第3章

Wecome,now,totheconsiderationofthosemurderswhicharecommitted,orattempted,withnootherobjectthantheattainmentofaninfamousnotoriety。ThatthisclassofcrimeshasitsorigininthePunishmentofDeath,wecannotquestion;because(aswehavealreadyseen,andshallpresentlyestablishbyanotherproof)greatnotorietyandinterestattach,andaregenerallyunderstoodtoattach,onlytothosecriminalswhoareindangerofbeingexecuted。

Oneofthemostremarkableinstancesofmurderoriginatinginmadself—conceit;andofthemurderer’spartintherepulsivedrama,inwhichthelawappearsatsuchgreatdisadvantagetoitselfandtosociety,beingactedalmosttothelastwithaself—complacencythatwouldbehorriblyludicrousifitwerenotutterlyrevolting;ispresentedinthecaseofHocker。

Hereisaninsolent,flippant,dissoluteyouth:apingthemanofintrigueandlevity:over—dressed,over—confident,inordinatelyvainofhispersonalappearance:distinguishedastohishair,cane,snuff—box,andsinging—voice:andunhappilythesonofaworkingshoemaker。Bentonloftierflightsthansuchapoorhouse—

swallowasateacherinaSunday—schoolcantake;andhavingnotruth,industry,perseverance,orotherdullwork—a—dayquality,toplumehiswingswithal;hecastsabouthim,inhisjauntyway,forsomemodeofdistinguishinghimself——somemeansofgettingthatheadofhairintotheprint—shops;ofhavingsomethinglikejusticedonetohissinging—voiceandfineintellect;ofmakingthelifeandadventuresofThomasHockerremarkable;andofgettingupsomeexcitementinconnectionwiththatslightedpieceofbiography。TheStage?No。Notfeasible。TherehasalwaysbeenaconspiracyagainsttheThomasHockers,inthatkindofeffort。IthasbeenthesamewithAuthorshipinproseandpoetry。Istherenothingelse?A

Murder,now,wouldmakeanoiseinthepapers!Thereisthegallowstobesure;butwithoutthat,itwouldbenothing。Shortofthat,itwouldn’tbefame。Well!Wemustalldieatonetimeorother;

andtodiegame,andhaveitinprint,isjustthethingforamanofspirit。TheyalwaysdiegameattheMinorTheatresandtheSaloons,andthepeoplelikeitverymuch。Thurtell,too,diedverygame,andmadeacapitalspeechwhenhewastried。There’sallaboutitinabookatthecigar—shopnow。Come,Tom,getyournameup!Letitbeadashingmurderthatshallkeepthewood—engraversatitforthenexttwomonths。Youaretheboytogothroughwithit,andinterestthetown!

Themiserablewretch,inflatedbythislunaticconceit,arrangeshiswholeplanforpublicationandeffect。Itisquiteanepitomeofhisexperienceofthedomesticmelodramaorpennynovel。ThereistheVictimFriend;themysteriousletteroftheinjuredFemaletotheVictimFriend;theromanticspotfortheDeath—Strugglebynight;theunexpectedappearanceofThomasHockertothePoliceman;

theparlourofthePublicHouse,withThomasHockerreadingthepapertoastrangegentleman;theFamilyApartment,withasongbyThomasHocker;theInquestRoom,withThomasHockerboldlylookingon;theinterioroftheMaryleboneTheatre,withThomasHockertakenintocustody;thePoliceOfficewithThomasHocker\"affable\"tothespectators;theinteriorofNewgate,withThomasHockerpreparinghisdefence;theCourt,whereThomasHocker,withhisdancing—masterairs,isputuponhistrial,andcomplimentedbytheJudge;theProsecution,theDefence,theVerdict,theBlackCap,theSentence——

eachofthemalineinanyPlaybill,andhowboldalineinThomasHocker’slife!

