第4章

Thisitwaswhich,inspiteofhisessentiallymoderncharacterasasinger,qualifiedShelleytobethepoetofPrometheusUnbound,foritmadehim,inthetruestsenseoftheword,amythologicalpoet。

Thischildlikequalityassimilatedhimtothechildlikepeoplesamongwhommythologieshavetheirrise。ThoseNaturemythswhich,accordingtomany,arethebasisofallmythology,arelikewisetheverybasisofShelley\'spoetry。Thelarkthatisthegossipofheaven,thewindsthatpluckthegreyfromthebeardsofthebillows,thecloudsthataresnortedfromthesea\'sbroadnostril,alltheelementalspiritsofNature,takefromhisverseperpetualincarnationandreincarnation,passinathousandglorioustransmigrationsthroughtheradiantformsofhisimagery。

Thus,butnotintheWordsworthiansense,heisaveritablepoetofNature。ForwithNaturetheWordsworthianswilladmitnotampering:

theyexactthedirectinterpretativereproductionofher;thatthepoetshouldfollowherasamistress,notuseherasahandmaid。TosuchfollowingofNature,Shelleyfeltnocall。Hesawinhernotapicturesetforhiscopying,butapalettesetforhisbrush;notahabitationpreparedforhisinhabiting,butaColiseumwhencehemightquarrystonesforhisownpalaces。Eveninhisdescriptivepassagesthedream—characterofhissceneryisnotorious;itisnottheclear,recognisablesceneryofWordsworth,butalandscapethathoversathwarttheheatandhazearisingfromhiscracklingfantasies。ThematerialsforsuchvisionaryEdenshaveevidentlybeenaccumulatedfromdirectexperience,buttheyarerecomposedbyhimintosuchscenesasneverhadmortaleyebeheld。\"Don\'tyouwishyouhad?\"asTurnersaid。TheonejustificationforclassingShelleywiththeLakepoetisthathelovedNaturewithaloveevenmorepassionate,thoughperhapslessprofound。Wordsworth\'sNightingaleandStockdovesumsupthecontrastbetweenthetwo,asthoughithadbeenwrittenforsuchapurpose。Shelleyisthe\"creatureofebullientheart,\"whoSingsasifthegodofwineHadhelpedhimtoavalentine。

Wordsworth\'sisthe—Lovewithquietblending,Slowtobeginandneverending,the\"seriousfaithandinwardglee。\"

ButifShelley,insteadofcullingNature,crossedwithitspollentheblossomsofhisownsoul,thatBabyloniangardenishismarvellousandbestapology。ForastoundingfigurativeopulenceheyieldsonlytoShakespeare,andeventoShakespearenotinabsolutefecunditybutinimages。Thesourcesofhisfigurativewealtharespecialised,sourcesofShakespeare\'sareuniversal。Itwouldhavebeenasconsciousaneffortforhimtospeakwithoutfigureasitisformostmentospeakwithfigure。Suspendedinthedrippingwellofhisimaginationthecommonestobjectbecomesencrustedwithimagery。HereinagainhedeviatesfromthetrueNaturepoet,thenormalWordsworthtypeofNaturepoet:imagerywastohimnotameremeansofexpression,notevenameremeansofadornment;itwasadelightforitsownsake。

Andhereinwefindthetrailbywhichwewouldclassifyhim。Hebelongstoaschoolofwhichnotimpossiblyhemayhardlyhavereadaline—theMetaphysicalSchool。ToalargeextentheISwhattheMetaphysicalSchoolshouldhavebeen。Thatschoolwasacertainkindofpoetrytryingforarange。Shelleyistherangefound。

CrashawandShelleysprangfromthesameseed;butintheonecasetheseedwaschokedwiththorns,intheothercaseitfellongoodground。TheMetaphysicalSchoolwasinitsdirectresultsanabortivemovement,thoughindirectlymuchcameofit—forDrydencameofit。Dryden,toagreaterextentthanis(weimagine)

generallyperceived,wasCowleysystematised;andCowley,whosankintothearmsofDryden,rosefromthelapofDonne。

