第1章

PrefacePage3PREFACEFORoveronehundredyearsSpiritualismhasbeenbeforetheworld。

Thissurelyistimeenoughtoenableittoshowitscharacterbyitsfruits。

\"Bytheirfruitsyeshallknowthem,\"isarulethatadmitsofnoexceptions。

Ifevilfruitsappear,thetreeiscorrupt。

Spiritualismhasmadeunboundedpromisesofgood。Ithasclaimedtobethelong-promisedsecondcomingofChrist;theopeningofaneweraamongmankind;therosyportalofagoldenage,whenallmenshouldbereformed,evildisappear,andtherenovationofsocietycausetheheartsofmentoleapforjoy,andtheearthtoblossomastherose。

Hasitfulfilledall,orany,ofthesepromises?Ifnot,isitnotadeception?andifadeception,consideringitswide-spreadinfluence,andthenumberofitsadherents,isitnotoneofthemostgiganticandappallingdeceptionsthathaseverfallenuponChristendom?TheBibleintheplainestterms,declaresthatinthelastdaysmaligninfluenceswillbeletlooseupontheworld;falsepretensionswillbeurgeduponthemindsofmen;

anddeceptions,backedupbypreternaturalsignsandwonders,willdeveloptosuchadegreeofstrength,that,ifitwerepossible,theywoulddeceivetheveryelect。Page4IsitpossiblethatSpiritualismmaybetheverydevelopmentofevil,againstwhichthiswarningisdirected?

Toinvestigatethesequestions,andtoshowbyunimpeachabletestimony,whatSpiritualismis,andtheplaceitholdsamongthepsychologicalmovementsofthepresentday,istheobjectofthesepages。NotafewbookshavebeenwrittenagainstSpiritualism;butmostofthemendeavortoaccountforitonthegroundofhumanjuggleryandimposture,oronnaturalprinciples,thediscoveryofanewandheretoforeoccultforceinnature,etc。,fromwhichgreatthingsmaybeexpectedinthefuture。Butrarelyhasanyonediscusseditfromthestandpointofprophecy,andthetestimonyoftheScriptures,theonlypointofview,aswebelieve,fromwhichitstrueorigin,nature,andtendency,canbeascertained。

ManyfeaturesintheworkofSpiritualismwouldseemtoindicatethatthesourcefromwhichitspringsisfarfromgood;butitisbaseduponachurchdogma,firmlyestablishedthroughallChristendom,whichinmanymindsisofsufficientweighttooverbalanceconsiderationsthatwouldotherwisebeconsideredamplegroundsforshunningorrenouncingit。Itisthereforethemorenecessarythatthereader,inexaminingthisquestion,shouldletthebondsthathaveheretoforeboundhimtopreconceivedopinions,sitlooseuponhim,andthatheshouldputhimselfinthemoodofDr。Channingwhenhesaid:\"Imustchoosetoreceivethetruth,nomatterhowitbearsuponmyself,andmustfollowitnomatterPage5whereitleads,fromwhatpartyitseversme,ortowhatpartyitallies。\"

Andheshouldrememberalso,astheeminentandpiousDr。Vinetoncesagaciouslyobserved,that\"evennow,aftereighteencenturiesofChristianity,weareveryprobablyinvolvedinsomeenormouserror,ofwhichChristianitywill,insomefuturetime,makeusashamed。\"

Inview,therefore,oftheimportanceofthisquestion,andthetremendousissuesthathangonthedecisionswemaymakeintheseperiloustimes,wefeeljustifiedeveninadjuringthereadertocanvassthissubjectwithaninflexibledeterminationtolearnthetruth,andthentofollowitwhereveritmaylead。UriahSmithBattleCreek,Mich。,1897。

ModernSpiritualism:ASubjectofProphecyandaSignoftheTimes,Chapter1Page9CHAPTERONEOPENINGTHOUGHTWHATthinkye?Whenceisit——fromheavenorofmen?SuchwasthenatureofthequestionaddressedbyourSaviourtothemenofhistime,concerningthebaptismofJohn。Itisthecrucialquestionbywhichtotesteverysystemthatcomestousinthegarbofreligion:Isitfromheavenorofmen?Andifatrueanswertothequestioncanbefound,itmustdetermineourattitudetowardit;forifitisfromheaven,itchallengesatonceouracceptanceandprofoundregard,butifitisofmen,soonerorlater,in。thisworldorintheworldtocome,itwillbedestroyedwithallitsfollowers;forourSaviourhasdeclaredthateveryplantwhichourheavenlyFatherhasnotplantedshallberootedup。Matt。15:13。

Tothosewhodonotbelieveinany\"heavenlyFather,\"norin\"ChristtheSaviour,\"norinany\"revealedwordofGod,\"wewouldsaythatthesepointswillbeassumedinthisworkratherthanPage10directlyargued,thoughmanyincidentalproofswillappear,towhichwetrustourfriendswillbepleasedtogivesomeconsideration。ButweaddressourselvesparticularlytothosewhostillhavefaithinGodtheFatherofall;inhisdivineSon,ourLordJesusChrist,throughwhosebloodwehaveredemption;intheBibleastheinspiredrevelationofGod’swill;

andintheHolySpiritastheenlightenerofthemind,andthesanctifierofthesoul。Toallthosetowhomthispositioniscommonground,theBiblewillbethestandardofauthority,andthecourtoflastappeal,inthestudyuponwhichwenowenter。

AMANIFESTATIONOFPOWERSpiritualismcannotbedisposedofwithasneer。Atossoftheheadandacryof\"humbug,\"willnotsufficetomeetitsclaimsandthetestimonyofcareful,conservativemenwhohavestudiedthoroughlyintothegenuinenessofitsmanifestations,andhavesoughtforthesecretofitspower,andhavebecomesatisfiedastotheone,andbeenwhollybaffledastotheother。Thattherehavebeenabundantinstancesofattemptedfraud,deception,jugglery,andimposition,isnottobedenied。Butthisdoesnotbyanymeanssetasidethefactthattherehavebeenmanifestationsofmorethanhumanpower,theevidenceforwhichhasneverbeenimpeached。Thedetectionofafewshammediums,whoaretryingtoimposeuponthecredulityofthepublic,formoney,maysatisfythecarelessandunthinking,thatthewholeaffairisahumbug。SuchwilldismissthematterPage11fromtheirminds,anddepart,easiersubjectstobecapturedbythemovementwhensomemanifestationappearsforwhichtheycanfindnoexplanation。

Butthemorethoughtfulandcarefulobserverswellknowthattheexposureofthesemountebanksdoesnotaccountforthenumberlessmanifestationsofpower,andthesteadycurrentofphenomena,utterlyinexplicableonanyhumanhypothesis,whichhaveattendedthemovementfromthebeginning。

ThePhiladelphiaNorthAmerican,ofJuly31,1885,publishedacommunicationfromThomasR。Hazard,inwhichhesays:——\"ButSpiritualism,whatevermaybethoughtofit,mustberecognizedasafact。Itisoneofthecharacteristicintellectualoremotionalphenomenaofthetimes,andassuch,itisdeservingofamoreseriousexaminationthanithasyetreceived。Therearethosewhosayitisallhumbug,andthateverythingoutsideoftheordinarycoursewhichtakesplaceattheso-calledséances,isthedirectresultoffraudulentanddeliberativeimposture;inshort,thateverySpiritualistmustbeeitherafooloraknave。Theseriousobjectiontothishypothesisisthattheexplanationisalmostasdifficultofbeliefastheoccurrenceswhichitexplains。

TheremustcertainlybesomeSpiritualistswhoarebothhonestandintelligent;

andifthemanifestationsattheséanceswerealtogetherandinvariablyfraudulent,surelythewholethingmusthavecollapsedlongbeforethis;

andtheSeybertCommission,whichfindsitnecessarytoextenditsinvestigationsoveranindefiniteperiod,whichwillcertainlynotbelessthanayear,wouldhavebeenabletosweepthedelusionawayinshortorder。\"Thephenomenaaresowellknown,thatitisunnecessarytorecountthemhere。Amongthemmaybementionedsuchachievementsasthese:VariousarticleshavebeentransportedfromplacetoPage12place,withouthumanhands,butbytheagencyofso-calledspiritsonly;

beautifulmusichasbeenproducedindependentlyofhumanagency,withandwithouttheaidofvisibleinstruments;manywell-attestedcasesofhealinghavebeenpresented;personshavebeencarriedthroughtheairbythespiritsinthepresenceofmanywitnesses;tableshavebeensuspendedintheairwithseveralpersonsuponthem;purportedspiritshavepresentedthemselvesinbodilyformandtalkedwithanaudiblevoice;andallthisnotonceortwicemerely,buttimeswithoutnumber,asmaybegatheredfromtherecordsofSpiritualism,allthroughitshistory。

