第2章

Asthepopulationsofthefreestatesgrowfarmorequicklythanthoseoftheslavestates,thenumberofNorthernRepresentativeswasboundtooutstripthatoftheSouthernveryrapidly。TherealseatofthepoliticalpoweroftheSouthisaccordinglytransferredmoreandmoretotheAmericanSenate,whereeverystate,whetheritspopulationisgreatorsmall,isrepresentedbytwoSenators。InordertoassertitsinfluenceintheSenateand,throughtheSenate,itshegemonyovertheUnitedStates,theSouththereforerequiredacontinualformationofnewslavestates。This,however,wasonlypossiblethroughconquestofforeignlands,asinthecaseofTexas,orthroughthetransformationoftheTerritoriesbelongingtotheUnitedStatesfirstintoslaveTerritoriesandlaterintoslavestates,asinthecaseofMissouri,Arkansas,etc。JohnCalhoun,whomtheslaveholdersadmireastheirstatesmanparexcellence,statedasearlyasFebruary19,1847,intheSenate,thattheSenatealoneplacedabalanceofpowerinthehandsoftheSouth,thatextensionoftheslaveterritorywasnecessarytopreservethisequilibriumbetweenSouthandNorthintheSenate,andthattheattemptsoftheSouthatthecreationofnewslavestatesbyforcewereaccordinglyjustified。

Finally,thenumberofactualslaveholdersintheSouthoftheUniondoesnotamounttomorethanthreehundredthousand,anarrowoligarchythatisconfrontedwithmanymillionsofso—calledpoorwhites,whosenumbershavebeenconstantlygrowingthroughconcentrationoflandedpropertyandwhoseconditionisonlytobecomparedwiththatoftheRomanplebeiansintheperiodofRome’sextremedecline。OnlybyacquisitionandtheprospectofacquisitionofnewTerritories,aswellasbyfilibusteringexpeditions,isitpossibletosquaretheinterestsofthesepoorwhiteswiththoseoftheslaveholders,togivetheirrestlessthirstforactionaharmlessdirectionandtotamethemwiththeprospectofonedaybecomingslaveholdersthemselves。

Astrictconfinementofslaverywithinitsoldterrain,therefore,wasboundaccordingtoeconomiclawtoleadtoitsgradualeffacement,inthepoliticalspheretoannihilatethehegemonythattheslavestatesexercisedthroughtheSenate,andfinallytoexposetheslaveholdingoligarchywithinitsownstatestothreateningperilsfromthepoorwhites。InaccordancewiththeprinciplethatanyfurtherextensionofslaveTerritorieswastobeprohibitedbylaw,theRepublicansthereforeattackedtheruleoftheslaveholdersatitsroot。TheRepublicanelectionvictorywasaccordinglyboundtoleadtoopenstrugglebetweenNorthandSouth。Andthiselectionvictory,asalreadymentioned,wasitselfconditionedbythesplitintheDemocraticcamp。

TheKansasstrugglehadalreadycausedasplitbetweentheslaveholders’

partyandtheDemocratsoftheNorthalliedtoit。Withthepresidentialelectionof1860,thesamestrifenowbrokeoutagaininamoregeneralform。TheDemocratsoftheNorth,withDouglasastheircandidate,madetheintroductionofslaveryintoTerritoriesdependentonthewillofthemajorityofthesettlers。Theslaveholders’party,withBreckinridgeastheircandidate,maintainedthattheConstitutionoftheUnitedStates,astheSupremeCourthadalsodeclared,broughtslaverylegallyinitstrain;inandofitselfslaverywasalreadylegalinallTerritoriesandrequirednospecialnaturalisation。Whilst,therefore,theRepublicansprohibitedanyextensionofslaveTerritories,theSouthernpartylaidclaimtoallTerritoriesoftherepublicaslegallywarranteddomains。

