Inpsychoanalytictreatment，however，theassociation—experimentenablesonetomakeonlyapreliminary，qualitativeanalysisofthecase，itoffersnoessentialcontributiontothetechnique，andisreallynotindispensableintheworkofanalysis。Ofmoreimportance，however，wasanotherdiscoveryoftheZü；richSchool，orrather，ofitstwoleaders，BleulerandJung。
Theformerpointedoutthatagreatmanypurelypsychiatriccasescanbeexplainedbythesamepsychoanalyticprocessasthoseusedindreamsandintheneuroses（FreudscheMechanismen）。Jungemployedwithsuccesstheanalyticmethodofinterpretationinthestrangestandmostobscurephenomenaofdementiapræ；cox，theoriginofwhichappearedquiteclearwhencorrelatedwiththelifeandinterestsofthepatient。Fromthattimeonitbecameimpossibleforthepsychiatriststoignorepsychoanalysis。Bleuler’sgreatworkonSchizophrenie[sic]（1911），inwhichthepsychoanalyticpointsofviewareplacedonanequalfootingwiththeclinical—systematicones，broughtthissuccesstocompletion。
Imustnotomittopointoutadivergencewhichwasthenalready[p。
21]distinctlynoticeableintheworkingtendenciesofthetwoschools。
Alreadyin1897Ihadpublishedtheanalysisofacaseofschizophrenia，whichshowed，however，paranoidtrends，sothatitssolutioncouldnothaveanticipatedtheimpressionofJung’sanalyses。Buttometheimportantelementhadnotbeentheinterpretationofthesymptoms，butratherthepsychicmechanismsofthedisease，andaboveall，theagreementofthismechanismwiththeonealreadyknowninhysteria。Nolighthadbeenthrownatthattimeonthedifferencebetweenthesetwomaladies。Iwasthenalreadyworkingtowardatheoryofthelibidointheneuroseswhichwastoexplainallneuroticaswellaspsychoticappearancesonthebasisofabnormaldriftsofthelibido。TheSwissinvestigatorslackedthispointofview。
SofarasIknowBleuler，eventoday，adherestoanorganiccausationfortheformsofDementiaPræ；cox，andJung，whosebookonthismaladyappearedin1907，upheldthetoxictheoryofthesameattheCongressatSalzburgin1908，whichthoughnotexcludingit，goesfarbeyondthelibidotheory。Onthissamepointhecametogrieflater（1912），inthathenowusedtoomuchofthestuffwhichpreviouslyherefusedtoemployatall。
AthirdcontributionfromtheSwissSchool，whichistobeascribedprobablyentirelytoJung，Idonotvalueashighlyasdootherswhoarenotinasclosecontactwithit。Ispeakofthetheoryofthecomplexes，whichgrewoutofthe\"DiagnostischeAssoziationsstudien\"（1906—1910）。
Ititselfhasneitherresultedinapsychologicaltheorynorhasitaddedanunconstrainedinsertiontothecontextofthepsychoanalyticprinciples。
Ontheotherhand，theword\"complex\"hasgainedforitselftherightofcitizenshipinpsychoanalysis，asbeingaconvenientandoftenanindispensabletermfordescriptivesummariesofpsychologicfacts。Noneotheramongthenamesanddesignations，newlycoinedasaresultofpsychoanalyticneeds，hasattainedsuchwidespreadpopularity；butnoothertermhasbeensomisappliedtothedetrimentofclearthinking。Inpsychoanalyticdictiononeoftenspokeofthe\"returnofthecomplex\"when\"thereturnoftherepression\"wasintendedtobeconveyed，oronebecameaccustomedtosay\"Ihaveacomplex[p。22]againsthim\"whenmorecorrectlyheshouldhavesaid\"aresistance。\"
Intheyearsafter1907，whichfollowedtheunionoftheschoolsofViennaandZü；rich，psychoanalysisreceivedthatextraordinaryimpetusinwhichitstillfindsitselftoday。Thisispositivelyattestedbythespreadofpsychoanalyticliteratureandtheincreaseinthenumberofdoctorswhodesiretopracticeorlearnit，alsobythemassofattacksuponitbycongressesandlearnedsocieties。Ithaswanderedintothemostdistantcountries，iteverywhereshockedpsychiatrists，andhasgainedtheattentionoftheculturedlaityandworkersinotherscientificfields。HavelockEllis，whohasfolloweditsdevelopmentwithsympathywithoutevercallinghimselfitsadherent，wrote，in1911，inapaperfortheAustralasianMedicalCongress：\"Freud’spsychoanalysisisnowchampionedandcarriedoutnotonlyinAustriaandinSwitzerland，butintheUnitedStates，inEngland，India，Canada，and，Idoubtnot，inAustralasia。\"[5]
AdoctorfromChile（probablyaGerman）appearedattheInternationalCongressinBuenosAyres[sic]，in1910，andspokeonbehalfoftheexistenceofinfantilesexualityandpraisedtheresultsofpsychoanalytictherapyinobsessions。\"[6]AnEnglishneurologistinCentralIndiainformedmethroughadistinguishedcolleaguewhocametoEurope，thatthecasesofMohammedanIndiansonwhomhehadpracticedanalysisshowednootheretiologyoftheirneurosesthanourEuropeanpatients。
TheintroductionofpsychoanalysisintoNorthAmericatookplaceunderparticularlygloriousauspices。Intheautumnof1909，JungandmyselfwereinvitedbyPresidentStanleyHall，ofClarkUniversity，totakepartinthecelebrationofthetwentiethanniversaryoftheopeningofClarkUniversity，bygivingsomelecturesinGerman。Wefound，toourgreatastonishment，thattheunprejudicedmenofthatsmallbutrespectedpedagogic—philosophicaluniversityknewallthepsychoanalyticwritingsandhadhonoredthem[p。
23]intheirlecturestotheirstudents。ThuseveninprudishAmericaonecould，atleastinacademiccircles，discussfreelyandtreatscientificallyallthosethingsthatareregardedasoffensiveinlife。ThefivelecturesthatIimprovisedatWorcesterthenappearedinEnglishintheAmericanJournalofPsychology；laterontheywereprintedinGermanunderthetitle，\"Ü；berPsychoanalyse。\"Junglecturedondiagnosticassociationstudiesandon\"conflictsinthepsychiclifeofthechild。\"WewererewardedforitwiththehonorarydegreeofLL。D。DuringthisweekofcelebrationatWorcester，psychoanalysiswasrepresentedbyfivepersons。BesidesJungandmyselftherewereFerenczi，whohadjoinedmeastravelling—companion，ErnestJones，thenofTorontoUniversity（Canada），nowinLondon，andA。
A。Brill，whowasalreadypractisingpsychoanalysisinNewYork。
ThemostnoteworthypersonalrelationshipwhichresultedatWorcester，wasthatestablishedwithJamesJ。Putnam，teacherofneuropathologyatHarvardUniversity。Foryearshehadexpressedadisparagingopinionofpsychoanalysis，butnowhebefriendeditandrecommendedittohiscountrymenandhiscolleaguesinnumerouslectures，richincontentandfineofform。