Afewparticularinstances,assamples,itmaybeallowabletonotice:

Notmanyyearssince,JosephCookmadehismemorabletouraroundtheworld。

InEuropehemetthefamousGermanphilosopher,ProfessorZöllner。

Mr。ZöllnerhadbeencarefullyinvestigatingthephenomenaofSpiritualism,andassuredMr。Cookofthefollowingoccurrencesasfacts,underhisownobservation:Knotshadbeenfoundtiedinthemiddleofcords,bysomeinvisibleagency,whilebothendsweremadesecurelyfast,sothattheycouldnotbetamperedwith;messageswerewrittenbetweendoublyandtreblysealedslates;coinhadpassedthroughatableinamannertoillustratethesuspensionofthelawsofimpenetrabilityofmatter;strapsofleatherwereknottedunderhisownhand;theimpressionoftwofeetwasgivenonsootedpaperpastedinsideoftwosealedslates;wholeanduninjuredwoodenringswereplacedPage13aroundthestandardofacardtable,overeitherendofwhichtheycouldbynopossibilitybeslipped;andfinallythetableitself,aheavybeechenstructure,whollydisappeared,andthenfellfromthetopoftheroomwhereProfessorZöllnerandhisfriendsweresitting。

Infurtherconfirmationofthefactthatrealspiritualisticmanifestationsarenosleight-of-handperformances,wecitethecaseofHarryKellar,aprofessionalperformer,asgivenin\"NineteenthCenturyMiracles,\"p。

213。Theséancewasheldwiththemedium,Eglinton,inCalcutta,India,Jan。25,1882。Hesays:——\"ItisneedlesstosaythatIwentasaskepticbutImustownthatIhavecomeawayutterlyunabletoexplainbyanynaturalmeansthephenomenathatIwitnessedonTuesdayevening。\"Hethendescribestheparticularsoftheséance。Anintelligence,purportingtobethespiritofoneGeary,gaveacommunication。Mr。Kellardidnotrecognizethenamenorrecalltheman。Themessagewasrepeated,withtheaddedcircumstancesofthetimeandparticularsofapreviousmeeting,whenMr。Kellarrecalledtheevents,and,muchtohissurprise,thewholemattercameclearlytohisrecollection。Hethenadds:——\"IstillremainaskepticasregardsSpiritualism,butIrepeatmyinabilitytoexplainoraccountforwhatmusthavebeenanintelligentforcewhichproducedthewritingontheslate,which,ifmysensesaretobereliedon,wasinnowaytheresultoftrickeryorsleight-of-hand。\"Page14Anotherinstancefrom\"HomeCircle,\"p。25,isthatofMr。Bellachini,alsoaprofessionalconjuror,ofBerlin,Germany。Hisinterviewwaswiththecelebratedmedium,Mr。Slade。Fromhistestimonywequotethefollowing:

——\"Ihavenot,inthesmallestdegree,foundanythingtobeproducedbyprestidigitativemanifestationsormechanicalapparatus;andanyexplanationoftheexperimentswhichtookplaceunderthecircumstancesandconditionsthenobtaining,byanyreferencetoprestidigitation,isabsolutelyimpossibleIdeclare,moreover,thepublishedopinionsof-laymenastothe\"How\"ofthissubject,tobepremature,andaccordingtomyviewsandexperience,falseandone-sided。\"——Dated,Berlin,Dec。6,1877。Whenprofessionalconjurorsbearsuchtestimonyasthis,whileitdoesnotproveSpiritualismtobewhatitclaimstobe,itdoesdisprovethehumbugtheory。

Inadditiontothis,itappearsthattwopropositions,oneof$2000,andtheotherof$5000,havebeenofferedtotheonewhoclaimedtobeabletoduplicateallthemanifestationsofSpiritualism,toduplicatetwowell-authenticatedtests;butthechallengehasneverbeenaccepted,northerewardclaimed。SeeReligio-PhilosophicalJournal,ofJan。

15,1881,andJanuary,1883。

AwriterintheSpiritualClarion,inanarticleon\"TheMillenniumofSpiritualism,\"bearsthefollowingtestimonyinregardtothepowerandstrengthofthemovement:——\"Thisrevelationhasbeenwithapower,amight,thatifdivestedofitsalmostuniversalbenevolence,hadbeenaterrorPage15totheverysoul;thehairoftheverybravesthadstoodonend,andhischilledbloodhadcreptbackuponhisheart,atthesightsandsoundsofitsinexplicablephenomena。Itcomeswithforetokeningandwarning。Ithasbeen,fromtheveryfirst,itsownbestprophet,andstepbystep,ithasforetoldtheprogressitwouldmake。Itcomes,too,mosttriumphant。Nofaithbeforeitevertooksuchavictoriousstandinitsveryinfancy。Ithassweptlikeahurricaneoffirethroughtheland,compellingfaithfromthebaffledscoffer,andthemostdetermineddoubter。\"Dr。W。F。Barrett,ProfessorofExperimentalPhysicsintheRoyalCollegeofDublin,says:——\"ItiswellknowntothosewhohavemadethephenomenaofSpiritualismthesubjectofprolongedandcarefulinquiry,inthespiritofexactandunimpassionedscientificresearch,thatbeneatharepellentmassofimpostureanddelusionthereremaincertaininexplicableandstartlingfactswhichsciencecanneitherexplainawaynordeny。\"——\"Automatic,orSpirit,Writing,\"p。11(1896)。IntheArenaofNovember,1892,p。688,Mr。

M。J。Savage,thenotedUnitarianministerofBoston,says:——\"Nextcomeswhatareordinarilyclassedtogetheras’mediumisticphenomena。’Themostimportantofthesearepsychometry,’vision’of’spirit’

forms,claimedcommunicationsbymeansofrappings,tablemovements,automaticwriting,independentwriting,trancespeaking,etc。Withthemalsooughttobenotedwhataregenerallycalledphysicalphenomena,thoughinmostcases,sincetheyareintelligiblydirected,theuseoftheword’physical,’

withoutthisqualification,mightbemisleading。Thesephysicalphenomenaincludesuchfactsasthemovementofmaterialobjectsbyotherthantheordinarymuscularforce,themakingobjectsheavierorlighterwhentestedbythescales,theplayingonmusicalinstrumentsbysomeinvisiblepower,etc……Nowallofthesereferredto(withtheexceptionofindependentwriting,andmaterialization)IknowtobePage16genuine。IdonotatallmeanbythisthatIknowthatthe’spiritualistic’interpretationofthemisthetrueone。Imeanonlythattheyaregenuinephenomena;thattheyhaveoccurred;thattheyarenottricksortheresultoffraud。\"IntheForumofDecember,1889,p。455,thesamewriterdescribeshisexperienceatthehouseofafriendwithwhomhehadbeenacquaintedeightortenyears。Whenabouttodepart,hethoughthewouldtryanexperiment。

Hesays:——\"SheandIstoodatoppositeendsofthetableatwhichwehadbeensitting。Bothofushavingplacedthetipsofourfingerslightlyonthetopofthetable,Ispoke,asifaddressingsomeunseenforceconnectedwiththetable,andsaid:’NowImustgo;willyounotaccompanymetothedoor?’Thedoorwastenorfifteenfeetdistant,andwasclosed。Thetablestarted。Ithadnocasters,andinordertomakeitmoveasitdid,weshouldhavehadtogobehindandpushit。Asamatteroffactweledit,whileitaccompaniedusalltheway,andstruckagainstthedoorwithconsiderableforce。\"Fromthesamearticle,p。456,wequoteagain:——\"Iaddonemoreexperimentofmyown。Isatonedayinaheavy,stuffedarmchair。Thepsychicsatbesideme,andlayinghishandonthebackofthechair,graduallyraisedit。ImmediatelyIfeltandsawmyself,chairandall,liftedintotheairatleastonefootfromthefloor。Therewasnounevenmotionimplyinganysenseofeffortonthepartoftheliftingforce;andIwasgentlyloweredagaintothecarpet。Thiswasinbroadlight,inahotelparlor,andinpresenceofakeen-eyedlawyerfriend。

Icouldplainlywatchthewholething。Nomanlivingcouldhaveliftedmeinsuchaposition,andbesides,Isawthatthepsychicmadenottheslightestapparenteffort。Norwasthereanymachineryorpreparationofanykind。Mycompanion,thelawyer,ongoingaway,speakinginreferencetothewholesitting,said:’I’veseenenoughevidencetohangeverymanintheState——enoughtoproveanythingexceptingthis。’Page17\"ProfessorGrookes,ofLondon,relateshavingseenandheardanaccordionplayedonwhileitwasenclosedinawirenet-work,andnottouchedbyanyvisiblehand。Ihaveseenanapproachtothesamething。

