第3章

……Oh,fortunate,Mysisters,whointheheroicdawnOfracessung!TothemdiddestinygiveThevirginfireandchasteingenuousnessOftheirland’sspeech;and,reverenced,theirhandsRanoverpotentstrings。\" ItwillneverdotoallowthatweareatsuchadesperatepassinEnglish,butsomethingofthisdivinedespairwemayfeeltoointhinkingof\"thespacioustimesofgreatElizabeth,\"whenthepoetsweretryingthestopsoftheyounglanguage,andthrillingwiththesurprisesoftheirownmusic。Wemaycomfortourselves,however,unlesswepreferaluxuryofgrief,byrememberingthatnolanguageiseveroldonthelipsofthosewhospeakit,nomatterhowdecrepititdropsfromthepen。

Wehaveonlytoleaveourstudies,editorialandother,andgointotheshopsandfieldstofindthe\"spacioustimes\"again;andfromthebeginningRealism,beforeshehadputonhercapitalletter,haddivinedthisnear—at—handtruthalongwiththerest。Lowell,almostthegreatestandfinestrealistwhoeverwroughtinverse,showedusthatElizabethwasstillQueenwhereheheardYankeefarmerstalk。Oneneednotinviteslangintothecompanyofitsbetters,thoughperhapsslanghasbeendroppingits\"s\"andbecominglanguageeversincetheworldbegan,andiscertainlysometimesdelightfulandforciblebeyondthereachofthedictionary。Iwouldnothaveanyonegoaboutfornewwords,butifoneofthemcameaptly,nottorejectitshelp。ForournoveliststotrytowriteAmericanly,fromanymotive,wouldbeadismalerror,butbeingbornAmericans,Ithenuse\"Americanisms\"whenevertheseservetheirturn;andwhentheircharactersspeak,IshouldliketohearthemspeaktrueAmerican,withallthevaryingTennesseean,Philadelphian,Bostonian,andNewYorkaccents。Ifwebotherourselvestowritewhatthecriticsimaginetobe\"English,\"weshallbepriggishandartificial,andstillmoresoifwemakeourAmericanstalk\"English。\"Thereisalsothisseriousdisadvantageabout\"English,\"thatifwewrotethebest\"English\"intheworld,probablytheEnglishthemselveswouldnotknowit,or,iftheydid,certainlywouldnotownit。Ithasalwaysbeensupposedbygrammariansandpuriststhatalanguagecanbekeptastheyfindit;butlanguages,whiletheylive,areperpetuallychanging。Godapparentlymeantthemforthecommonpeople;andthecommonpeoplewillusethemfreelyastheyuseothergiftsofGod。OntheirlipsourcontinentalEnglishwilldiffermoreandmorefromtheinsularEnglish,andIbelievethatthisisnotdeplorable,butdesirable。

Infine,IwouldhaveourAmericannovelistsbeasAmericanastheyunconsciouslycan。MatthewArnoldcomplainedthathefoundno\"distinction\"inourlife,andIwouldgladlypersuadeallartistsintendinggreatnessinanykindamongusthattherecognitionofthefactpointedoutbyMr。Arnoldoughttobeasourceofinspirationtothem,andnotdiscouragement。Wehavebeennowsomehundredyearsbuildingupastateontheaffirmationoftheessentialequalityofmenintheirrightsandduties,andwhetherwehavebeenrightorbeenwrongthegodshavetakenusatourword,andhaverespondedtouswithacivilizationinwhichthereisno\"distinction\"perceptibletotheeyethatlovesandvaluesit。Suchbeautyandsuchgrandeuraswehaveiscommonbeauty,commongrandeur,orthebeautyandgrandeurinwhichthequalityofsolidaritysoprevailsthatneitherdistinguishesitselftothedisadvantageofanythingelse。Itseemstomethattheseconditionsinvitetheartisttothestudyandtheappreciationofthecommon,andtotheportrayalineveryartofthosefinerandhigheraspectswhichuniteratherthanseverhumanity,ifhewouldthriveinourneworderofthings。Thetalentthatisrobustenoughtofronttheevery—dayworldandcatchthecharmofitswork—worn,care—worn,brave,kindlyface,neednotfeartheencounter,thoughitseemsterribletothesortnurturedinthesuperstitionoftheromantic,thebizarre,theheroic,thedistinguished,asthethingsaloneworthyofpaintingorcarvingorwriting。Theartsmustbecomedemocratic,andthenweshallhavetheexpressionofAmericainart;andthereproachwhichArnoldwashalfrightinmakingusshallhavenojusticeinitanylonger;weshallbe\"distinguished。\"

XXII。

Inthemeantimeithasbeensaidwithasuperficialjusticethatourfictionisnarrow;thoughinthesamesenseIsupposethepresentEnglishfictionisasnarrowasourown;andmostmodernfictionisnarrowinacertainsense。InItalythebestmenarewritingnovelsasbriefandrestrictedinrangeasours;inSpainthenovelsareintenseanddeep,andnotspacious;theFrenchschool,withtheexceptionofZola,isnarrow;theNorwegiansarenarrow;theRussians,exceptTolstoy,arenarrow,andthenextgreatestafterhim,Tourguenief,isthenarrowestgreatnovelist,astomeredimensions,thateverlived,dealingnearlyalwayswithsmallgroups,isolatedandanalyzedinthemostAmericanfashion。Infact,thechargeofnarrownessaccusesthewholetendencyofmodernfictionasmuchastheAmericanschool。ButIdonotbyanymeansallowthatthisnarrownessisadefect,whiledenyingthatitisauniversalcharacteristicofourfiction;itisrather,forthepresent,avirtue。Indeed,IshouldcallthepresentAmericanwork,NorthandSouth,thoroughratherthannarrow。Inonesenseitisasbroadaslife,foreachmanisamicrocosm,andthewriterwhoisabletoacquaintusintimatelywithhalfadozenpeople,ortheconditionsofaneighborhoodoraclass,hasdonesomethingwhichcannotinany,badsensebecallednarrow;hisbreadthisverticalinsteadoflateral,thatisall;andthisdepthismoredesirablethanhorizontalexpansioninacivilizationlikeours,wherethedifferencesarenotofclasses,butoftypes,andnotoftypeseithersomuchasofcharacters。Anewmethodwasnecessaryindealingwiththenewconditions,andthenewmethodisworldwide,becausethewholeworldismoreorlessAmericanized。Tolstoyisexceptionallyvoluminousamongmodernwriters,evenRussianwriters;anditmightbesaidthattheforteofTolstoyhimselfisnotinhisbreadthsidewise,butinhisbreadthupwardanddownward。’TheDeathofIvanIlyitch’

