DavidHume1742
OFESSAYWRITING
Theelegantpartofmankind,whoarenotimmersedintheanimallife,butemploythemselvesintheoperationsofthemind,maybedividedintothe
Theseparationofthelearnedfromtheconversibleworldseemstohavebeenthegreatdefectofthelastage,andmusthavehadaverybadinfluencebothonbooksandcompany:forwhatpossibilityisthereoffindingtopicsofconversationfitfortheentertainmentofrationalcreatures,withouthavingrecoursesometimestohistory,poetry,politics,andthemoreobviousprinciples,atleast,ofphilosophy?Mustourwholediscoursebeacontinuedseriesofgossippingstoriesandidleremarks?Mustthemindneverrisehigher,butbeperpetuallyStun’dandwornoutwithendlesschatOfWilldidthis,andNansaidthat?[2]
Thiswouldbetorenderthetimespentincompanythemostunentertaining,aswellasthemostunprofitablepartofourlives。
Ontheotherhand,learninghasbeenasgreataloserbybeingshutupincollegesandcells,andsecludedfromtheworldandgoodcompany。Bythatmeans,everythingofwhatwecall
’TiswithgreatpleasureIobserve,thatmenofletters,inthisage,havelost,inagreatmeasure,thatshynessandbashfulnessoftemper,whichkeptthematadistancefrommankind;and,atthesametime,thatmenoftheworldareproudofborrowingfrombookstheirmostagreeabletopicsofconversation。’Tistobehoped,thatthisleaguebetwixtthelearnedandconversibleworlds,whichissohappilybegun,willbestillfartherimproved,totheirmutualadvantage;andtothatend,Iknownothingmoreadvantageousthansuch
cannotbutconsidermyselfasakindofresidentorambassadorfromthedominionsoflearningtothoseofconversation;andshallthinkitmyconstantdutytopromoteagoodcorrespondencebetwixtthesetwostates,whichhavesogreatadependenceoneachother。Ishallgiveintelligencetothelearnedofwhateverpassesincompany,andshallendeavourtoimportintocompanywhatevercommoditiesIfindinmynativecountryproperfortheiruseandentertainment。Thebalanceoftradeweneednotbejealousof,norwilltherebeanydifficultytopreserveitonbothsides。Thematerialsofthiscommercemustchieflybefurnishedbyconversationandcommonlife:themanufacturingofthemalonebelongstolearning。
As’twouldbeanunpardonablenegligenceinanambassadornottopayhisrespectstothesovereignofthestatewhereheiscommissionedtoreside;soitwouldbealtogetherinexcusableinmenottoaddressmyself,withaparticularrespect,tothefairsex,whoarethesovereignsoftheempireofconversation。I
approachthemwithreverence;andwerenotmycountrymen,thelearned,astubbornindependentraceofmortals,extremelyjealousoftheirliberty,andunaccustomedtosubjection,I
shouldresignintotheirfairhandsthesovereignauthorityovertherepublicofletters。Asthecasestands,mycommissionextendsnofarther,thantodesirealeague,offensiveanddefensive,againstourcommonenemies,againsttheenemiesofreasonandbeauty,peopleofdullheadsandcoldhearts。Fromthismomentletuspursuethemwiththeseverestvengeance:letnoquarterbegiven,buttothoseofsoundunderstandingsanddelicateaffections;andthesecharacters,’tistobepresumed,weshallalwaysfindinseparable。
