第5章

LordAbingerrefusedtheevidencewhichLordWynfordhadwarnedLordGrantleywouldbefatal:theevidenceofwhichLordWynfordhadsaid,thatifitshouldevercomeout,itwouldbeattended\"withlossofcharacter\"forMrNorton。

Itwassuppressed:andbecauseitwassuppressedthecasewasdecidedforMrNortoninsteadofagainsthim,asLordWynfordhadwarnedhimmusthappen。

Afterthis,MrNortonproposedoncemoretohave\"referees。\"HenamedSirF。Thesiger,whoseopinionI

giveinhisownwords:——\"TheaccommodationproposedbyNortonisoneinwhichyouaretogivewayuponeverysubject,andheisnottorecedeuponone;anditseemstometoberidiculoustotalkofconciliationuponsuchafooting……ItisimpossiblenottobestruckwiththevacillatingandvexatiouscoursewhichNortonhaspursued;excitinghopesonlytodisappointthem,andmakingpromisesapparentlyfortheopportunityofbreakingthem。\"

Page76

Whyshouldtherebenotribunalofcontroloverthese\"vacillating\"husbands,whorefusetoabidebywrittenpledges,andmakepromises\"fortheopportunityofbreakingthem\"?Whyistheabsurdfictionof\"non-existence\",tobekeptupinlaw,wheninfact,twoalienatedpartiesexist,withadverseinterests,strugglingandantagonistic?

Oneoftheepisodesofmy\"non-existence\"inlaw,atthistime,consistedinmyhavingtoendurealibelofimmoderatelengthandbitterness,inthe\"BritishandForeignQuarterlyReview。\"Ihadmadelittlestruggleaboutothermatters。IhadyieldedtoLordMelbourne\'searnestrequestthat,whilehewasminister,Iwouldnotpublishmyownaccountofthecasebetweenhimandmyhusband。

Butresolutely,passionately,andtillthefinalhourofsuccess,Istruggledagainstthelawwhichenabledanotherwomantotakemychildren。

Inthecourseofthatstruggle,Iwrotetwopamphlets:one,\"OntheSeparationofMotherandChild;\"theother,\"APlainLettertotheChancellor,byPierceStevenson,Esq。\"ThereviewinquestionattributedtomeapaperIdidnotwrite,andneversaw;\"OntheGrievancesofWoman;\"andboldlysettingmyname,intheindex,asPage77

theauthor,——proceeded,inlanguagestrangerabidandvirulent,toabusethewriter;callinghera\"SHE-DEVIL\"anda\"SHE-BEAST。\"

Nolessthanonehundredandforty-twopagesweredevotedtothenominaltaskofopposingtheInfantCustodyBill,andinrealitytoabusingme。

Notbeingtheauthorofthepapercriticised,IrequestedmysolicitortoprosecutetheReviewasalibel。Heinformedmethatbeingamarriedwoman,Icouldnotprosecuteofmyself;thatmyhusbandmustprosecute:

myhusband——whohadassailedmewitheverylibelinhispower!Therecouldbenoprosecution:andIwaslefttostudythegrotesqueanomalyinlawofhavingmydefensemadenecessary,——andmadeimpossible,——bythesameperson。

\"Oh!but,\"——saythosewhohavenotstudiedandsufferedunderthelaw,asIhave,——\"inreturnforallthis,thehusbandisresponsibleforhiswife\'sdebts:thatweallknow!\"Doyou?Iwillshewthatnotonlyheisnotresponsibleforhiswife\'sdebtstoothers——butheisnotresponsibleforhisowncovenanteddebtstoher。Heis,asIhavesaid,legallyresponsiblefornothing,butthatsheshallnotcomeupontheparish。

In1848,myhusbandrequiredreadymoneyPage78

toimprovetheestatelefthimbythewomantowhommychildrenwereatfirsttaken。

Inordertoraisethismoneyonthetrust-fundsofourmarriagesettlements,mysignaturewasnecessary。

Toobtainmysignature,Mr。Nortondrewupacontract。Hedictatedthetermsofthecontracthimself;vehementlyurgeditscompletion;andreproachedmysolicitorforthedelay,distrust,andreluctance,whichIshewedbeforeIsignedit。Idideventuallysignit;andsodidMr。Norton;andso,also,asIhavealreadystated,didtheHon。EdmundPhipps(marriedtothewidowoftheHon。CharlesNorton,myhusband\'syoungerbrother)。

Theeffectofmysignaturewas,thatMr。Nortonimmediatelyraisedtheloanfromourtrust-fund,toemployonhisestate。Theeffectofhissignature,andthesignaturesoftheMarquisofNormanby\'sbrother,andthesolicitorwhodrewitup,wasabsolutelynil。

