistence,therefore,ofanybeingcanonlybeprovedbyargumentsfromitscauseoritseffect;andtheseargumentsarefoundedentirelyonexperience。Ifwereason
Thefallingofapebblemay,foraughtweknow,extinguishthesun;orthewishofamancontroltheplanetsintheirorbits。Itisonlyexperience,whichteachesusthenatureandboundsofcauseandeffect,andenablesustoinfertheexistenceofoneobjectfromthatofanother。[40]Suchisthefoundationofmoralreasoning,whichformsthegreaterpartofhumanknowledge,andisthesourceofallhumanactionandbehaviour。
Moralreasoningsareeitherconcerningparticularorgeneralfacts。Alldeliberationsinliferegardtheformer;
asalsoalldisquisitionsinhistory,chronology,geography,andastronomy。
Thesciences,whichtreatofgeneralfacts,arepolitics,naturalphilosophy,physic,chemistry,&c。wherethequalities,causesandeffectsofawholespeciesofobjectsareenquiredinto。
DivinityorTheology,asitprovestheexistenceofaDeity,andtheimmortalityofsouls,iscomposedpartlyofreasoningsconcerningparticular,partlyconcerninggeneralfacts。Ithasafoundationin
Moralsandcriticismarenotsoproperlyobjectsoftheunderstandingasoftasteandsentiment。Beauty,whethermoralornatural,isfelt,moreproperlythanperceived。Orifwereasonconcerningit,andendeavourtofixitsstandard,weregardanewfact,towit,thegeneraltastesofmankind,orsomesuchfact,whichmaybetheobjectofreasoningandenquiry。
Whenwerunoverlibraries,persuadedoftheseprinciples,whathavocmustwemake?Ifwetakeinourhandanyvolume;ofdivinityorschoolmetaphysics,forinstance;
letusask,
NOTES
[1][COPYRIGHT:(c)1995,JamesFieser(jfieser@utm。edu),allrightsreserved。Unalteredcopiesofthiscomputertextfilemaybefreelydistributeforpersonalandclassroomuse。
Alterationstothisfilearepermittedonlyforpurposesofcomputerprintouts,althoughalteredcomputertextfilesmaynotcirculate。Excepttocovernominaldistributioncosts,thisfilecannotbesoldwithoutwrittenpermissionfromthecopyrightholder。Thiscopyrightnoticesupersedesallpreviousnoticesonearlierversionsofthistextfile。Whenquotingfromthistext,pleaseusethefollowingcitation:
EDITORIALCONVENTIONS:lettersbetweenslashes(e。g。,H/UME\\)designatesmallcapitalization。Letterswithinangledbrackets(e。g。,
Originalpaginationiscontainedwithincurlybrackets(e。g。,<1>)。Spellingandpunctuationhavenotbeenmodernized。Printer\'serrorshavebeencorrectedwithoutnote。Bracketedcommentswithintheendnotesaretheeditor\'s。Thisisaworkingdraft。PleasereporterrorstoJamesFieser(jfieser@utm。edu)。]
[2]ThisisnotintendedanywaytodetractfromthemeritofMr。L/OCKE\\,whowasreallyagreatphilosopherandajustandmodestreasoner。Itisonlymeanttoshowthecommonfateofsuchabstractphilosophy。[ThisnotewasremovedbyHumefromlatereditionsofthe
J。F。]
[3]Thatfacultybywhichwediscerntruthandfalsehood,andthatbywhichweperceiveviceandvirtue,hadlongbeenconfoundedwitheachother;andallmoralitywassupposedtobebuiltonexternalanimmutablerelationswhich,toeveryintelligentmind,wereequallyinvariableasanypropositionconcerningquantityornumber。Butalatephilosopher[FrancisHutcheson]hastaughtus,bythemostconvincingarguments,thatmoralityisnothingintheabstractnatureofthings,butisentirelyrelativetothesentimentormentaltasteofeachparticularbeing,inthesamemannerasthedistinctionsofsweetandbitter,hotandcoldarisefromtheparticularfeelingofeachsenseororgan。Moralperceptions,therefore,oughtnottobeclassedwiththeoperationsoftheunderstanding,butwiththetastesorsentiments。
Ithadbeenusualwithphilosopherstodivideallthepassionsofthemindintotwoclasses,theselfishandbenevolent,whichweresupposedtostandinconstantoppositionandcontrariety;norwasitthoughtthatthelattercouldeverattaintheirproperobjectbutattheexpenseoftheformer。Amongtheselfishpassionswererankedavarice,ambition,revenge;amongthebenevolent,naturalaffection,friendship,publicspirit。Philosophersmaynowperceivetheimproprietyofthisdivision。[SeeButler\'s
thatthoughthesatisfactionofthesepassionsgivesusenjoyment,yettheprospectofthisenjoymentisnotthecauseofthepassion,but,onthecontrary,thepassionisantecedenttotheenjoyment,andwithouttheformerthelattercouldneverpossiblyexist;thatthecaseispreciselythesamewithpassionsdenominatedbenevolent,andconsequentlythatamanisnomoreinterestedwhenheseekshisownglorythanwhenthe
happinessofhisfriendistheobjectofhiswishes;norisheanymoredisinterestedwhenhesacrificeshiseaseandquiettopublicgoodthanwhenhelaborsforthegratificationofavariceorambition。Here,therefore,isaconsiderableadjustmentintheboundariesofthepassions,whichhadbeenconfoundedbythenegligenceorinaccuracyofformerphilosophers。Thesetwoinstancesmaysufficetoshowusthenatureandimportanceofthatspeciesofphilosophy。[ThisnotewasremovedbyHumefromlatereditionsofthe
[4]I/T\\isprobablethatnomorewasmeantbythese,whodeniedinnateideas,thanthatallideaswerecopiesofourimpressions;thoughitmustbeconfessed,thattheterms,whichtheyemployed,werenotchosenwithsuchcaution,norsoexactlydefined,astopreventallmistakesabouttheirdoctrine。Forwhatismeantby
andothers;asstandingforanyofourperceptions,oursensationsandpassions,aswellasthoughts。Nowinthissense,Ishoulddesiretoknow,whatcanbemeantbyasserting,thatself-love,orresentmentofinjuries,orthepassionbetweenthesexesisnotinnate?