leavesasvastanimpressiononthereader’ssoulasanyepisodeof’WarandPeace,’which,indeed,canberecalledonlyinepisodes,andnotasawhole。Ithinkthatourwritersmaybesafelycounselledtocontinuetheirworkinthemodernway,becauseitisthebestwayyetknown。Iftheymakeittrue,itwillbelarge,nomatterwhatitssuperficiesare;anditwouldbethegreatestmistaketotrytomakeitbig。Abigbookisnecessarilyagroupofepisodesmoreorlesslooselyconnectedbyathreadofnarrative,andthereseemsnoreasonwhythisthreadmustalwaysbesupplied。Eachepisodemaybequitedistinct,oritmaybeoneofaconnectedgroup;thefinaleffectwillbefromthetruthofeachepisode,notfromthesizeofthegroup。

Thewholefieldofhumanexperienceasneversonearlycoveredbyimaginativeliteratureinanyageasinthis;andAmericanlifeespeciallyisgettingrepresentedwithunexampledfulness。Itistruethatnoonewriter,noonebook,representsit,forthatisnotpossible;

oursocialandpoliticaldecentralizationforbidsthis,andmayforeverforbidit。Butagreatnumberofverygoodwritersareinstinctivelystrivingtomakeeachpartofthecountryandeachphaseofourcivilizationknowntoalltheotherparts;andtheirworkisnotnarrowinanyfeebleorvicioussense。Theworldwasonceverylittle,anditisnowverylarge。Formerly,allsciencecouldbegraspedbyasinglemind;butnowthemanwhohopestobecomegreatorusefulinsciencemustdevotehimselftoasingledepartment。Itissoineverything——allarts,alltrades;andthenovelistisnotsuperiortotheuniversalruleagainstuniversality。Hecontributeshissharetoathoroughknowledgeofgroupsofthehumanraceunderconditionswhicharefullofinspiringnoveltyandinterest。Heworksmorefearlessly,frankly,andfaithfullythanthenovelisteverworkedbefore;hiswork,ormuchofit,maybedestinednevertobereprintedfromthemonthlymagazines;butifheturnstohisbook—shelfandregardsthearrayoftheBritishorotherclassics,heknowsthatthey,too,areforthemostpartdead;heknowsthattheplanetitselfisdestinedtofreezeupanddropintothesunatlast,withallitssurvivingliteratureuponit。Thequestionismerelyoneoftime。Heconsoleshimself,therefore,ifheiswise,andworkson;andwemayalltakesomecomfortfromthethoughtthatmostthingscannotbehelped。Especiallyamovementinliteraturelikethatwhichtheworldisnowwitnessingcannotbehelped;andwecouldnomoreturnbackandbeoftheliteraryfashionsofanyagebeforethisthanwecouldturnbackandbeofitssocial,economical,orpoliticalconditions。

IfIwereauthorizedtoaddressanyworddirectlytoournovelistsI

shouldsay,Donottroubleyourselvesaboutstandardsorideals;buttrytobefaithfulandnatural:rememberthatthereisnogreatness,nobeauty,whichdoesnotcomefromtruthtoyourownknowledgeofthings;

andkeeponworking,evenifyourworkisnotlongremembered。

Atleastthree—fifthsoftheliteraturecalledclassic,inalllanguages,nomorelivesthanthepoemsandstoriesthatperishmonthlyinourmagazines。Itisallprintedandreprinted,generationaftergeneration,centuryaftercentury;butitisnotalive;itisasdeadasthepeoplewhowroteitandreadit,andtowhomitmeantsomething,perhaps;withwhomitwasafashion,acaprice,apassingtaste。Asuperstitiouspietypreservesit,andpretendsthatithasaestheticqualitieswhichcandelightoredify;butnobodyreallyenjoysit,exceptasareflectionofthepastmoodsandhumorsoftherace,orarevelationoftheauthor’scharacter;otherwiseitistrash,andoftenveryfilthytrash,whichthepresenttrashgenerallyisnot。

XXIII。

OneofthegreatnewspaperstheotherdayinvitedtheprominentAmericanauthorstospeaktheirmindsuponapointinthetheoryandpracticeoffictionwhichhadalreadyvexedsomeofthem。ItwasthequestionofhowmuchorhowlittletheAmericannoveloughttodealwithcertainfactsoflifewhicharenotusuallytalkedofbeforeyoungpeople,andespeciallyyoungladies。Ofcoursethequestionwasnotdecided,andIforgetjusthowfarthebalanceinclinedinfavorofalargerfreedominthematter。

Butitcertainlyinclinedthatway;oneortwowritersofthesexwhichissomehowsupposedtohavepurityinitskeeping(asifpuritywereathingthatdidnotpracticallyconcerntheothersex,preoccupiedwithseriousaffairs)gaveitarathervigoroustilttothatside。Inviewofthisfactitwouldnotbethepartofprudencetomakeanefforttodressthebalance;andindeedIdonotknowthatIwasgoingtomakeanysucheffort。Buttherearesomethingstosay,aroundandaboutthesubject,whichIshouldliketohavesomeoneelsesay,andwhichImaymyselfpossiblybesafeinsuggesting。

