第5章

Butthecaseistotallydifferentwithrespecttotheinstitutionofcivilgovernment,organizedonthesystemofrepresentation。Suchagovernmenthascognizanceofeverything,andofeverymanasamemberofthenationalsociety,whetherhehaspropertyornot;and,therefore,theprinciplerequiresthateveryman,andeverykindofright,berepresented,ofwhichtherighttoacquireandtoholdpropertyisbutone,andthatnotofthemostessentialkind。

Theprotectionofaman\'spersonismoresacredthantheprotectionofproperty;andbesidesthis,thefacultyofperforminganykindofworkorservicesbywhichheacquiresalivelihood,ormaintaininghisfamily,isofthenatureofproperty。Itispropertytohim;hehasacquiredit;

anditisasmuchtheobjectofhisprotectionasexteriorproperty,possessedwithoutthatfaculty,canbetheobjectofprotectioninanotherperson。

Ihavealwaysbelievedthatthebestsecurityforproperty,beitmuchorlittle,istoremovefromeverypartofthecommunity,asfarascanpossiblybedone,everycauseofcomplaint,andeverymotivetoviolence;

andthiscanonlybedonebyanequalityofrights。Whenrightsaresecure,propertyissecureinconsequence。Butwhenpropertyismadeapretenseforunequalorexclusiverights,itweakenstherighttoholdtheproperty,andprovokesindignationandtumult;foritisunnaturaltobelievethatpropertycanbesecureundertheguaranteeofasocietyinjuredinitsrightsbytheinfluenceofthatproperty。

Nexttotheinjusticeandill-policyofmakingpropertyapretenseforexclusiverights,istheunaccountableabsurdityofgivingtomeresoundtheideaofproperty,andannexingtoitcertainrights;forwhatelseisatitlebutsound?Natureisoftengivingtotheworldsomeextraordinarymenwhoarriveatfamebymeritanduniversalconsent,suchasAristotle,Socrates,Plato,etc。Theyweretrulygreatornoble。Butwhengovernmentsetsupamanufactoryofnobles,itisasabsurdasifsheundertooktomanufacturewisemen。Hernoblesareallcounterfeits。

Thiswax-workorderhasassumedthenameofaristocracy;andthedisgraceofitwouldbelessenedifitcouldbeconsideredonlyaschildishimbecility。

Wepardonfopperybecauseofitsinsignificance,andonthesamegroundwemightpardonthefopperyoftitles。Buttheoriginofaristocracywasworsethanfoppery。Itwasrobbery。Thefirstaristocratsinallcountrieswerebrigands。Thoseoflatertimes,sycophants。

ItisverywellknownthatinEngland(andthesamewillbefoundinothercountries),thegreatlandedestatesnowheldindescentwereplunderedfromthequietinhabitantsattheConquest。Thepossibilitydidnotexistofacquiringsuchestateshonestly。Ifitbeaskedhowtheycouldhavebeenacquired,noanswerbutthatofrobberycanbegiven。Thattheywerenotacquiredbytrade,bycommerce,bymanufactures,byagriculture,orbyanyreputableemployment,iscertain。

Howthenweretheyacquired?Blush,aristocracy,tohearyourorigin,foryourprogenitorswerethieves。TheyweretheRobespierresandtheJacobinsofthatday。Whentheyhadcommittedtherobbery,theyendeavoredtolosethedisgraceofitbysinkingtheirrealnamesunderfictitiousones,whichtheycalledtitles。Itiseverthepractiseoffelonstoactinthismanner。

Theyneverpassbytheirrealnames。

Asproperty,honestlyobtained,isbestsecuredbyanequalityofrights,soill-gottenpropertydependsforprotectiononamonopolyofrights。

Hewhohasrobbedanotherofhisproperty,willnextendeavortodisarmhimofhisrights,tosecurethatproperty;forwhentherobberbecomesthelegislatorhebelieveshimselfsecure。ThatpartoftheGovernmentofEnglandthatiscalledtheHouseofLords,wasoriginallycomposedofpersonswhohadcommittedtherobberiesofwhichIhavebeenspeaking。