Tobeserious,andtoquittheallusionbeforeitbewornthread—bare,Iamofopinion,thatwomen,thatis,womenofsenseandeducation(fortosuchaloneIaddressmyself)aremuchbetterjudgesofallpolitewritingthanmenofthesamedegreeofunderstanding;andthat’tisavainpannic,iftheybesofarterrifiedwiththecommonridiculethatislevelledagainstlearnedladies,asutterlytoabandoneverykindofbooksandstudytooursex。Letthedreadofthatridiculehavenoothereffect,thantomakethemconcealtheirknowledgebeforefools,whoarenotworthyofit,norofthem。Suchwillstillpresumeuponthevaintitleofthemalesextoaffectasuperiorityabovethem:butmyfairreadersmaybeassured,thatallmenofsense,whoknowtheworld,haveagreatdeferencefortheirjudgmentofsuchbooksaslywithinthecompassoftheirknowledge,andreposemoreconfidenceinthedelicacyoftheirtaste,thoughunguidedbyrules,thaninallthedulllaboursofpedantsandcommentators。Inaneighbouringnation,equallyfamousforgoodtaste,andforgallantry,theladiesare,inamanner,thesovereignsofthe
Thereisonlyonesubject,onwhichIamapttodistrustthejudgmentoffemales,andthatis,concerningbooksofgallantryanddevotion,whichtheycommonlyaffectashighflownaspossible;andmostofthemseemmoredelightedwiththewarmth,thanwiththejustnessofthepassion。Imentiongallantryanddevotionasthesamesubject,because,inreality,theybecomethesamewhentreatedinthismanner;andwemayobserve,thattheybothdependupontheverysamecomplexion。Asthefairsexhaveagreatshareofthetenderandamorousdisposition,itpervertstheirjudgmentonthisoccasion,andmakesthembeeasilyaffected,evenbywhathasnoproprietyintheexpressionnornatureinthesentiment。Mr。Addison’selegantdiscoursesofreligionhavenorelishwiththem,incomparisonofbooksofmysticdevotion:andOtway’stragediesarerejectedfortherantsofMr。Dryden。
Wouldtheladiescorrecttheirfalsetasteinthisparticular;letthemaccustomthemselvesalittlemoretobooksofallkinds:letthemgiveencouragementtomenofsenseandknowledgetofrequenttheircompany:andfinally,letthemconcurheartilyinthatunionIhaveprojectedbetwixtthelearnedandconversiblewor1ds。Theymay,perhaps,meetwithmorecomplaisancefromtheirusualfollowersthanfrommenoflearning;buttheycannotreasonablyexpectsosincereanaffection:and,Ihope,theywillneverbeguiltyofsowrongachoice,astosacrificethesubstancetotheshadow。
OFSUPERSTITIONANDENTHUSIASM
DavidHume1741
Thesetwospeciesoffalsereligion,thoughbothpernicious,areyetofaverydifferent,andevenofacontrarynature。Themindofmanissubjecttocertainunaccountableterrorsandapprehensions,proceedingeitherfromtheunhappysituationofprivateorpublicaffairs,fromillhealth,fromagloomyandmelancholydisposition,orfromtheconcurrenceofallthesecircumstances。Insuchastateofmind,infiniteunknownevilsaredreadedfromunknownagents;andwhererealobjectsofterrorarewanting,thesoul,activetoitsownprejudice,andfosteringitspredominantinclination,findsimaginaryones,towhosepowerandmalevolenceitsetsnolimits。Astheseenemiesareentirelyinvisibleandunknown,themethodstakentoappeasethemareequallyunaccountable,andconsistinceremonies,observances,mortifications,sacrifices,presents,orinanypractice,howeverabsurdorfrivolous,whicheitherfollyorknaveryrecommendstoablindandterrifiedcredulity。Weakness,fear,melancholy,togetherwithignorance,are,therefore,thetruesourcesofSuperstition。