Oneofthefirstoftheseisthefact,generallylostsightofbythosewhocensuretheAnglo—Saxonnovelforitsprudishness,thatitisreallynotsuchaprudeafterall;andthatifitissometimesapparentlyanxioustoavoidthoseexperiencesoflifenotspokenofbeforeyoungpeople,thismaybeanappearanceonly。Sometimesanovelwhichhasthisshufflingair,thiseffectoftrucklingtopropriety,mightdefenditself,ifitcouldspeakforitself,bysayingthatsuchexperienceshappenednottocomewithinitsscheme,andthat,sofarfrommaimingormutilatingitselfinignoringthem,itwasallthemorefaithfullyrepresentativeofthetoneofmodernlifeindealingwithlovethatwaschaste,andwithpassionsohonestthatitcouldbeopenlyspokenofbeforethetenderestsocietybudatdinner。Itmightsaythattheguiltyintrigue,thebetrayal,theextremeflirtationeven,wastheexceptionalthinginlife,andunlesstheschemeofthestorynecessarilyinvolvedit,thatitwouldbebadarttolugitin,andasbadtasteastointroducesuchtopicsinamixedcompany。Itcouldsayveryjustlythatthenovelinourcivilizationnowalwaysaddressesamixedcompany,andthatthevastmajorityofthecompanyareladies,andthatverymany,ifnotmost,oftheseladiesareyounggirls。Ifthenovelwerewrittenformenandformarriedwomenalone,asincontinentalEurope,itmightbealtogetherdifferent。Butthesimplefactisthatitisnotwrittenforthemaloneamongus,anditisaquestionofwriting,undercoverofouruniversalacceptance,thingsforyounggirlstoreadwhichyouwouldbeputout—of—doorsforsayingtothem,oroffranklygivingnoticeofyourintention,andsocuttingyourselfofffromthepleasure——anditisaveryhighandsweetoneofappealingtothesevivid,responsiveintelligences,whicharenonethelessbrilliantandadmirablebecausetheyareinnocent。

Onedayanovelistwholiked,afterthemannerofothermen,torepineathishardfate,complainedtohisfriend,acritic,thathewastiredoftherestrictionhehadputuponhimselfinthisregard;foritisamistake,ascanbereadilyshown,tosupposethatothersimposeit。\"SeehowfreethoseFrenchfellowsare!\"herebelled。\"Shallwealwaysbeshutuptoourtraditionofdecency?\"

\"Doyouthinkit’smuchworsethanbeingshutuptotheirtraditionofindecency?\"saidhisfriend。

Thenthatnovelistbegantoreflect,andherememberedhowsicktheinvariablemotiveoftheFrenchnovelmadehim。Heperceivedfinallythat,conventionforconvention,ourswasnotonlymoretolerable,butonthewholewastruertolife,notonlytoitscomplexion,butalsotoitstexture。Noonewillpretendthatthereisnotviciouslovebeneaththesurfaceofoursociety;ifhedid,thefetidexplosionsofthedivorcetrialswouldrefutehim;butifhepretendedthatitwasinanyjustsensecharacteristicofoursociety,hecouldbestillmoreeasilyrefuted。Yetitexists,anditisunquestionablythematerialoftragedy,thestufffromwhichintenseeffectsarewrought。Thequestion,afterowningthisfact,iswhethertheseintenseeffectsarenotrathercheapeffects。Iinclinetothinktheyare,andIwilltrytosaywhyI

thinkso,ifImaydosowithoutoffence。Thematerialitself,themerementionofit,hasaninstantfascination;itarrests,itdetains,tillthelastwordissaid,andwhilethereisanythingtobehinted。Thisiswhatmakesaloveintrigueofsomesortallbutessentialtothepopularityofanyfiction。Withoutsuchanintriguetheintellectualequipmentoftheauthormustbeofthehighest,andthenhewillsucceedonlywiththehighestclassofreaders。Butanyauthorwhowilldealwithaguiltyloveintrigueholdsallreadersinhishand,thehighestwiththelowest,aslongashehintstheslightesthopeofthesmallestpotentialnaughtiness。Heneednotatallbeagreatauthor;hemaybeaveryshabbywretch,ifhehasbutthecourageorthetrickofthatsortofthing。Thecriticswillcallhim\"virile\"and\"passionate\";decentpeoplewillbeashamedtohavebeenlimedbyhim;butthelowaveragewillonlyaskanotherchanceofflockingintohisnet。Ifhehappenstobeanablewriter,hisreallyfineandcostlyworkwillbeunheeded,andtheluretotheappetitewillbechieflyremembered。Theremaybeotherqualitieswhichmakereputationsforothermen,butinhiscasetheywillcountfornothing。Hepaysthispenaltyforhissuccessinthatkind;

andeveryonepayssomesuchpenaltywhodealswithsomesuchmaterial。

ButIdonotmeantoimplythathiscasecoversthewholeground。Sofarasitgoes,though,itoughttostopthemouthsofthosewhocomplainthatfictionisenslavedtoproprietyamongus。Itappearsthatofacertainkindofimproprietyitisfreetogiveusallitwill,andmore。

Butthisisnotwhatseriousmenandwomenwritingfictionmeanwhentheyrebelagainstthelimitationsoftheirartinourcivilization。Theyhavenodesiretodealwithnakedness,aspaintersandsculptorsfreelydointheworshipofbeauty;orwithcertainfactsoflife,asthestagedoes,intheserviceofsensation。Buttheyaskwhy,whentheconventionsoftheplasticandhistrionicartsliberatetheirfollowerstotheportrayalofalmostanyphaseofthephysicaloroftheemotionalnature,anAmericannovelistmaynotwriteastoryonthelinesof’AnnaKarenina’or’MadameBovary。’TheywishtotouchoneofthemostseriousandsorrowfulproblemsoflifeinthespiritofTolstoyandFlaubert,andtheyaskwhytheymaynot。Atonetime,theyremindus,theAnglo—Saxonnovelistdiddealwithsuchproblems——DeFoeinhisspirit,Richardsoninhis,Goldsmithinhis。Atwhatmomentdidourfictionlosethisprivilege?InwhatfatalhourdidtheYoungGirlariseandsealthelipsofFiction,withatouchofherfinger,tosomeofthemostvitalinterestsoflife?