In1851,mymotherdied。

Sheleftme(throughmybrother,toguarditfrommyhusband)asmallannuity,asanadditiontomyincome。Mr。Nortonfirstendeavouredtoclaimherlegacy,andthenbalancedthefirstpaymentunderherwill,byarbitrarilystoppingmyallowance。Iinsistedthattheallowancewassecured,Page79

byhisownsignature,andthoseothersignatures,toaformaldeed。Hedefiedmetoproveit,——\"as,bylaw,manandwifewereone,andcouldnotcontractwitheachother;andthedeedwasthereforegoodfornothing。\"

IconfessIthoughtthefearofexposurewouldpreventhisdisputingthecontract;Ithought,——thistimeatleast,thememorablewordsofLordWynford,——\"GeorgeNortoncanhavenodefencetotheactions,andhisdefendingthemwillbeattendedwithlossofcharacter,\"mustoperateasacheckuponsounfair,somonstrousanact,asavailinghimselfofthelegalfictionofmy\"non-existence,\"

toescapefromawrittenbond,whichanyonenothiswifemighthaveprosecutedupon。

Iwasmistaken。NotonlyMrNortonheldbythequibblethatmanandwifecouldnotcontractwitheachother;notonlyhedidthis,——buthehadthebaseandcruelhypocrisytooncemoredragforwardLordMelbourne\'sname,inordertomakethatseemmyshameandmydisgrace,whichwasinfacthisshameandhisdisgrace;andtopretendwrong,whereheknewhehadbeenthewronger。Oncemore,forthesakeofmoney,——asintheactionfor\"damages,\"——heendeavouredtocovermewithopprobrium!Creepingbacktohisoldplace;scramblinguponthemoss-Page80

coveredandforsakenpedestalof\"theinjuredhusband\";hemetthemotherofhisgrown-upsons,withtheaccusationshehadadmittedtobeafalsehoodintheirchildhood:bruisingthoseboyishheartswithforgottenslanders,firstraised,andfirstretracted,whentheeldestwasbutsixyearsold!

Hemetmeinpersoninthelawcourt;heinstructedhislawyer,inmyverypresence,whatquestionstoaskmethatcouldinsultmemost:andwhenthatgentlemanafterwardsapologisedforthetoneofthosequestions,heassertedthatMrNorton\'sinstructionswentbeyondwhathehadevenventuredtoask!

Heaffected(Ogrossaffectation!)

tobehurt,as\"aninjuredhusband,\"atmyacceptinganyassistanceinmoneyfromLordMelbourne\'ssisterorfamilyafterhisdecease;andaffirmedthathehadmadeconditionswithmeaboutit。WhenIcontradictedthisonoath,——disprovedit,andcommentedontheshamefulpretencebywhich,inadisputeaboutmymother\'swill,hereviveddiscussionsaboutLordMelbourne,——seeingthathehimselfretainedonethousanda-yearfromLordMelbourne\'spatronage,——(steadilypreservingTHATmemoryofpastfavors,eventhroughalltherevilingofhisdeadpatron),——Page81

MrNortonprintedthewonderfulfalsehood,thatLordMelbournehadgivenhimtheplaceheheld,\"beforeheknewMrsNorton!\"Theridiculeofthis——(eveniftrue)——mighthavestruckanyone;thisnewwayofdividingtheledger;thisabhorrenceofaman\"becauseoftheseductionofmywife\"——butsatisfactionintheplaceobtainedfromhim,becauseitwas\"beforetheseductionofmywife。\"ButIproveditnottobetrue,byLordMelbourne\'sownletters。Itwasasheerinvention;andgivenwiththemostcarefuldetail。YetMrNorton,——convictedofitsbeingutterlyfalse,——contentedhimselfwithsaying,\"thematterhadhappenedsolongago,\"hemadean\"unintentionalmistake。\"Howmanymoreofhisslandersagainstthedeadandthelivingare\"unintentionalmistakes\"?

Iwillnotpauseoverthatquestion。Iwillnotpauseoverthestilldebateablepoint,whetherthatsignedpaper,evenifnotacontractwithme,maynotbeheldgoodasacontractwithmycreditors;——awrittenandstampedagreementwiththem,madebyamagistrateandabarrister;thesoleconditionannexedbeing,thatwhileitispaidtheyshallnotapplytohim。NorwillIenlargefurtherontheabuseandinsultwhichwasshoweredonmethatdayincourt,onlyforPage82

assertingajustclaim。INSULTisnotDEGRADATION:

Queenshavebeeninsulted,asIwas:andthefamoussummonsinHenryVIII。\'stime——\"Katherine!comeintocourt,\"——wasaboutasjustasthatwhichcalledmethere!Itisenoughtoknow,thatinthisdisputebetweentheexistenthusbandandthenon-existentwife,theexistenthusbandhadeveryadvantage。Thedeadfriendandpatronwasscurrilouslyabused,bythemanwhostillholdsplaceunderhisappointment。Thelivingbut\"non-existent\"

wife,waspubliclyinsulted,bythehusbandwhohadwrittenhertheGreenacreletters,andentreatedherreturnhomeonthepleathatshemight\"forgive\"

thetrial,sincehedisbelievedinitsaccusations!The\"existent\"husbandsubpoenaedmybankers;compelledthemtoproducetheirbooks,andsenthisattorneytomakeextractsattheirbank,ofallsumsenteredinmyprivateaccount。Healsosubpoenaedmypublishers;tocompelthemtodeclarewhatwerethecopyrightstheyheldofme,andwhatsumstheyhadpaidme:

for,(amazingtosay,)thecopyrightsofmyworksarehis,bylaw:

myverysoulandbrainsarenotmyown!And,whenallwasdone,thisgreatdictumwasimpresseduponmymemory;thatthecontractwasnil,becausethefictionofPage83

thelawis,that\"manandwifeareone,\"——andnottwocontractingparties;andMrNorton,therefore,wasnotbound\"inlaw,\"only\"inhonour。\"

Iamnotnowdiscussingthis,withanyreferencetohimindividually。Gone,——past——buriedinunutterablescorn,——arethedaysinwhichIappealed,eithertohim,orfromhim。Icomplain,——notoftheexistenthusband,butoftheexistentlaw:

andofthat\"nationofgallantgentlemen,\"whoscarcelycare,andscarcelyknow,whatistheexistinglawonsuchsubjects。

Afterthecreditor\'scasewasover,MrNortonenquired,(theoldenquiry!)——whetherIwould\"submittoreferees\"thepoint,whetherheought\"inhonour\"toabidebyhissignature;

andwhetherIwouldnamearefereeonmypart。Iansweredintheaffirmative:

andInamedasmyreferee,onewhomayfairlyclaimtoinspireasmuchconfidence,respect,anduniversalesteem,frommenofallranks,ages,orparties,asIthinkiteverwasthelotofanypersontoenjoy:——InamedtheMarquisofLansdowne。MrNortonproposedhisownbrother,LordGrantley;

whichnominationwasdeclined,asanimpossiblechoice——impossible,recollectingthePage84

circumstancesofthetrial,——theresidenceofthewitnesses,——andthenearnessofconnection。Nootherchoicewasproposed。MrNortoneitherfelt,(ashemaytrulyfeel),thatnounprejudicedgentlemaninEngland,wouldsupporthiminhislegalquibble:——orhehadneverintendedtoproposeachoicewhichcouldbeaccepted,——whichismorethanprobable。

NowIwillprayyourMajesty\'sattentiontotheeffectofthisnon-existenceinlaw,ontheseveralpartiesinvolvedinthediscussionofthiscontract。

AndfirstIwilltakeMrNorton\'sposition。

Fromthedateofmymother\'sdeath,hehaswithheldentirely,andwithperfectimpunity,myincomeashiswife。Idonotreceive,andhavenotreceivedforthepastthreeyears,asinglefarthingfromhim。Heretains,andalwayshasretained,propertythatwasleftinmyhome-giftsmadetomebymyownfamilyonmymarriage,andtomymotherbyyourMajesty\'saunt,H。R。H。theDuchessofYork;——articlesboughtfrommyliteraryearnings,——bookswhichbelongedtoLordMelbourne;

and,Page85

inparticular,amanuscriptofwhichLordMelbournehimselfwastheauthor,(whenaveryyoungman,)whichMrNortonresolutelyrefusedtogiveup。

Hereceivesfrommytrusteestheinterestoftheportionbequeathedmebymyfather,whodiedinthepublicservice,holdinganofficialappointmentattheCapeofGoodHope,leavingafamilyofveryyoungorphans,slenderlyprovidedfor。Ifmyfatherlived,itistobepresumedthereisnomanhewouldseewithgreaterabhorrencethanMrNorton(consideringwhatthefateofhisdaughterhasbeen),yetsuchportionashewasabletoleaveme,goesfromthe\"non-existent\"wife,totheexistenthusband,inthegeneraltrust-fundofourmarriage。

Ihavealso(asMrNortonimpressedonme,bysubpoenaingmypublishers)thepowerofearning,byliterature,——whichfund(thoughitbethegrantofHeaven,andnotthelegacyofearth)isnomorelegallyminethanmyfamilyproperty。

Nowagain,Isay,isorisnotthisaridiculouslaw(iflawsbemadetoconducttojustice)?I

cannotdivorcemyhusband,eitherforadultery,desertion,orcruelty;

Imustremainmarriedtohisname;hehas,inrightofthatfact(ofmyPage86

linktohisname),arighttoeverythingIhaveintheworld——andIhavenomoreclaimuponhim,thananyoneofyourMajesty\'sladiesinwaiting,whoareutterstrangerstohim!Ineverseehim:——Ihearofhimonlybyattacksonmyreputation:——andIdonotreceiveafarthingofsupportfromhim。Hisreply,byattorney(dated10thofApril,thissession),toanysuchdemand——istobidthecreditor\"examinethewillofmymotherinDoctors\'Commons\"(therebythrowingoffthemaskofpretencehewore,andstandingopenlyonhislegalirresponsibility):andwhenwefirstseparated,heofferedme,assoleprovision,asmallpensionpaidbyGovernmenttoeachofmyfather\'schildren;reckoningthatpensionashis!