TherespectwhichheenjoysinAmerica，owingtohischaracter，hishighmoralstandardandhiskeenlovefortruth，wasveryhelpfultothecauseofpsychoanalysisandprotecteditagainstthedenunciationstowhichitmightotherwisehaveearlysuccumbed。YieldingtoomuchtothegreatethicalandphilosophicbentofhisnaturePutnamlaterrequiredofpsychoanalysiswhat，tome，seemsanimpossibledemand。Hewishedthatitshouldbepressedintotheserviceofacertainmoralphilosophicalconceptionoftheuniverse；
butPutnamhasremainedthechiefpropofthepsychoanalyticmovementinhisnativeland。
ForthediffusionofthismovementBrillandJonesdeservethegreatestcredit。Withaself—denyingindustrytheyconstantlybroughtunderthenoticeoftheircountrymen，throughtheirworks，theeasilyobservablefundamentalprinciplesofpsychoanalysisofeverydaylife，ofthedreamandoftheneuroses。Brillhasstrengthenedtheseinfluencesbyhismedicalactivitiesandhistranslationsof[p。24]mywritings：Jones，byilluminatinglecturesandcleverdiscussionsattheAmericanCongresses。[7]
ThelackofarootedscientifictraditionandthelesserrigidityofofficialauthorityhavebeenofdecidedadvantagetotheimpetusgiventopsychoanalysisinAmericabyStanleyHall。Itwascharacteristictherefromthebeginningthatprofessors，headsofinsaneasylums，aswellasindependentpractitioners，allshowedthemselvesequallyinterestedinpsychoanalysis。Butjustforthisveryreasonitisclearthatthefightforpsychoanalysismustbefoughttoadecisiveend，wherethegreaterresistancehasbeenmetwith，namely，inthecountriesoftheoldculturalcenters。
OftheEuropeancountries，Francehassofarshownherselftheleastreceptivetowardspsychoanalysis，althoughcreditablewritingsbytheZü；richphysician，A。Maeder，haveopenedupfortheFrenchreaderaneasypathtoitsprinciples。ThefirstindicationsofinterestcamefromprovincialFrance。Moricheau—Beauchant（Poitiers）wasthefirstFrenchmanwhoopenlyacceptedpsychoanalysis。Ré；gisandHesnard（Bordeaux）havelatelytried（1913）toovercometheprejudicesoftheircountrymenbyanexhaustiveandsensefulpresentationofthesubject，whichtakesexceptiononlytosymbolism。InParisitselftherestillappearstoreigntheconviction（givensuchoratoricalexpressionatLondonCongress1913byJanet）thateverythinggoodinpsychoanalysisonlyrepeats，withslightmodifications，theviewsofJanet——everythingelseinpsychoanalysisbeingbad。JanethimselfhadtostandatthisCongressanumberofcorrectionsfromErnestJones，whowasabletoreproachhimforhislackofknowledgeofthesubject。
Wecannot，however，forgetthecreditdueJanetforhisworksonthepsychologyoftheneuroses，althoughwemustrepudiatehisclaims。
Italy，aftermanypromisingstarts，ceasedtotakefurtherinterest。
OwingtopersonalconnectionspsychoanalysisgainedanearlyhearinginHolland：VanEmden，VanOphuijsen，VanRenterghem[p。25]（\"Freudenzijnschool\"）andthetwodoctorsStä；rkearebusyinHollandparticularlyonthetheoreticalside。[8]TheinterestinpsychoanalysisinscientificcirclesinEnglanddevelopedveryslowly，buttheindicationsarethatjusthere，favoredbytheEnglishlikingforthepracticalandtheirpassionatechampionshipofjustice，aflourishingfutureawaitspsychoanalysis。
InSweden，P。Bjerre，successortoWetterstand，has，atleasttemporarily，givenuphypnoticsuggestioninfavorofanalytictreatment。A。Vogt（Christiania）
honoredpsychoanalysisalreadyin1907inhis\"Psykiatriensgruntraek，\"
sothatthefirsttext—bookonpsychiatrythattookanynoticeofpsychoanalysiswaswritteninNorwegian。InRussia，psychoanalysisisverygenerallyknownandwidespread；almostallmywritingsaswellasthoseofotheradvocatesofanalysisaretranslatedintoRussian。ButadeepergraspoftheanalyticteachinghasnotyetshownitselfinRussia。ThecontributionswrittenbyRussianphysiciansandpsychiatristsarenotatpresentnoteworthy。
OnlyOdessapossessesatrainedpsychoanalystinthepersonofM。Wulff。
TheintroductionofpsychoanalysisintothescienceandliteratureofPolandisduechieflytotheendeavorsofL。Jekels。Hungary，geographicallysoneartoAustria，scientificallysoforeigntoit，hasgiventopsychoanalysisonlyoneco—worker，S。Ferenczi，butsuchanoneasisworthawholesociety。
ThestandingofpsychoanalysisinGermanycanbedescribedinnootherwaythantostatethatitisthecynosureofallscientificdiscussion，andevokesfromphysiciansaswellasfromthelaity，opinionsofdecidedrejection，which，sofar，havenotcometoanend，butwhich，onthecontrary，areconstantlyrenewedandstrengthened。Noofficialseatoflearninghas，sofar，admittedpsychoanalysis。Successfulpractitionerswhoapplyitarefew。Onlyafewinstitutions，suchasthatofBinswanger’sinKreuzlingen（onSwisssoil）andMarcinowski’sinHolstein，haveopenedtheirdoorsto[p。26]psychoanalysis。InthecriticalcityofBerlin，wehaveK。Abraham，oneofthemostprominentrepresentativesofpsychoanalysis。HewasformerlyanassistantofBleuler。Onemightwonderthatthisstateofthingshasthuscontinuedforanumberofyearswithoutanychange，ifitwasnotknownthattheaboveaccountmerelydescribesthesuperficialappearances。
Onemustnotoverestimatethesignificanceoftherejectionofpsychoanalysisbytheofficialrepresentativesofscience，theheadsofinstitutions，aswellastheiryoungfollowing。Itiseasytounderstandwhytheopponentsloudlyraisetheirvoiceswhilstthefollowers，beingintimidated，keepsilent。Manyofthelatter，whosefirstcontributionstoanalysisraisedhighexpectations，laterwithdrewfromthemovementunderthepressureofcircumstances。Butthemovementitselfstridesaheadquietly。Itisalwaysgainingnewsupportersamongpsychiatristsandthelaity。Itconstantlyincreasesthenumberofreadersofpsychoanalyticliteratureandthusforcestheopponentstoamoreviolentattemptatdefense。InthecourseoftheseyearsIhaveread，perhapsadozentimes，inthereportsofthetransactionsofcertaincongressesandofmeetingsofscientificsocieties，orinreviewsofcertainpublications，thatpsychoanalysiswasnowdead，thatitwasfinallyovercomeandsettled。TheanswertoallthiswouldhavetoreadlikethetelegramfromMarkTwaintothenewspaperthatfalselyannouncedhisdeath：\"Thereportofmydeathisgrosslyexaggerated。\"Aftereachofthesedeath—notices，psychoanalysishasgainednewfollowersandco—workersandhascreatedforitselfneworgans。Surelytobereporteddeadisanadvanceoverbeingtreatedwithdeadsilence!