IndaylightIhaveseenamanholdanaccordionintheair,notmorethanthreefeetawayfromme。Hehelditbyonehand,graspingthesideoppositetothatonwhichthekeyswerefixed。Inthisposition,it,orsomething,playedlongtunes,thesidecontainingthekeysbeingpushedinanddrawnoutwithoutanycontactthatIcouldsee。Ithensaid,’Willitnotplayforme?’Thereplywas,’Idon’tknow:youcantryit。’Ithentooktheaccordioninmyhands。Therewasnomusic;butwhatdidoccurwasquiteasinexplicabletome,andquiteasconvincingasadisplayofsomekindofpower。Iknownothowtoexpressit,exceptbysayingthattheaccordionwasseizedasifbysomeonetryingtotakeitawayfromme。Totestthispower,Igraspedtheinstrumentwithbothhands。Thestrugglewasasrealasthoughmyantagonistwasanotherman。Isucceededinkeepingit,butonlybythemoststrenuousefforts。

\"OnanotheroccasionIwassittingwitha’medium。’Iwastoofarawayforhimtoreachme,evenhadhetried,whichhedidnotdo;forhesatperfectlyquiet。Mykneeswerenotunderthetable,butwerewhereIcouldseethemplainly。Suddenlymyrightkneewasgraspedasbyahand。Itwasafirmgrip。Icouldfeeltheprintandpressureofallthefingers。I

saidnotawordofthestrangesensation,butquietlyputmyrighthanddownandclaspedmykneeinordertoseeifIcouldfeelanythingonmyhand。AtonceIfeltwhatseemedlikethemostdelicatefingertipsplayingovermyownfingersandgraduallyrisingintheirtouchestowardmywrist。

Whenthiswasreached,Ifeltaseriesofclear,distinct,anddefinitepats,asthoughmadebyahandoffleshyvigor。Imadenomotiontoindicatewhatwasgoingon,andsaidnotaworduntilthesensationhadpassed。

AllthiswhileIwascarefullywatchingmyhand,foritwasplaindaylight,anditwasinfullview;butIsawnothing。\"Weneednotmultiplyevidenceonthispoint。AremarkbyT。J。Hudson(\"LawofPsychicPhe-Page18nomena,\"p。206,McClurg&Co。,Chicago,1894)mayfitlyclosethisdivisionofthesubject。Hesays:——\"Iwillnotwastetime,however,byattemptingtoprovebyexperimentsofmyown,orofothers,thatsuchphenomenadooccur。Itistoolateforthat。Thefactsaretoowellknowntothecivilizedworldtorequireproofatthistime。Themanwhodeniesthephenomenaofspiritismto-dayisnotentitledtobecalledaskeptic,heissimplyignorant;anditwouldbeahopelesstasktoattempttoenlightenhim。\"AMANIFESTATIONOFINTELLIGENCEFromthetestimonyalreadygivenitisevidentthatthereisconnectedwithSpiritualismanagencythatisabletomanifestpowerandstrengthbeyondanythingthathumanbeings,unaided,areabletoexert。Itisjustasevidentthatthesameagencypossessesintelligencebeyondthepowerofhumanminds。Indeed,thiswastheveryfeaturethatfirstbroughtittotheattentionofthepublic。Spiritualism,asthereaderisdoubtlessaware,originatedinthefamilyofMr。JohnD。Fox,inHydesville,nearRochester,N。Y。,inthespringof1848。RobertDaleOwen,inhisworkcalled\"FootfallsontheBoundaryofAnotherWorld,\"p。290,hasgivenafullnarrationofthecircumstancesattendingthisremarkableevent。

Theparticulars,hestates,hehadfromMrs。Fox,andhertwodaughters,MargaretandKate,andson,David。Theattentionofthefamilyhadbeenattractedbystrangenoiseswhichfinallyassumedtheformofraps,ormuffledfootfalls,andbecameveryannoying。ChairswerePage19sometimesmovedfromtheirplaces,andthiswasoncealsothecasewiththedining-roomtable。HeardoccasionallyduringFebruary,thedisturbancesoincreasedduringthelatterpartofMarch,asseriouslytobreakthenightlyreposeofthefamily。Butastheseannoyancesoccurredonlyinthenighttime,allthefamilyhopedthatsoon,bysomemeans,themysterywouldbeclearedaway。TheydidnotabandonthishopetillFriday,the31stofMarch,1848。Weariedbyasuccessionofsleeplessnights,thefamilyretiredearly,hopingforarespitefromthedisturbancesthathadharassedthem。Inthistheyweredoomedtoespecialdisappointment。WecandonobetterthantoletMr。Owencontinuethenarrative,inhisownwords:——\"Theparentshadremovedthechildren’sbedsintotheirbedroom,andstrictlyenjoinedthemnottotalkofnoises,eveniftheyheardthem。

Butscarcelyhadthemotherseenthemsafelyinbed,andwasretiringtorestherself,whenthechildrencriedout,’Heretheyareagain!’Themotherchidedthem,andlaydown。Thereuponthenoisesbecamelouderandmerestartling。Thechildrensatupinbed。Mrs。Foxcalledherhusband。Thenightbeingwindy,itwassuggestedtohimthatitmightbetherattlingofthesashes。Hetriedseveraltoseeiftheywereloose。Kate,theyoungergirl,happenedtoremarkthatasoftenasherfathershookawindow-sash,thenoisesseemedtoreply。Beingalivelychild,andinameasureaccustomedtowhatwasgoingon,sheturnedtowherethenoisewas,snappedherfingers,andcalledout,’Here,oldSplitfoot,doasIdo!’Theknockinginstantlyresponded。

\"Thatwastheverycommencement。Whocantellwheretheendwillbe?

\"IdonotmeanthatitwasKateFox,whothus,inchildishjest,firstdiscoveredthatthesemysterioussoundsPage20seemedinstinctwithintelligence。Mr。Mompesson,twohundredyearsago,hadalreadyobservedasimilarphenomenon。Glanvilhadverifiedit。SohadWesley,andhischildren。Sowehaveseen,andothers。Butinallthesecasesthematterrestedthereandtheobservationwasnotprosecutedfurther。As,previoustotheinventionofthesteamengine,sundryobservershadtroddentheverythresholdofthediscoveryandtherestopped,sointhiscase,wheretheroyalchaplain,disciplethoughhewasoftheinductivephilosophy,andwherethefounderofMethodism,admitting,ashedid,theprobabilitiesofultramundaneinterference,werebothatfault,aYankeegirl,butnineyearsold,followingupmoreinsportthaninearnest,achanceobservation,becametheinstigatorofamovementwhich,whateveritstruecharacter,hashaditsinfluencethroughoutthecivilizedworld。

Thesparkhadbeenignited,——onceatleasttwocenturiesago;butithaddiedeachtimewithouteffect。Itkindlednoflametillthemiddleofthenineteenthcentury。

\"AndyethowtriflingthestepfromtheobservationatTedworthtothediscoveryatHydesville!Mr。Mompesson,inbedwithhislittledaughter(aboutKate’sage),whomthesoundseemedchieflytofollow,’observedthatitwouldexactlyanswer。indrumming,anythingthatwasbeatenorcalledfor。’Buthiscuriosityledhimnofurther。

\"NotsoKateFox。Shetried,bysilentlybringingtogetherherthumbandforefinger;whethershecouldobtainaresponse。YesIItcouldsee,then,aswellashear。Shecalledhermother。’Onlylook,mother,’

shesaid,bringingtogetheragainherfingerandthumb,asbefore。Andasoftenassherepeatedthenoiselessmotion,justasoftenrespondedtheraps。

\"Thisatoncearrestedhermother’sattention。’Countten,’shesaid,addressingthenoise。Tenstrokes,distinctlygivenI’HowoldismydaughterMargaret?’Twelvestrokes。’AndKate?’Nine。’Whatcanallthismean?’

wasMrs。Fox’sthought。Whowasansweringher?Wasitonlysomemysteriousechoofherownthought?Butthenextquestionwhichsheputseemedtorefutetheidea。’HowmanychildrenhaveI?’sheaskedaloud。Sevenstrokes。

’Ah!’shethought,’itcanblundersometimes。’Page21Andthenaloud,’Tryagain。’Stillthenumberofrapswasseven。