WhetherIwishedtoopposethemintheiraspirationforgreaterfreedom,orwhetherIwishedtoencouragethem,IshouldbegintoanswerthembysayingthattheYoungGirlhasneverdoneanythingofthekind。Themannersofthenovelhavebeenimprovingwiththoseofitsreaders;thatisall。Gentlemennolongerswearorfalldrunkunderthetable,orabductyoungladiesandshutthemupinlonelycountry—houses,orsohabituallysetabouttheruinoftheirneighbors’wives,astheyoncedid。Generally,peoplenowcallaspadeanagriculturalimplement;theyhavenotgrowndecentwithouthavingalsogrownalittlesqueamish,buttheyhavegrowncomparativelydecent;thereisnodoubtaboutthat。Theyrequireofanovelistwhomtheyrespectunquestionableproofofhisseriousness,ifheproposestodealwithcertainphasesoflife;theyrequireasortofscientificdecorum。Hecannolongerexpecttobereceivedonthegroundofentertainmentonly;heassumesahigherfunction,somethinglikethatofaphysicianorapriest,andtheyexpecthimtobeboundbylawsassacredasthoseofsuchprofessions;theyholdhimsolemnlypledgednottobetraythemorabusetheirconfidence。Ifhewillaccepttheconditions,theygivehimtheirconfidence,andhemaythentreattohisgreaterhonor,andnotatalltohisdisadvantage,ofsuchexperiences,suchrelationsofmenandwomenasGeorgeEliottreatsin’AdamBede,’in’DanielDeronda,’in’Romola,’inalmostallherbooks;suchasHawthornetreatsin’TheScarletLetter;’suchasDickenstreatsin’DavidCopperfield;’suchasThackeraytreatsin’Pendennis,’

andglancesatineveryoneofhisfictions;suchasmostofthemastersofEnglishfictionhaveatsametimetreatedmoreorlessopenly。Itisquitefalseorquitemistakentosupposethatournovelshaveleftuntouchedthesemostimportantrealitiesoflife。Theyhaveonlynotmadethemtheirstockintrade;theyhavekeptatrueperspectiveinregardtothem;theyhaverelegatedthemintheirpicturesoflifetothespaceandplacetheyoccupyinlifeitself,asweknowitinEnglandandAmerica。Theyhavekeptacorrectproportion,knowingperfectlywellthatunlessthenovelistobeamap,witheverythingscrupulouslylaiddowninit,afaithfulrecordoflifeinfarthegreaterextentcouldbemadetotheexclusionofguiltyloveandallitscircumstancesandconsequences。

IjustifytheminthisviewnotonlybecauseIhatewhatischeapandmeretricious,andholdinpeculiarloathingthecantofthecriticswhorequire\"passion\"assomethinginitselfadmirableanddesirableinanovel,butbecauseIprizefidelityinthehistorianoffeelingandcharacter。Mostofthesecriticswhodemand\"passion\"wouldseemtohavenoconceptionofanypassionbutone。Yetthereareseveralotherpassions:thepassionofgrief,thepassionofavarice,thepassionofpity,thepassionofambition,thepassionofhate,thepassionofenvy,thepassionofdevotion,thepassionoffriendship;andallthesehaveagreaterpartinthedramaoflifethanthepassionoflove,andinfinitelygreaterthanthepassionofguiltylove。Wittinglyorunwittingly,EnglishfictionandAmericanfictionhaverecognizedthistruth,notfully,notinthemeasureitmerits,butingreaterdegreethanmostotherfiction。

XXIV。

Whocandenythatfictionwouldbeincomparablystronger,incomparablytruer,ifonceitcouldtearoffthehabitwhichenslavesittothecelebrationchieflyofasinglepassion,inonephaseoranother,andcouldfranklydedicateitselftotheserviceofallthepassions,alltheinterests,allthefacts?Everynovelistwhohasthoughtabouthisartknowsthatitwould,andIthinkthatuponreflectionhemustdoubtwhetherhisspherewouldbegreatlyenlargedifhewereallowedtotreatfreelythedarkeraspectsofthefavoritepassion。But,asIhaveshown,theprivilege,therighttodothis,isalreadyperfectlyrecognized。

Thisisprovedagainbythefactthatseriouscriticismrecognizesasmaster—works(Iwillnotpushthequestionofsupremacy)thetwogreatnovelswhichaboveallothershave,movedtheworldbytheirstudyofguiltylove。Ifbyanychance,ifbysomeprodigiousmiracle,anyAmericanshouldnowarisetotreatitonthelevelof’AnnaKarenina’and’MadameBovary,’hewouldbeabsolutelysureofsuccess,andoffameandgratitudeasgreatasthosebookshavewonfortheirauthors。

ButwhateditorofwhatAmericanmagazinewouldprintsuchastory?

CertainlyIdonotthinkanyonewould;andhereournovelistmustagainsubmittoconditions。Ifhewishestopublishsuchastory(supposinghimtohaveoncewrittenit),hemustpublishitasabook。Abookissomethingbyitself,responsibleforitscharacter,whichbecomesquicklyknown,anditdoesnotnecessarilypenetratetoeverymemberofthehousehold。Thefatherorthemothermaysaytothechild,\"Iwouldratheryouwouldn’treadthatbook\";ifthechildcannotbetrusted,thebookmaybelockedup。Butwiththemagazineanditsserialtheaffairisdifferent。BetweentheeditorofareputableEnglishorAmericanmagazineandthefamilieswhichreceiveitthereisatacitagreementthathewillprintnothingwhichafathermaynotreadtohisdaughter,orsafelyleavehertoreadherself。

Afterall,itisamatterofbusiness;andtheinsurgentnovelistshouldconsiderthesituationwithcoolnessandcommon—sense。Theeditordidnotcreatethesituation;butitexists,andhecouldnotevenattempttochangeitwithoutmanysortsofdisaster。Herespectsit,therefore,withthegoodfaithofanhonestman。Evenwhenheishimselfanovelist,withardorforhisartandimpatienceofthelimitationsputuponit,heinterposeshisveto,asThackeraydidinthecaseofTrollopewhenacontributorapproachesforbiddenground。

Itdoesnotavailtosaythatthedailypapersteemwithfactsfarfouleranddeadlierthananywhichfictioncouldimagine。Thatistrue,butitistruealsothatthesexwhichreadsthemostnovelsreadsthefewestnewspapers;and,besides,thereporterdoesnotcommandthenovelist’sskilltofiximpressionsinayounggirl’smindortosuggestconjecture。