Butadmittingtheseterms,
Tobeingenuous,Imustownittobemyopinion,thatL/OCKE\\wasbetrayedintothisquestionbytheschoolmen,who,makinguseofundefinedterms,drawouttheirdisputestoatediouslength,withoutevertouchingthepointinquestion。Alikeambiguityandcircumlocutionseemtorunthroughthatphilosopher\'sreasoningsonthisaswellasmostothersubjects。
[5]Resemblance。
[6]Contiguity。
[7]CauseandEffect。
[8]Forinstance,ContrastorContrarietyisalsoaconnexionamongIdeas:butitmayperhaps,beconsideredasamixtureof
[9][Theremainderofthissectionwasremovedfromthefinaltwoeditionsof
[10]ContrarytoAristotle[cf。1450a]。
[11]Theword,Power,ishereusedinalooseandpopularsense。Themoreaccurateexplicationofitwouldgiveadditionalevidencetothisargument。SeeSect。7。
[12]N/OTHING\\ismoreusefulthanforwriters,even,on
Thesamedistinctionbetweenreasonandexperienceismaintainedinallourdeliberationsconcerningtheconductoflife;whiletheexperiencedstatesman,general,physician,ormerchantistrustedandfollowed;andtheunpractisednovice,withwhatevernaturaltalentsendowed,neglectedanddespised。Thoughitbeallowed,thatreasonmayformveryplausibleconjectureswithregardtotheconsequencesofsuchaparticularconductinsuchparticularcircumstances;itisstillsupposedimperfect,withouttheassistanceofexperience,whichisaloneabletogivestabilityandcertaintytothemaxims,derivedfromstudyandreflection。
Butnotwithstandingthatthisdistinctionbethusuniversallyreceived,bothintheactiveandspeculativescenesoflife,Ishallnotscrupletopronounce,thatitis,atbottom,erroneous,atleast,superficial。
Ifweexaminethosearguments,which,inanyofthesciencesabovementioned,aresupposedtobemereeffectsofreasoningandreflection,theywillbefoundtoterminate,atlast,insomegeneralprincipleor,conclusion,forwhichwecanassignnoreasonbutobservationandexperience。Theonlydifferencebetweenthemandthosemaxims,whicharevulgarlyesteemedtheresultofpureexperience,is,thattheformercannotbeestablishedwithoutsomeprocessofthought,andsomereflectiononwhatwehaveobserved,inordertodistinguishitscircumstances,andtraceitsconsequences:Whereasinthelatter,theexperiencedeventisexactlyandfullyfamiliarto
thatwhichweinferastheresultofanyparticularsituation。ThehistoryofaT/IBERIUS\\oraN/ERO\\makesusdreadaliketyranny,wereourmonarchsfreedfromtherestraintsoflawsandsenates:
Buttheobservationofanyfraudorcrueltyinprivatelifeissufficient,withtheaidofalittlethought,togiveusthesameapprehension;whileitservesasaninstanceofthegeneralcorruptionofhumannature,andshowsusthedangerwhichwemustincurbyreposinganentireconfidenceinmankind。Inbothcases,itisexperiencewhichisultimatelythefoundationofourinferenceandconclusion。
Thereisnomansoyoungandinexperienced,asnottohaveformed,fromobservation,manygeneralandjustmaximsconcerninghumanaffairsandtheconductoflife;butitmustbeconfessed,that,whenamancomestoputtheseinpractice,hewillbeextremelyliabletoerror,tilltimeandfartherexperiencebothenlargethesemaxims,andteachhimtheirproperuseandapplication。Ineverysituationorincident,therearemanyparticularandseeminglyminutecircumstances,whichthemanofgreatesttalentis,atfirst,apttooverlook,thoughonthemthejustnessofhisconclusions,andconsequentlytheprudenceofhisconduct,entirelydepend。Nottomention,that,toayoungbeginner,thegeneralobservationsandmaximsoccurnotalwaysontheproperoccasions,norcanbeimmediatelyappliedwithduecalmnessanddistinction。Thetruthis,anunexperiencedreasonercouldbenoreasoneratall,wereheabsolutelyunexperienced;andwhenweassignthatcharactertoanyone,wemeanitonlyinacomparativesense,andsupposehimpossessedofexperience,inasmallerandmoreimperfectdegree。