Butthemindofmanisalsosubjecttoanunaccountableelevationandpresumption,arisingfromprosperoussuccess,fromluxurianthealth,fromstrongspirits,orfromaboldandconfidentdisposition。Insuchastateofmind,theimaginationswellswithgreat,butconfusedconceptions,towhichnosublunarybeautiesorenjoymentscancorrespond。Everythingmortalandperishablevanishesasunworthyofattention。Andafullrangeisgiventothefancyintheinvisibleregionsorworldofspirits,wherethesoulisatlibertytoindulgeitselfineveryimagination,whichmaybestsuititspresenttasteanddisposition。Henceariseraptures,transports,andsurprisingflightsoffancy;andconfidenceandpresumptionstillencreasing,theseraptures,beingaltogetherunaccountable,andseemingquitebeyondthereachofourordinaryfaculties,areattributedtotheimmediateinspirationofthatDivineBeing,whoistheobjectofdevotion。Inalittletime,theinspiredpersoncomestoregardhimselfasadistinguishedfavouriteoftheDivinity;andwhenthisfrenzyoncetakesplace,whichisthesummitofenthusiasm,everywhimsyisconsecrated:Humanreason,andevenmoralityarerejectedasfallaciousguides:Andthefanaticmadmandelivershimselfover,blindly,andwithoutreserve,tothesupposedillapsesofthespirit,andtoinspirationfromabove。Hope,pride,presumption,awarmimagination,togetherwithignorance,are,therefore,thetruesourcesofEnthusiasm。
Thesetwospeciesoffalsereligionmightaffordoccasiontomanyspeculations;butIshallconfinemyself,atpresent,toafewreflectionsconcerningtheirdifferentinfluenceongovernmentandsociety。
Myfirstreflectionis,
Butthestrongermixturethereisofsuperstition,thehigheristheauthorityofthepriesthood。[3]
Ontheotherhand,itmaybeobserved,thatallenthusiastshavebeenfreefromtheyokeofecclesiastics,andhaveexpressedgreatindependenceintheirdevotion;withacontemptofforms,ceremonies,andtraditions。Thequakersarethemostegregious,though,atthesametime,themostinnocententhusiaststhathaveyetbeenknown;andare,perhaps,theonlysect,thathaveneveradmittedpriestsamongstthem。Theindependents,ofalltheEnglishsectaries,approachnearesttothequakersinfanaticism,andintheirfreedomfrompriestlybondage。Thepresbyteriansfollowafter,atanequaldistanceinbothparticulars。Inshortthisobservationisfoundedinexperience;andwillalsoappeartobefoundedinreason,ifweconsider,that,asenthusiasmarisesfromapresumptuousprideandconfidence,itthinksitselfsufficientlyqualifiedtoapproachtheDivinity,withoutanyhumanmediator。Itsrapturousdevotionsaresofervent,thatitevenimaginesitselfactuallytoapproachhimbythewayofcontemplationandinwardconverse;whichmakesitneglectallthoseoutwardceremoniesandobservances,towhichtheassistanceofthepriestsappearssorequisiteintheeyesoftheirsuperstitiousvotaries。Thefanaticconsecrateshimself,andbestowsonhisownpersonasacredcharacter,muchsuperiortowhatformsandceremoniousinstitutionscanconferonanyother。
My
especiallyafteritrisestothatheightastoinspirethedeludedfanaticwiththeopinionofdivineilluminations,andwithacontemptforthecommonrulesofreason,morality,andprudence。
Itisthusenthusiasmproducesthemostcrueldisordersinhumansociety;butitsfuryislikethatofthunderandtempest,whichexhaustthemselvesinalittletime,andleavetheairmorecalmandpurethanbefore。Whenthefirstfireofenthusiasmisspent,mennaturally,inallfanaticalsects,sinkintothegreatestremissnessandcoolnessinsacredmatters;therebeingnobodyofmenamongthem,endowedwithsufficientauthority,whoseinterestisconcernedtosupportthereligiousspirit:Norites,noceremonies,noholyobservances,whichmayenterintothecommontrainoflife,andpreservethesacredprinciplesfromoblivion。