第1章

byThomasH。Huxley

NATURALHISTORYisthenamefamiliarlyappliedtothestudyofthepropertiesofsuchnaturalbodiesasminerals,plants,andanimals;thescienceswhichembodytheknowledgemanhasacquireduponthesesubjectsarecommonlytermedNaturalSciences,incontradistinctiontootherso—called\"physical\"sciences;andthosewhodevotethemselvesespeciallytothepursuitofsuchscienceshavebeenandarecommonlytermed\"Naturalists。\"

Linnaeuswasanaturalistinthiswidesense,andhis’SystemaNaturae’

wasaworkuponnaturalhistory,inthebroadestacceptationoftheterm;init,thatgreatmethodisingspiritembodiedallthatwasknowninhistimeofthedistinctivecharactersofminerals,animals,andplants。ButtheenormousstimuluswhichLinnaeusgavetotheinvestigationofnaturesoonrendereditimpossiblethatanyonemanshouldwriteanother’SystemaNaturae,’andextremelydifficultforanyonetobecomeevenanaturalistsuchasLinnaeuswas。

Greatashavebeentheadvancesmadebyallthethreebranchesofscience,ofoldincludedunderthetitleofnaturalhistory,therecanbenodoubtthatzoologyandbotanyhavegrowninanenormouslygreaterratiothanmineralogy;andhence,asIsuppose,thenameof\"naturalhistory\"hasgraduallybecomemoreandmoredefinitelyattachedtotheseprominentdivisionsofthesubject,andby\"naturalist\"peoplehavemeantmoreandmoredistinctlytoimplyastudentofthestructureandfunctionoflivingbeings。

Howeverthismaybe,itiscertainthattheadvanceofknowledgehasgraduallywidenedthedistancebetweenmineralogyanditsoldassociates,whileithasdrawnzoologyandbotanyclosertogether;sothatoflateyearsithasbeenfoundconvenient(andindeednecessary)

toassociatethescienceswhichdealwithvitalityandallitsphenomenaunderthecommonheadof\"biology\";andthebiologistshavecometorepudiateanyblood—relationshipwiththeirfoster—brothers,themineralogists。

Certainbroadlawshaveageneralapplicationthroughoutboththeanimalandthevegetableworlds,butthegroundcommontothesekingdomsofnatureisnotofverywideextent,andthemultiplicityofdetailsissogreat,thatthestudentoflivingbeingsfindshimselfobligedtodevotehisattentionexclusivelyeithertotheoneortheother。Ifheelectstostudyplants,underanyaspect,weknowatoncewhattocallhim。Heisabotanist,andhisscienceisbotany。Butiftheinvestigationofanimallifebehischoice,thenamegenerallyappliedtohimwillvaryaccordingtothekindofanimalshestudies,ortheparticularphenomenaofanimallifetowhichheconfineshisattention。Ifthestudyofmanishisobject,heiscalledananatomist,oraphysiologist,oranethnologist;butifhedissectsanimals,orexaminesintothemodeinwhichtheirfunctionsareperformed,heisacomparativeanatomistorcomparativephysiologist。

Ifheturnshisattentiontofossilanimals,heisapalaeontologist。

Ifhismindismoreparticularlydirectedtothespecificdescription,discrimination,classification,anddistributionofanimals,heistermedazoologist。

Forthepurposeofthepresentdiscourse,however,Ishallrecognisenoneofthesetitlessavethelast,whichIshallemployastheequivalentofbotanist,andIshallusethetermzoologyasdenotingthewholedoctrineofanimallife,incontradistinctiontobotany,whichsignifiesthewholedoctrineofvegetablelife。

Employedinthissense,zoology,likebotany,isdivisibleintothreegreatbutsubordinatesciences,morphology,physiology,anddistribution,eachofwhichmay,toaverygreatextent,bestudiedindependentlyoftheother。

Zoologicalmorphologyisthedoctrineofanimalformorstructure。

Anatomyisoneofitsbranches;developmentisanother;whileclassificationistheexpressionoftherelationswhichdifferentanimalsbeartooneanother,inrespectoftheiranatomyandtheirdevelopment。

Zoologicaldistributionisthestudyofanimalsinrelationtotheterrestrialconditionswhichobtainnow,orhaveobtainedatanypreviousepochoftheearth’shistory。

Zoologicalphysiology,lastly,isthedoctrineofthefunctionsoractionsofanimals。Itregardsanimalbodiesasmachinesimpelledbycertainforces,andperforminganamountofworkwhichcanbeexpressedintermsoftheordinaryforcesofnature。Thefinalobjectofphysiologyistodeducethefactsofmorphology,ontheonehand,andthoseofdistributionontheother,fromthelawsofthemolecularforcesofmatter。

Suchisthescopeofzoology。ButifIweretocontentmyselfwiththeenunciationofthesedrydefinitions,Ishouldillexemplifythatmethodofteachingthisbranchofphysicalscience,whichitismychiefbusinessto—nighttorecommend。Letusturnawaythenfromabstractdefinitions。Letustakesomeconcretelivingthing,someanimal,thecommonerthebetter,andletusseehowtheapplicationofcommonsenseandcommonlogictotheobviousfactsitpresents,inevitablyleadsusintoallthesebranchesofzoologicalscience。

Ihavebeforemealobster。WhenIexamineit,whatappearstobethemoststrikingcharacteritpresents?Why,Iobservethatthispartwhichwecallthetailofthelobster,ismadeupofsixdistincthardringsandaseventhterminalpiece。IfIseparateoneofthemiddlerings,saythethird,Ifinditcarriesuponitsundersurfaceapairoflimbsorappendages,eachofwhichconsistsofastalkandtwoterminalpieces。SothatIcanrepresentatransversesectionoftheringanditsappendagesuponthediagramboardinthisway。