OfasuddenathoughtcrossedMrs。Fox’smind。’Aretheyallalive?’sheasked。Silenceforanswer。’Howmanyareliving?’Sixstrokes。’Howmanyaredead?’Asinglestroke。Shehadlostachild。

\"Thensheasked,’Areyouaman?’Noanswer。’Areyouaspirit?’Itrapped。’Maymyneighborshear,ifIcallthem?’Itrappedagain。

\"Thereuponsheaskedherhusbandtocallherneighbor,aMrs。Redfield,whocameinlaughing。Buthercheerwassoonchanged。Theanswerstoherinquirieswereaspromptandpertinent,astheyhadbeentothoseofMrs。

Fox。Shewasstruckwithawe;andwhen,inreplytoaquestionaboutthenumberofherchildren,byrappingfour,insteadofthree,assheexpected,itremindedherofalittledaughter,Mary,whomshehadrecentlylost,themotherburstintotears。\"Wehaveintroducedthisnarrativethusatlengthnotonlybecauseitisinterestinginitselfbutbecauseitisofspecialinterestthatalltheparticularsoftheorigin,orbeginning,ofsuchamovementasthis,shouldbewellunderstood。Thefollowingparagraphwillexplainhowitcametobecalled\"TheRochesterKnockings,\"underwhichnameitfirstbecamewidelyknown。Itisfromthe\"Reportofthe37thAnniversaryofModernSpiritualism,\"

heldinBrooklyn,N。Y。,March31,1885,andreportedintheBannerofLightthe25thofthefollowingmonth:——\"AfterasongbyJ。T。Lillie,Mrs。LeahFoxUnderhill,theelderofthethreeFoxsisters(whowasonourplatform),wasrequestedtospeak。Mrs。Underhillsaidthatshewasnotapublicspeaker,butwouldansweranyquestionsfromtheaudience,andinresponsetothesequestionstoldinagraphicmannerhowthespiritscametotheirhumblehomeinHydesville,in1848;howonthe31stofMarchthefirstintelligentcommunicationfromthespiritworldcamePage22throughtheraps;howthefamilyhadbeenannoyedbythemanifestations,andbythenotorietythatfollowed;howtheyoungersisters,CatherineandMargaret,weretakentoRochester,whereshelived,bytheirmother,hopingthatthisgreatandapparentcalamitymightpassfromthem;howtheirfatherandmotherprayedthatthiscupmightbetakenaway,butthephenomenabecamemoremarkedandviolent;howinthemorningtheywouldfindfourcoffinsdrawnwithanartistichandonthedoorofthedining-roomofherhomeinRochester,ofdifferentsizes,approximatingtotheagesandsizesofthefamily,andthesewerelinedwithapinkcolor,andtheyweretoldthatunlesstheymadethisgreatfactknown,theywouldallspeedilydie,andenterthespirit-world。

\"Gladlywouldtheyallhaveacceptedthispenaltyfortheirdisobedienceinnotmakingthistruthknowntotheworld。ShetoldhowtheywerecompelledtohireCorinthianHallInRochester;howseveralpublicmeetingswereheldinRochester,culminatingintheselectionofacommitteeofprominentinfidels,who,aftersubmittingtheFoxchildrentothemostseveretests,——theybeingdisrobedinthepresenceofacommitteeofladies,——reportedintheirfavorAllthetimeshewasonourplatform,therewasacontinuousrappingbythespiritsinresponsetowhatwasbeingsaidbytheseveralspeakers,alsoinresponsetothesinging,andallourexercises。\"InthesamevolumeoftheForumfromwhichquotationshavealreadybeenmade,M。J。Savagestatesmanyfactswhichhaveadeterminatebearingonthepointnowunderconsideration;namely,theintelligencemanifestedinthespiritualphenomena。Fromthesewequoteafew。Hesays(p。452

andonward):——\"IaminpossessionofquitealargebodyofapparentfactsthatIdonotknowwhattodowith……Thatcertainthingstomeinexplicablehaveoccurred,Ibelieve。ThenegativeopinionofsomeonewithwhomnosuchthingshavePage23occurred,willnotsatisfymeIamreadytosubmitsomespecimensofthosethingsthatconstitutemyproblem。Theycanbeonlyspecimens;

foradetailedaccountofevenhalfofthoseIhavelaidby,wouldstretchtothelimitsofabook。

\"AmerchantshipboundforNewYorkwasonherhomewardvoyage。ShewasintheIndianOcean。ThecaptainwasengagedtobemarriedtoaladylivinginNewEngland。Onedayearlyintheafternoonhecame,paleandexcited,tooneofhismates,andexclaimed,’Tom,KatehasjustdiedI

haveseenherdie!’Thematelookedathiminamazement,notknowingwhattomakeofsuchtalk。Butthecaptainwentonanddescribedthewholescene——theroom,herappearance,howshedied,andallthecircumstances。Sorealwasittohim,andsuchwastheeffectonhim,ofhisgrief,thatfortwoorthreeweeks,hewascarefullywatchedlestheshoulddoviolencetohimself。Itwasmorethanonehundredandfiftydaysbeforetheshipreachedherharbor。Duringallthistimenonewswasreceivedfromhome。

ButwhenatlasttheshiparrivedatNewYork,itwasfoundthatKatediddieatthetimeandunderthecircumstancesseenanddescribedbythecaptainoffthecoastofIndia。Thisisonlyonecaseoutofhundreds。Whatdoesitmean?Coincidence?Justhappenedso?Thismightbesaidofone;butahundredofsuchcoincidencesbecomeinexplicable。\"Thefollowingisanotherinstancementionedbythesamewriter:——\"IwenttothehouseofawomaninNewYork。Shewasnotaprofessional。Wehadneverseeneachotherbefore。Wetookseatsintheparlorforatalk,Inotlookingforanymanifestation。Rapsbegan。Idonotsaywhethertheywerereallywheretheyseemedtobeornot;Iknowrightwellthatthejudgmentissubjecttoillusionthroughthesenses。

ButIwastolda’spiritfriend’waspresent;andsoonthename,time,andplaceofdeath,etc。,weregivenme。ItwasthenameofafriendI

hadonceknownintimately。Buttwentyyearshadpassedsincetheoldintimacy;

shehadlivedinanotherState;IamcertainthatsheandthePage24psychichadneverknownorevenheardofeachother。Shehaddiedwithinafewmonths。\"Mr。Savagethengivesexampleswherethepowerinquestionwasexclusivelymental:——\"ThefirsttimeIwaseverinthepresenceofaparticularpsychic,shewentintoatrance。Shehadneverseen,and,sofarasIknow,hadneverhadanywayofhearingofmyfather,whohaddiedsomeyearspreviously。WhenIwasaboy,healwayscalledmebyaspecialnamethatwasneverusedbyanyothermemberofthefamily。Inlateryearshehardlyeverusedit。Buttheentrancedpsychicsaid:’Anoldgentlemanishere,’

andshedescribedcertainverymarkedpeculiarities。Thensheadded:’Hesaysheisyourfather,andhecallsyou,’usingtheoldchildhoodnameofmine。\"Again,samepage:——\"Onecasemore,only,willImentionunderthishead。Amostintimatefriendofmyyouthhadrecentlydied。ShehadlivedinanotherState,andthepsychicdidnotknowthatsuchapersonhadeverexisted。

Weweresittingalonewhenthisoldfriendannouncedherpresence。Itwasinthisway:Aletteroftwopageswasautomaticallywritten,addressedtome。IthoughttomyselfasIreadit,——Ididnotspeak,——’Wereitpossible,Ishouldfeelsureshehadwrittenthis。’Ithensaid,asthoughspeakingtoher,’Willyounotgivemeyourname?’Itwasgiven,bothmaidenandmarriedname。Ithenbeganaconversationlastingoveranhour,whichseemedasrealasanyIeverhavewithmyfriends。Shetoldmeofherchildren,ofhersisters。Wetalked,overtheeventsofboyhoodandgirlhood。Iaskedherifsherememberedabookweusedtoreadtogether,andshegavemetheauthor’sname。Iaskedagainifsherememberedtheparticularpoemwewerebothspeciallyfondof,andshenameditatonce。Intheletterthatwaswritten,andinmuchoftheconversation,therewereapparenthintsofidentity,littletouchesandpeculiaritiesthatwouldmeanmuchtoanacquaintance,butnothingtoastranger。Icouldnotbutbemuchimpressed。Nowinthiscase,IknowthatPage25thepsychicneverknewofthisperson’sexistence,andofcoursenotofouracquaintance。\"Mr。Savagethenmentionscaseswhichhecallsstillmoreinexplicable,becausetheinformationconveyedwasnotknowneithertothepsychic(whichseemstobethenewnameformedium)ortohimself。Hesays:——\"ButonemorecasedareItakethespacefor,thoughthebudgetisonlyopened。Thisonedidnothappentome,butitissohedgedaboutandcheckedoff,thatitsevidentialvalueinascientificwayisabsolutelyperfect。Thenamesofsomeofthepartiesconcernedwouldberecognizedintwohemispheres。Aladyandgentlemanvisitedapsychic。Thegentlemanwasthelady’sbrother-in-law。Theladyhadanauntwhowasillinacitytwoorthreehundredmilesaway。Whenthepsychichadbecomeentranced,theladyaskedherifshehadanyimpressionastotheconditionofheraunt。Thereplywas,’No。’Butbeforethesittingwasover,thepsychicexclaimed,’Why,yourauntishereShehasalreadypassedaway。’’Thiscannotbetrue,’saidthelady;’theremustbeamistake。Ifshehaddied,theywouldhavetelegraphedusimmediately。’’But,’thepsychicinsisted,’sheishere。Andsheexplainsthatshediedabouttwoo’clockthismorning。