Themagazineisalittledespotic,alittlearbitrary;butunquestionablyitsfavorisessentialtosuccess,anditsconditionsarenotsuchnarrowones。YoucannotdealwithTolstoy’sandFlaubert’ssubjectsintheabsoluteartisticfreedomofTolstoyandFlaubert;sinceDeFoe,thatisunknownamongus;butifyoudealwiththeminthemannerofGeorgeEliot,ofThackeray,ofDickens,ofsociety,youmaydealwiththemeveninthemagazines。Thereisnootherrestrictionuponyou。Allthehorrorsandmiseriesandtorturesareopentoyou;yourpagesmaydropblood;sometimesitmayhappenthattheeditorwillevenexactsuchstrongmaterialfromyou。Butprobablyhewillrequirenothingbuttheobservanceoftheconventioninquestion;andifyoudonotyourselfpreferbloodshedhewillleaveyoufreetouseallsweetandpeaceablemeansofinterestinghisreaders。

Itisnonarrowfieldhethrowsopentoyou,withthatlittlesigntokeepoffthegrassupatonepointonly。Itsvastnessisstillalmostunexplored,andwholeregionsinitareunknowntothefictionist。Diganywhere,anddobutdigdeepenough,andyoustrikeriches;or,ifyouareofthemindtorange,thegentlerclimes,thesoftertemperatures,theserenerskies,areallfreetoyou,andaresolittlevisitedthatthechanceofnoveltyisgreateramongthem。

XXV。

WhiletheAmericanshavegreatlyexcelledintheshortstorygenerally,theyhavealmostcreatedaspeciesofitintheThanksgivingstory。

WehavetransplantedtheChristmasstoryfromEngland,whiletheThanksgivingstoryisnativetoourair;butbothareofAnglo—Saxongrowth。Theirdifferenceisfromadifferenceofenvironment;andtheChristmasstorywhennaturalizedamongusbecomesalmostidenticalinmotive,incident,andtreatmentwiththeThanksgivingstory。IfIweretogeneralizeadistinctionbetweenthem,Ishouldsaythattheonedealtmorewithmarvelsandtheothermorewithmorals;andyetthecriticshouldbewareofspeakingtooconfidentlyonthispoint。Itiscertain,however,thattheChristmasseasonismeteorologicallymorefavorabletotheeffectivereturnofpersonslongsupposedlostatsea,orfromaprodigallife,orfromadarkenedmind。Thelonger,darker,andcoldernightsarebetteradaptedtotheapparitionofghosts,andtoallmannerofsignsandportents;whiletheyseemtopresentawiderfieldfortheinterventionofangelsinbehalfoforphansandoutcasts。Thedreamsofelderlysleepersatthistimeareapttobesuchaswilleffectalastingchangeinthemwhentheyawake,turningthemfromthehard,cruel,andgraspinghabitsofalifetime,andreconcilingthemtotheirsons,daughters,andnephews,whohavethwartedtheminmarriage;orsofteningthemtotheirmeek,uncomplainingwives,whoseheartstheyhavetrampleduponintheirrecklesspursuitofwealth;andgenerallydisposingthemtoadistributionofhampersamongthesickandpoor,andtoafriendlyreceptionofgentlemenwithcharitysubscriptionpapers。

Shipsreadilydriveuponrocksintheearlytwilight,andofferexcitingdifficultiesofsalvage;andtheheavysnowsgatherquicklyroundthestepsofwandererswholiedowntodieinthem,preparatorytotheirdiscoveryandrescuebyimmediaterelatives。Themidnightweatherisalsoverysuitableforencounterwithmurderersandburglars;andthecontrastofitsfreezinggloomwiththelightandcheerin—doorspromotesthegayetieswhichmerge,atallwell—regulatedcountry—houses,inloveandmarriage。Intheregionofpurecharacternomomentcouldbesoavailableforflingingoffthemaskoffrivolity,orimbecility,orsavagery,whichonehaswornfortenortwentylongyears,say,forthepurposeoffoilingsomevillain,andsurprisingthereader,andhelpingtheauthoroutwithhisplot。PersonsabroadintheAlps,orApennines,orPyrenees,oranywhereseekingshelterinthehutsofshepherdsorthedensofsmugglers,findnotimelikeitforlyinginafeignedslumber,andlisteningtothewhisperedmachinationsoftheirsuspiciouslookingentertainers,andthensuddenlystartingupandfightingtheirwayout;

orelsespringingfromtherealsleepintowhichtheyhavesunkexhausted,andfindingitbroaddayandthegoodpeasantswhomtheyhadsounjustlydoubted,waitingbreakfastforthem。

WeneednotpointoutthesuperioradvantagesoftheChristmasseasonforanythingonehasamindtodowiththeFrenchRevolution,oftheArcticexplorations,ortheIndianMutiny,orthehorrorsofSiberianexile;

thereisnotimesogoodfortheuseofthismaterial;andghostsonshipboardarenotoriouslyfondofChristmasEve。Inourownloggingcampsthemanwhohasgoneintothewoodsforthewinter,afterquarrellingwithhiswife,thenhearshersadappealingvoice,andismovedtogoodresolutionsasatnootherperiodoftheyear;andintheminingregions,firstinCaliforniaandlaterinColorado,thehardenedreprobate,dyinginhisboots,smellshismother’sdoughnuts,andbreatheshislastinasoliloquizedvisionoftheoldhome,andthelittlebrother,orsister,ortheoldfathercomingtomeethimfromheaven;whilehisrudecompanionslistenroundhim,anddrytheireyesonthebuttsoftheirrevolvers。

Ithastobeverygrim,allthat,tobetrulyeffective;andhere,already,wehaveatouchintheAmericanizedChristmasstoryofthemoralisticqualityoftheAmericanThanksgivingstory。Thiswasseldomwritten,atfirst,forthemereentertainmentofthereader;itwasmeanttoentertainhim,ofcourse;butitwasmeanttoedifyhim,too,andtoimprovehim;andsomesuchintentionisstillpresentinit。IratherthinkthatitdealsmoreprobablywithcharactertothisendthanitsEnglishcousin,theChristmasstory,does。ItisnotsoimprobablethatamanshouldleaveoffbeingadrunkardonThanksgiving,asthatheshouldleaveoffbeingacurmudgeononChristmas;thatheshouldconquerhisappetiteasthatheshouldinstantlychangehisnature,bygoodresolutions。Hewouldbeverylikely,indeed,tobreakhisresolutionsineithercase,butnotsolikelyintheoneasintheother。