WhattheyhadattemptedbywayofexamplewithregardtoKansas,toforceslaveryonaTerritorythroughthecentralgovernmentagainstthewillofthesettlersthemselves,theynowsetupaslawforalltheTerritoriesoftheUnion。SuchaconcessionlaybeyondthepoweroftheDemocraticleadersandwouldonlyhaveoccasionedthedesertionoftheirarmytotheRepublicancamp。Ontheotherhand,Douglas’ssettlers’sovereigntycouldnotsatisfytheslaveholders’party。WhatitwantedtoeffecthadtobeeffectedwithinthenextfouryearsunderthenewPresident,couldonlybeeffectedbytheresourcesofthecentralgovernmentandbrookednofurtherdelay。Itdidnotescapetheslaveholdersthatanewpowerhadarisen,theNorth—west,whosepopulation,havingalmostdoubledbetween1850and1860,wasalreadyprettywellequaltothewhitepopulationoftheslavestates——apowerthatwasnotinclinedeitherbytradition,temperamentormodeoflifetoletitselfbedraggedfromcompromisetocompromiseinthemanneroftheoldNorth—easternstates。TheUnionwasstillofvaluetotheSouthonlysofarasithandedoverFederalpowertoitasameansofcarryingouttheslavepolicy。Ifnot,thenitwasbettertomakethebreaknowthantolookonatthedevelopmentoftheRepublicanPartyandtheupsurgeoftheNorth—westforanotherfouryearsandbeginthestruggleundermoreunfavourableconditions。Theslaveholders’

partythereforeplayedvabanque。WhentheDemocratsoftheNorthdeclinedtogoonplayingthepartofthepoorwhitesoftheSouth,theSouthsecuredLincoln’svictorybysplittingthevote,andthentookthisvictoryasapretextfordrawingtheswordfromthescabbard。

Thewholemovementwasandisbased,asonesees,ontheslavequestion。Notinthesenseofwhethertheslaveswithintheexistingslavestatesshouldbeemancipatedoutrightornot,butwhetherthetwentymillionfreemenoftheNorthshouldsubmitanylongertoanoligarchyofthreehundredthousandslaveholders;whetherthevastTerritoriesoftherepublicshouldbenurseriesforfreestatesorforslavery;finally,whetherthenationalpolicyoftheUnionshouldtakearmedspreadingofslaveryinMexico,CentralandSouthAmericaasitsdevice。

InanotherarticlewewillprobetheassertionoftheLondonpressthattheNorthmustsanctionsecessionasthemostfavourableandonlypossiblesolutionoftheconflict。

TheTrentCaseKarlMarxTheTrentCaseLondon,November28,1861

TheconflictoftheEnglishmailshipTrentwiththeNorthAmericanwarshipSanJacintointhenarrowpassageoftheOldBahamaChannelisthelionamongtheeventsoftheday。IntheafternoonofNovember27

themailshipLaPlatabroughtthenewsoftheincidenttoSouthampton,wheretheelectrictelegraphatonceflashedittoallpartsofGreatBritain。

ThesameeveningtheLondonStockExchangewasthestageofstormyscenessimilartothoseatthetimeoftheannouncementoftheItalianwar。Quotationsforgovernmentstocksankthree—quarterstoonepercent。ThewildestrumourscirculatedinLondon。TheAmericanAmbassador,Adams,wassaidtohavebeengivenhispassport,anembargotohavebeenimposedonallAmericanshipsintheThames,etc。AtthesametimeaprotestmeetingofmerchantswasheldattheStockExchangeinLiverpool,todemandmeasuresfromtheBritishGovernmentforthesatisfactionoftheviolatedhonouroftheBritishflag。Everysound—mindedEnglishmanwenttobedwiththeconvictionthathewouldgotosleepinastateofpeacebutwakeupinastateofwar。

Nevertheless,thefactiswell—nighcategoricallyestablishedthattheconflictbetweentheTrentandtheSanJacintobringsnowarinitstrain。Thesemi—officialpress,likeTheTimesandTheMorningPost,strikesapeacefulnoteandpoursjuridicallycooldeductionsontheflickeringsofpassion。PapersliketheDailyTelegraph,whichatthefaintestmotd’ordreroarfortheBritishlion,aretruemodelsofmoderation。OnlytheToryoppositionpress,TheMorningHeraldandTheStandard,hitsout。Thesefactsforceeveryexperttoconcludethattheministryhasalreadydecidednottomakeacasusbellioutoftheuntowardevent。