Itisworthyofremark,thatthenearerheapproachestothegallows——thegreatlastscenetowhichthewholeoftheseeffectshavebeenworkingup——themoretheoverweeningconceitofthepoorwretchshowsitself;themorehefeelsthatheistheheroofthehour;themoreaudaciouslyandrecklesslyhelies,insupportingthecharacter。Inpublic——atthecondemnedsermon——hedeportshimselfasbecomesthemanwhoseautographsareprecious,whoseportraitsareinnumerable;inmemoryofwhom,wholefencesandgateshavebeenborneaway,insplinters,fromthesceneofmurder。HeknowsthattheeyesofEuropeareuponhim;butheisnotproud——onlygraceful。

Hebows,likethefirstgentlemaninEurope,totheturnkeywhobringshimaglassofwater;andcomposeshisclothesandhassockascarefully,asgoodMadameBlaizecoulddo。Inprivate——withinthewallsofthecondemnedcell——everywordandactionofhiswaninglife,isalie。Hiswholetimeisdividedbetweentellingliesandwritingthem。Ifheeverhaveanotherthought,itisforhisgenteelappearanceonthescaffold;aswhenhebegsthebarber\"nottocuthishairtooshort,ortheywon’tknowhimwhenhecomesout\"。Hislastproceedingbutoneistowritetworomanticloveletterstowomenwhohavenoexistence。Hislastproceedingofall(butlesscharacteristic,thoughtheonlytrueone)istoswoonaway,miserably,inthearmsoftheattendants,andbehangeduplikeacravendog。

Isnotsuchahistory,fromfirsttolast,amostrevoltinganddisgracefulone;andcanthestudentofitbringhimselftobelievethatitevercouldhaveplaceinanyrecordoffacts,orthatthemiserablechief—actorinitcouldhaveeverhadamotiveforhisarrogantwickedness,butforthecommentandtheexplanationwhichthePunishmentofDeathsupplies!

Itisnotasolitarycase,norisitaprodigy,butamerespecimenofaclass。ThecaseofOxford,whofiredatHerMajestyinthePark,willbefound,onexamination,toresembleitverynearly,intheessentialfeature。Thereisnoprovedpretencewhateverforregardinghimasmad;otherthanthathewaslikethismalefactor,brimfulofconceit,andadesiretobecome,evenatthecostofthegallows(theonlycostwithinhisreach)thetalkofthetown。HehadlessinventionthanHocker,andperhapswasnotsodeliberatelybad;buthisattemptwasabranchofthesametree,andithasitsrootinthegroundwherethescaffoldiserected。

Oxfordhadhisimitators。Letitneverbeforgottenintheconsiderationofthispartofthesubject,howtheywerestopped。

Solongasattemptsinvestedthemwiththedistinctionofbeingindangerofdeathatthehangman’shands,solongdidtheyspringup。

Whenthepenaltyofdeathwasremoved,andameanandhumiliatingpunishmentsubstitutedinitsplace,theracewasatanend,andceasedtobe。

II

Wecome,now,toconsidertheeffectofCapitalPunishmentinthepreventionofcrime。

Doesitpreventcrimeinthosewhoattendexecutions?

Thereneveris(andthereneverwas)anexecutionattheOldBaileyinLondon,butthespectatorsincludetwolargeclassesofthieves——

oneclasswhogothereastheywouldgotoadog—fight,oranyotherbrutalsport,fortheattractionandexcitementofthespectacle;

theotherwhomakeitadrymatterofbusiness,andmixwiththecrowdsolelytopickpockets。Addtothese,thedissolute,thedrunken,themostidle,profligate,andabandonedofbothsexes——

somemoodyill—conditionedminds,drawnthitherbyafearfulinterest——andsomeimpelledbycuriosity;ofwhomthegreaterpartareofanageandtemperamentrenderingthegratificationofthatcuriosityhighlydangeroustothemselvesandtosociety——andthegreatelementsoftheconcoursearestated。

NoristhisassemblagepeculiartoLondon。Itisthesameincountrytowns,allowingforthedifferentstatisticsofthepopulation。ItisthesameinAmerica。IwaspresentatanexecutioninRome,foramosttreacherousandwickedmurder,andnotonlysawthesamekindofassemblagethere,but,wearingwhatiscalledashooting—coat,withagreatmanypocketsinit,feltinnumerablehandsbusyineveryoneofthem,closetothescaffold。