IfInowtakethefourthring,Ifindithasthesamestructure,andsohavethefifthandthesecond;sothat,ineachofthesedivisionsofthetail,Ifindpartswhichcorrespondwithoneanother,aringandtwoappendages;andineachappendageastalkandtwoendpieces。

Thesecorrespondingpartsarecalled,inthetechnicallanguageofanatomy,\"homologousparts。\"Theringofthethirddivisionisthe\"homologue\"oftheringofthefifth,theappendageoftheformeristhehomologueoftheappendageofthelatter。And,aseachdivisionexhibitscorrespondingpartsincorrespondingplaces,wesaythatallthedivisionsareconstructeduponthesameplan。Butnowletusconsiderthesixthdivision。Itissimilarto,andyetdifferentfrom,theothers。Theringisessentiallythesameasintheotherdivisions;

buttheappendageslookatfirstasiftheywereverydifferent;andyetwhenweregardthemclosely,whatdowefind?Astalkandtwoterminaldivisions,exactlyasintheothers,butthestalkisveryshortandverythick,theterminaldivisionsareverybroadandflat,andoneofthemisdividedintotwopieces。

Imaysay,therefore,thatthesixthsegmentisliketheothersinplan,butthatitismodifiedinitsdetails。

Thefirstsegmentisliketheothers,sofarasitsringisconcerned,andthoughitsappendagesdifferfromanyofthoseyetexaminedinthesimplicityoftheirstructure,partscorrespondingwiththestemandoneofthedivisionsoftheappendagesoftheothersegmentscanbereadilydiscernedinthem。

Thusitappearsthatthelobster’stailiscomposedofaseriesofsegmentswhicharefundamentallysimilar,thougheachpresentspeculiarmodificationsoftheplancommontoall。ButwhenIturntotheforepartofthebodyIsee,atfirst,nothingbutagreatshield—likeshell,calledtechnicallythe\"carapace,\"endinginfrontinasharpspine,oneithersideofwhicharethecuriouscompoundeyes,setupontheendsofstoutmovablestalks。Behindthese,ontheundersideofthebody,aretwopairsoflongfeelers,orantennae,followedbysixpairsofjawsfoldedagainstoneanotheroverthemouth,andfivepairsoflegs,theforemostofthesebeingthegreatpinchers,orclaws,ofthelobster。

Itlooks,atfirst,alittlehopelesstoattempttofindinthiscomplexmassaseriesofrings,eachwithitspairofappendages,suchasI

haveshownyouintheabdomen,andyetitisnotdifficulttodemonstratetheirexistence。Stripoffthelegs,andyouwillfindthateachpairisattachedtoaverydefinitesegmentoftheunderwallofthebody;butthesesegments,insteadofbeingthelowerpartsoffreerings,asinthetail,aresuchpartsofringswhichareallsolidlyunitedandboundtogether;andthelikeistrueofthejaws,thefeelers,andtheeye—stalks,everypairofwhichisborneuponitsownspecialsegment。Thustheconclusionisgraduallyforceduponus,thatthebodyofthelobsteriscomposedofasmanyringsastherearepairsofappendages,namely,twentyinall,butthatthesixhindmostringsremainfreeandmovable,whilethefourteenfrontringsbecomefirmlysolderedtogether,theirbacksformingonecontinuousshield——thecarapace。

Unityofplan,diversityinexecution,isthelessontaughtbythestudyoftheringsofthebody,andthesameinstructionisgivenstillmoreemphaticallybytheappendages。IfIexaminetheoutermostjawIfinditconsistsofthreedistinctportions,aninner,amiddle,andanouter,mounteduponacommonstem;andifIcomparethisjawwiththelegsbehindit,orthejawsinfrontofit,Ifinditquiteeasytosee,that,inthelegs,itisthepartoftheappendagewhichcorrespondswiththeinnerdivision,whichbecomesmodifiedintowhatweknowfamiliarlyasthe\"leg,\"whilethemiddledivisiondisappears,andtheouterdivisionishiddenunderthecarapace。Norisitmoredifficulttodiscernthat,intheappendagesofthetail,themiddledivisionappearsagainandtheoutervanishes;while,ontheotherhand,intheforemostjaw,theso—calledmandible,theinnerdivisiononlyisleft;and,inthesameway,thepartsofthefeelersandoftheeye—stalkscanbeidentifiedwiththoseofthelegsandjaws。

Butwhitherdoesallthistend?Totheveryremarkableconclusionthataunityofplan,ofthesamekindasthatdiscoverableinthetailorabdomenofthelobster,pervadesthewholeorganizationofitsskeleton,sothatIcanreturntothediagramrepresentinganyoneoftheringsofthetail,whichIdrewupontheboard,andbyaddingathirddivisiontoeachappendage,Icanuseitasasortofschemeorplanofanyringofthebody。Icangivenamestoallthepartsofthatfigure,andthenifItakeanysegmentofthebodyofthelobster,Icanpointouttoyouexactly,whatmodificationthegeneralplanhasundergoneinthatparticularsegment;whatparthasremainedmovable,andwhathasbecomefixedtoanother;whathasbeenexcessivelydevelopedandmetamorphosedandwhathasbeensuppressed。

ButIimagineIhearthequestion,Howisallthistobetested?Nodoubtitisaprettyandingeniouswayoflookingatthestructureofanyanimal;butisitanythingmore?DoesNatureacknowledge,inanydeeperway,thisunityofplanweseemtotrace?