Handinhandwithitsterritorialexpansionjustdescribedpsychoanalysisbecameenlargedwithregardtoitscontentsthroughitsencroachinguponfieldsofknowledgeoutsideofthestudyoftheneurosesandpsychiatry。
IwillnottreatindetailthedevelopmentofthispartofourbranchofsciencesincethiswasexcellentlydonebyRankandSachs（inLö；wenfeld’s\"Grenzfragen\"）[9]whichpresents[p。27]exhaustivelyjusttheseachievementsintheworkofanalysis。Besides，hereeverythingisininchoateform，hardlyworkedout，mostlyonlypreliminaryandsometimesonlyinthestageofanintention。Everyhonestthinkerwillfindhereinnogroundsforreproach。Thereisatremendousamountofproblemsforasmallnumberofworkerswhosechiefactivitylieselsewhere，whoareobligedtoattackthespecialproblemsofthenewsciencewithonlyamateurishpreparation。Theseworkershailingfromthepsychoanalyticfieldmakenosecretoftheirdilettantism，theyonlydesiretobeguidesandtemporaryoccupantsoftheplacesofthosespecialiststowhomtheyrecommendtheanalytictechniqueandprinciplesuntilthelatterarereadytotakeupthisworkthemselves。Thattheresultsaimedatare，evennow，notatallinsignificant，isduepartlytothefruitfulnessofthepsychoanalyticmethod，andpartlytothecircumstancethatalreadythereareafewinvestigators，who，withoutbeingphysicians，havemadetheapplicationofpsychoanalysistothementalsciencestheirlifework。
Mostofthesepsychoanalyticapplicationscanbetraced，asiseasilyunderstood，totheimpetusgivenbymyearlyanalyticworks。Theanalyticexaminationsofnervouspatientsandneuroticmanifestationsofnormalpersonsdrovemetotheassumptionofpsychologicalrelationshipswhich，mostcertainly，couldnotbelimitedonlytothatfield。Thusanalysispresentedusnotonlywiththeexplanationofpathologicaloccurrences，butalsoshowedustheirconnectionwithnormalpsychiclifeanduncoveredundreamed—ofrelationsbetweenpsychiatryandavarietyofothersciencesdealingwithactivitiesofmind。Thuscertaintypicaldreamsfurnishedtheunderstandingofmanymythsandfairytales。RiklinandAbrahamfollowedthishintandbeganthoseinvestigationsaboutmythswhichhavefoundtheircompletionintheworksofRankonMythology，workswhichdofulljusticetoalltherequirementsofthespecialist。Theprosecutionofdream—symbologyledtotheveryheartoftheproblemsofmythology，folk—lore（Jones，Storfer）
andofreligiousabstraction。AtoneofthepsychoanalyticcongressestheaudiencewasdeeplyimpressedwhenastudentofJungpointedoutthesimilarity[p。28]ofthephantasy—formationofschizophrenicswiththecosmogoniesofprimitivetimesandpeoples。Inalaterelaboration，nolongerfreefromobjectionyetveryinteresting，Jungmadeuseofmythologicalmaterialinanattempttoharmonizetheneuroticwithreligiousandmythologicalphantasies。
Anotherpathledfromtheinvestigationofdreamstotheanalysisofpoeticcreations，andfinallytotheanalysisofauthorsandartiststhemselves。
Verysoonitwasdiscoveredthatthedreamsinventedbywritersstandinthesamerelationtoanalysisasdogenuinedreams。[10]
Theconceptionoftheunconsciouspsychicactivityenabledustogetthefirstglimpseintothenatureofthepoeticcreativeness。Thevaluationoftheemotionalfeelingswhichwewereforcedtorecognizewhilestudyingtheneurosesenabledustorecognizethesourcesofartisticproductionsandbroughtuptheproblemastohowtheartistreactstothosestimuliandwithwhatmeanshedisguiseshisreactions。[11]
Mostpsychoanalystswithwideinterestshavefurnishedcontributionsfromtheirworksforthetreatmentoftheseproblems，whichareamongthemostattractiveintheapplicationofpsychoanalysis。Naturallyherealsooppositionwasnotlackingfromthosewhoarenotacquaintedwithanalysis，andexpresseditselfwiththesamelackofunderstandingandpassionaterejectionasonthenativesoilofpsychoanalysis。Foritwastobeexpectedasamatterofcourse，thateverywherepsychoanalysispenetrates，itwouldhavetogothroughthesamestrugglewiththenatives。However，theseattemptedinvasionshavenotyetstirredupinterestinallfieldswhichwill，inthefuture，beopentothem。AmongthestrictlyscientificapplicationsofanalysistoliteraturethedeepworkofRankonthethemeofincesteasilyranksfirst。Itscontentiscertaintoevokethegreatestunpopularity。
Philologicalandhistoricalworksonthebasisofpsychoanalysisarefew，atpresent。Imyselfdaredtoventuretomakethefirstattempt[p。
29]intotheproblemsofthepsychologyofreligionin1910，whenIcomparedreligiousceremonialswithneuroticceremonials。Inhisworkonthe\"pietyoftheCountofZinzendorf，\"aswellasinothercontributions，theRev。
Dr。Pfister，ofZü；rich，hassucceededintracingbackreligiouszealotismtoperverseeroticism。IntherecentworksoftheZü；richSchooloneismorelikelytofindthatreligionbecomesinjectedintotheanalysisratherthanrationallyexplainedbyit。
Inmyfouressayson\"TotemandTaboo\"[12]Imadetheattempttodiscusstheproblemsofracepsychologybymeansofanalysis。
Thisshouldleadusdirectlytotheoriginsofthemostimportantinstitutionsofourcivilization，suchasstateregulations，morality，religion，aswellastotheoriginsoftheinterdictionofincestandofconscience。
Towhatextenttherelationsthusobtainedwillbeprooftocriticismcannotbedeterminedtoday。
MybookonWit[l3]furnishedthefirstexamplesoftheapplicationofanalyticthinkingtoestheticthemes。Everythingelseisstillwaitingforworkers，whocanexpectarichharvestinthisveryfield。Wearelackinghereinworkersfromtheserespectivespecialtiesandinordertoattractsuch，HansSachsfoundedin1912，thejournalImago，editedbyhimselfandRank。Hitschmannandv。Wintersteinmadeabeginningwiththepsychoanalyticelucidationofphilosophicalsystemsandpersonalities。
Thecontinuationanddeepertreatmentofthesameismuchtobedesired。
Therevolutionaryfindingsofpsychoanalysisconcerningthepsychiclifeofthechild，thepartplayedthereinbysexualimpulses（v。Hug—Helmuth）
andthefateofsuchparticipationofsexualitywhichbecomesuselessforthepurposeofpropagation，naturallydrewattentiontopedagogics，andinstigatedtheefforttopushtheanalyticalviewpointintotheforegroundofthissphere。RecognitionisduetotheRev。Pfisterforhavingbegunthisapplicationofanalysiswithhonestenthusiasm，andforhavingbroughtittothe[p。30]noticeofministersandeducators。[14]
HesucceededinwinningoveranumberofSwisspedagoguesassympathizersinthiswork。Itissaidthatsomepreferredtoremaincircumspectlyinthebackground。AportionoftheViennaanalystsseemtohavelandedintheirretreatfrompsychoanalysisonasortofmedicalpedagogy。（AdlerandFurtmü；ller，\"HeilenandBilden，\"1913·；）
Ihaveattemptedintheseincompletesuggestionstoindicatethe，asyet，hardlyvisiblewealthofassociationswhichhavesprungupbetweenmedicalpsychoanalysisandotherfieldsofscience。ThereismaterialfortheworkofawholegenerationofinvestigatorsandIdoubtnotthatthisworkwillbedonewhenoncetheresistancetopsychoanalysisassuchhasbeenovercome。[15]