Ihavealreadymentionedthatoutofonehundredandsixty—sevenconvictsundersentenceofdeath,questionedatdifferenttimesintheperformanceofhisdutybyanEnglishclergyman,therewereonlythreewhohadnotbeenspectatorsofexecutions。Mr。Wakefield,inhisFactsrelatingtothePunishmentofDeath,goesintotheworking,asitwere,ofthissum。Histestimonyisextremelyvaluable,becauseitistheevidenceofaneducatedandobservingman,who,beforehavingpersonalknowledgeofthesubjectandofNewgate,wasquitesatisfiedthatthePunishmentofDeathshouldcontinue,butwho,whenhegainedthatexperience,exertedhimselftotheutmostforitsabolition,evenatthepainofconstantpublicreferenceinhisownpersontohisownimprisonment。\"Itcannotbeegotism\",hereasonablyobserves,\"thatpromptsamantospeakofhimselfinconnectionwithNewgate。\"

\"Whoeverwillundergothepain,\"saysMr。Wakefield,\"ofwitnessingthepublicdestructionofafellow—creature’slife,inLondon,mustbeperfectlysatisfiedthatinthegreatmassofspectators,theeffectofthepunishmentistoexcitesympathyforthecriminalandhatredofthelaw……IaminclinedtobelievethatthecriminalsofLondon,spokenofasaclassandallowingforexceptions,takethesamesortofdelightinwitnessingexecutions,asthesportsmanandsoldierfindinthedangersofhuntingandwar……IamconfidentthatfewOldBaileySessionspasswithoutthetrialofaboy,whosefirstthoughtofcrimeoccurredwhilsthewaswitnessinganexecution……Andonegrownman,ofgreatmentalpowersandsuperioreducation,whowasacquittedofachargeofforgery,assuredmethatthefirstideaofcommittingaforgeryoccurredtohimatthemomentwhenhewasaccidentallywitnessingtheexecutionofFauntleroy。Towhichitmaybeadded,thatFauntleroyissaidtohavemadepreciselythesamedeclarationinreferencetotheoriginofhisowncriminality。

Butoneconvict\"whowaswithinanaceofbeinghanged\",amongthemanywithwhomMr。Wakefieldconversed,seemstometohaveunconsciouslyputaquestionwhichtheadvocatesofCapitalPunishmentwouldfinditverydifficultindeedtoanswer。\"Haveyouoftenseenanexecution?\"askedMr。Wakefield。\"Yes,often。\"\"Diditnotfrightenyou?\"\"No。Whyshouldit?\"

Itisveryeasyandverynaturaltoturnfromthisruffian,shockedbythehardenedretort;butanswerhisquestion,whyshouldit?

Shouldhebefrightenedbythesightofadeadman?Weareborntodie,hesays,withacarelesstriumph。Wearenotborntothetreadmill,ortoservitudeandslavery,ortobanishment;buttheexecutionerhasdonenomoreforthatcriminalthannaturemaydotomorrowforthejudge,andwillcertainlydo,inherowngoodtime,forjudgeandjury,counselandwitnesses,turnkeys,hangman,andall。Shouldhebefrightenedbythemannerofthedeath?Itishorrible,truly,sohorrible,thatthelaw,afraidorashamedofitsowndeed,hidesthefaceofthestrugglingwretchitslays;butdoesthisfactnaturallyawakeninsuchaman,terror——ordefiance?Letthesamemanspeak。\"Whatdidyouthinkthen?\"askedMr。Wakefield。

\"Think?Why,Ithoughtitwasa——shame。\"

Disgustandindignation,orrecklessnessandindifference,oramorbidtendencytobroodoverthesightuntiltemptationisengenderedbyit,aretheinevitableconsequencesofthespectacle,accordingtothedifferenceofhabitanddispositioninthosewhobeholdit。Whyshoulditfrightenordeter?Weknowitdoesnot。

Weknowitfromthepolicereports,andfromthetestimonyofthosewhohaveexperienceofprisonsandprisoners,andwemayknowit,ontheoccasionofanexecution,bytheevidenceofourownsenses;ifwewillbeatthemiseryofusingthemforsuchapurpose。Butwhyshouldit?Whowouldsendhischildorhisapprentice,orwhattutorwouldsendhisscholars,orwhatmasterwouldsendhisservants,tobedeterredfromvicebythespectacleofanexecution?