Theobjectionsuggestedbythesequestionsisaveryvalidandimportantone,andmorphologywasinanunsoundstatesolongasitresteduponthemereperceptionoftheanalogieswhichobtainbetweenfullyformedparts。Theuncheckedingenuityofspeculativeanatomistsproveditselffullycompetenttospinanynumberofcontradictoryhypothesesoutofthesamefacts,andendlessmorphologicaldreamsthreatenedtosupplantscientifictheory。

Happily,however,thereisacriterionofmorphologicaltruth,andasuretestofallhomologies。Ourlobsterhasnotalwaysbeenwhatweseeit;itwasonceanegg,asemifluidmassofyolk,notsobigasapin’shead,containedinatransparentmembrane,andexhibitingnottheleasttraceofanyoneofthoseorgans,whosemultiplicityandcomplexity,intheadult,aresosurprising。Afteratimeadelicatepatchofcellularmembraneappearedupononefaceofthisyolk,andthatpatchwasthefoundationofthewholecreature,theclayoutofwhichitwouldbemoulded。Graduallyinvestingtheyolk,itbecamesubdividedbytransverseconstrictionsintosegments,theforerunnersoftheringsofthebody。Upontheventralsurfaceofeachoftheringsthussketchedout,apairofbud—likeprominencesmadetheirappearance——therudimentsoftheappendagesofthering。Atfirst,alltheappendageswerealike,but,astheygrew,mostofthembecamedistinguishedintoastemandtwoterminaldivisions,towhichinthemiddlepartofthebody,wasaddedathirdouterdivision;anditwasonlyatalaterperiod,thatbythemodification,orabsorption,ofcertainoftheseprimitiveconstituents,thelimbsacquiredtheirperfectform。

Thusthestudyofdevelopmentprovesthatthedoctrineofunityofplanisnotmerelyafancy,thatitisnotmerelyonewayoflookingatthematter,butthatitistheexpressionofdeep—seatednaturalfacts。Thelegsandjawsofthelobstermaynotmerelyberegardedasmodificationsofacommontype,——infactandinnaturetheyareso,——thelegandthejawoftheyounganimalbeing,atfirst,indistinguishable。

Thesearewonderfultruths,themoresobecausethezoologistfindsthemtobeofuniversalapplication。Theinvestigationofapolype,ofasnail,ofafish,ofahorse,orofaman,wouldhaveledus,thoughbyalesseasypath,perhaps,toexactlythesamepoint。Unityofplaneverywherelieshiddenunderthemaskofdiversityofstructure——thecomplexiseverywhereevolvedoutofthesimple。Everyanimalhasatfirsttheformofanegg,andeveryanimalandeveryorganicpart,inreachingitsadultstate,passesthroughconditionscommontootheranimalsandotheradultparts;andthisleadsmetoanotherpoint。I

havehithertospokenasifthelobsterwerealoneintheworld,but,asIneedhardlyremindyou,therearemyriadsofotheranimalorganisms。

Ofthese,some,suchasmen,horses,birds,fishes,snails,slugs,oysters,corals,andsponges,arenotintheleastlikethelobster。

Butotheranimals,thoughtheymaydifferagooddealfromthelobster,areyeteitherverylikeit,orarelikesomethingthatislikeit。Thecrayfish,therocklobster,andtheprawn,andtheshrimp,forexample,howeverdifferent,areyetsolikelobsters,thatachildwouldgroupthemasofthelobsterkind,incontradistinctiontosnailsandslugs;andtheselastagainwouldformakindbythemselves,incontradistinctiontocows,horses,andsheep,thecattlekind。

Butthisspontaneousgroupinginto\"kinds\"isthefirstessayofthehumanmindatclassification,orthecallingbyacommonnameofthosethingsthatarealike,andthearrangingtheminsuchamannerasbesttosuggestthesumoftheirlikenessesandunlikenessestootherthings。

Thosekindswhichincludenoothersubdivisionsthanthesexes,orvariousbreeds,arecalled,intechnicallanguage,species。TheEnglishlobsterisaspecies,ourcrayfishisanother,ourprawnisanother。Inothercountries,however,therearelobsters,crayfish,andprawns,verylikeours,andyetpresentingsufficientdifferencestodeservedistinction。Naturalists,therefore,expressthisresemblanceandthisdiversitybygroupingthemasdistinctspeciesofthesame\"genus。\"Butthelobsterandthecrayfish,thoughbelongingtodistinctgenera,havemanyfeaturesincommon,andhencearegroupedtogetherinanassemblagewhichiscalledafamily。Moredistantresemblancesconnectthelobsterwiththeprawnandthecrab,whichareexpressedbyputtingalltheseintothesameorder。Again,moreremote,butstillverydefinite,resemblancesunitethelobsterwiththewoodlouse,thekingcrab,thewaterflea,andthebarnacle,andseparatethemfromallotheranimals;whencetheycollectivelyconstitutethelargergroup,orclass,’Crustacea’。Butthe’Crustacea’exhibitmanypeculiarfeaturesincommonwithinsects,spiders,andcentipedes,sothatthesearegroupedintothestilllargerassemblageor\"province\"’Articulata’;and,finally,therelationswhichthesehavetowormsandotherloweranimals,areexpressedbycombiningthewholevastaggregateintothesub—kingdomof’Annulosa’。

IfIhadworkedmywayfromaspongeinsteadofalobster,Ishouldhavefounditassociated,byliketies,withagreatnumberofotheranimalsintothesub—kingdom’Protozoa’;ifIhadselectedafresh—waterpolypeoracoral,themembersofwhatnaturaliststermthesub—kingdom’Coelenterata’,wouldhavegroupedthemselvesaroundmytype;hadasnailbeenchosen,theinhabitantsofallunivalveandbivalve,landandwater,shells,thelampshells,thesquids,andthesea—matwouldhavegraduallylinkedthemselvesontoitasmembersofthesamesub—kingdomof’Mollusca’;andfinally,startingfromman,Ishouldhavebeencompelledtoadmitfirst,theape,therat,thehorse,thedog,intothesameclass;andthenthebird,thecrocodile,theturtle,thefrog,andthefish,intothesamesub—kingdomof’Vertebrata’。