Superstition,onthecontrary,stealsingraduallyandinsensibly;rendersmentameandsubmissive;isacceptabletothemagistrate,andseemsinoffensivetothepeople:Tillatlastthepriest,havingfirmlyestablishedhisauthority,becomesthetyrantanddisturberofhumansociety,byhisendlesscontentions,persecutions,andreligiouswars。HowsmoothlydidtheRomishchurchadvanceinheracquisitionofpower?ButintowhatdismalconvulsionsdidshethrowallEurope,inordertomaintainit?Ontheotherhand,oursectaries,whowereformerlysuchdangerousbigots,arenowbecomeveryfreereasoners;andthe
My
The
littleinfluencedbyauthority;and,inaword,buthalfcatholics。Theconsequencesareexactlyconformabletotheforegoingreasoning。The
OFTHEDELICACYOFTASTEANDPASSION
DavidHume1741
/SOME\\Peoplearesubjecttoacertain
believe,wheneverythingisbalanced,thereisnoone,whowouldnotratherbeofthelattercharacter,wereheentirelymasterofhisowndisposition。Goodorillfortuneisverylittleatourdisposal:Andwhenaperson,thathasthissensibilityoftemper,meetswithanymisfortune,hissorroworresentmenttakesentirepossessionofhim,anddepriveshimofallrelishinthecommonoccurrencesoflife;therightenjoymentofwhichformsthechiefpartofourhappiness。Greatpleasuresaremuchlessfrequentthangreatpains;sothatasensibletempermustmeetwithfewertrialsintheformerwaythaninthelatter。Nottomention,thatmenofsuchlivelypassionsareapttobetransportedbeyondallboundsofprudenceanddiscretion,andtotakefalsestepsintheconductoflife,whichareoftenirretrievable。
Thereisa
Ibelieve,however,everyonewillagreewithme,that,notwithstandingthisresemblance,delicacyoftasteisasmuchtobedesiredandcultivatedasdelicacyofpassionistobelamented,andtoberemedied,ifpossible。Thegoodorillaccidentsoflifeareverylittleatourdisposal;butweareprettymuchmasterswhatbooksweshallread,whatdiversionsweshallpartakeof,andwhatcompanyweshallkeep。Philosophershaveendeavouredtorenderhappinessentirelyindependentofeverythingexternal。Thatdegreeofperfectionisimpossibletobe
Whateverconnexiontheremaybeoriginallybetweenthesetwospeciesofdelicacy,Iampersuaded,thatnothingissopropertocureusofthisdelicacyofpassion,asthecultivatingofthathigherandmorerefinedtaste,whichenablesustojudgeofthecharactersofmen,ofcompositionsofgenius,andoftheproductionsofthenoblerarts。Agreaterorlessrelishforthoseobviousbeauties,whichstrikethesenses,dependsentirelyuponthegreaterorlesssensibilityofthetemper:Butwithregardtothesciencesandliberalarts,afinetasteis,insomemeasure,thesamewithstrongsense,oratleastdependssomuchuponit,thattheyareinseparable。Inordertojudgearightofacompositionofgenius,therearesomanyviewstobetakenin,somanycircumstancestobecompared,andsuchaknowledgeofhumannaturerequisite,thatnoman,whoisnotpossessedofthesoundestjudgment,willevermakeatolerablecriticinsuchperformances。Andthisisanewreasonforcultivatingarelishintheliberalarts。Ourjudgmentwillstrengthenbythisexercise:Weshallformjusternotionsoflife:Manythings,whichpleaseorafflictothers,willappeartoustoofrivoloustoengageourattention:Andweshalllosebydegreesthatsensibilityanddelicacyofpassion,whichissoincommodious。
ButperhapsIhavegonetoofarinsaying,thatacultivatedtasteforthepoliteartsextinguishesthepassions,andrendersusindifferenttothoseobjects,whicharesofondlypursuedbytherestofmankind。Onfartherreflection,Ifind,thatitratherimprovesoursensibilityforallthetenderandagreeablepassions;atthesametimethatitrendersthemindincapableoftherougherandmoreboisterousemotions。