ButthemovementwassoabortivethatfewwillthankusforconnectingwithitthenameofShelley。ThisisbecausetomostpeopletheMetaphysicalSchoolmeansDonne,whereasitoughttomeanCrashaw。Wejudgethedirectionofadevelopmentbyitshighestform,thoughthatformmayhavebeenproducedbutonce,andproducedimperfectly。NowthehighestproductoftheMetaphysicalSchoolwasCrashaw,andCrashawwasaShelleymanque;heneverreachedthePromisedLand,buthehadfervidvisionsofit。TheMetaphysicalSchool,likeShelley,lovedimageryforitsownsake:andhowbeautifulathingthefranktoyingwithimagerymaybe,letTheSkylarkandTheCloudwitness。Itisonlyevilwhenthepoet,onthestraightwaytoafixedobject,lagscontinuallyfromthepathtoplay。Thisiscommendableneitherinpoetnorerrand—boy。TheMetaphysicalSchoolfailed,notbecauseittoyedwithimagery,butbecauseittoyedwithitfrostily。TosportwiththetanglesofNeaera\'shairmaybetrivialidlenessorcaressingtenderness,exactlyasyourrelationtoNeaeraisthatofheartlessgallantryoroflove。Soyoumaytoywithimageryinmereintellectualingenuity,andthenyoumightaswellgowriteacrostics:oryoumaytoywithitinraptures,andthenyoumaywriteaSensitivePlant。Infact,theMetaphysicalpoetswhentheywentastraycannotbesaidtohavedoneanythingsodaintyasisimpliedbyTOYINGwithimagery。Theycutitintoshapeswithapairofscissors。FromallsuchdangerShelleywassavedbyhispassionatespontaneity。Notrappingsaretoosplendidfortheswiftsteedsofsunrise。Hissword—hiltmayberoughwithjewels,butitisthehiltofanExcalibur。Histhoughtsscorchthroughallthefoldsofexpression。

Hisclothofgoldburstsattheflexures,andshowsthenakedpoetry。

Itisthisgiftofnotmerelyembodyingbutapprehendingeverythinginfigurewhichco—operatestowardscreatinghisrarestcharacteristics,soalmostpreternaturallydevelopedinnootherpoet,namely,hiswell—knownpowertocondensethemosthydrogenicabstraction。Sciencecannoweducethreadsofsuchexquisitetenuitythatonlythefeetofthetiniestinfant—spiderscanascendthem;butupthefilmiestinsubstantialityShelleyrunswithagileease。Tohim,intruth,nothingisabstract。ThedustiestabstractionsStart,andtrembleunderhisfeet,Andblossominpurpleandred。

Thecoldestmoonofanideariseshaloedthroughhisvaporousimagination。Thedimmest—sparkedchipofaconceptionblazesandscintillatesinthesubtileoxygenofhismind。ThemostwrinkledAEsonofanabstrusenessleapsrosyoutofhisbubblinggenius。InamoreintensifiedsignificationthanitisprobablethatShakespearedreamedof,Shelleygivestoairynothingalocalhabitationandaname。HereafreshhetouchestheMetaphysicalSchool,whoseverytitlewasdrawnfromthishabitualpursuitofabstractions,andwhofailedinthatpursuitfromtheonecauseomnipresentwiththem,becauseinalltheirpoeticsmithytheyhadleftneveraplaceforaforge。Theylaidtheirfancieschillontheanvil。Crashaw,indeed,partiallyanticipatedShelley\'ssuccess,andyetfurtherdidalaterpoet,somuchfurtherthatwefinditdifficulttounderstandwhyagenerationthatworshipsShelleyshouldberevivingGray,yetalmostforgetthenameofCollins。Thegeneralityofreaders,whentheyknowhimatall,usuallyknowhimbyhisOdeonthePassions。Inthis,despiteitsbeauty,thereisstillasoupconofformalism,alingeringtraceofpowderfromtheeighteenthcenturyperiwig,dimmingthebrightlocksofpoetry。Onlytheliterarystudentreadsthatlittlemasterpiece,theOdetoEvening,whichsometimesheraldstheShelleianstrain,whileotherpassagesarethesolethingsinthelanguagecomparabletotheminiaturesofIlPenseroso。Crashaw,Collins,Shelley—threericochetsoftheonepebble,threejetsfromthreeboundsoftheonePegasus!Collins\'sPity,\"witheyesofdewylight,\"isnearofkintoShelley\'sSleep,\"thefilmy—eyed\";andthe\"shadowytribesofmind\"arethelinealprogenitorsof\"Thought\'scrownedpowers。\"