AndifIhadfollowedoutallthesevariouslinesofclassificationfully,Ishoulddiscoverintheendthattherewasnoanimal,eitherrecentorfossil,whichdidnotatoncefallintooneorotherofthesesub—kingdoms。Inotherwords,everyanimalisorganizedupononeorotherofthefive,ormore,plans,whoseexistencerendersourclassificationpossible。Andsodefinitelyandpreciselymarkedisthestructureofeachanimal,that,inthepresentstateofourknowledge,thereisnottheleastevidencetoprovethataform,intheslightestdegreetransitionalbetweenanyofthetwogroups’Vertebrata’,’Annulosa’,’Mollusca’,and’Coelenterata’,eitherexists,orhasexisted,duringthatperiodoftheearth’shistorywhichisrecordedbythegeologist。Nevertheless,youmustnotforamomentsuppose,becausenosuchtransitionalformsareknown,thatthemembersofthesub—kingdomsaredisconnectedfrom,orindependentof,oneanother。Onthecontrary,intheirearliestconditiontheyareallalike,andtheprimordialgermsofaman,adog,abird,afish,abeetle,asnail,andapolypeare,innoessentialstructuralrespects,distinguishable。

Inthisbroadsense,itmaywithtruthbesaid,thatalllivinganimals,andallthosedeadcreationswhichgeologyreveals,areboundtogetherbyanall—pervadingunityoforganization,ofthesamecharacter,thoughnotequalindegree,tothatwhichenablesustodiscernoneandthesameplanamidstthetwentydifferentsegmentsofalobster’sbody。

Trulyithasbeensaid,thattoacleareyethesmallestfactisawindowthroughwhichtheInfinitemaybeseen。

Turningfromthesepurelymorphologicalconsiderations,letusnowexamineintothemannerinwhichtheattentivestudyofthelobsterimpelsusintootherlinesofresearch。

LobstersarefoundinalltheEuropeanseas;butontheoppositeshoresoftheAtlanticandintheseasofthesouthernhemispheretheydonotexist。Theyare,however,representedintheseregionsbyverycloselyallied,butdistinctforms——the’HomarusAmericanus’andthe’HomarusCapensis’:sothatwemaysaythattheEuropeanhasonespeciesof’Homarus’;theAmerican,another;theAfrican,another;andthustheremarkablefactsofgeographicaldistributionbegintodawnuponus。

Again,ifweexaminethecontentsoftheearth’scrust,weshallfindinthelatterofthosedeposits,whichhaveservedasthegreatburyinggroundsofpastages,numberlesslobster—likeanimals,butnonesosimilartoourlivinglobsterastomakezoologistssurethattheybelongedeventothesamegenus。Ifwegostillfurtherbackintime,wediscover,intheoldestrocksofall,theremainsofanimals,constructedonthesamegeneralplanasthelobster,andbelongingtothesamegreatgroupof’Crustacea’;butforthemostparttotallydifferentfromthelobster,andindeedfromanyotherlivingformofcrustacean;andthuswegainanotionofthatsuccessivechangeoftheanimalpopulationoftheglobe,inpastages,whichisthemoststrikingfactrevealedbygeology。

Consider,now,whereourinquirieshaveledus。Westudiedourtypemorphologically,whenwedetermineditsanatomyanditsdevelopment,andwhencomparingit,intheserespects,withotheranimals,wemadeoutitsplaceinasystemofclassification。Ifweweretoexamineeveryanimalinasimilarmanner,weshouldestablishacompletebodyofzoologicalmorphology。

Again,weinvestigatedthedistributionofourtypeinspaceandintime,and,ifthelikehadbeendonewitheveryanimal,thesciencesofgeographicalandgeologicaldistributionwouldhaveattainedtheirlimit。

Butyouwillobserveoneremarkablecircumstance,that,uptothispoint,thequestionofthelifeoftheseorganismshasnotcomeunderconsideration。Morphologyanddistributionmightbestudiedalmostaswell,ifanimalsandplantswereapeculiarkindofcrystals,andpossessednoneofthosefunctionswhichdistinguishlivingbeingssoremarkably。Butthefactsofmorphologyanddistributionhavetobeaccountedfor,andthescience,whoseaimitistoaccountforthem,isPhysiology。

Letusreturntoourlobsteroncemore。Ifwewatchedthecreatureinitsnativeelement,weshouldseeitclimbingactivelythesubmergedrocks,amongwhichitdelightstolive,bymeansofitsstronglegs;orswimmingbypowerfulstrokesofitsgreattail,theappendagesofwhosesixthjointarespreadoutintoabroadfan—likepropeller:seizeit,anditwillshowyouthatitsgreatclawsarenomeanweaponsofoffence;suspendapieceofcarrionamongitshaunts,anditwillgreedilydevourit,tearingandcrushingthefleshbymeansofitsmultitudinousjaws。

Supposethatwehadknownnothingofthelobsterbutasaninertmass,anorganiccrystal,ifImayusethephrase,andthatwecouldsuddenlyseeitexertingallthesepowers,whatwonderfulnewideasandnewquestionswouldariseinourminds!Thegreatnewquestionwouldbe,\"Howdoesallthistakeplace?\"thechiefnewideawouldbe,theideaofadaptationtopurpose,——thenotion,thattheconstituentsofanimalbodiesarenotmereunconnectedparts,butorgansworkingtogethertoanend。Letusconsiderthetailofthelobsteragainfromthispointofview。Morphologyhastaughtusthatitisaseriesofsegmentscomposedofhomologousparts,whichundergovariousmodifications——beneathandthroughwhichacommonplanofformationisdiscernible。ButifIlookatthesamepartphysiologically,Iseethatitisamostbeautifullyconstructedorganoflocomotion,bymeansofwhichtheanimalcanswiftlypropelitselfeitherbackwardsorforwards。