Shealsosaysthatatelegramhasbeensent,andyouwillfinditatthehouseonyourreturn。’

\"Hereseemedaclearcaseforatest。Sowhiletheladystartedforherhome,herbrother-in-lawcalledatthehouseofafriendandtoldthestory。Whiletherethehusbandcamein。Havingbeenawayforsomehourshehadnotheardofanytelegram。Butthefriendseatedhimselfathisdeskandwroteoutacarefulaccount,whichallthreesignedonthespot。

Whentheyreachedhome,——twoorthreemilesaway,——therewasthetelegramconfirmingthefactandthetimeoftheaunt’sdeath,preciselyasthepsychichadtoldthem。

\"Herearemostwonderfulfacts。Howshalltheybeaccountedfor?Ihavenottrustedmymemoryforthesethings,buthavemadecarefulrecordatthetime。IknowPage26otherrecordsofasimiliarkindkeptbyothers。Theyarekeptprivate。Why?ThelateRev。J。G。Wood,ofEngland,theworld-famousnaturalist,oncesaidtome:’Iamgladtotalkofthesethingstoanyonewhohasarighttoknow。ButIusedtocalleverybodyafoolwhohadanythingtodowiththem;and’withasmile——’Idonotenjoybeingcalledafool。’

\"Psychicandothersocietiesthatadvertiseforstrangephenomena,mustlearnthatatleastarespectfultreatmentistobeaccorded,orpeoplewillnotlaybaretheirsecretsouls。Andthen,intheverynatureofthecase,theseexperimentsconcernmattersofthemostpersonalnature。Manyofthemoststrikingcasespeoplewillnotmakepublic。Insomeofthoseaboverelated,Ihavehadsotoveilfacts,thattheydonotappearasremarkableastheyreallyare。Thewholecannotbetold。\"Aquotationfromthissamewriter(\"AutomaticWriting,\"page14),Says:

——\"IaminpossessionofarespectablebodyoffactsthatIdonotknowhowtoexplainexceptonthetheorythatIamdealingwithsomeinvisibleintelligence。IholdthatastheonlytenabletheoryIamacquaintedwith。\"Inthesamework(page19),theauthor,Mrs。S。A。Underwood,astheresultofhercommunicationsfromspirits,says:——\"Detailedstatementsoffactsunknowntoeitherofus[thatis,herselfandher\"control\"],butwhichweeksafterwardwerelearnedtobecorrect,havebeenwritten,andrepeatedagainandagain,whendisbelievedandcontradictedbyus。\"Onthispoint,also,asonthepreceding,testimonyneednotbemultiplied。

ThefactsaretoowellknownandtoogenerallyadmittedtowarrantthedevotionoffurtherspacetoapresentationofthePage27evidence。Thequestionmustsoonbemet,Whatisthesourceofthepowerandintelligencethusmanifested?ButthismayproperlybeheldinabeyancetillwetakeaglanceatTHEPROGRESSOFSPIRITUALISMduringthefiftyyearsofitsmodernhistory。Itbeganinawaytoexcitethewonderandcuriosityofthepeople,theveryelementsthatwouldgivewingstoitsprogressthroughtheland。Mensuddenlyfoundtheirthoughtscareeringthroughnewchannels。Anunseenworldseemedtomakeknownitspresenceandinviteinvestigation。Asthephenomenaclaimedtobeduetothedirectagencyofspirits,themovementnaturallyassumedthenameof\"Spiritualism。\"Itwasthenhailedbymultitudesasanewandlivingteacher,cometoclearupuncertaintiesandtodispeldoubtsfromthemindsofmen。

Atleastanirrepressiblecuriositywaseverywhereexcitedtoknowwhatthenew\"ism\"wouldteachconcerningthatinvisibleworldwhichitprofessedtohavecometoopentotheknowledgeofmankind。Everywheremensoughtbywhatmeanstheycouldcomeintocommunicationwiththespiritrealm。

Intowhateverplacethenewsentered,circleswereformed,andthenumberofconvertsoutstrippedthepenoftheenroller。Itgatheredadherentsfromeverywalkoflife——fromthehigherclassesaswellasthelower;

theeducated,cultured,andrefined,aswellastheuncultivatedandignorant;

fromministerslawyers,physicians,judges,Page28teachers,governmentofficials,andalltheprofessions。Buttheindividualsthusinterested,beingoftoodiverseandindependentviewstoagreeuponanypermanentbasisfororganization,thedatafornumericalstatisticsaredifficulttoprocure。Variousestimates,however,oftheirnumbershavebeenformed。Aslongagoas1876,computationsofthenumberofSpiritualistsintheUnitedStatesrangedfrom3,000,000byHepworthDixon,to10,000,000

bytheRomanCatholiccouncilatBaltimore。OnlyfiveyearsfromthetimethefirstconverttoModernSpiritualismappeared,JudgeEdmonds,himselfanenthusiasticconvert,saidoftheirnumbers:——\"Besidestheundistinguishedmultitudes,therearemanynowofhighstandingandtalentrankedamongthem,——doctors,lawyers,andclergymeningreatnumbers,aProtestantbishop,thelearnedandreverendpresidentofacollege,judgesofourhighercourts,membersofCongress,foreignambassadors,andex-membersoftheUnitedStatesSenate。\"Uptothepresenttime,itisnotprobablethatthenumberofSpiritualistshasbeenmuchreducedbyapostasiesfromthefaith,ifsuchitmaybecalled;

whilethemovementitselfhasbeengrowingmoreprominentandbecomingmorewidelyknowneveryyear。Theconclusionwouldthereforeinevitablyfollowthatitsadherentsmustnowbemorenumerousthaneverbefore。A

letteraddressedbythewritertothepublishersofthePhilosophicalJournal,Chicago,onthispoint,receivedthefollowingreply,datedDec。24,1895:——\"Beingunorganized,largely,noreliablefigurescanbegiven。

Manythousandsareinthechurches,andarecountedthere。ItisclaimedthatthereareaboutfivemillionintheUnitedStates,andoverfiftymillionintheworld。\"TheChristianatWorkofAug。17,1876,undertheheadof\"WitchesandFools,\"said:——\"Butwedonotknowhowmanyjudges,bankers,merchants,prominentmeninnearlyeveryoccupationinlife,thereare,whomakeitaconstantpracticetovisitclairvoyants,sightseers,andso-calledSpiritualmediums;

yetitcanscarcelybedoubtedthattheirnameislegion;thatnotonlytheunreligiousman,butprofessingChristians,menandwomen,areinthehabitofconsultingspiritsfromthevastydeepforinformationconcerningboththedeadandtheliving。Manywhopassforintelligentpeople,whowouldbeshockedtohavetheirChristianitycalledinquestion,areconstantlyengagedinthisdisreputablebusiness。\"Thefollowingappearedsomeyearsago,intheSanFranciscoChronicle:——\"Untilquiterecently,sciencehascoldlyignoredtheallegedphenomenaofSpiritualism,andtreatedAndrewJacksonDavis,Home,andtheDavenportbrothers,asiftheybelongedtothecommonfraternityofshowmenandmountebanks。Butnowtherehascomeamostnoteworthychange。