Generically,theThanksgivingstoryischeerfullerinitsdramaandsimplerinitspersonsthantheChristmasstory。Rarelyhasitdealtwiththesupernatural,eithertheapparitionofghostsortheinterventionofangels。TheweatherbeingsomuchmilderatthecloseofNovemberthanitisamonthlater,verylittlecanbedonewiththeelements;thoughonthecoastanortheasterlystormhasbeen,andcanbe,veryusefullyemployed。TheThanksgivingstoryismorerestrictedinitsrange;thesceneisstillmostlyinNewEngland,andthecharactersareofNewEnglandextraction,whocomehomefromtheWestusually,orNewYork,fortheeventofthelittledrama,whateveritmaybe。Itmaybethereconciliationofkinsfolkwhohavequarrelled;ortheunionofloverslongestranged;orhusbandsandwiveswhohavehadhardwordsandparted;ormotherswhohadthoughttheirsonsdeadinCaliforniaandfindthemselvesagreeablydisappointedintheirreturn;orfatherswhoforoldtime’ssakereceivebacktheirerringandconvenientlydyingdaughters。

Thenotesarenotmanywhichthissimplemusicsounds,buttheyhaveaSabbathtone,mostly,andwinthelistenertokindlierthoughtsandbettermoods。TheartisatitshighestinsomestrongsketchofRoseTerryCooke’s,orsomeperfectlysatisfyingstudyofMissJewett’s,orsomegraphicsituationofMissWilkins’s;andthenitisaveryfineart。

Butmostlyitispoorandrudeenough,andmakesopenly,shamelessly,forthereader’semotions,aswellashismorals。Itisinclinedtoberatherdescriptive。Theturkey,thepumpkin,thecorn—field,figurethroughout;andtheleaflesswoodsareblueandcoldagainsttheeveningskybehindthelowhip—roofed,old—fashionedhomestead。TheparlanceisusuallytheYankeedialectanditsWesternmodifications。

TheThanksgivingstoryismostlyconfinedinscenetothecountry;itdoesnotseempossibletodomuchwithitintown;anditisaseriousquestionwhetherwithitsgeographicalandtopicallimitationsitcanholditsownagainsttheChristmasstory;andwhetheritwouldnotbewellforauthorstoconsideracombinationwithitselderrival。

Thetwofeastsaresoneartogetherinpointoftimethattheycouldbeeasilycoveredbythesentimentofevenabriefnarrative。Undertheagglutinatedstyleof’AThanksgiving—ChristmasStory,’fictionappropriatetobothcouldbeproduced,andbothcouldbeemployednaturallyandprobablyinthetransactionofitsaffairsandthedevelopmentofitscharacters。Theplotforsuchastorycouldeasilybemadetoincludeatotal—abstinencepledgeandfamilyreunionatThanksgiving,andanapparitionandspiritualregenerationoverabowlofpunchatChristmas。

XXVI。

Itwouldbeinterestingtoknowthefarbeginningsofholidayliterature,andIcommendthequesttothescientificspiritwhichnowspecializesresearchineverybranchofhistory。Inthemeantime,withoutbeingtooconfidentofthefacts,Iventuretosuggestthatitcameinwiththeromanticmovementaboutthebeginningofthiscentury,whenmountainsceasedtobehorridandbecamepicturesque;whenruinsofallsorts,butparticularlyabbeysandcastles,becamehabitabletothemostdelicateconstitutions;whenthedespisedGothickofAddisondroppedits\"k,\"andarosethechivalrousandreligiousGothicofScott;whenghostswereredeemedfromthecontemptintowhichtheyhadfallen,andresumedtheirplaceinpolitesociety;infact,thepoliterthesociety;thewelcomertheghosts,andwhateverelsewasoutofthecommon。InthatdaytheAnnualflourished,andthisartificialflowerwasprobablythefirstliteraryblossomontheChristmasTreewhichhassincebornesomuchtinselfoliageandpaintedfruit。ButtheAnnualwasextremelyOriental;

itwasmuchpreoccupiedwith,HaideesandGulnaresandZuleikas,withHindasandNourmahals,owingtothedistinctionwhichByronandMoorehadgivensuchladies;andwhenitbegantoconcernitselfwiththeactualitiesofBritishbeauty,thedaughtersofAlbion,thoughinscribedwiththenamesofrealcountessesandduchesses,betrayedtheirdescentfromthewell—knownEasternodalisques。ItwaspossiblythroughanAmericanthatholidayliteraturebecamedistinctivelyEnglishinmaterial,andWashingtonIrving,withhisNewWorldloveofthepast,mayhavegiventheimpulsetotheliteraryworshipofChristmaswhichhassincesowidelyestablisheditself。AfestivalrevivedinpopularinterestbyaNew—YorkertowhomDutchassociationswithNew—year’shadendearedtheGermanidealofChristmas,andwhomtherobustgayetiesoftheseasoninold—fashionedcountry—houseshadcharmed,wouldbeoneofthoseroundaboutresultswhichdestinylikes,and\"wouldatleastbeEarlyEnglish。\"

IfwecannotclaimwithallthepatrioticconfidenceweshouldliketofeelthatitwasIrvingwhosetChristmasinthatlightinwhichDickenssawitsaestheticcapabilities,itisperhapsbecausealloriginsareobscure。Foranythingthatwepositivelyknowtothecontrary,theDruidicritesfromwhichEnglishChristmasborrowedtheinvitingmistletoe,ifnotthedecorativeholly,mayhavebeenaccompaniedbytherecitationsofholidaytriads。ButitiscertainthatseveralplaysofShakespearewereproduced,ifnotwritten,forthecelebrationoftheholidays,andthatthentheblacktideofPuritanismwhichsweptovermen’ssoulsblottedoutallsuchobservanceofChristmaswiththefestivalitself。Itcameinagain,byanaturalreaction,withthereturningStuarts,andthroughouttheperiodoftheRestorationitenjoyedaperfunctoryfavor。Thereismentionofit;oftenenoughintheeighteenth—centuryessayists,intheSpectatorsandIdlersandTatlers;

buttheworldaboutthemiddleofthelastcenturylamentstheneglectintowhichithadfallen。Irvingseemstohavebeenthefirsttoobserveitssurvivingriteslovingly,andDickensdivineditsimmenseadvantageasaliteraryoccasion。Hemadeitinsomesortentirelyhisforatime,andtherecanbenoquestionbutitwashewhoagainendearedittothewholeEnglish—speakingworld,andgaveitawideranddeeperholdthanithadeverhadbeforeuponthefanciesandaffectionsofourrace。