Buthowisthisremarkablepropulsivemachinemadetoperformitsfunctions?IfIweresuddenlytokilloneoftheseanimalsandtotakeoutallthesoftparts,Ishouldfindtheshelltobeperfectlyinert,tohavenomorepowerofmovingitselfthanispossessedbythemachineryofamillwhendisconnectedfromitssteam—engineorwater—wheel。ButifIweretoopenit,andtakeoutthevisceraonly,leavingthewhiteflesh,Ishouldperceivethatthelobstercouldbendandextenditstailaswellasbefore。IfIweretocutoffthetail,I

shouldceasetofindanyspontaneousmotioninit;butonpinchinganyportionoftheflesh,Ishouldobservethatitunderwentaverycuriouschange——eachfibrebecomingshorterandthicker。Bythisactofcontraction,asitistermed,thepartstowhichtheendsofthefibreareattachedare,ofcourse,approximated;andaccordingtotherelationsoftheirpointsofattachmenttothecentresofmotionsofthedifferentrings,thebendingortheextensionofthetailresults。

Closeobservationofthenewly—openedlobsterwouldsoonshowthatallitsmovementsareduetothesamecause——theshorteningandthickeningofthesefleshyfibres,whicharetechnicallycalledmuscles。

Here,then,isacapitalfact。Themovementsofthelobsterareduetomuscularcontractility。Butwhydoesamusclecontractatonetimeandnotatanother?Whydoesonewholegroupofmusclescontractwhenthelobsterwishestoextendhistail,andanothergroupwhenhedesirestobendit?Whatisitoriginates,directs,andcontrolsthemotivepower?

Experiment,thegreatinstrumentfortheascertainmentoftruthinphysicalscience,answersthisquestionforus。Intheheadofthelobsterthereliesasmallmassofthatpeculiartissuewhichisknownasnervoussubstance。Cordsofsimilarmatterconnectthisbrainofthelobster,directlyorindirectly,withthemuscles。Now,ifthesecommunicatingcordsarecut,thebrainremainingentire,thepowerofexertingwhatwecallvoluntarymotioninthepartsbelowthesectionisdestroyed;andontheotherhand,if,thecordsremainingentire,thebrainmassbedestroyed,thesamevoluntarymobilityisequallylost。

Whencetheinevitableconclusionis,thatthepoweroforiginatingthesemotionsresidesinthebrain,andispropagatedalongthenervouscords。

Inthehigheranimalsthephenomenawhichattendthistransmissionhavebeeninvestigated,andtheexertionofthepeculiarenergywhichresidesinthenerveshasbeenfoundtobeaccompaniedbyadisturbanceoftheelectricalstateoftheirmolecules。

Ifwecouldexactlyestimatethesignificationofthisdisturbance;ifwecouldobtainthevalueofagivenexertionofnerveforcebydeterminingthequantityofelectricity,orofheat,ofwhichitistheequivalent;ifwecouldascertainuponwhatarrangement,orotherconditionofthemoleculesofmatter,themanifestationofthenervousandmuscularenergiesdepends(anddoubtlesssciencewillsomedayorotherascertainthesepoints),physiologistswouldhaveattainedtheirultimategoalinthisdirection;theywouldhavedeterminedtherelationofthemotiveforceofanimalstotheotherformsofforcefoundinnature;andifthesameprocesshadbeensuccessfullyperformedforalltheoperationswhicharecarriedonin,andby,theanimalframe,physiologywouldbeperfect,andthefactsofmorphologyanddistributionwouldbededuciblefromthelawswhichphysiologistshadestablished,combinedwiththosedeterminingtheconditionofthesurroundinguniverse。

ThereisnotafragmentoftheorganismofthishumbleanimalwhosestudywouldnotleadusintoregionsofthoughtaslargeasthosewhichIhavebrieflyopeneduptoyou;butwhatIhavebeensaying,Itrust,hasnotonlyenabledyoutoformaconceptionofthescopeandpurportofzoology,buthasgivenyouanimperfectexampleofthemannerinwhich,inmyopinion,thatscience,orindeedanyphysicalscience,maybebesttaught。Thegreatmatteris,tomaketeachingrealandpractical,byfixingtheattentionofthestudentonparticularfacts;

butatthesametimeitshouldberenderedbroadandcomprehensive,byconstantreferencetothegeneralizationsofwhichallparticularfactsareillustrations。Thelobsterhasservedasatypeofthewholeanimalkingdom,anditsanatomyandphysiologyhaveillustratedforussomeofthegreatesttruthsofbiology。ThestudentwhohasonceseenforhimselfthefactswhichIhavedescribed,hashadtheirrelationsexplainedtohim,andhasclearlycomprehendedthem,has,sofar,aknowledgeofzoology,whichisrealandgenuine,howeverlimiteditmaybe,andwhichisworthmorethanallthemerereadingknowledgeofthesciencehecouldeveracquire。Hiszoologicalinformationis,sofar,knowledgeandnotmerehear—say。

Andifitweremybusinesstofityouforthecertificateinzoologicalsciencegrantedbythisdepartment,IshouldpursueacoursepreciselysimilarinprincipletothatwhichIhavetakento—night。Ishouldselectafresh—watersponge,afresh—waterpolypeora’Cyanaea’,afresh—watermussel,alobster,afowl,astypesofthefiveprimarydivisionsoftheanimalkingdom。Ishouldexplaintheirstructureveryfully,andshowhoweachillustratedthegreatprinciplesofzoology。

Havinggoneverycarefullyandfullyoverthisground,Ishouldfeelthatyouhadasafefoundation,andIshouldthentakeyouinthesameway,butlessminutely,oversimilarlyselectedillustrativetypesoftheclasses;andthenIshoulddirectyourattentiontothespecialformsenumeratedundertheheadoftypes,inthissyllabus,andtotheotherfactstherementioned。

Thatwould,speakinggenerally,bemyplan。ButIhaveundertakentoexplaintoyouthebestmodeofacquiringandcommunicatingaknowledgeofzoology,andyoumaythereforefairlyaskmeforamoredetailedandpreciseaccountofthemannerinwhichIshouldproposetofurnishyouwiththeinformationIreferto。

Myownimpressionis,thatthebestmodelforallkindsoftraininginphysicalscienceisthataffordedbythemethodofteachinganatomy,inuseinthemedicalschools。Thismethodconsistsofthreeelements——lectures,demonstrations,andexaminations。