Towritethehistoryoftheresistances，Iconsider，atpresent，bothfruitlessandinopportune。Itwouldnotbeverygloriousforthescientificmenofourday。ButIwilladdatoncethatithasneveroccurredtometorailagainsttheopponentsofpsychoanalysismerelybecausetheywereopponents，notcountingafewunworthyindividuals，fortunehuntersandplundererssuchasintimeofwararealwaysfoundonbothsides。ForI
knewhowtoaccountforthebehavioroftheseopponentsandhadbesidesdiscoveredthatpsychoanalysisbringstolighttheworstineveryman。
ButIdecidednottoanswermyopponentsand，sofarasIhadinfluence，tokeepothersfrompolemics。Thevalueofpublicorliterarydiscussionsseemedtomeverydoubtfulundertheparticularconditionsinwhichthefightoverpsychoanalysistookplace。Thevalueofmajoritiesatcongressesorsocietymeetingswascertainlydoubtful，andmyconfidenceinthehonestyanddistinctionofmyopponentswasalwaysslight。Observationshowsthatonlyveryfewpersonsarecapableofremainingpolite，nottospeakofobjective，inanyscientificdispute，andtheimpressiongainedfromascientificquarrelwasalwaysahorrortome。Perhapsthisattitudeofminehasbeenmisunderstood，[p。31]perhapsIhavebeenconsideredasgood—naturedorsointimidatedthatitwassupposednofurtherconsiderationneedbeshownme。
Thisisamistake。Icanrevileandraveaswellasanyother，butI
amnotabletorenderintoliteraryformtheexpressionsoftheunderlyingaffectsandthereforeIprefertoabstainentirely。PerhapsinmanyrespectsitmighthavebeenbetterhadIpermittedfreeventtomyownpassionsandtothoseaboutme。WehaveallheardtheinterestingattemptatanexplanationoftheoriginofpsychoanalysisfromitsViennesemilieu。Janetdidnotscorntomakeuseofitaslateas1913，although，nodoubt，heisproudofbeingaParisian。Thisapereç；usaysthatpsychoanalysis，especiallytheassertionthattheneurosescanbetracedbacktodisturbancesinthesexuallife，couldonlyhaveoriginatedinacitylikeVienna，inanatmosphereofsensualityandimmoralitynottobefoundinothercities，andthatitthusrepresentsonlyareflection，thetheoreticalprojectionasitwere，oftheseparticularVienneseconditions。Well，Icertainlyamnolocalpatriot，butthistheoryhasalwaysseemedtobeespeciallynonsensical，sononsensicalthatsometimesIwasinclinedtoassumethatthereproachingoftheViennaspiritwasonlyaeuphemisticsubstitutionforanotheronewhichonedidnotcaretobringuppublicly。Iftheassumptionshadbeenoftheoppositekind，wemightbeinclinedtolisten。Butevenifweassumethattheremightbeacitywhoseinhabitantshaveimposeduponthemselvesspecialsexualrestrictionsandatthesametimeshowapeculiartendencytosevereneuroticmaladies，thensuchatownmightwellfurnishthesoilonwhichsomeobservermightgettheideaofconnectingthesetwofactsandofdeductingtheonefromtheother。ButneitherassumptionfitsVienna。TheVienneseareneithermoreabstemiousnoryetmorenervousthandwellersinanyothermetropolis。Sexmattersarealittlefreer，prudishnessislessthaninthecitiesofwesternandnorthernEuropethataresoproudoftheirchastity。Oursupposedobserverwould，morelikely，beledastraybytheparticularconditionsprevailinginViennathanbeenlightenedastothecauseoftheneuroses。[p。32]
ButViennahasdoneeverythingpossibletodenyhershareintheoriginofpsychoanalysis。Nowhereelseistheinimicalindifferenceofthelearnedandculturedcirclessoclearlyevidenttothepsychoanalyst。
PerhapsIamsomewhattoblameforthisbymypolicyofavoidingwidespreadpublicity。IfIhadcausedpsychoanalysistooccupythemedicalsocietiesofViennawithnoisysessions，withanunloadingofallpassions，whereinallreproachesandinvectivescarriedonthetongueorinthemindwouldhavebeenexpressed，thenperhapsthebanagainstpsychoanalysismight，bynow，havebeenremovedanditsstandingnolongermighthavebeenthatofastrangerinitsnativecity。Asitis，thepoetmayberightwhenhemakesWallensteinsay：\"YetthistheViennesewillnotforgiveme，ThatIdidthemoutofaspectacle。\"ThetasktowhichIamunequal，namely，thatofreproachingtheopponents\"suaviterinmodo\"fortheirinjusticeandarbitrariness，wastakenupbyBleulerin1911andcarriedoutinmosthonorablefashioninhiswork，\"Freud’sPsychoanalysis：aDefenseandaCriticism。\"Itwouldbesoentirelynaturalformetopraisethiswork，criticalintwodirections，thatI
hastentotellwhatthereisinitIobjectto。Thisworkappearstometobestillverypartisan，toolenienttothemistakesofouropponents，andaltogethertooseveretotheshortcomingsofourfollowers。Thischaracterizationofitmayexplainwhytheopinionofapsychiatristofsuchhighstanding，ofsuchindubitableabilityandindependence，hasnothadgreaterinfluenceonhiscolleagues。Theauthorof\"Affectivity\"（1906）mustnotbesurprisediftheinfluenceofaworkisnotdeterminedbythevalueofitsargumentbutbythetoneofitsaffect。Anotherpartofthisinfluence——theoneonthefollowersofpsychoanalysis——Bleulerhimselfdestroyedlateronbybringingintoprominencein1913，inhis\"CriticismoftheFreudianSchool，\"theobversesideofhisattitudetopsychoanalysis。Thereinhetakesawaysomuchfromthestructureofthepsychoanalyticprinciplesthatouropponentsmaywellbesatisfiedwiththeassistanceofthisdefender。
[p。33]ItwasnotnewargumentsorbetterobservationsthatservedBleulerasaguidancefortheseverdicts，butonlythereferencetoownknowledge，theinadequacyofwhichtheauthornolongeradmitsasinhisearlierwritings。
Hereanalmostirreparablelossseemedtothreatenpsychoanalysis。However，inhislastutterance（\"DieKritikenderSchizophrenie，\"1914）ontheoccasionoftheattacksmadeuponhimowingtohisintroductionofpsychoanalysisintohisbookon\"Schizophrenie，\"Bleulerrisestowhathehimselftermsa\"haughtypresumption：\"\"ButnowIwillassumeahaughtypresumption，Iconsiderthatthemanypsychologiestodatehavecontributedmightylittletotheexplanationoftheconnectionbetweenpsychogeneticsymptomsanddiseases，butthatthedeeperpsychology（tiefenpsychologie）furnishesusapartofthepsychologystilltobecreated，whichthephysicianneedsinordertounderstandhispatientsandtohealthemrationally；andI
evenbelievethatinmy’Schizophrenie’Ihavetakenaverysmallsteptowardsthis。\"Thefirsttwoassertionsaresurelycorrect，thelattermaybeanerror。
Sincebythe\"deeperpsychology\"psychoanalysisaloneistobeunderstood，wemay，forthepresent，remainsatisfiedwiththisadmission。[p。34]III\"Cutitshort，Ondoomsday’twon’tbeworthafarthing!\"Goethe。TwoyearsafterthefirstcongressthesecondprivatecongressofpsychoanalyststookplaceatNuremberg，March，1910。·；Duringtheinterval，whilstIwasstillundertheimpressionofthefavorablereceptioninAmerica，thegrowinghostilityinGermanyandtheunexpectedsupportthroughtheacquisitionoftheZü；richSchool，IhadconceivedaprojectwhichIwasabletocarryout，atthissecondcongress，withthehelpofmyfriendS。Ferenczi。Ihadinmindtoorganizethepsychoanalyticmovement，totransferitscentertoZü；rich，andplaceitunderaheadwhowouldtakecareofitsfuture。Asthisfoundmuchoppositionamongtheadherentsofpsychoanalysis，Iwillexplainmymotivesmorefully。ThusIhopetojustifymyself，evenifitturnsoutthatmyactionwasnotaverywiseone。