Itmustbeaddedthattheevent,ifnotthedetailsofitsenactment,wasanticipated。OnOctober12,Messrs。Slidell,ConfederacyemissarytoFrance,andMason,ConfederacyemissarytoEngland,togetherwiththeirsecretariesEustisandMacFarland,hadruntheblockadeofCharlestononthesteamshipTheodoraandsailedforHavana,theretoseektheopportunityofapassageundertheBritishflag。InEnglandtheirarrivalwasexpecteddaily。NorthAmericanwarshipshadsetoutfromLiverpooltointerceptthegentlemen,withtheirdispatches,onthissideoftheAtlanticOcean。

TheBritishministryhadalreadysubmittedthequestionwhethertheNorthAmericanswereentitledtotakesuchasteptoitsofficialjurisconsultsfortheiropinion。Theiranswerissaidtohavebeenintheaffirmative。

Thelegalquestionturnsinanarrowcircle。SincethefoundationoftheUnitedStates,NorthAmericahasadoptedBritishmaritimelawinallitsrigour。Amajorprincipleofthismaritimelawisthatallneutralmerchantmenaresubjecttosearchbythebelligerentparties。

\"Thisright,\"saidLordStowellinajudgmentwhichhasbecomefamous,\"offersthesolesecuritythatnocontrabandiscarriedonneutralships。\"

ThegreatestAmericanauthority,Kent,statesinthesamesense:

\"Therightofself—preservationgivesbelligerentnationsthisright。ThedoctrineoftheBritishadmiraltyontherightofvisitationandsearch……hasbeenrecognisedinitsfullestextentbythecourtsofjusticeinourcountry。\"

Itwasnotoppositiontotherightofsearch,asissometimeserroneouslysuggested,thatbroughtabouttheAnglo—AmericanWarof1812to1814。Rather,AmericadeclaredwarbecauseEnglandunlawfullypresumedtosearchevenAmericanwarships,onthepretextofcatchingdesertersfromtheBritishNavy。

TheSanJacinto,therefore,hadtherighttosearchtheTrentandtoconfiscateanycontrabandstowedaboardher。ThatdispatchesinthepossessionofMason,SlidellandCo。comeunderthecategoryofcontrabandevenTheTimes,TheMorningPost,etc。,admit。ThereremainsthequestionwhetherMessrs。Mason,SlidellandCo。werethemselvescontrabandandmightconsequentlybeconfiscated!Thepointisaticklishoneanddifferencesofopinionprevailamongthedoctorsoflaw。Pratt,themostdistinguishedBritishauthorityon\"Contraband\",inthesectionon\"Quasi—Contraband,Dispatches,Passengers\"specificallyrefersto\"communicationofinformationandordersfromabelligerentgovernmenttoitsofficersabroad,ortheconveyanceofmilitarypassengers\"。Messrs。

MasonandSlidell,ifnotofficers,werejustaslittleambassadors,sincetheirgovernmentsarerecognisedneitherbyBritainnorbyFrance。Whatarethey,then?InjustificationoftheverybroadconceptionsofcontrabandassertedbyBritainintheAnglo—Frenchwars,Jeffersonalreadyremarksinhismemoirsthatcontraband,byitsnature,precludesanyexhaustivedefinitionandnecessarilyleavesgreatscopeforarbitrariness。Inanyevent,however,oneseesthatfromthestandpointofEnglishlawthelegalquestiondwindlestoaDunsScotuscontroversy,theexplosiveforceofwhichwillnotgobeyondexchangeofdiplomaticnotes。

ThepoliticalaspectoftheNorthAmericanprocedurewasestimatedquitecorrectlybyTheTimesinthesewords:

\"EvenMr。SewardhimselfmustknowthatthevoicesoftheSoutherncommissioners,soundingfromtheircaptivity,areathousandtimesmoreeloquentinLondonandinParisthantheywouldhavebeeniftheyhadbeenheardinSt。James’sandtheTuileries。\"

AndisnottheConfederacyalreadyrepresentedinLondonbyMessrs。

YanceyandMann?