Theobjectoflecturesis,inthefirstplace,toawakentheattentionandexcitetheenthusiasmofthestudent;andthis,Iamsure,maybeeffectedtoafargreaterextentbytheoraldiscourseandbythepersonalinfluenceofarespectedteacherthaninanyotherway。

Secondly,lectureshavethedoubleuseofguidingthestudenttothesalientpointsofasubject,andatthesametimeforcinghimtoattendtothewholeofit,andnotmerelytothatpartwhichtakeshisfancy。

Andlastly,lecturesaffordthestudenttheopportunityofseekingexplanationsofthosedifficultieswhichwill,andindeedoughtto,ariseinthecourseofhisstudies。

Butforastudenttoderivetheutmostpossiblevaluefromlectures,severalprecautionsareneedful。

Ihaveastrongimpressionthatthebetteradiscourseis,asanoration,theworseitisasalecture。Theflowofthediscoursecarriesyouonwithoutproperattentiontoitssense;youdropawordoraphrase,youlosetheexactmeaningforamoment,andwhileyoustrivetorecoveryourself,thespeakerhaspassedontosomethingelse。

ThepracticeIhaveadoptedoflateyears,inlecturingtostudents,istocondensethesubstanceofthehour’sdiscourseintoafewdrypropositions,whicharereadslowlyandtakendownfromdictation;thereadingofeachbeingfollowedbyafreecommentaryexpandingandillustratingtheproposition,explainingterms,andremovinganydifficultiesthatmaybeattackableinthatway,bydiagramsmaderoughly,andseentogrowunderthelecturer’shand。Inthismanneryou,atanyrate,insuretheco—operationofthestudenttoacertainextent。Hecannotleavethelecture—roomentirelyemptyifthetakingofnotesisenforced;andastudentmustbepreternaturallydullandmechanical,ifhecantakenotesandhearthemproperlyexplained,andyetlearnnothing。

WhatbooksshallIread?isaquestionconstantlyputbythestudenttotheteacher。Myreplyusuallyis,\"None:writeyournotesoutcarefullyandfully;strivetounderstandthemthoroughly;cometomefortheexplanationofanythingyoucannotunderstand;andIwouldratheryoudidnotdistractyourmindbyreading。\"Aproperlycomposedcourseoflecturesoughttocontainfullyasmuchmatterasastudentcanassimilateinthetimeoccupiedbyitsdelivery;andtheteachershouldalwaysrecollectthathisbusinessistofeed,andnottocramtheintellect。Indeed,Ibelievethatastudentwhogainsfromacourseoflecturesthesimplehabitofconcentratinghisattentionuponadefinitelylimitedseriesoffacts,untiltheyarethoroughlymastered,hasmadeastepofimmeasurableimportance。

But,howevergoodlecturesmaybe,andhoweverextensivethecourseofreadingbywhichtheyarefollowedup,theyarebutaccessoriestothegreatinstrumentofscientificteaching——demonstration。IfIinsistunweariedly,nayfanatically,upontheimportanceofphysicalscienceasaneducationalagent,itisbecausethestudyofanybranchofscience,ifproperlyconducted,appearstometofillupavoidleftbyallothermeansofeducation。Ihavethegreatestrespectandloveforliterature;nothingwouldgrievememorethantoseeliterarytrainingotherthanaveryprominentbranchofeducation:indeed,Iwishthatrealliterarydisciplinewerefarmoreattendedtothanitis;butI

cannotshutmyeyestothefact,thatthereisavastdifferencebetweenmenwhohavehadapurelyliterary,andthosewhohavehadasoundscientific,training。

Seekingforthecauseofthisdifference,IimagineIcanfinditinthefactthat,intheworldofletters,learningandknowledgeareone,andbooksarethesourceofboth;whereasinscience,asinlife,learningandknowledgearedistinct,andthestudyofthings,andnotofbooks,isthesourceofthelatter。

Allthatliteraturehastobestowmaybeobtainedbyreadingandbypracticalexerciseinwritingandinspeaking;butIdonotexaggeratewhenIsay,thatnoneofthebestgiftsofsciencearetobewonbythesemeans。Onthecontrary,thegreatbenefitwhichascientificeducationbestows,whetherastrainingorasknowledge,isdependentupontheextenttowhichthemindofthestudentisbroughtintoimmediatecontactwithfacts——uponthedegreetowhichhelearnsthehabitofappealingdirectlytoNature,andofacquiringthroughhissensesconcreteimagesofthosepropertiesofthings,whichare,andalwayswillbe,butapproximativelyexpressedinhumanlanguage。OurwayoflookingatNature,andofspeakingabouther,variesfromyeartoyear;butafactonceseen,arelationofcauseandeffect,oncedemonstrativelyapprehended,arepossessionswhichneitherchangenorpassaway,but,onthecontrary,formfixedcentres,aboutwhichothertruthsaggregatebynaturalaffinity。

Therefore,thegreatbusinessofthescientificteacheris,toimprintthefundamental,irrefragablefactsofhisscience,notonlybywordsuponthemind,butbysensibleimpressionsupontheeye,andear,andtouchofthestudent,insocompleteamanner,thateverytermused,orlawenunciated,shouldafterwardscallupvividimagesoftheparticularstructural,orother,factswhichfurnishedthedemonstrationofthelaw,ortheillustrationoftheterm。

Nowthisimportantoperationcanonlybeachievedbyconstantdemonstration,whichmaytakeplacetoacertainimperfectextentduringalecture,butwhichoughtalsotobecarriedonindependently,andwhichshouldbeaddressedtoeachindividualstudent,theteacherendeavouring,notsomuchtoshowathingtothelearner,astomakehimseeitforhimself。