Forthis,Ithinktheremaybeassignedtwoverynaturalreasons。Inthe
andproduceanagreeablemelancholy,which,ofalldispositionsofthemind,isthebestsuitedtoloveandfriendship。
Inthe
andfindingmany,whoarefittosupplyhisplace,theyneverfeelanyvacancyorwantinhisabsence。ButtomakeuseoftheallusionofacelebratedFrench[2]author,thejudgmentmaybecomparedtoaclockorwatch,wherethemostordinarymachineissufficienttotellthehours;butthemostelaboratealonecanpointouttheminutesandseconds,anddistinguishthesmallestdifferencesoftime。Onethathaswelldigestedhisknowledgebothofbooksandmen,haslittleenjoymentbutinthecompanyofafewselectcompanions。Hefeelstoosensibly,howmuchalltherestofmankindfallshortofthenotionswhichhehasentertained。
And,hisaffectionsbeingthusconfinedwithinanarrowcircle,nowonderhecarriesthemfurther,thaniftheyweremoregeneralandundistinguished。Thegaietyandfrolicofabottlecompanionimproveswithhimintoasolidfriendship:
Andtheardoursofayouthfulappetitebecomeanelegantpassion。
OFTHELIBERTYOFTHEPRESS
DavidHume1741
NOTHINGismoreapttosurprizeaforeigner,thantheextremeliberty,whichweenjoyinthiscountry,ofcommunicatingwhateverwepleasetothepublic,andofopenlycensuringeverymeasure,enteredintobythekingorhisministers。Iftheadministrationresolveuponwar,itisaffirmed,that,eitherwilfullyorignorantly,theymistaketheinterestsofthenation,andthatpeace,inthepresentsituationofaffairs,isinfinitelypreferable。Ifthepassionoftheministerslietowardspeace,ourpoliticalwritersbreathenothingbutwaranddevastation,andrepresenttopacificconductofthegovernmentasmeanandpusillanimous。Asthislibertyisnotindulgedinanyothergovernment,eitherrepublicanormonarchical;inH/OLLAND\\
andV/ENICE\\,morethaninF/RANCE\\orS/PAIN\\;itmayverynaturallygiveoccasiontoaquestion,
G/REAT\\B/RITAIN\\
Thereason,whythelawsindulgeusinsuchalibertyseemstobederivedfromourmixedformofgovernment,whichisneitherwhollymonarchical,norwhollyrepublican。Itwillbefound,ifImistakenot,atrueobservationinpolitics,thatthetwoextremesingovernment,libertyandslavery,commonlyapproachnearesttoeachother;andthat,asyoudepartfromtheextremes,andmixalittleofmonarchywithliberty,thegovernmentbecomesalwaysthemorefree;andontheotherhand,whenyoumixalittleoflibertywithmonarchy,theyokebecomesalwaysthemoregrievousandintolerable。Inagovernment,suchasthatofF/RANCE\\,whichisabsolute,andwherelaw,custom,andreligionconcur,allofthem,tomakethepeoplefullysatisfiedwiththeircondition,themonarchcannotentertainany
INagovernmentaltogetherrepublican,suchasthatofH/OLLAND\\,wherethereisnotmagistratesoeminentastogive
andthoughmanyadvantagesresultfromsuchpowers,inpreservingpeaceandorder,yettheylayaconsiderablerestraintonmen’sactions,andmakeeveryprivatecitizenpayagreatrespecttothegovernment。Thusitseemsevident,thatthetwoextremesofabsolutemonarchyandofarepublic,approachneartoeachotherinsomematerialcircumstances。Inthe
Tojustifytheotherpartoftheforegoingobservation,that,ineverygovernment,themeansaremostwideofeachother,andthatthemixturesofmonarchyandlibertyrendertheyokeeithermoreeasyormoregrievous;ImusttakenoticeofaremarkinT/ACITUS\\withregardtotheR/OMANS\\