WelearnfromsuchhighauthorityastheFortnightlyReviewthatAlfredH。Wallace,F。R。S。;WilliamCrookes,F。R。S。andeditoroftheQuarterlyJournalofScience;W。H。Harrison,F。R。S。andpresidentoftheBritishEthnologicalSociety,withothersoccupyingahighpositioninthescientificandliteraryworld,havebeenseriouslyinvestigatingthephenomenaofspiritism。Thereportwhichthoselearnedgentlemenmakeissimplyastounding。Thereisnofairytale,nostoryofmythormiracle,thatismoreincrediblethantheirnarrative。Theytellusingraveandsoberspeech,thatthespiritofagirlwhodiedahundredyearsago,appearedtotheminvisibleform。Shetalkedwiththem,gavethemlocksofherhair,piecesofherdress,andherautograph。TheyPage30sawherinbodilypresence,feltherperson,heardhervoice;

sheenteredtheroominwhichtheywere,anddisappearedwithouttheopeningofadoor。Thesavantsdeclarethattheyhavehadnumerousinterviewswithherunderconditionsforbiddingtheideaoftrickeryorimposture。

\"Nowthatmeneminentinthescientificworldhavetakenuptheinvestigation,Spiritualismhasentereduponanewphase。Itcannolongerbetreatedwithsilentcontempt。Mr。Wallace’sarticlesintheFortnightlyhaveattractedgeneralattention,andmanyoftheleadingEnglishreviewsandnewspapersarediscussingthematter。TheNewYorkWorlddevotesthreecolumnsofitsspacetoasummaryofthelastarticleintheFortnightly,anddeclareseditoriallythatthe’phenomena’thusattested’deservetherigidscientificexaminationwhichMr。Wallaceinvitesforthem。’Thisistreatingthematterintherightway。Letallthewell-attestedfactsbecollected,andthenletusseewhatconclusionstheyjustify。Ifspiritcommunicationisafact,itiscertainlyamostinterestingone。InthelanguagewhichtheWorldattributestoJohnBright,’Ifitisafact,itistheonebesideswhicheveryotherfactofhumanexistencesinksintoinsignificance。’\"OneofthereasonswhyitwouldbequiteimpossibletostatethenumberofrealSpiritualistsinourlandto-dayhasalreadybeenhintedatinaforegoingextract。Itisthat\"manythousands,\"andwethinkthenumbermightinallprobabilityberaisedtomillions,whoareinrealitySpiritualists,donotgobythatname。Theyareinthevariouschurches,andarecountedthere。YettheybelievethephenomenaofSpiritualism,acceptitsteachingsintheirownminds,andquietlyandconstantly,astheChristianatWorkavers,consultclairvoyantsandmediums,inquestofknowledge。

ThegrosserfeaturesoftheteachingsofSpiritualismwhichwerepainfullypromi-Page31nentinitsearlierstages,whichthereisnoreasontobelievearediscountenancedorabandonedeitherintheoryorpractice,arerelegatedtoaninvisiblebackground,whileinitsoutwardaspectitnowposesintheattitudeofpietyandthegarbofreligion。ItevenprofessestoadoptsomeofthemoreprominentandpopulardoctrinesofChristianity。InthisphasetheaveragechurchgoercannotseewhyhemaynotacceptallthatSpiritualismhastogive,andstillretainhisdenominationalrelationship。Besidesthis,thecomingtolight,everynowandthen,ofthefactthatsomepersonofnationalorworld-widefameisaSpiritualist,addspopularityandgivesanewimpetustothemovement。SuchinstancesmaybenamedasthefounderoftheLelandStanfordUniversity,ofCalifornia;thewidowofex-Vice-PresidentHendricks,ofIndiana,who,itissaid,iscarryingonsomeverysuccessfulfinancialtransactionsbydirectionfromthespiritworld;andMr。W。T。

Stead,LondoneditoroftheReviewofReviews,who,in1893startedanewquarterly,calledTheBorderLand,tobedevotedtotheadvocacyofthephilosophyofSpiritualism,whichhehadthenbutrecentlyespoused。

Inothercountriesithasinvadedtheranksofthemobility,andevenseateditselfonthethronesofmonarchs。ThelateroyalhousesofFrance,Spain,andRussiaaresaid,bycurrentrumor,tohavesoughtthespiritsforknowledge。

Nocausecouldcovetmorerapidandwide-spreadsuccessthanthishasenjoyed。

ModernSpiritualism:ASubjectofProphecyandaSignoftheTimes,Chapter2Page32CHAPTERTWOWHATISTHEAGENCYINQUESTION?HAVINGnowshownthatthereareconnectedwithSpiritualismsupermundanephenomenathatcannotbedenied,andequallyevidentsuperhumanintelligence,sufficienttogivetothemovementunprecedentedrecognitioninalltheworld,thewayisopenforthemostimportantquestionthatcanberaisedconcerningit,andonewhichnowdemandsananswer;andthatis,Whatistheagencybywhichthesephenomenaareproduced,andbywhichthisintelligenceismanifested?Thisquestionmustbeexaminedwiththeutmostcare,and,ifpossible,adecisionbereachedofthemostassuringcertainty;for,asMr。M。J。Savagesays,\"Spiritualismiseitheragrandtruthoramostlamentabledelusion。\"

ItisproperthattheclaimwhichSpiritualismputsforthforitself,inthisregard,shouldfirstbeheard。Thisissowellknownthatitscarcelyneedbestated。Itisthatthereisineveryhumanbeingasoul,orspirit,whichconstitutestherealperson;thatthissoul,orspirit,isimmortal;

thatitmanifestsitselfthroughatangiblebodyduringthisearthlife,andwhenthatbodydies,passesunscathedintotheunseenworld,intoanenlargedsphereoflife,activity,andPage33intelligence;thatinthissphereitcanstilltakecognizanceofearthlythings,andcommunicatewiththosestillintheflesh,respectingsceneswhichithasleft,andthosemoreinterestingconditionsstillveiledfrommortalsight;thatitisbythesedisembodied,or\"discarnated\"spiritsthatrapsaregiven,objectsmoved,intelligencemanifested,secretsrevealed,slateswritten,voicesuttered,facesshown,andepistlesaddressedtomortals,asfriendwouldwritetofriend。Ifthisbetrue,itopenswhatwouldindeedbeconsideredagrandavenueofconsolationtobereavedhearts,bygivingthemevidencethattheirdepartedfriendsstilllived;thattheyrecognized,loved,andaccompaniedthem,anddelightedstilltocounselandinstructthem。Ifnottrue,itisamasterpieceofsuperhumancraftandcunning;forittakesChristendomonthesidewhereitisleastguarded;

astheviewiseverywhereheldthatthedeadareconscious,andtheonlyquestionwouldbeastotheirpowertocommunicatewithpersonsstilllivinginthebody;anditthrowsitsarmsaroundtheindividualwhentheheartisthemosttender,whenplungedintoaconditioninwhicheverypangofbereavedsorrow,everytieofaffection,amideverythroboflove,presshimtocravewithallhisbeingthatcommunicationwiththedeadmaybeprovedafact,andtoconstrainhimtoacceptthedoctrine,unlesskeptfromitbysomepowerstrongerthanthecordsthatbindhearttoheartindeathlesslove。Ifitbeadeception,itoccupiesavantagegroundbeforewhichmenmaywelltremble。Page34But,ashasbeenalreadystated,thequestionisheretobediscussedfromthestandpointoftheBible;theBibleistobetakenasthestandardofauthoritybywhichallconflictingclaimsrespectingthenatureofman,mustbedecided。TheauthenticityoftheScriptures,inreferencetothosewhodenytheirauthority,isanantecedentquestion,intothediscussionofwhichitisnottheprovinceofthislittleworktoenter。Aword,however,bywayofdigression,maybeallowedinreferencetoitsauthorship。

CREDENTIALSOFTHEBIBLE1。TheBibleclaimstobethewordofGod。Thosewhowroteitassertthattheywroteasthey\"weremovedbytheHolyGhost;\"andtheyappendtowhattheyutter,a\"ThussaiththeLord。\"

2。Ifitisnotwhatitclaimstobe,itisanimpostureinventedbydeceiversandliars。

3。Goodmenwouldnotdeceiveandlie;thereforetheywerenottheoneswhoinventedtheBible。

4。If,therefore,itwasinventedbymenatall,itmusthavebeeninventedbybadmen。

5。Allliarsandreligiousimpostorsarebadmen;but——

6。TheBiblerepeatedlyandmostexplicitlyforbidslyingandimposture,underthethreateningofmostcondignpunishment。

7。Would,therefore,liarsandimpostorsinventabookwhichmorethananyotherbookeverwritten,denounceslyingandimposture,thuscondemningPage35themselvestotheseverestjudgmentsofGod,andatlasttoeternaldeath?

8。If,then,theBibleisnottheinventionofgoodmen,——becausesuchmenwouldnotlieanddeceive;norofevilmen,——becausesuchmenwouldnotcondemnthemselves;norofgoodorevilangels,forthesamereasons,whoelsecanbeitsauthor,buthewhoclaimstobe,thatis,thelivingGod?