IjudgedthattheassociationwithViennawasnorecommendation，butratheranobstacleforthenewmovement。AplacelikeZü；rich，intheheartofEurope，whereanacademicteacherhadopenedhisinstitutiontopsychoanalysis，seemedtomemuchmorepromising。Moreover，Iassumedthatmyownpersonwasasecondobstacle。Theestimateputuponmypersonalitywasutterlyconfusedbythefavorordislikefromdifferentfactions。I
waseithercomparedtoDarwinandKeplerorreviledasaparalytic。I，therefore，desiredtopushintothebackgroundnotonlythecitywhencepsychoanalysisemanated，butalsomyownpersonality。Furthermore，Iwasnolongeryoung，IsawalongroadbeforemeandIfeltoppressedbytheideathatithadfallentomylottobecomealeaderinmyadvancedage。
YetIfeltthattheremustbealeader。Iknewonlytoowellwhatmistakeslayinwaitforhimwhowouldundertakethepracticeofpsychoanalysis，andhopedthatmanyofthesemightbeavoidedifwehadanauthoritywhowaspreparedto[p。35]guideandadmonish。Suchauthoritynaturallydevolveduponmeinviewoftheindisputableadvantageoffifteenyears’experience。
Itwasnowmydesiretotransferthisauthoritytoayoungermanwhowould，quitenaturally，takemyplaceonmydeath。IfeltthatthispersoncouldbeonlyC。G。Jung，forBleulerwasofmyownage。InfavorofJungwashisconspicuoustalents，thecontributionshehadalreadymadetoanalysis，hisindependentposition，andtheimpressionofenergywhichhispersonalityalwaysmade。Healsoseemedpreparedtoenterintofriendlyrelationswithme，andtogiveup，formysake，certainrace—prejudiceswhichhehadsofarpermittedhimselftoindulge。Ihadnonotionthenthatinspiteoftheadvantagesenumerated，thiswasaveryunfortunatechoice；thatitconcernedapersonwho，incapableoftoleratingtheauthorityofanother，wasstilllessfittedtobehimselfanauthority，onewhoseenergywasdevotedtotheunscrupulouspursuitofhisowninterests。
TheformationofanofficialorganizationIconsiderednecessarybecauseIfearedtheabusestowhichpsychoanalysiswouldbesubjected，onceitshouldachievepopularity。Ifeltthatthereshouldbeaplacethatcouldgivethedictum：\"Withallthisnonsense，analysishasnothingtodo；thisisnotpsychoanalysis。\"Itwasdecidedthatatthemeetingofthelocalgroupswhichtogetherformedtheinternationalorganization，instructionshouldbegivenhowpsychoanalysisshouldbepractised，thatphysiciansshouldbetrainedthereandthatthelocalsocietyshould，inaway，standsponsorforthem。Italsoappearedtomedesirablethattheadherentsofpsychoanalysisshouldmeetforfriendlyintercourseandmutualsupport，inasmuchasofficialsciencehadpronounceditsgreatbanandboycottagainstphysiciansandinstitutionspractisingpsychoanalysis。ThisandnothingelseIwishedtoattainbythefoundingofthe\"InternationalPsychoanalyticAssociation。\"Perhapsitwasmorethancouldpossiblybeattained。Justasmyopponentslearnedthatitwasnotpossibletostemthenewmovement，soIhadtolearn，byexperience，thatitwouldnotpermititselftobeledalongtheparticularpathwhichIhadlaidoutforit。Themotionmadeby[p。36]FerencziatNurembergwasseconded。Jungwaselectedpresident，andRiklinwaschosenassecretary。Itwasalsodecidedtopublishacorrespondingjournalthroughwhichthecentralassociationwas\"tofosterandfurtherthescienceofpsychoanalysisasfoundedbyFreudbothaspurepsychology，aswellasinitsapplicationtomedicineandthementalsciences，andtopromoteassistanceamongthemembersinalltheireffortstoacquireandtospreadpsychoanalyticknowledge。\"ThemembersoftheViennagroupalonefirmlyopposedtheprojectswithapassionateexcitement。Adlerexpressedhisfearthat\"acensorshipandlimitationofscientificfreedom\"wasintended。
TheViennesefinallygavein，afterhavinggainedtheirpointthatZü；richshouldnotberaisedtothecenteroftheassociation，butthatthecentershouldbethehomecityofthepresident，whowastobeelectedfortwoyears。
Atthiscongressthreelocalgroupswereconstituted：oneinBerlinunderthechairmanshipofAbraham，oneinZü；rich，whosechairmanbecamethepresidentofthecentralassociation，andoneinVienna，thechairmanshipofwhichIrelinquishedtoAdler。Afourthgroup，inBudapest，couldnotbeformeduntillater。OnaccountofillnessBleulerhadbeenabsentfromthecongress。Laterbeevincedconsiderablehesitationaboutenteringtheassociationandalthoughhelethimselfbepersuadedtodosobymypersonalrepresentations，heresignedashorttimeafterwardsowingtodisagreementsatZü；rich。ThisseveredtheconnectionbetweentheZü；richgroupandtheBurghö；lzliinstitution。
AnotherresultoftheNurembergCongresswasthefoundingoftheZentralblattfü；rPsychoanalyse，whichcausedareconciliationbetweenAdlerandStekel。IthadoriginallybeenintendedasanopposingtendencyandwastowinbackforViennathehegemonythreatenedbytheelectionofJung。
Butwhenthetwofoundersofthejournal，underpressureofthedifficultyoffindingapublisher，assuredmeoftheirfriendlyintentionsandasguaranteeoftheirattitudegavemetherighttoveto，Iacceptedtheeditorshipandworkedvigorouslyforthisneworgan，thefirstnumberofwhichappearedinSeptember，1910。[p。37]
IwillnotcontinuethehistoryofthePsychoanalyticCongress。ThethirdonetookplaceatWeimar，September，1911，andevensurpassedthepreviousonesinspiritandscientificinterest。J。J。Putnam，whowaspresentatthismeeting，laterexpressedinAmericahissatisfactionandhisrespectforthe\"mentalattitude\"ofthosepresentandquotedwordswhichIwassupposedtohaveusedinreferencetothelatter：\"Theyhavelearnedtoendureabitoftruth。\"AsamatteroffactanyonewhohasattendedscientificcongressesmusthavereceivedalastingimpressioninfavorofthePsychoanalyticAssociation。Imyselfhadpresidedovertwoformercongresses。Ithoughtitbesttogiveeverylecturerampletimeforhispaperandleftthediscussionsoftheselecturestotakeplacelaterasasortofprivateexchangeofideas。Jung，whopresidedovertheWeimarmeeting，reë；stablishedthediscussionsaftereachlecture，whichhadnot，however，proveddisturbingatthattime。
Twoyearslater，inSeptember，1913，quiteanotherpicturewaspresentedbythecongressatMunichwhichisstillvividlyrecalledbythosewhowerepresent。ItwaspresidedoverbyJunginanunamiableandincorrectfashion：thelecturerswerelimitedastotime，andthediscussiondwarfedthelectures。ThroughamaliciousmoodofchancetheevilgeniusofHochehadtakenuphisresidenceinthesamehouseinwhichtheanalystsheldtheirmeetings。Hochecouldeasilyhaveconvincedhimselfthathischaracterizationofthesepsychoanalysts，asasect，blindlyandmeeklyfollowingtheirleader，wastrueadabsurdum。Thefatiguingandunedifyingproceedingsendedinthereë；lectionofJungaspresidentoftheInternationalPsychoanalyticAssociation，whichfactJungaccepted，althoughtwofifthsofthosepresentrefusedhimtheirsupport。Wetookleavefromoneanotherwithoutfeelingtheneedtomeetagain!