undertheemperors,thattheyneithercouldbeartotalslaverynortotalliberty,
Accordingtotheseremarks,wearetoconsidertheR/OMAN\\governmentundertheemperorsasamixtureofdespotismandliberty,wherethedespotismprevailed;andtheE/NGLISH\\governmentasamixtureofthesamekind,wherethelibertypredominates。Theconsequencesareconformabletotheforegoingobservation;andsuchasmaybeexpectedfromthosemixedformsofgovernment,whichbegetamutualwatchfulnessandjealousy。TheR/OMAN\\emperorswere,manyofthem,themostfrightfultyrantsthateverdisgracedhumannature;anditisevident,thattheircrueltywaschieflyexcitedbytheir
andeventhesejudgesmustbehisfellow—subjects,whoareobliged,bytheirowninterest,tohaveawatchfuleyeovertheencroachmentsandviolenceoftheministers。Fromthesecauses,itproceeds,thatthereisasmuchliberty,andeven,perhaps,licentiousnessinG/REAT\\B/RITAIN\\,astherewereformerlyslaveryandtyrannyinR/OME\\。
Theseprinciplesaccountforthegreatlibertyofthepressinthesekingdoms,beyondwhatisindulgedinanyothergovernment。Itisapprehended,thatarbitrarypowerwouldstealinuponus,werewenotcarefultopreventitsprogress,andweretherenotaneasymethodofconveyingthealarmfromoneendofthekingdomtotheother。Thespiritofthepeoplemustfrequentlyberouzed,inordertocurbtheambitionofthecourt;andthedreadofrouzingthisspiritmustbeemployedtopreventthatambition。Nothingsoeffectualtothispurposeasthelibertyofthepress,bywhichallthelearning,wit,andgeniusofthenationmaybeemployedonthesideoffreedom,andeveryonebeanimatedtoitsdefence。Aslong,therefore,astherepublicanpartofourgovernmentcanmaintainitselfagainstthemonarchical,itwillnaturallybecarefultokeepthepressopen,asofimportancetoitsownpreservation。
Itmusthoweverbeallowed,thattheunboundedlibertyofthepress,thoughitbedifficult,perhapsimpossible,toproposeasuitableremedyforit,isoneoftheevils,attendingthosemixtformsofgovernment。
OFTHERISEANDPROGRESSOFTHEARTSANDSCIENCES
DavidHume1742
Nothingrequiresgreaternicety,inourenquiriesconcerninghumanaffairs,thantodistinguishexactlywhatisowingto
Thedistinguishingbetweenchanceandcausesmustdependuponeveryparticularman’ssagacity,inconsideringeveryparticularincident。But,ifIweretoassignanygeneralruletohelpusinapplyingthisdistinction,itwouldbethefollowing,
Twonaturalreasonsmay。beassignedforthisrule。
Tojudgebythisrule,thedomesticandthegradualrevolutionsofastatemustbeamorepropersubjectofreasoningandobservation,thantheforeignandtheviolent,whicharecommonlyproducedbysinglepersons,andaremoreinfluencedbywhim,folly,orcaprice,thanbygeneralpassionsandinterests。
Thedepressionofthelords,andriseofthecommonsinEngland,afterthestatutesofalienationandtheencreaseoftradeandindustry,aremoreeasilyaccountedforbygeneralprinciples,thanthedepressionoftheSpanish,andriseoftheFrenchmonarchy,afterthedeathofCharlesV。HadHarryIV,CardinalRichlieuandLouisXIVbeenSpaniards;andPhilipII,III,andIV,andCharlesIIbeenFrenchmen,thehistoryofthesetwonationshadbeenentirelyreversed。