9。If,therefore,fromtheverynatureofthecase,itmustbeGod’sbook,whynotbelieveit,andobeyit?

Toreturn:AppealisthereforemadetotheBible;andtheobjectistolearnwhattheBibleteachesaboutSpiritualism。Whentheclaimisputforththatitisthedisembodiedspiritsofdeadmenwhomakethecommunications,theBiblereaderisatonceawareofaconflictofclaims。IntimeswhentheBiblewaswritten,therewerepracticesamongmenwhichwentunderthenamesof\"enchantment,\"\"sorcery,\"\"witchcraft,\"\"necromancy,\"\"divination,\"

\"consultingwithfamiliarspirits,\"etc。Thesepracticeswereallmoreorlessrelated,butsomeofthembearanunmistakablemeaning。Thus,\"necromancy\"

isdefinedtomean\"apretendedcommunicationwiththedead。\"A\"familiarspirit\"was\"aspiritordemonsupposedtoattendonanindividual,ortocomeathiscall;theinvisibleagentofanecromancer’swill。\"——CenturyDictionary。Spiritualistsdonotdenytheirtheirintercoursewiththeinvisibleworldcomesundersome,atPage36least,oftheseheads。ButallsuchpracticestheBibleexplicitlyforbids。

Deut。18:9-12:\"Thereshallnotbefoundamongyouanyonethatmakethhissonorhisdaughtertopassthroughthefire,orthatusethdivination,oranobserveroftimes,oranenchanter,orawitch,oracharmer,oraconsulterwithfamiliarspirits,orawizard,oranecromancer。ForallthatdothesethingsareanabominationuntotheLord。\"Lev。19:31:

\"Regardnotthemthathavefamiliarspirits,neitherseekafterwizards,tobedefiledbythem:IamtheLordyourGod。\"Seealso,2Kings21:2,6,9,11;Rev。21:8;Gal。5:19-21;Acts16:16-18;etc。ThusplainlyinboththeOldandNewTestaments,arethesepracticesforbidden。

ANIMPOSSIBILITYButwhydoestheBibleforbidsuchpracticesasnecromancy,ora\"pretended\"

communicationwiththedead?——Becauseitwouldbeonlyapretenseatbest;forsuchcommunicationisimpossible。Thedeadareunconsciousintheirgraves,andhavenopowertocommunicatewiththeliving。Letthistruthbeonceestablished,anditisthedeath-blowtotheclaimsofSpiritualism,inthecasesofallwhowillreceiveit。Allusionhasalreadybeenmadetoapopularandwide-spreaddogmaintheChristianchurchwhichfurnishesabasisforSpiritualism。Itisthatthesoulisimmortal,andthatthedeadareconscious。Spiritsmakeknowntheirpresence,andclaimtobethespiritsofpersonswhohaveoncelivedPage37hereinhumanbodies。NowiftheBibleteachesthatthereisnosuchthingasadisembodiedhumanspirit,aknowledgeofthatfactwouldenableonetodetectatoncetheimpostureofanyintelligencewhichfrombehindthecurtainshouldclaimtobesuchspirit。Anyspiritseekingtheattentionofmeninthislife,andclaimingtobewhattheBiblesaysdoesnotexist,comeswithafalsehoodonitslipsorinitsraps,iftheBibleistrue,andthusrevealsitsrealcharactertobethatofadeceiver。InthiscasetheBiblebelieverisarmedagainsttheimposture。Nomanlikestobefooled。

Nomatterthereforehownicethecommunicatingintelligencemayseem,howmanytruethingsitmaysay,orhowmanygoodthingsitmaypromise,theconvictioncannotbeevadedthatnorealgoodcanbeintendedorconferredbyanyspirit,orwhateveritmaybe,masqueradingunderthegarboffalsehood,orpretendingtobewhatitisnot。Onsuchafoundation110stablesuperstructurecanbereared。Itbecomesadeathtrap,suretocollapseandinvolveinruinallthosewhotrusttherein。

Itisverydesirablethatthereadercomprehendthefullimportanceofthedoctrine,asrelatedtothissubject,thatthedeadareunconsciousandthattheyhavenopowertocommunicatewiththeliving。Thisbeingestablished,itsweepsawayatonestroketheentirefoundationofSpiritualism。

EvidencewillnowbepresentedtoshowthatthisisaBibledoctrine;andwhereverthisisreceived,thefabricofSpiritualismfrombasetofinialfalls;itcannotPage38possiblystand。Butwherethedoctrineprevailsthatonlythethinveilthatlimitsourmortalvision,separatesusfromaworldfulloftheconscious,intelligentspiritsofthosewhohavedepartedthislife,Spiritualismhasthefield,beyondthepossibilityofdislodgment。Whenonebelievesthathehasdisembodiedspiritfriendsallabouthim,howcanhequestionthattheyareabletocommunicatewithhim?andwhensomeunseenintelligencemakesitspresenceknown,andclaimstobeoneofthosefriends,andreferstofactsorscenes,knownonlytothemtwo,howcanthelivingdisputetheclaim?Howcanherefusetoacceptaclaim,which,onhisownhypothesis,thereisnoconceivablereasontodeny?Butif’thespiritsarenotwhattheyclaimtobe,howshalltheinexplicablephenomenaattendingtheirmanifestationsbeexplained?——TheBiblebringstoviewotheragencies,nottheso-calledspiritsofthedeparted,towhoseworkingallthathaseverbeenmanifestedwhichtomortalvisionismysteriousandinexplicable,maybejustlyattributed。

THESOULNOTIMMORTALSpiritualismdeclaresittobethegreatobjectofitsmission,toprovetheimmortalityofthesoul,which,itsays,isnottaughtintheScriptureswithsufficientclearness,andisnototherwisedemonstrated。ItwellattributestotheScripturesalackofplainteachinginsupportofthatdogma;anditwouldhavestatedmoretruth,ifithadsaidthatthePage39Scripturesnowherecountenancesuchadoctrineatall。But,itissaid,theScripturesarefulloftheterms,\"soul\"and\"spirit。\"Verytrue;buttheynowhereusethosetermstodesignatesuchapartofmanasincommonparlance,andinpopulartheology,theyhavecometomean。Thefactis,thepopularconceptofthe\"soul\"and\"spirit\"hasbeenformulatedentirelyoutsidetheBible。Sedulously,unremittingly,formorethansixthousandyears,theideahasbeeninculcatedinthemindsofmen,fromthecradletothegrave,thatmanisadualbeing,consistingofanoutwardbodywhichdies,andaninwardbeingcalled\"soul,\"or\"spirit,\"whichdoesnotdie,butpassestohigherspiritlife,whenthebodygoesintothegrave。Thefatherofthisdoctrineisrarelyreferredtobyitsbelievers,asauthority,possiblythroughalittlefeelingofembarrassmentastoitsparentage;

forheitwaswhoannouncedittoourfirstparentsinthesewords:\"Yeshallnotsurelydie!\"Gen。3:4。Whenmenbegantodie,itwasashrewdstrokeofpolicyonthepartofhimwhohadpromisedthemthattheyshouldnotdie,totrytoprovetothosewhoremainedthattheothershadnotreallydied,butonlychangedconditions。Itisnomarvelthatheshouldtrytomakemenbelievethattheypossessedanimmaterial,immortalentitythatcouldnotdie;but,inviewoftheghastlyexperiencesofthepassingyears,itisthemarvelofmarvelsthatheshouldhavesucceededsowell。

ThetroublenowisthatmentakethesemeaningswhichhavebeendevisedandfosteredintoPage40stupendousstrengthoutsidethepaleofBibleteaching,andattachthemtotheBibletermsof\"soul\"and\"spirit。\"Inotherwords,themongrelpago-papaltheologywhichhasgrownupinChristendom,letstheBiblefurnishtheterms,andpaganismthedefinitions。ButfromtheBiblestandpoint,thesedefinitionsdonotbelongthere;theyareforeigntothetruth,andtheBibledoesnotrecognizethem。TheyareasmuchoutofplaceaswastheinventorofthemhimselfinthegardenofEden。LettheBiblefurnishitsowndefinitionstoitsownterms,andallwillbeclear。TheopinionofJohnMilton,thecelebratedauthorofParadiseLost,isworthyofnote。

Inhis\"TreatiseonChristianDoctrine,\"Vol。I,pp。250,251,hesays:

——\"Manisalivingbeing,intrinsicallyandproperlyoneindividual,notcompoundandseparable,not,accordingtothecommonopinion,madeupandframedoftwodistinctanddifferentnatures,asofbodyandsoul,butthewholemanissoul,andthesoul,man;thatistosay,abodyorsubstance,individual,animated,sensitive,andrational。\"Inthissensethewordisemployedmanytimes;butwhoeverwilltracetheuseofthewords\"soul\"and\"spirit\"throughtheBible,willfindthemappliedalsotoagreatvarietyofobjects;as,person,mind,heart,body(intheexpression\"adeadbody\"),will,lust,appetite,breath,creature,pleasure,desire,anger,courage,blast,etc。,etc。,inallnearlyfiftydifferentways。Butitisafactwhichshouldbeespeciallynoted,thatinnotasingleinstanceistheretheleasthintgiventhatanythingexpressedbythesePage41termsiscapableofexistingforasinglemoment,asaconsciousentity,orinanyothercondition,withoutthebody!Thisbeingso,noneofthese,accordingtotheBible,aretheagencyclaimedtobepresentinSpiritualism。

Anotherfactinreferencetothispoint,shouldbealloweditsdecisivebearing。Thequestionnowunderinvestigationis,Isthesoulimmortal,asSpiritualismhastakenuponitselftoteach,andclaimstodemonstrate?