AboutthetimeofthisthirdCongresstheconditionoftheInternationalPsychoanalyticAssociationwasasfollows：ThelocalgroupsatVienna，Berlin，andZurichhadconstitutedthemselvesalreadyatthecongressatNurembergin1910。InMay，1911，agroup，underthechairmanshipofDr。
L。Seif，wasaddedatMunich。InthesameyearthefirstAmericanlocalgroupwasformedunderthechairmanship[p。38]ofA。A。Brillunderthenameof\"TheNewYorkPsychoanalyticSociety。\"AttheWeimarCongress，thefoundingofasecondAmericangroupwasauthorized。Thiscameintoexistenceduringthenextyearas\"TheAmericanPsychoanalyticAssociation。\"
ItincludedmembersfromCanadaandallAmerica；Putnamwaselectedpresident，andErnestJoneswasmadesecretary。JustbeforethecongressatMü；nichin1913，alocalgroupwasfoundedatBudapestundertheleadershipofS。Ferenczi。SoonafterwardsJones，whosettledinLondon，foundedthefirstEnglishgroup。Thenumberofmembersoftheeightgroupstheninexistencecouldnot，ofcourse，furnishanystandardforthecomputationofthenon—organizedstudentsandadherentsofpsychoanalysis。
Thedevelopmentoftheperiodicalliteratureofpsychoanalysisisalsoworthyofabriefmention。ThefirstperiodicalpublicationsservingtheinterestsofanalysisweretheSchriftenzurangewandtenSeelenkundenwhichhaveappearedirregularlysince1907andhavereachedthefifteenthvolume。[15a]
TheypublishedwritingsbyFreud，Riklin，Jung，Abraham，Rank，Sadger，Pfister，M。Graf，Jones，StorferandHug—Hellmuth。ThefoundingoftheImago，tobementionedlater，hassomewhatloweredthevalueofthisformofpublication。AfterthemeetingatSalzburg，1908theJahrbuchfü；rpsychoanalytischeundpsychopathologischeForschungenwasfounded，whichappearedunderJung’seditorshipforfiveyears，andithasnowreappearedunderneweditorshipandundertheslightlychangedtitleofJahrbuchderPsychoanalyse。Itnolongerwishestobeasinformeryears，merelyanarchiveforcollectingworksofpsychoanalyticmerit，butitwishestojustifyitseditorialtaskbytakingduenoticeofalloccurrencesandallendeavorsinthefieldofpsychoanalysis。AsmentionedbeforeDasZentralblattfü；rPsychoanalysestartedbyAdlerandStekelafterthefoundingofthe\"InternationalAssociation\"（Nuremberg，1910）wentthroughinashorttimeaveryvariedcareer。Alreadyinthetenthissueofthefirstvolumetherewasanannouncementthatinviewofscientificdifferenceofopinionwith[p。39]theeditors，Dr。Adlerhaddecidedvoluntarilytowithdrawhiscollaboration。ThisplacedtheentireeditorshipinthehandsofDr。
Stekel（summerof1911）。AttheWeimarcongresstheZentralblattwasraisedtotheofficialorganofthe\"InternationalAssociation\"andbyraisingtheannualduesitwasmadeaccessibletoallmembers。Beginningwiththethirdnumberofthesecondyear（winter1912）Stekelalonebecameresponsibleforthecontentsofthejournal。Hisbehavior，whichisdifficulttoexplaininpublic，forcedmetoseverallmyconnectionswiththisjournalandtogivepsychoanalysisinallhasteaneworgan，theInternationalJournalforMedicalPsychoanalysis（InternationaleZeitschriftfü；rÄ；rztlichePsychoanalyse）。Withthehelpofalmostallmycollaboratorsandthenewpublisher，H。Heller，thefirstnumberofthisnewjournalwasabletoappearinJanuary，19q3，totaketheplaceoftheZentralblattastheofficialorganofthe\"InternationalPsychoanalyticAssociation。\"
MeanwhileDr。HannsSachsandDr。OttoRankfoundedearlyin1912anewjournal，Imago（publishedbyHeller），whoseonlyaimistheapplicationofpsychoanalysistomentalsciences。Imagohasnowreachedthemiddleofitsthirdyear，andenjoystheincreasinginterestofreaderswhoarenotmedicallyinterestedinpsychoanalysis。
Apartfromthesefourperiodicalpublications（Schriftenz。Angew。Seelenkunde，Jahrbuch，Intern。Zeitschrift，andImago）otherGermanandforeignjournalshavecontributedworksthatcanclaimaplaceinpsychoanalyticliterature。
TheJournalofAbnormalPsychology，publishedbyMortonPrince，asarule，containsmanygoodanalyticalcontributions。Inthewinterof1913Dr。
WhiteandDr。Jelliffestartedajournalexclusivelydevotedtopsychoanalysis，THEPSYCHOANALYTICREVIEW，whichtakesintoaccountthefactthatmostphysiciansinAmericainterestedinpsychoanalysisdonotmastertheGermanlanguage。
Iamnowobligedtospeakoftwosecessionswhichhavetakenplaceamongthefollowersofpsychoanalysis。Thefirstofthesetookplaceintheintervalbetweenthefoundingoftheassociation[p。40]in1910andthecongressatWeimar，1911，thesecondtookplaceafterthis，andcametolightinMü；nichin1913·；Thedisappointmentwhichtheycausedmemighthavebeenavoidedifmoreattentionhadbeenpaidtothemechanismsofthosewhoundergoanalyticaltreatment。Iwaswellawarethatanyonemighttakeflightonfirstapproachtotheunlovelytruthsofanalysis；Imyselfhadalwaysassertedthatanyone’sunderstandingmaybesuspendedbyone’sownrepressions（throughtheresistanceswhichsustainthem）sothatinhisrelationtopsychoanalysishecannotgetbeyondacertainpoint。ButIhadnotexpectedthatanyonewhohadmasteredanalysistoacertaindepthcouldrenouncethisunderstandingandloseit。Andyetdailyexperiencewithpatientshadshownthatthetotalrejectionofallknowledgegainedthroughanalysismaybebroughtaboutbyanydeeperstratumofparticularlystrongresistance。Evenifwesucceedthroughlaboriousworkincausingsuchapatienttograsppartsofanalyticknowledgeandhandletheseashisownpossessions，itmaywellhappenthatunderthedominationofthenextresistancehewillthrowtothewindsallhehaslearnedandwilldefendhimselfasinhisfirstdaysoftreatment。Ihadtolearnthatthiscanhappenamongpsychoanalystsjustasamongpatientsduringtreatment。
Itisnoenviabletasktowritethehistoryofthesetwosecessions，partlybecauseIamnotimpelledtoitbystrongpersonalmotives——I
hadnotexpectedgratitudenoramItoanyactivedegreerevengeful——