Forthesamereason,itismoreeasytoaccountfortheriseandprogressofcommerceinanykingdom,thanforthatoflearning;andastate,whichshouldapplyitselftotheencouragementoftheone,wouldbemoreassuredofsuccess,thanonewhichshouldcultivatetheother。Avarice,orthedesireofgain,isanuniversalpassion,whichoperatesatalltimes,inallplaces,anduponallpersons:Butcuriosity,ortheloveofknowledge,hasaverylimitedinfluence,andrequiresyouth,leisure,education,genius,andexample,tomakeitgovernanyperson。Youwillneverwantbooksellers,whiletherearebuyersofbooks:Buttheremayfrequentlybereaderswheretherearenoauthors。Multitudesofpeople,necessityandliberty,havebegottencommerceinHolland:Butstudyandapplicationhavescarcelyproducedanyeminentwriters。
Wemay,therefore,conclude,thatthereisnosubject,inwhichwemustproceedwithmorecaution,thanintracingthehistoryoftheartsandsciences;lestweassigncauseswhichneverexisted,andreducewhatismerelycontingenttostableanduniversalprinciples。Thosewhocultivatethesciencesinanystate,arealwaysfewinnumber:Thepassion,whichgovernsthem,limited:Theirtasteandjudgmentdelicateandeasilyperverted:
Andtheirapplicationdisturbedwiththesmallestaccident。
Chance,therefore,orsecretandunknowncauses,musthaveagreatinfluenceontheriseandprogressofalltherefinedarts。
Butthereisareason,whichinducesmenottoascribethematteraltogethertochance。Thoughthepersons,whocultivatethescienceswithsuchastonishingsuccess,astoattracttheadmirationofposterity,bealwaysfew,inallnationsandallages;itisimpossiblebutashareofthesamespiritandgeniusmustbeantecedentlydiffusedthroughoutthepeopleamongwhomtheyarise,inordertoproduce,form,andcultivate,fromtheirearliestinfancy,thetasteandjudgmentofthoseeminentwriters。Themasscannotbealtogetherinsipid,fromwhichsuchrefinedspiritsareextracted。’ThereisaGodwithinus,’saysOVID,’whobreathesthatdivinefire,bywhichweareanimated。’[2]Poets,inallages,haveadvancedthisclaimtoinspiration。Thereisnot,however,anythingsupernaturalinthecase。Theirfireisnotkindledfromheaven。Itonlyrunsalongtheearth;iscaughtfromonebreasttoanother;andburnsbrightest,wherethematerialsarebestprepared,andmosthappilydisposed。Thequestion,therefore,concerningtheriseandprogressoftheartsandsciences,isnotaltogetheraquestionconcerningthetaste,genius,andspiritofafew,butconcerningthoseofawholepeople;andmay,therefore,beaccountedfor,insomemeasure,bygeneralcausesandprinciples。
Igrant,thataman,whoshouldenquire,whysuchaparticularpoet,asHomerforinstance,existed,atsuchaplace,insuchatime,wouldthrowhimselfheadlongintochimaera,andcouldnevertreatofsuchasubject,withoutamultitudeoffalsesubtiltiesandrefinements。Hemightaswellpretendtogiveareason,whysuchparticulargenerals,asFabiusandScipio,livedinRomeatsuchatime,andwhyFabiuscameintotheworldbeforeScipio。
Forsuchincidentsasthese,nootherreasoncanbegiventhanthatofHorace:
ButIampersuaded,thatinmanycasesgoodreasonsmightbegiven,whysuchanationismorepoliteandlearnedataparticulartime,thananyofitsneighbours。Atleast,thisissocuriousasubject,thatitwereapitytoabandonitentirely,beforewehavefoundwhetheritbesusceptibleofreasoning,andcanbereducedtoanygeneralprinciples。
Myfirstobservationonthisheadis,