Itwasanassociationfortheprotectionofthepropertytheyhadstolen。

Butbesidesthecriminalityoftheoriginofaristocracy,ithasaninjuriouseffectonthemoralandphysicalcharacterofman。Likeslaveryitdebilitatesthehumanfaculties;forasthemindboweddownbyslaverylosesinsilenceitselasticpowers,so,inthecontraryextreme,whenitisbuoyedupbyfolly,itbecomesincapableofexertingthem,anddwindlesintoimbecility。Itisimpossiblethatamindemployeduponribandsandtitlescaneverbegreat。Thechildishnessoftheobjectsconsumestheman。

Itisatalltimesnecessary,andmoreparticularlysoduringtheprogressofarevolution,anduntilrightideasconfirmthemselvesbyhabit,thatwefrequentlyrefreshourpatriotismbyreferencetofirstprinciples。

Itisbytracingthingstotheiroriginthatwelearntounderstandthem:

anditisbykeepingthatlineandthatoriginalwaysinviewthatweneverforgetthem。

Aninquiryintotheoriginofrightswilldemonstratetousthatrightsarenotgiftsfromonemantoanother,norfromoneclassofmentoanother;

forwhoishewhocouldbethefirstgiver,orbywhatprinciple,oronwhatauthority,couldhepossesstherightofgiving?

Adeclarationofrightsisnotacreationofthem,noradonationofthem。Itisamanifestoftheprinciplebywhichtheyexist,followedbyadetailofwhattherightsare;foreverycivilrighthasanaturalrightforitsfoundation,anditincludestheprincipleofareciprocalguaranteeofthoserightsfrommantoman。As,therefore,itisimpossibletodiscoveranyoriginofrightsotherwisethanintheoriginofman,itconsequentlyfollows,thatrightsappertaintomaninrightofhisexistenceonly,andmustthereforebeequaltoeveryman。

Theprincipleofanequalityofrightsisclearandsimple。Everymancanunderstandit,anditisbyunderstandinghisrightsthathelearnshisduties;forwheretherightsofmenareequal,everymanmustfinallyseethenecessityofprotectingtherightsofothersasthemosteffectualsecurityforhisown。

Butif,intheformationofaconstitution,wedepartfromtheprincipleofequalrights,orattemptanymodificationofit,weplungeintoalabyrinthofdifficultiesfromwhichthereisnowayoutbutbyretreating。Wherearewetostop?Orbywhatprinciplearewetofindoutthepointtostopat,thatshalldiscriminatebetweenmenofthesamecountry,partofwhomshallbefree,andtherestnot?

Ifpropertyistobemadethecriterion,itisatotaldeparturefromeverymoralprincipleofliberty,becauseitisattachingrightstomerematter,andmakingmantheagentofthatmatter。Itis,moreover,holdinguppropertyasanappleofdiscord,andnotonlyexcitingbutjustifyingwaragainstit;forImaintaintheprinciple,thatwhenpropertyisusedasaninstrumenttotakeawaytherightsofthosewhomayhappennottopossessproperty,itisusedtoanunlawfulpurpose,asfire-armswouldbeinasimilarcase。

Inastateofnatureallmenareequalinrights,buttheyarenotequalinpower;theweakcannotprotectthemselvesagainstthestrong。Thisbeingthecase,theinstitutionofcivilsocietyisforthepurposeofmakinganequalizationofpowersthatshallbeparallelto,andaguaranteeof,theequalityofrights。Thelawsofacountry,whenproperlyconstructed,applytothispurpose。

Everymantakesthearmofthelawforhisprotectionasmoreeffectualthanhisown;andthereforeeverymanhasanequalrightintheformationofthegovernment,andofthelawsbywhichheistobegovernedandjudged。