andpartlybecauseIknowthatIherebylaymyselfopentotheinvectivesofopponentsmanifestingbutlittleconsideration，andatthesametimeIregaletheenemiesofpsychoanalysiswiththelongwished—forspectacleofseeingthepsychoanalyststearingeachothertopieces。Ihadtoexercisemuchcontroltokeepmyselffromfightingwiththeopponentsofpsychoanalysis，andnowIfeelconstrainedtotakeupthefightwithformerfollowersorsuchasstillwishtobecalledso。Ihavenochoice；tokeepsilentwouldbecomfortableorcowardly，butitwouldhurtthesubjectmorethanthefrankuncoveringoftheexistingevils。Anyonewhohasfollowedthegrowthofscientificmovementswillknowthatquitesimilardisturbances[p。41]
anddissensionstookplaceinallofthem。Itmaybethatelsewheretheyaremorecarefullyconcealed。However，psychoanalysis，whichdeniesmanyconventionalideals，isalsomorehonestinthesethings。
AnotherverypalpableinconvenienceliesinthefactthatIcannotaltogetheravoidgoingintoananalyticelucidation。Analysisisnot，however，suitableforpolemicaluse；italwayspresupposestheconsentoftheoneanalyzedandthesituationofasuperiorandsubordinate。Thereforehewhowishestouseanalysiswithpolemicintentmustoffernoobjectionifthepersonsoanalyzedwill，inhisturn，useanalysisagainsthim，andifthediscussionmergesintoastateinwhichtheawakeningofaconvictioninanimpartialthirdpartyisentirelyexcluded。Ishall，therefore，makeherethesmallestpossibleuseofanalysis，therebylimitingmyindiscretionandaggressionagainstmyopponents，andIwillalsoaddthatIbasenoscientificcriticismonthismeans。IhavenothingtodowiththepossiblesubstanceoftruthsinthetheoriestoberejectednoramIseekingtorefutethesame。Thistaskmaybelefttootherableworkersinthefieldofpsychoanalysis，andsomeofithasalreadybeendone。Ionlydesiretoshowthatthesetheoriesdenythebasicprinciplesofanalysis——Iwillshowinwhatpoints——andforthisreasonshouldnotbeknownunderthisname。Ishall，therefore，useanalysisonlytomakeclearhowthesedeviationsfromanalysiscouldtakeplaceamonganalysts。AtthepartingplacesIam，ofcourse，obligedtodefendthejustrightsofpsychoanalysiswithpurelycriticalremarks。
Psychoanalysishasfoundasitsfirsttasktheexplanationoftheneuroses；
ithastakenthetwofactsofresistanceandtransferenceasstartingpoints，andbybearinginmindthethirdfactofamnesiainthetheoriesofrepression，ithasgivenjustificationtothesexualmotiveforcesoftheneurosesandoftheunconscious。Psychoanalysishasneverclaimedtogiveaperfecttheoryofthehumanpsychiclife，buthasonlydemandedthatitsdiscoveriesshouldbeusedforthecompletionandcorrectionofknowledgewehavegainedelsewhere。ButAlfredAdler’stheorygoesfarbeyondthisgoal。Itpretendstoexplainwithonestrokethebehaviorandcharacter[p。42]ofmenaswellastheirneuroticandpsychoticmaladies。Asamatteroffact，Adler’stheoryismoreadequatetoanyotherfieldthantothatoftheneuroses，whichhestillputsinthefirstplacebecauseofthehistoryofitsorigin。
IhadtheopportunityofstudyingDr。Adlermanyyearsandhaveneverdeniedhimthetestimonialofhavingasuperiormind，especiallyendowedspeculatively。
Asproofofthe\"persecution\"whichheclaimstohavesufferedatmyhands，IcanonlysaythataftertheformationoftheAssociationIhandedovertohimtheleadershipoftheViennagroup。ItwasonlyafterurgentrequestsfromallthemembersofthesocietythatIcouldbeprevailedupontoresumethepresidencyatthescientificproceedings。WhenIhadrecognizedDr。
Adler’sslighttalentfortheestimationoftheunconsciousmaterial，I
expectedthathewouldknowhowtodiscovertheconnectionsbetweenpsychoanalysisandpsychologyandthebiologicalbasesoftheimpulses，adiscoverytowhichhewasentitled，inacertainsense，throughhisvaluablestudiesabouttheinferiorityoforgans。Hereallydidbringoutsomething，buthisworkmakestheimpressionasif——tospeakinhisownjargon——itwereintendedtoprovethatpsychoanalysiswaswrongineverythingandthatthesignificanceofthesexualimpellingforcescouldonlybeduetogullibilityabouttheassertionsofneurotics。OfthepersonalmotiveofhisworkImayalsospeakpublicly，sincehehimselfrevealeditinthepresenceofasmallcircleofmembersoftheViennagroup。\"Doyoubelieve，\"heremarked，\"thatitissuchagreatpleasureformetostandinyourshadowmywholelife？\"TobesureIseenothingobjectionableinthefactthatayoungermanshouldfranklyadmitanambitionwhichonemight，inanycase，suspectasoneoftheincentivesofhiswork。Butevenunderthedominationofsuchamotiveamanshouldknowhowtoavoidbeing\"unfair\"asdesignatedbytheEnglishwiththeirfinesocialtact。WeGermanshaveonlyamuchcoarserwordatourdisposaltoconveythisidea。HowlittleAdlerhassucceededinnotbeingunfairisshownbythegreatnumberofmeanoutburstsofangerwhichdistorthiswritings，andbythefeelingofanungovernablemaniaforprioritywhichpervades[p。43]hiswork。
AttheViennaPsychoanalyticSocietyweonceheardhimclaimforhimselfthepriorityfortheviewpointsofthe\"unityoftheneuroses\"andthe\"dynamicconception\"ofthesame。ThiswasagreatsurpriseformeasI
hadalwaysbelievedthatIhadrepresentedthesetwoprinciplesbeforeIhadeverknownAdler。[15b]
ThisstrivingofAdlerforaplaceinthesunhasbroughtabout，however，oneresult，whichmustbeconsideredbeneficialtopsychoanalysis。WhenIwasobligedtobringaboutAdler’sresignationfromtheeditorialstaffoftheZentralblatt，aftertheappearanceofhisirreconcilablescientificantagonisms，AdleralsolefttheViennagroupandfoundedanewsocietytowhichhefirstgavethetastefulname\"SocietyforFreePsychoanalysis。\"
Buttheoutsidepublic，unacquaintedwithanalysis，isevidentlyaslittleskilledinrecognizingthedifferencebetweentheviewsoftwopsychoanalysts，asareEuropeansinrecognizingthetintsbetweentwoChinesefaces。The\"free\"psychoanalysisremainedintheshadowofthe\"official\"and\"orthodox\"
one，andwastreatedonlyasanappendageofthelatter。ThenAdlertookthestepforwhichwearethankful。Heseveredallconnectionwithpsychoanalysisandnamedhisteachings\"TheIndividualPsychology。\"ThereismuchspaceonGod’searth，andanyonewhocanissurelyjustifiedintumblingaboutuponituninhibited；butitisnotdesirabletocontinuelivingunderoneroofwhenpeoplenolongerunderstandoneanotherandnolongergetontogether。Adler’s\"IndividualPsychology\"isnowoneofthemanypsychologicalmovementsopposedtopsychoanalysis，anditsfurtherdevelopmentliesoutsideourinterests。