Themightofthatgreattalentnoonecangainsay,thoughinthelightofthetruerworkwhichhassincebeendonehisliteraryprinciplesseemalmostasgrotesqueashistheoriesofpoliticaleconomy。Innoonedirectionwashiserringforcemorefeltthaninthecreationofholidayliteratureaswehaveknownitforthelasthalf—century。Creation,ofcourse,isthewrongword;itsaystoomuch;butindefaultofabetterword,itmaystand。Hedidnotmakesomethingoutofnothing;thematerialwastherebeforehim;themoodandeventheneedofhistimecontributedimmenselytohissuccess,asthevolitionofthesubjecthelpsonthemesmerist;butitiswithinboundstosaythathewasthechiefagencyinthedevelopmentofholidayliteratureaswehaveknownit,ashewasthechiefagencyinuniversalizingthegreatChristianholidayaswenowhaveit。Otheragencieswroughtwithhimandafterhim;butitwashewhorescuedChristmasfromPuritandistrust,andhumanizeditandconsecratedittotheheartsandhomesofall。

Veryroughmagic,asitnowseems,heusedinworkinghismiracle,butthereisnodoubtabouthisworkingit。OneopenshisChristmasstoriesinthislaterday——’TheCarol,TheChimes,TheHauntedMan,TheCricketontheHearth,’andalltherest——andwith\"ahearthigh—sorrowfulandcloyed,\"askshimselfforthepreternaturalvirtuethattheyoncehad。

Thepathosappearsfalseandstrained;thehumorlargelyhorseplay;thecharactertheatrical;thejovialitypumped;thepsychologycommonplace;

thesociologyalonefunny。Itisaworldofrealclothes,earth,air,water,andtherest;thepeopleoftenspeakthelanguageoflife,buttheirmotivesareasdisproportionedandimprobable,andtheirpassionsandpurposesasovercharged,asthoseoftheworstofBalzac’speople。

Yetallthesemonstrosities,astheynowappear,seemtohaveoncehadsymmetryandverity;theymovedthemostcultivatedintelligencesofthetime;theytouchedtruehearts;theymadeeverybodylaughandcry。

Thiswasperhapsbecausetheimagination,fromhavingbeenfedmostlyupongrossunrealities,alwaysrespondsreadilytofantasticappeals。

Therehasbeenanamusingsortofaweofit,asifitwerethechannelofinspiredthought,andweresomehowsacred。Themostpreposterousinventionsofitsactivityhavebeenregardedintheirtimeasthegreatestfeatsofthehumanmind,andinitsreceptiveformithasbeennursedintoanimbecilitytowhichthetruthisrepugnant,andthefactthatthebeautifulresidesnowhereelseisinconceivable。Ithasbeenflatteredoutofallsufferanceinitstoyingswiththemereelementsofcharacter,anditsattemptstopresenttheseincombinationsforeigntoexperiencearestillpraisedbythepoorersortofcriticsasmasterpiecesofcreativework。

InthedayofDickens’searlyChristmasstoriesitwasthoughtadmirablefortheauthortotaketypesofhumanitywhicheverybodyknew,andtoaddtothemfromhisimaginationtilltheywereasstrangeasbeastsandbirdstalking。Nowwebegintofeelthathumannatureisquiteenough,andthatthebestanauthorcandoistoshowitasitis。ButinthosestoriesofhisDickenssaidtohisreaders,Letusmakebelieveso—and—

so;andtheresultwasajointjuggle,achild’s—play,inwhichthewholesomeallegiancetolifewaslost。Artistically,therefore,theschemewasfalse,andartistically,therefore,itmustperish。Itdidnotperish,however,beforeithadpropagateditselfinawholeschoolofunrealitiessoghastlythatonecanhardlyrecallwithoutashudderthosesentimentalitiesatsecondhandtowhichholidayliteraturewasabandonedlongaftertheoriginalconjurerhadweariedofhisperformance。

UnderhisowneyeandofconsciouspurposeacircleofimitatorsgrewupinthefabricationofChristmasstories。Theyobviouslyformedthemselvesuponhissoberedideals;theycollaboratedwithhim,anditwasoftenhardtoknowwhetheritwasDickensorSalaorCollinswhowaswriting。TheChristmasbookhadbythattimelostitsdirectapplicationtoChristmas。Itdealtwithshipwrecksagooddeal,andwithperilousadventuresofallkinds,andwithunmeritedsuffering,andwithghostsandmysteries,becausehumannature,securefromstormanddangerinawell—lightedroombeforeacheerfulfire,likestohavethesethingsimagedforit,anditslong—puerilizedfancywillbearanendlessrepetitionofthem。Thewizardswhowroughttheirspellswiththemcontentedthemselveswiththelastingefficacyofthesesimplemeans;

andtheapprentice—wizardsandjourneyman—wizardswhohavesucceededthempractisethesameartsattheoldstand;buttheethicalintentionwhichgavedignitytoDickens’sChristmasstoriesofstillearlierdatehasalmostwhollydisappeared。Itwasaqualitywhichcouldnotbeworkedsolongasthephantomsandhair—breadthescapes。Peoplealwaysknewthatcharacterisnotchangedbyadreaminaseriesoftableaux;thataghostcannotdomuchtowardsreforminganinordinatelyselfishperson;thatalifecannotbeturnedwhite,likeaheadofhair,inasinglenight,bythemostallegoricalapparition;thatwantandsinandshamecannotbecuredbykettlessingingonthehob;andgraduallytheyceasedtomakebelievethattherewasvirtueinthesedevicesandappliances。Yettheethicalintentionwasnotfruitless,crudeasitnowappears。

Itwaswellonceayear,ifnotoftener,toremindmenbyparableoftheold,simpletruths;toteachthemthatforgiveness,andcharity,andtheendeavorforlifebetterandpurerthaneachhaslived,aretheprinciplesuponwhichalonetheworldholdstogetherandgetsforward。

Itwaswellforthecomfortableandtherefinedtobeputinmindofthesavageryandsufferingallroundthem,andtobetaught,asDickenswasalwaysteaching,thatcertainfeelingswhichgracehumannature,astendernessforthesickandhelpless,self—sacrificeandgenerosity,self—respectandmanlinessandwomanliness,arethecommonheritageoftherace;thedirectgiftofHeaven,sharedequallybytherichandpoor。