Ifitbeanexampletocriminals,andtocriminalsonly,whyarenottheprisonersinNewgatebroughtouttoseetheshowbeforethedebtors’door?Why,whiletheyaremadepartiestothecondemnedsermon,aretheyrigidlyexcludedfromtheimprovingpostscriptofthegallows?Becauseanexecutioniswellknowntobeanutterlyuseless,barbarous,andbrutalisingsight,andbecausethesympathyofallbeholders,whohaveanysympathyatall,iscertaintobealwayswiththecriminal,andneverwiththelaw。

Ilearnfromthenewspaperaccountsofeveryexecution,howMr。So—

and—so,andMr。Somebodyelse,andMr。So—forthshookhandswiththeculprit,butIneverfindthemshakinghandswiththehangman。Allkindsofattentionandconsiderationarelavishedontheone;buttheotherisuniversallyavoided,likeapestilence。Iwanttoknowwhysomuchsympathyisexpendedonthemanwhokillsanotherinthevehemenceofhisownbadpassions,andwhythemanwhokillshiminthenameofthelawisshunnedandfledfrom?Isitbecausethemurdererisgoingtodie?Thenbynomeansputhimtodeath。Isitbecausethehangmanexecutesalaw,which,whentheyoncecomenearitfacetoface,allmeninstinctivelyrevoltfrom?Thenbyallmeanschangeit。Thereis,therecanbe,nopreventioninsuchalaw。

ItmaybeurgedthatPublicExecutionsarenotintendedforthebenefitofthosedregsofsocietywhohabituallyattendthem。Thisisanabsurdity,towhichtheobviousansweris,Somuchtheworse。

Iftheybenotconsideredwithreferencetothatclassofpersons,comprehendingagreathostofcriminalsinvariousstagesofdevelopment,theyoughttobe,andmustbe。Tolosesightofthatconsiderationistobeirrational,unjust,andcruel。Allotherpunishmentsareespeciallydevised,withareferencetotherootedhabits,propensities,andantipathiesofcriminals。Andshallitbesaid,outofBedlam,thatthislastpunishmentofallisalonetobemadeanexceptionfromtherule,evenwhereitisshowntobeameansofpropagatingviceandcrime?

Buttheremaybepeoplewhodonotattendexecutions,towhomthegeneralfameandrumourofsuchscenesisanexample,andameansofdeterringfromcrime。

Whoarethey?WehaveseenthataroundCapitalPunishmenttherelingersafascination,urgingweakandbadpeopletowardsit,andimpartinganinteresttodetailsconnectedwithit,andwithmalefactorsawaitingitorsufferingit,whichevengoodandwell—

disposedpeoplecannotwithstand。Weknowthatlast—dyingspeechesandNewgatecalendarsarethefavouriteliteratureofverylowintellects。Thegallowsisnotappealedtoasanexampleintheinstructionofyouth(unlesstheyaretrainingforit);noraretherecondensedaccountsofcelebratedexecutionsfortheuseofnationalschools。Thereisastoryinanoldspelling—bookofacertainDon’tCarewhowashangedatlast,butitisnotunderstoodtohavehadanyremarkableeffectoncrimesorexecutionsinthegenerationtowhichitbelonged,andwithwhichithaspassedaway。

Hogarth’sidleapprenticeishanged;butthewholescene——withtheunmistakablestoutlady,drunkandpious,inthecast;thequarrelling,blasphemy,lewdness,anduproar;TiddyDollvendinghisgingerbread,andtheboyspickinghispocket——isabittersatireonthegreatexample;asefficientthen,asnow。

Isitefficienttopreventcrime?Theparliamentaryreturnsdemonstratethatitisnot。Iwasengagedinmakingsomeextractsfromthesedocuments,whenIfoundthemsowellabstractedinoneofthepaperspublishedbythecommitteeonthissubjectestablishedatAylesburylastyear,bythehumaneexertionsofLordNugent,thatI

amgladtoquotethegeneralresultsfromitspages:

\"In1843areturnwaslaidonthetableoftheHouseofthecommitmentsandexecutionsformurderinEnglandandWalesduringthethirtyyearsendingwithDecember1842,dividedintofiveperiodsofsixyearseach。Itshowsthatinthelastsixyears,from1836to1842,duringwhichtherewereonly50executions,thecommitmentsformurderwerefewerby61thaninthesixyearsprecedingwith74executions;fewerby63thaninthesixyearsending1830with75executions;fewerby56thaninthesixyearsending1824with94executions;andfewerby93thaninthesixyearsending1818whentherewasnolessanumberofexecutionsthan122。Butitmaybesaid,perhaps,thatintheinferencewedrawfromthisreturn,wearesubstitutingcauseforeffect,andthatineachsuccessivecycle,thenumberofmurdersdecreasedinconsequenceoftheexampleofpublicexecutionsinthecycleimmediatelypreceding,andthatitwasforthatreasontherewerefewercommitments。Thismightbesaidwithsomecolouroftruth,iftheexamplehadbeentakenfromtwosuccessivecyclesonly。Butwhenthecomparativeexamplesadducedareofnolessthanfivesuccessivecycles,andtheresultgraduallyandconstantlyprogressiveinthesamedirection,therelationoffactstoeachotherisdeterminedbeyondallgroundfordispute,namely,thatthenumberofthesecrimeshasdiminishedinconsequenceofthediminutionofthenumberofexecutions。Moreespeciallywhenitisalsorememberedthatitwasimmediatelyafterthefirstofthesecyclesoffiveyears,whentherehadbeenthegreatestnumberofexecutionsandthegreatestnumberofmurders,thatthegreatestnumberofpersonsweresuddenlycastlooseuponthecountry,withoutemploy,bythereductionoftheArmyandNavy;thatthencameperiodsofgreatdistressandgreatdisturbanceintheagriculturalandmanufacturingdistricts;andaboveall,thatitwasduringthesubsequentcyclesthatthemostimportantmitigationswereeffectedinthelaw,andthatthePunishmentofDeathwastakenawaynotonlyforcrimesofstealth,suchascattleandhorsestealingandforgery,ofwhichcrimescorrespondingstatisticsshowlikewiseacorrespondingdecrease,butforthecrimesofviolencetoo,tendingtomurder,suchasaremanyoftheincendiaryoffences,andsuchasarehighwayrobberyandburglary。Butanotherreturn,laidbeforetheHouseatthesametime,bearsuponourargument,ifpossible,stillmoreconclusively。Intable11wehaveonlytheyearswhichhaveoccurredsince1810,inwhichallpersonsconvictedofmurdersuffereddeath;and,comparedwiththeseanequalnumberofyearsinwhichthesmallestproportionofpersonsconvictedwereexecuted。

Inthefirstcasetherewere66personsconvicted,allofwhomunderwentthepenaltyofdeath;inthesecond83wereconvicted,ofwhom31onlywereexecuted。Nowseehowthesetwoverydifferentmethodsofdealingwiththecrimeofmurderaffectedthecommissionofitintheyearsimmediatelyfollowing。Thenumberofcommitmentsformurder,inthefouryearsimmediatelyfollowingthoseinwhichallpersonsconvictedwereexecuted,was270。

\"Inthefouryearsimmediatelyfollowingthoseinwhichlittlemorethanone—thirdofthepersonsconvictedwereexecuted,therewerebut222,being48less。Ifwecomparethecommitmentsinthefollowingyearswiththoseinthefirstyears,weshallfindthat,immediatelyaftertheexamplesofunsparingexecution,thecrimeincreasednearly13percent。,andthataftercommutationwasthepracticeandcapitalpunishmenttheexception,itdecreased17percent。

\"InthesameparliamentaryreturnisanaccountofthecommitmentsandexecutionsinLondonandMiddlesex,spreadoveraspaceof32

years,endingin1842,dividedintotwocyclesof16yearseach。Inthefirstofthese,34personswereconvictedofmurder,allofwhomwereexecuted。Inthesecond,27wereconvicted,andonly17

executed。Thecommitmentsformurderduringthelatterlongperiod,with17executions,weremorethanonehalffewerthantheyhadbeenintheformerlongperiodwithexactlydoublethenumberofexecutions。Thisappearstoustobeasconclusiveuponourargumentasanystatisticalillustrationcanbeuponanyargumentprofessingtoplacesuccessiveeventsintherelationofcauseandeffecttoeachother。Howjustlythenisitsaidinthatableandusefulperiodicalwork,nowinthecourseofpublicationatGlasgow,underthenameoftheMagazineofPopularInformationonCapitalandSecondaryPunishment,’thegreaterthenumberofexecutions,thegreaterthenumberofmurders;thesmallerthenumberofexecutions,thesmallerthenumberofmurders。ThelivesofherMajesty’ssubjectsarelesssafewithahundredexecutionsayearthanwithfifty;lesssafewithfiftythanwithtwenty—five。’\"