Adler’stheorywas，fromtheverybeginning，a\"system，\"whichpsychoanalysiswascarefulnottobecome。Itisalsoanexcellentexampleofa\"secondaryelaboration\"asseen，forexample，intheprocesswhichthewakingthoughtproducesindreammaterial。[16]
Inthiscaseinsteadofdreammaterialthereisthematerialnewly[p。
44]acquiredfromtheviewpointoftheegoandbroughtunderthefamiliarcategoriesofthesame。Itisthentranslated，changed，andasthoroughlymisunderstoodashappensinthecaseofdream—formation。Adler’stheoryisthuscharacterizedlessbywhatitassertsthanbywhatitdenies。Itconsequentlyconsistsofthreeelementsofquitedissimilarvalue；first，goodcontributionstothepsychologyoftheego，whicharesuperfluousbutadmissible；secondly，translationsofanalyticalfactsintothenewjargon，and，thirdly，distortionsandperversionsofthesefactswhentheydonotfitintotheegopresuppositions。Theelementsofthefirstkindhaveneverbeenignoredbypsychoanalysis，althoughitowednospecialattentiontothem。Psychoanalysishadagreaterinterestinshowingthatallegostrivingsaremixedwithlibidinouscomponents。Adler’stheoryemphasizesthecounterparttoit；namely，thatalllibidinousfeelingcontainsanadmixtureofegotism。ThiswouldhavebeenapalpablegainifAdlerhadnotmadeuseofthisassertiontodeny，everytime，thelibidinousfeelingsinfavoroftheimpellingegocomponents。Histheorythusdoesexactlywhatallpatientsdo，andwhatourconsciousthinkingalwaysdoes，itrationalizes，asJoneswouldsay，inordertoconcealtheunconsciousmotives。Adlerissoconsistentinthis，thatheconsiderstheobjectofevincingdominationoverthewoman，tobeonthetop，asthemainspringofthesexualact。Idonotknowifhehasupheldthismonstrousideainhiswritings。
Psychoanalysisearlyrecognizedthateveryneuroticsymptomowesthepossibilityofitsexistencetosomecompromise。Itmust，therefore，alsoputtosomegoodaccountthedemandsoftheegowhichmanagestherepression，itmustofferitsomeadvantagesbyfindingforitsomeusefulemployment，otherwiseitwouldsufferthesamefateastheoriginallydefendedimpulses。
Theterm\"morbidgain\"expressesthisstateofaffairs。Onemightevenhavebeenjustifiedindifferentiatingtheprimarygainfortheegowhichmusthavebeenactiveattheorigin，froma\"secondary\"gainwhichappearsinconnectionwithotherintentionsoftheego，whenthesymptomisabouttoassertitself。Ithasalsolongbeenknowntoanalysisthatthewithdrawalofthismorbidgain，orthecessationofthesame[p。45]inconsequenceofsomerealchange，isoneofthemechanismsinthecureofthesymptom。
Ontheserelationshipswhichcanbeverifiedandunderstoodwithoutdifficulty，Adler’stheoryputsthegreatestemphasis。Itentirelyoverlooksthefactthatinnumerabletimestheegomakesavirtueoutofnecessityinsubmittingtothemostundesiredsymptomforceduponit，becauseoftheuseitcanmakeofit，e。g。，whentheegoacceptsanxietyasameansofsecurity。
HeretheegoplaystheabsurdpartofthePierotinthecircus，who，throughhisgestures，wishestoconveytothespectatorstheimpressionthatallchangesinthemenagearetakingplaceathiscommand。Butonlytheyoungestamongthespectatorsbelievehim。
ForthesecondpartofAdler’stheorypsychoanalysismuststandsecurityasforitsownpossessions。Foritisnothingbutpsychoanalyticknowledgewhichtheauthorhadfromallthesourcesopenedtohimduringtenyearsofourjointwork，butwhichhelatermarkedashisownafterchangingthenomenclature。Forinstance，Imyselfconsider\"security\"abetterwordthan\"protectivemeasure，\"whichIused；butcannotfindinitanynewmeaning。SimilarlyonewillfindinAdler’sstatementsagreatmanylong—knownfeaturesifonewillreplacetheexpressions\"feigned\"（fingiert）fictiveandfiction，bytheoriginalwords\"tofancy\"and\"phantasy。\"Thisidentitywouldbeemphasizedbypsychoanalysis，eveniftheauthorhadnotformanyyearsparticipatedinourcommonwork。
ThethirdpartofAdler’stheory，whichconsistsingivingnewinterpretationsto，andindistortingthedisagreeablefactsofpsychoanalysis，containsthatwhichdefinitelyseverstheactual\"IndividualPsychology\"frompsychoanalysis。
AsisknowntheprincipleofAdler’ssystemstatesthatitistheobjectoftheself—assertionoftheindividual，his\"willtopower\"intheformofthe\"masculineprotest，\"tomanifestitselfdomineeringlyintheconductoflife，incharacterformationandintheneurosis。This\"masculineprotest，\"
theAdlerismmotor，isnothingelse，however，thantherepressionsetfreefromitspsychologicalmechanism，andwhatismore，itissexualizedandthushardlyinkeepingwiththevauntedexpulsionofsexuality[p46]fromitsplaceinthepsychiclife。The\"masculineprotest\"certainlyexists，butinconstitutingitasthemotorofthepsychiclife，observationhasonlyplayedthepartofthespringboardwhichoneleavesinordertoupliftone’sself。Letusconsideroneofthemostfundamentalsituationsoftheinfantiledesire；namely，theobservationofthesexualactbetweenadultsbythechild。Whenthelife—historyofsuchpersonsislatersubjectedtoanalysisbyaphysician，itisfoundthatatthismomenttheminorspectatorwasseizedbytwofeelings；one，inthecaseofaboy，toputhimselfintheplaceoftheactiveman，andtheother，theopposingfeeling，toidentifyhimselfwiththesufferingwoman。Bothstrivingsconjointlyexhaustthepleasurethatmighthaveresultedfromthissituation。Onlythefirstfeelingcancomeundertheheadofthe\"masculineprotest\"ifthisideaistoretainanymeaningatall。Thesecondfeeling，whosefateAdlereitherignoresordoesnotknow，isreallytheonewhichassumesgreatersignificanceinthelaterneurosis。Adlerhasplacedhimselfsoentirelyintothejealousconfinementoftheego，thatheonlyaccountsforsuchemotionalfeelingsasareagreeabletotheegoandfurtheredbyit；butthecaseoftheneurosis，whichopposesthesestrivings，liesbeyondhishorizon。