Itdidnotnecessarilydetractfromthevalueofthelessonthat,withtheimperfectartofthetime,hemadehispaupersandportersnotonlyhuman,butsuperhuman,andtooaltogethervirtuous;anditremainedtruethathomelifemaybelovelyunderthelowliestroof,althoughhelikedtopaintitwithoutashadowonitsbeautythere。Itisstillafactthatthesickareveryoftensaintly,althoughheputnopeevishnessintotheirpatiencewiththeirills。Hisethicalintentiontoldformanhoodandfraternityandtolerance,andwhenthisintentiondisappearedfromthebetterholidayliterature,thatliteraturewassensiblythepoorerfortheloss。

XXVII。

ButifthehumanitarianimpulsehasmostlydisappearedfromChristmasfiction,Ithinkithasneversogenerallycharacterizedallfiction。

Onemayrefusetorecognizethisimpulse;onemaydenythatitisinanygreaterdegreeshapinglifethaneverbefore,butnoonewhohasthecurrentofliteratureunderhiseyecanfailtonoteitthere。Peoplearethinkingandfeelinggenerously,ifnotlivingjustly,inourtime;

itisadayofanxietytobesavedfromthecursethatisonselfishness,ofeagerquestionhowothersshallbehelped,ofbolddenialthattheconditionsinwhichwewouldfainhaverestedaresacredorimmutable。

EspeciallyinAmerica,wheretheracehasgainedaheightneverreachedbefore,theeminenceenablesmorementhaneverbeforetoseehowevenherevastmassesofmenaresunkinmiserythatmustgroweverydaymorehopeless,orembroiledinastruggleformerelifethatmustendinenslavingandimbrutingthem。

Art,indeed,isbeginningtofindoutthatifitdoesnotmakefriendswithNeeditmustperish。Itperceivesthattotakeitselffromthemanyandleavethemnojoyintheirwork,andtogiveitselftothefewwhomitcanbringnojoyintheiridleness,isanerrorthatkills。Themenandwomenwhodothehardworkoftheworldhavelearnedthattheyhavearighttopleasureintheirtoil,andthatwhenjusticeisdonethemtheywillhaveit。Inallagespoetryhasaffirmedsomethingofthissort,butitremainedforourstoperceiveitandexpressitsomehowineveryformofliterature。Butthisisonlyonephaseofthedevotionofthebestliteratureofourtimetotheserviceofhumanity。Nobookwrittenwithaloworcynicalmotivecouldsucceednow,nomatterhowbrilliantlywritten;andtheworkdoneinthepasttotheglorificationofmerepassionandpower,tothedeificationofself,appearsmonstrousandhideous。Theromanticspiritworshippedgenius,worshippedheroism,butatitsbest,insuchamanasVictorHugo,thisspiritrecognizedthesupremeclaimofthelowesthumanity。Itserrorwastoidealizethevictimsofsociety,topaintthemimpossiblyvirtuousandbeautiful;buttruth,whichhassucceededtothehighestmissionofromance,paintsthesevictimsastheyare,andbidstheworldconsiderthemnotbecausetheyarebeautifulandvirtuous,butbecausetheyareuglyandvicious,cruel,filthy,andonlynotaltogetherloathsomebecausethedivinecanneverwhollydieoutofthehuman。Thetruthdoesnotfindthesevictimsamongthepooralone,amongthehungry,thehouseless,theragged;butitalsofindsthemamongtherich,cursedwiththeaimlessness,thesatiety,thedespairofwealth,wastingtheirlivesinafool’sparadiseofshowsandsemblances,withnothingrealbutthemiserythatcomesofinsincerityandselfishness。

Idonotthinkthefictionofourowntimeevenalwaysequaltothiswork,orperhapsmorethanseldomso。ButasIonceexpressed,tothelong—reverberatingdiscontentoftwocontinents,fictionisnowafinerartthanit,hasbeenhitherto,andmorenearlymeetstherequirementsoftheinfalliblestandard。Ihavehopesofrealusefulnessinit,becauseitisatlastbuildingontheonlysurefoundation;butIambynomeanscertainthatitwillbetheultimateliteraryform,orwillremainasimportantaswebelieveitisdestinedtobecome。Onthecontrary,itisquiteimaginablethatwhenthegreatmassofreaders,nowsunkinthefoolishjoysofmerefable,shallbeliftedtoaninterestinthemeaningofthingsthroughthefaithfulportrayaloflifeinfiction,thenfictionthemostfaithfulmaybesupersededbyastillmorefaithfulformofcontemporaneoushistory。Iwillinglyleavetheprecisecharacterofthisformtothemorerobustimaginationofreaderswhosemindshavebeennurtureduponromanticnovels,andwhoreallyhaveanimaginationworthspeakingof,andconfinemyself,asusual,tothehithersideoftheregionsofconjecture。

Theartwhichinthemeantimedisdainstheofficeofteacherisoneofthelastrefugesofthearistocraticspiritwhichisdisappearingfrompoliticsandsociety,andisnowseekingtoshelteritselfinaesthetics。

Theprideofcasteisbecomingtheprideoftaste;butasbefore,itisaversetothemassofmen;itconsentstoknowthemonlyinsomeconventionalizedandartificialguise。Itseekstowithdrawitself,tostandaloof;tobedistinguished,andnottobeidentified。Democracyinliteratureisthereverseofallthis。Itwishestoknowandtotellthetruth,confidentthatconsolationanddelightarethere;itdoesnotcaretopaintthemarvellousandimpossibleforthevulgarmany,ortosentimentalizeandfalsifytheactualforthevulgarfew。Menaremorelikethanunlikeoneanother:letusmakethemknowoneanotherbetter,thattheymaybeallhumbledandstrengthenedwithasenseoftheirfraternity。Neitherarts,norletters,norsciences,exceptastheysomehow,clearlyorobscurely,tendtomaketheracebetterandkinder,aretoberegardedasseriousinterests;theyarealllowerthantherudestcraftsthatfeedandhouseandclothe,forexcepttheydothisofficetheyareidle;andtheycannotdothisexceptfromandthroughthetruth。