Inthefirstagesoftheworld,whenmenareasyetbarbarousandignorant,theyseeknofarthersecurityagainstmutualviolenceandinjustice,thanthechoiceofsomerulers,fewormany,inwhomtheyplaceanimplicitconfidence,withoutprovidinganysecurity,bylawsorpoliticalinstitutions,againsttheviolenceandinjusticeoftheserulers。Iftheauthoritybecenteredinasingleperson,andifthepeople,eitherbyconquest,orbytheordinarycourseofpropagation,encreasetoagreatmultitude,themonarch,findingitimpossible,inhisownperson,toexecuteeveryofficeofsovereignty,ineveryplace,mustdelegatehisauthoritytoinferiormagistrates,whopreservepeaceandorderintheirrespectivedistricts。Asexperienceandeducationhavenotyetrefinedthejudgmentsofmentoanyconsiderabledegree,theprince,whoishimselfunrestrained,neverdreamsofrestraininghisministers,butdelegateshisfullauthoritytoeveryone,whomhesetsoveranyportionofthepeople。Allgenerallawsareattendedwithinconveniencies,whenappliedtoparticularcases;
anditrequiresgreatpenetrationandexperience,bothtoperceivethattheseinconvenienciesarefewerthanwhatresultfromfulldiscretionarypowersineverymagistrate;andalsotodiscernwhatgenerallawsare,uponthewhole,attendedwithfewestinconveniencies。Thisisamatterofsogreatdifficulty,thatmenmayhavemadesomeadvances,eveninthesublimeartsofpoetryandeloquence,wherearapidityofgeniusandimaginationassisttheirprogress,beforetheyhavearrivedatanygreatrefinementintheirmunicipallaws,wherefrequenttrialsanddiligentobservationcanalonedirecttheirimprovements。Itisnot,therefore,tobesupposed,thatabarbarousmonarch,unrestrainedanduninstructed,willeverbecomealegislator,orthinkofrestraininghis
Arbitrarypower,inallcases,issomewhatoppressiveanddebasing;butitisaltogetherruinousandintolerable,whencontractedintoasmallcompass;andbecomesstillworse,whentheperson,whopossessesit,knowsthatthetimeofhisauthorityislimitedanduncertain。’Habetsubjectostanquamsuos;viles,utalienos。’[3]Hegovernsthesubjectswithfullauthority,asiftheywerehisown;andwithnegligenceortyranny,asbelongingtoanother。Apeople,governedaftersuchamanner,areslavesinthefullandpropersenseoftheword;anditisimpossibletheycaneveraspiretoanyrefinementsortasteofreason。Theydarenotsomuchaspretendtoenjoythenecessariesoflifeinplentyorsecurity。
Toexpect,therefore,thattheartsandsciencesshouldtaketheirfirstriseinamonarchy,istoexpectacontradiction。
Beforetheserefinementshavetakenplace,themonarchisignorantanduninstructed;andnothavingknowledgesufficienttomakehimsensibleofthenecessityofbalancinghisgovernmentupongenerallaws,hedelegateshisfullpowertoallinferiormagistrates。Thisbarbarouspolicydebasesthepeople,andforeverpreventsallimprovements。Wereitpossible,that,beforesciencewereknownintheworld,amonarchcouldpossesssomuchwisdomastobecomealegislator,andgovernhispeoplebylaw,notbythearbitrarywilloftheirfellow—subjects,itmightbepossibleforthatspeciesofgovernmenttobethefirstnurseryofartsandsciences。Butthatsuppositionseemsscarcelytobeconsistentorrational。
Itmayhappen,thatarepublic,initsinfantstate,maybesupportedbyasfewlawsasabarbarousmonarchy,andmayentrustasunlimitedanauthoritytoitsmagistratesorjudges。But,besidesthatthefrequentelectionsbythepeople,areaconsiderablecheckuponauthority;itisimpossible,but,intime,thenecessityofrestrainingthemagistrates,inordertopreserveliberty,mustatlastappear,andgiverisetogenerallawsandstatutes。TheRomanConsuls,forsometime,decidedallcauses,withoutbeingconfinedbyanypositivestatutes,tillthepeople,bearingthisyokewithimpatience,createdthe