Iamwellawarethattherearegreatpracticaldifficultiesinthewayofeffectualzoologicaldemonstrations。Thedissectionofanimalsisnotaltogetherpleasant,andrequiresmuchtime;norisiteasytosecureanadequatesupplyoftheneedfulspecimens。Thebotanisthashereagreatadvantage;hisspecimensareeasilyobtained,arecleanandwholesome,andcanbedissectedinaprivatehouseaswellasanywhereelse;andhence,Ibelieve,thefact,thatbotanyissomuchmorereadilyandbettertaughtthanitssisterscience。But,beitdifficultorbeiteasy,ifzoologicalscienceistobeproperlystudied,demonstration,and,consequently,dissection,mustbehad。

Withoutit,nomancanhaveareallysoundknowledgeofanimalorganization。

Agooddealmaybedone,however,withoutactualdissectiononthestudent’spart,bydemonstrationuponspecimensandpreparations;andinallprobabilityitwouldnotbeverydifficult,werethedemandsufficient,toorganizecollectionsofsuchobjects,sufficientforallthepurposesofelementaryteaching,atacomparativelycheaprate。

Evenwithoutthese,muchmightbeeffected,ifthezoologicalcollections,whichareopentothepublic,werearrangedaccordingtowhathasbeentermedthe\"typicalprinciple\";thatistosay,ifthespecimensexposedtopublicviewweresoselectedthatthepubliccouldlearnsomethingfromthem,insteadofbeing,asatpresent,merelyconfusedbytheirmultiplicity。Forexample,thegrandornithologicalgalleryattheBritishMuseumcontainsbetweentwoandthreethousandspeciesofbirds,andsometimesfiveorsixspecimensofaspecies。

Theyareveryprettytolookat,andsomeofthecasesare,indeed,splendid;butIwillundertaketosay,thatnomanbutaprofessedornithologisthasevergatheredmuchinformationfromthecollection。

Certainly,nooneofthetensofthousandsofthegeneralpublicwhohavewalkedthroughthatgalleryeverknewmoreabouttheessentialpeculiaritiesofbirdswhenheleftthegallerythanwhenheenteredit。Butif,somewhereinthatvasthall,therewereafewpreparations,exemplifyingtheleadingstructuralpeculiaritiesandthemodeofdevelopmentofacommonfowl;ifthetypesofthegenera,theleadingmodificationsintheskeleton,intheplumageatvariousages,inthemodeofnidification,andthelike,amongbirds,weredisplayed;andiftheotherspecimenswereputawayinaplacewherethemenofscience,towhomtheyarealoneuseful,couldhavefreeaccesstothem,Icanconceivethatthiscollectionmightbecomeagreatinstrumentofscientificeducation。

ThelastimplementoftheteachertowhichIhaveadvertedisexamination——ameansofeducationnowsothoroughlyunderstoodthatI

needhardlyenlargeuponit。Iholdthatbothwrittenandoralexaminationsareindispensable,and,byrequiringthedescriptionofspecimens,theymaybemadetosupplementdemonstration。

Suchisthefullestreplythetimeatmydisposalwillallowmetogivetothequestion——howmayaknowledgeofzoologybebestacquiredandcommunicated?

Butthereisapreviousquestionwhichmaybemoved,andwhich,infact,Iknowmanyareinclinedtomove。Itisthequestion,whyshouldtrainingmastersbeencouragedtoacquireaknowledgeofthis,oranyotherbranchofphysicalscience?Whatistheuse,itissaid,ofattemptingtomakephysicalscienceabranchofprimaryeducation?Isitnotprobablethatteachers,inpursuingsuchstudies,willbeledastrayfromtheacquirementofmoreimportantbutlessattractiveknowledge?And,eveniftheycanlearnsomethingofsciencewithoutprejudicetotheirusefulness,whatisthegoodoftheirattemptingtoinstilthatknowledgeintoboyswhoserealbusinessistheacquisitionofreading,writing,andarithmetic?

Thesequestionsare,andwillbe,verycommonlyasked,fortheyarisefromthatprofoundignoranceofthevalueandtruepositionofphysicalscience,whichinfeststhemindsofthemosthighlyeducatedandintelligentclassesofthecommunity。ButifIdidnotfeelwellassuredthattheyarecapableofbeingeasilyandsatisfactorilyanswered;thattheyhavebeenansweredoverandoveragain;andthatthetimewillcomewhenmenofliberaleducationwillblushtoraisesuchquestions,——Ishouldbeashamedofmypositionhereto—night。

Withoutdoubt,itisyourgreatandveryimportantfunctiontocarryoutelementaryeducation;withoutquestion,anythingthatshouldinterferewiththefaithfulfulfilmentofthatdutyonyourpartwouldbeagreatevil;andifIthoughtthatyouracquirementoftheelementsofphysicalscience,andyourcommunicationofthoseelementstoyourpupils,involvedanysortofinterferencewithyourproperduties,I

shouldbethefirstpersontoprotestagainstyourbeingencouragedtodoanythingofthekind。

Butisittruethattheacquisitionofsuchaknowledgeofscienceasisproposed,andthecommunicationofthatknowledge,arecalculatedtoweakenyourusefulness?OrmayInotratherask,isitpossibleforyoutodischargeyourfunctionsproperlywithouttheseaids?