TheBibleisfoundtobesolavishintheuseoftheterms\"soul\"and\"spirit,\"thatthesewordsoccurintheaggregate,seventeenhundredtimes。Seventeenhundredtimes,bywayofdescription,analysis,narrative,historicalfacts,ordeclarationsofwhattheycando,orsuffer,theBiblehassomethingtosayabout\"soul\"and\"spirit。\"Themostimportantquestiontobesettledconcerningthem,certainly,iswhethertheyareimmortalornot。WillnottheBible,sofreelytreatingoftheseterms,answerthisquestion?Verystrange,indeed,ifitdoesnot。Butdoesitonceaffirmthateitherthesoulorthespiritisimmortal?——Notonce!Doesiteverapplytothemtheterms\"eternal,\"\"deathless,\"\"neverdying,\"oranywordthatbearsthenecessarymeaningofimmortal?——Notinasingleinstance。Doesitapplytothemanytermfromwhichevenaninference,necessaryorremote,canbedrawnthattheyareimmortal?Evenreducedtothisattenuatedform,theanswerisstillanemphaticandoverwhelming,No!Well,then,doesitsayanythingaboutthenatureandcapabilitiesofexist-Page42enceofthatwhichitdenominatessoulorspirit?——Yes;itsaysthesoulisindangerofthegrave,maydie,bedestroyed,killed,andthatthespiritmaybewounded,cutoff,preserved,andso,conversely,madetoperish。

ItissometimesclaimedthatitisnotnecessarythattheBibleshouldaffirmtheimmortalityofthesoul,becauseitissoself-evidentafactthatitistakenforgranted。Butnoonesurelycansupposethattheimmortalityofthesoulismoreself-evidentthanthatofJehovah;yettheBiblehasseenfittoaffirmhisimmortalityinmostdirectterms。1Tim。1:17:

\"NowuntotheKingeternal,immortal,invisible,theonlywiseGod,behonorandgloryforeverandever。Amen。\"1Tim。6:16:\"Whoonlyhathimmortality,dwellinginthelightwhichnomancanapproachunto;

whomnomanbathseen,norcansee:towhombehonorandpowereverlasting。

Amen。\"Let,then,similarBibletestimonybefoundconcerningthesoul;

thatis,thatitis\"immortal,\"or\"hathimmortality,\"andthetaken-for-granteddevicewillnotbeneeded。

ModernSpiritualism:ASubjectofProphecyandaSignoftheTimes。

Chapter3Page43CHAPTERTHREETHEDEADUNCONSCIOUSFROMthefactnowestablishedthatthesoulisnotimmortal,itwouldfollowasaninevitableconclusion,thatthedeadarenotconsciousintheintermediatestate,andconsequentlycannotactthepartattributedtotheminmodernSpiritualism。Buttherearesomepositivestatementstowhichthereader’sattentionshouldbecalled,andsomeinstancessupposedtoprovetheconsciousstatewhichshouldbenoticed。

1。TheDeadKnownotAnything。——AsasampleofthewaytheBiblespeaksuponthisquestion,letthereaderturntothewordsofSolomon,inEccl。9:5,6,10:\"Forthelivingknowthattheyshalldie:butthedeadknownotanything,neitherhavetheyanymoreareward;forthememoryofthemisforgotten。Alsotheirlove,andtheirhatred,andtheirenvy,isnowperished;neitherhavetheyanymoreaportionforeverinanythingthatisdoneunderthesun……Whatsoeverthyhandfindethtodo,doitwiththymight;forthereisnowork,nordevice,norknowledge,norwisdom,inthegrave,whitherthougoest。\"

Thislanguageisaddressedtothereal,living,intelligent,responsibleman;andhowcoulditbePage44plainer?Onthehypothesisofthecommonlybelieveddistinctionbetweenthesoulandthebody,thismustbeaddressedtothesoul;forthebodyconsideredasthemerematerialinstrumentthroughwhichthesoulacts,isnotsupposedofitselftoknowanything。Thebody,asabody,independentofthesoul,doesnotknowthatitshalldie;butitisthatwhichknows,whileoneisalive,thatitshalldie——itisthatsameintelligentbeingthat,whendead,knowsnotanything。ButthespiritsinSpiritualismdoknowmanythingsintheircondition;thereforetheyarenotthosewhohaveoncelivedonthisearth,andpassedoffthroughdeath;forsuch,oncedead,thisscriptureaffirms,knownotanything——theyareinaconditioninwhichthereis\"nowork,nordevice,norknowledge,norwisdom。\"Thisisaplain,straightforward,literalstatement;thereisnomistakingitsmeaning;andifitistrue,thenitisnottruethattheunseenagentsworkingthroughSpiritualism,arethespiritsofthedead。

2。TheSpiritReturnstoGod。——Anotherpassagefromthesamewriterandthesamebook,mayrecurtothemindofthereader,asexpressingadifferentandcontradictorythought。Eccl。12:7。\"Thenshallthedustreturntotheearthasitwas:andthespiritshallreturnuntoGodwhogaveit。\"AcarefulanalysisofthispassagerevealsnosupportforSpiritualism;

foritdoesnotsaythatthespirit,onreturningtoGod,isconscious,oriscapableofcomingbackandcommunicatingwithmortals。ItisnotdeniedthatdifferentcomponentpartsenterintoPage45theconstitutionofman;andthatthesepartsmaybeseparated。Solomonhimselfmaythereforetelluswhathemeansbytheterm\"spirit\"whichhehereuses。Heemploysthesamewordinchapter3:21ofthissamebook,butsaysthatbeastshaveitaswellasmen。Andtheninverse19,heexplainswhathemeans,bysayingthatthey(manandtheloweranimals)allhaveonebreath。Therecordofman’screationinGen。2:7,showsthatavitalizingprinciple,calledthe\"breathoflife,\"wasnecessarytobeimpartedtotheorganizedbody,beforemanbecamealivingbeing;

andthisbreathoflife,ascommontomanandtoallbreathinganimals,isdescribedinGen。7:21,22,bytheterm[HEBREWCHARACTERSINPRINTED

TEXT](ruahh),thesamewordthatisusedfor\"breath,\"inEccl。3:19,\"spirit,\"inverse21,and\"thespirit,\"whichGodgavetoman,andwhichreturnstoGod,inchapter12:7。Thusitisclearthatreferenceisheremadesimplytothe\"breathoflife\"whichGodatfirstimpartedtoman,tomakehimalivingbeing,andwhichhewithdrawstohimself,inthehourofman’sdeath。Jobstatesthesamefact,anddescribestheprocess,inchapter34:14,15:

\"Ifhe[God]sethisheartuponman,ifhegatheruntohimselfhis[man’s]spirit[sameword]andhisbreath;……manshallturnagainuntodust。\"NoonecanfailtoseeherethatJobreferstothesameeventofwhichSolomonspeaks。

Andatthispointthequestionmayaswellberaised,andanswered,\"Whencecomesthisspiritwhichisclaimedtobetherealman,capableofanPage46independentandsuperiorexistencewithoutthebody?Bodiescomeintoexistencebynaturalgeneration;butwhencecomesthespirit?Isitapartofthebody?Ifso,itcannotbeimmortal;for\"thatwhichisbornofthefleshisflesh。\"John3:6。Isitsuppliedtohumanbeingsatbirth?Ifso,isthereagreatstorehouse,somewhere,ofsoulsandspirits,ready-made,fromwhichthesupplyisdrawnasfastaswantedinthisworld?Andifso,further,isittobeconcludedthatallspiritshavehadapre-existence?