Thatisthepositionofthehusband。

Thenextstartlingpoint,isthepositionofthetrades-peopleunderthis\"non-existent\"rule;andiftheopinionofpersonssohumblewerelikelytoreachyourMajesty,theycouldtellyouwhattheythinkofthelawwhichleavesthemutterlywithoutanyremedy。

Inthecreditor\'sactiontriedonMrNorton\'sPage87

contract,theplaintiffwasMrThrupp,oneofthecoachmakers\"byappointment\"toyourMajesty。MrThrupplosthiscauseasagainstMrNorton;andperhapstheuninitiatedimagineitwasmerelyaquestionwhichofusshouldpayhim;orpayanyothercreditor。Thosewhothinkso,aremistaken。Inconsequenceofthisruleofmy\"non-existence,\"MrThrupp,andthegroupofcreditors,canclaimpaymentfromnoone。Theycannotsuethe\"non-existent\"marriedwoman;thehusbandcannotcontractwiththe\"non-existent\"marriedwoman;andthe\"non-existent\"marriedwomancannotbecompelledtopay,ifsherefusestodischargethedebt。\"Oh!

butyouwillnotrefuse;youwillpay,surely,\"saythebystanders。

How?Myhusbandowesme#1,500,orthreeyears\'income。Ihavenomeansofraisingthislargesum;noonewouldlendmoneytoamarriedwoman;

shecangivenosecurity。Besides,Iamindebttomybankers:obstinatelydisbelievinginthepossibilityofthelaw\'sinjustice(beforeitwasprovedtome),Iborrowedfromthem,whenMrNortonstoppedmyallowance:

andthatloan,withinterest,isstillunpaid。Iamindebttomyprinters;

forworkarisingoutofthisveryinjustice。IhavepersonswhoreceivePage88

regularinstalmentseveryyear,onpastdues;Ihaveotheremploymentformymoney,thanmakingupMrNorton\'sdefalcations。

\"Oh!butyoushouldnothaveotheremployment:youshouldwriteandearnmoney,andpaythesepeople;

andtheneconomize,andretrench,soastogiveupthe#500ayeartoMrNorton。\"

Why?

Why,becauseIammarriedtoaname,——amItostriveandlabour,toenabletheownerofthatnametocommitadirectfraud?WhyamItopayMrNorton\'sdebts,torenounceallclaimonhim,andadmitthatmylegal\"non-existence\"madeoursigningthatcontractamerefarce?simplybecausehehasgrosslyandcruellyinsultedandslanderedme,inanopencourtofjustice,ongroundsheknewwerefalse;andwithadefenceabsolutelyfictitious?

IwouldnotifIcould!

IfallEnglandweretoagreetoraiseashillingsubscription,——orifsomeoneweretodowhatMrKennedyoftheWoodsandForestssayshasbeendoneforhim,——namely,comeforwardandsay,\"Ithinkthisbusinesssounjust,thatIwillsettleforlifetheincomeyoulose;nowpayyourpeople,\"——I

wouldnotadmitthatthemattershouldendso!Page89

IdonotconsiderthisasMYcause:thoughitisacauseofwhich(unfortunatelyforme)Iamanillustration。Itisthecauseofallthewomen,andofalargeproportionofthetradespeople,inEngland。IfIwerepersonallysetateaseaboutitto-morrow,thatwouldnotalterthelaw。Thesameinjusticemighthappennextdaytosomewomanwhocouldnotstruggle,orearn,orwrite;forwhomnoonewouldcomeforward;andtosomepettytradesman,——notlikeMrThrupp,coachmakertoyourMajesty,inalargewayofbusiness,——butgrievouslyinjuredbythelossofevenasmallsum。Whatisneeded,isnotthearrangingofoneparticularcase,butaTribunalofControl,aTribunalforMarriageandDivorce;todecideALLsuchcases;——andtopreventthepossibilityoftheshametoEnglandandtoEnglishlaw,entailedbythrowingthesumsecuredbyamagistrate\'ssignature,thesignaturesoftwopeers\'brothers,andalawyer,——amongatradesman\'slistof\"baddebts。\"