Whatisthepurposeofprimaryintellectualeducation?Iapprehendthatitsfirstobjectistotraintheyoungintheuseofthosetoolswherewithmenextractknowledgefromtheever—shiftingsuccessionofphenomenawhichpassbeforetheireyes;andthatitssecondobjectistoinformthemofthefundamentallawswhichhavebeenfoundbyexperiencetogovernthecourseofthings,sothattheymaynotbeturnedoutintotheworldnaked,defenceless,andapreytotheeventstheymightcontrol。

Aboyistaughttoreadhisownandotherlanguages,inorderthathemayhaveaccesstoinfinitelywiderstoresofknowledgethancouldeverbeopenedtohimbyoralintercoursewithhisfellowmen;helearnstowrite,thathismeansofcommunicationwiththerestofmankindmaybeindefinitelyenlarged,andthathemayrecordandstoreuptheknowledgeheacquires。Heistaughtelementarymathematics,thathemayunderstandallthoserelationsofnumberandform,uponwhichthetransactionsofmen,associatedincomplicatedsocieties,arebuilt,andthathemayhavesomepracticeindeductivereasoning。

Alltheseoperationsofreading,writing,andciphering,areintellectualtools,whoseuseshould,beforeallthings,belearned,andlearnedthoroughly;sothattheyouthmaybeenabledtomakehislifethatwhichitoughttobe,acontinualprogressinlearningandinwisdom。

But,inaddition,primaryeducationendeavourstofitaboyoutwithacertainequipmentofpositiveknowledge。Heistaughtthegreatlawsofmorality;thereligionofhissect;somuchhistoryandgeographyaswilltellhimwherethegreatcountriesoftheworldare,whattheyare,andhowtheyhavebecomewhattheyare。

Withoutdoubtallthesearemostfittingandexcellentthingstoteachaboy;Ishouldbeverysorrytoomitanyofthemfromanyschemeofprimaryintellectualeducation。Thesystemisexcellent,sofarasitgoes。

ButifIregarditclosely,acuriousreflectionarises。Isupposethat,fifteenhundredyearsago,thechildofanywell—to—doRomancitizenwastaughtjustthesesamethings;readingandwritinginhisown,and,perhaps,theGreektongue;theelementsofmathematics;andthereligion,morality,history,andgeographycurrentinhistime。

Furthermore,IdonotthinkIerrinaffirming,that,ifsuchaChristianRomanboy,whohadfinishedhiseducation,couldbetransplantedintooneofourpublicschools,andpassthroughitscourseofinstruction,hewouldnotmeetwithasingleunfamiliarlineofthought;amidstallthenewfactshewouldhavetolearn,notonewouldsuggestadifferentmodeofregardingtheuniversefromthatcurrentinhisowntime。

Andyetsurelythereissomegreatdifferencebetweenthecivilizationofthefourthcenturyandthatofthenineteenth,andstillmorebetweentheintellectualhabitsandtoneofthoughtofthatdayandthis?

Andwhathasmadethisdifference?Ianswerfearlessly——Theprodigiousdevelopmentofphysicalsciencewithinthelasttwocenturies。

Moderncivilizationrestsuponphysicalscience;takeawayhergiftstoourowncountry,andourpositionamongtheleadingnationsoftheworldisgoneto—morrow;foritisphysicalscienceonly,thatmakesintelligenceandmoralenergystrongerthanbruteforce。

Thewholeofmodernthoughtissteepedinscience;ithasmadeitswayintotheworksofourbestpoets,andeventhemeremanofletters,whoaffectstoignoreanddespisescience,isunconsciouslyimpregnatedwithherspirit,andindebtedforhisbestproductstohermethods。I

believethatthegreatestintellectualrevolutionmankindhasyetseenisnowslowlytakingplacebyheragency。Sheisteachingtheworldthattheultimatecourtofappealisobservationandexperiment,andnotauthority;sheisteachingittoestimatethevalueofevidence;sheiscreatingafirmandlivingfaithintheexistenceofimmutablemoralandphysicallaws,perfectobediencetowhichisthehighestpossibleaimofanintelligentbeing。

Butofallthisyouroldstereotypedsystemofeducationtakesnonote。

Physicalscience,itsmethods,itsproblems,anditsdifficulties,willmeetthepoorestboyateveryturn,andyetweeducatehiminsuchamannerthatheshallentertheworldasignorantoftheexistenceofthemethodsandfactsofscienceasthedayhewasborn。Themodernworldisfullofartillery;andweturnoutourchildrentodobattleinit,equippedwiththeshieldandswordofanancientgladiator。

Posteritywillcryshameonusifwedonotremedythisdeplorablestateofthings。Nay,ifwelivetwentyyearslonger,ourownconscienceswillcryshameonus。

Itismyfirmconvictionthattheonlywaytoremedyitis,tomaketheelementsofphysicalscienceanintegralpartofprimaryeducation。I

haveendeavouredtoshowyouhowthatmaybedoneforthatbranchofsciencewhichitismybusinesstopursue;andIcanbutadd,thatI

shouldlookuponthedaywheneveryschoolmasterthroughoutthislandwasacentreofgenuine,howeverrudimentary,scientificknowledge,asanepochinthehistoryofthecountry。

Butletmeentreatyoutoremembermylastwords。Addressingmyselftoyou,asteachers,Iwouldsay,merebooklearninginphysicalscienceisashamandadelusion——whatyouteach,unlessyouwishtobeimpostors,thatyoumustfirstknow;andrealknowledgeinsciencemeanspersonalacquaintancewiththefacts,betheyfewormany。*

[footnote]*Ithasbeensuggestedtomethatthesewordsmaybetakentoimplyadiscouragementonmypartofanysortofscientificinstructionwhichdoesnotgiveanacquaintancewiththefactsatfirsthand。Butthisisnotmymeaning。Theidealofscientificteachingis,nodoubt,asystembywhichthescholarseeseveryfactforhimself,andtheteachersuppliesonlytheexplanations。

Circumstances,however,donotoftenallowoftheattainmentofthatideal,andwemustputupwiththenextbestsystem——oneinwhichthescholartakesagooddealontrustfromateacher,who,knowingthefactsbyhisownknowledge,candescribethemwithsomuchvividnessastoenablehisaudiencetoformcompetentideasconcerningthem。ThesystemwhichIrepudiateisthatwhichallowsteacherswhohavenotcomeintodirectcontactwiththeleadingfactsofasciencetopasstheirsecond—handinformationon。Thescientificvirus,likevaccinelymph,ifpassedthroughtoolongasuccessionoforganisms,willloseallitseffectinprotectingtheyoungagainsttheintellectualepidemicstowhichtheyareexposed。