WeregardthislatestoperationofMr。Sewardasacharacteristicactoftactlessnessesbyself—consciousweaknesssimulatingstrength。IfthenavalincidenthastensSeward’sremovalfromtheWashingtonCabinet,theUnitedStateswillhavenoreasontorecorditasan\"untowardevent\"intheannalsofitsCivilWar。

TheAnglo—AmericanConflictKarlMarxTheAnglo—AmericanConflictLondon,November29,1861

ThelawofficersoftheCrownhadyesterdaytogivetheiropiniononthenavalincidentintheBahamaChannel。TheirrecordsofthecaseconsistedofthewrittenreportsoftheBritishofficerswhohaveremainedonboardtheTrentandoftheoraltestimonyofCommodoreWilliams,whowasonboardtheTrentasAdmiraltyagent,butdisembarkedfromtheLaPlataonNovember27atSouthampton,whencehewasimmediatelysummonedbytelegraphtoLondon。ThelawofficersoftheCrownacknowledgedtherightoftheSanJacintotovisitandsearchtheTrent。

SinceQueenVictoria’sproclamationofneutralityontheoutbreakoftheAmericanCivilWarexpresslylistsdispatchesamongarticlesofcontraband,therecouldbenodoubtonthispointeither。Thereremained,then,thequestionwhetherMessrs。Mason,SlidellandCo。werethemselvescontrabandandthereforeconfiscable。ThelawofficersoftheCrownappeartoholdthisview,fortheyhavedroppedthemateriallegalquestionentirely。AccordingtothereportofTheTimes,theiropinionblamesthecommanderoftheSanJacintoonlyforanerrorinprocedure。

InsteadofMessrs。Mason,SlidellandCo。,heshouldhavetakentheTrentherselfintowasaprize,broughthertothenearestAmericanportandtheresubmittedhertothejudgmentofaNorthAmericanprizecourt。ThisisincontestablytheprocedurecorrespondingtoBritishandthereforetoNorthAmericanmaritimelaw。

ItisequallyincontestablethattheBritishfrequentlyviolatedthisruleduringtheanti—JacobinwarandproceededinthesummaryfashionoftheSanJacinto。Howeverthatmaybe,thewholeconflictisreducedbythisopinionofthelawofficersoftheCrowntoatechnicalerrorandconsequentlydeprivedofanyimmediateimport。TwocircumstancesmakeiteasyfortheUniongovernmenttoacceptthispointofviewandthereforetoaffordformalsatisfaction。Inthefirstplace,CaptainWilkes,thecommanderoftheSanJacinto,couldhavereceivednodirectinstructionsfromWashington。OnthevoyagehomefromAfricatoNewYork,hecalledonNovember2atHavana,whichheleftagainonNovember4,whilsthisencounterwiththeTrenttookplaceonthehighseasonNovember8。CaptainWilkes’sstayofonlytwodaysinHavanadidnotpermitanyexchangeofnotesbetweenhimandhisgovernment。TheconsuloftheUnionwastheonlyAmericanauthoritywithwhomhecoulddeal。Inthesecondplace,however,hehadobviouslylosthishead,ashisfailuretoinsistonthesurrenderofthedispatchesproves。

TheimportanceoftheincidentliesinitsmoraleffectontheEnglishpeopleandinthepoliticalcapitalthatcaneasilybemadeoutofitbytheBritishcottonfriendsofsecession。CharacteristicofthelatteristheLiverpoolprotestmeetingorganisedbythemandpreviouslymentionedbyme。ThemeetingtookplaceonNovember27atthreeintheafternoon,inthecottonauction—roomsoftheLiverpoolExchange,anhourafterthealarmingtelegramfromSouthamptonhadarrived。

AftervainattemptstopressthechairmanshiponMr。Cunard,theowneroftheCunardsteamshipsplyingbetweenLiverpoolandNewYork,andotherhightradeofficials,ayoungmerchantnamedSpence,notoriousforaworkhewroteinsupportoftheslaverepublic,tookthechair。ContrarytotherulesofEnglishmeetings,he,thechairman,himselfproposedthemotiontocallon\"thegovernmenttopreservethedignityoftheBritishflagbydemandingpromptsatisfactionforthisaffront。\"Tremendousapplause,clappingandcheersuponcheers!ThemainargumentoftheopeningspeakerfortheslaverepublicwasthatslaveshipshadhithertobeenprotectedbytheAmericanflagfromtherightofsearchclaimedbyBritain。Andthenthisphilanthropistlaunchedafuriousattackontheslavetrade!HeadmittedthatEnglandhadbroughtaboutthewarof1812—14withtheUnitedStatesbyinsistingonsearchingfordesertersfromtheBritishNavyonUnionwarships。

\"But,\"hecontinuedwithwonderfuldialectic,\"butthereisadifferencebetweentherightofsearchtorecoverdesertersfromtheBritishNavyandtherighttoseizepassengers,likeMr。MasonandMr。

Slidell,menofthehighestrespectability,regardlessofthefactthattheywereprotectedbytheBritishflag!\"

Heplayedhishighesttrump,however,atthecloseofhisdiatribe。

\"Theotherday,\"hebellowed,\"whileIwasontheEuropeanContinent,IheardanobservationmadeastothecourseofourconductinregardtotheUnitedStates,andIwasunabletoreplytotheallusionwithoutablush——thatthefeelingofeveryintelligentmanupontheContinentwasthatwewouldsubmittoanyoutrageandsuffereveryindignityofferedtousbytheGovernmentoftheUnitedStates。Butthepitchergoessooftentothewellthatitisbrokenatlast。Ourpatiencehadbeenexercisedlongenough!Atlastwehavearrivedatfacts:thisisaveryhardandstartlingfact[!]anditisthedutyofeveryEnglishmantoapprisetheGovernmentofhowstrongandunanimousisthefeelingofthisgreatcommunityoftheoutrageofferedtoourflag。\"

Thissenselessrigamarolewasgreetedwithapealofapplause。Opposingvoiceswerehowleddownandhisseddownandstampeddown。TotheremarkofaMr。Campbellthatthewholemeetingwasirregular,theinexorableSpencereplied:\"Iperfectlyagreewithyouthatitisalittleirregularbutatthesametimethefactthatwehavemettoconsiderisratheranirregularfact。\"TotheproposalofaMr。Turnertoadjournthemeetingtothefollowingday,inorderthat\"thecityofLiverpoolcanhaveitssayandnotacliqueofcottonbrokersusurpitsname\",criesof\"Collarhim,throwhimout!\"resoundedfromallsides。Unperturbed,Mr。Turnerrepeatedhismotion,which,however,wasnotputtothevote,againcontrarytoalltherulesofEnglishmeetings。Spencetriumphed。But,asamatteroffact,nothinghasdonemoretocoolLondon’stemperthanthenewsofMr。Spence’striumph。

ControversyOvertheTrentCaseKarlMarxControversyOvertheTrentCaseLondon,December7,1861

ThePalmerstonpress(andonanotheroccasionIwillshowthatinforeignaffairsPalmerston’scontrolovernine—tenthsoftheEnglishpressisjustasabsoluteasLouisBonaparte’sovernine—tenthsoftheFrenchpress)——thePalmerstonpressfellsthatitworksamong\"pleasinghindrances\"。

Ontheonehand,itadmitsthatthelawofficersoftheCrownhavereducedtheaccusationagainsttheUnitedStatestoameremistakeinprocedure,toatechnicalerror。Ontheotherhand,itboaststhatonthebasisofsuchalegalquibbleahaughtyultimatumhasbeenpresentedtotheUnitedStatessuchascanonlybejustifiedbyagrossviolationoflaw,butnotbyaformalerrorintheexerciseofarecognisedright。Accordingly,thePalmerstonpressnowpleadsthemateriallegalquestionagain。

Thegreatimportanceofthecaseappearstodemandabriefexaminationofthemateriallegalquestion。

Bywayofintroduction,itmaybeobservedthatnotasingleEnglishpaperventurestoreproachtheSanJacintoforthevisitationandsearchoftheTrent。Thispoint,therefore,fallsoutsidethecontroversy。