AmostprofoundyetfantasticspeculatorontheprincipleswhichgovernthemovementsofHumanitywaswonttoextolasoneoftherulingsecretsofnaturewhathecalledthelawofthecontactofextremes.
Thehomelyproverbthat\"extremesmeet\"was,inhisview,agrandandpotenttruthineverysphereoflife;anaxiomwithwhichthephilosophercouldaslittledispenseastheastronomerwiththelawsofKeplerorthegreatdiscoveryofNewton.
Whetherthe\"contactofextremes\"besuchauniversalprincipleornot,astrikingillustrationofitmaybeseenintheeffecttheChineserevolutionseemslikelytoexerciseuponthecivilizedworld.Itmayseemaverystrange,andaveryparadoxicalassertionthatthenextuprisingofthepeopleofEurope,andtheirnextmovementforrepublicanfreedomandeconomyofGovernment,maydependmoreprobablyonwhatisnowpassingintheCelestialEmpire——theveryoppositeofEurope-thanonanyotherpoliticalcausethatnowexists——moreeventhanonthemenacesofRussiaandtheconsequentlikelihoodofageneralEuropeanwar.Butyetitisnoparadox,asallmayunderstandbyattentivelyconsideringthecircumstancesofthecase.
Whateverbethesocialcauses,andwhateverreligious,dynastic,ornationalshapetheymayassume,thathavebroughtaboutthechronicrebellionssubsistinginChinaforabouttenyearspast,andnowgatheredtogetherinoneformidablerevolutiontheoccasionofthisoutbreakhasunquestionablybeenaffordedbytheEnglishcannonforcinguponChinathatsoporificdrugcalledopium.BeforetheBritisharmstheauthorityoftheManchudynastyfelltopieces;thesuperstitiousfaithintheeternityoftheCelestialEmpirebrokedown;thebarbarousandhermetic,isolationfromthecivilizedworldwasinfringed;andanopeningwasmadeforthatintercoursewhichhassinceproceededsorapidlyunderthegoldenattractionsofCaliforniaandAustralia.AtthesametimethesilvercoinoftheEmpire,itslifeblood,begantobedrainedawaytotheBritishEastIndies.
Upto1830,thebalanceoftradebeingcontinuallyinfavouroftheChinese,thereexistedanuninterruptedimportationofsilverfromIndia,BritainAndtheUnitedStatesintoChina.Since1833,andespeciallysince1840,theexportofsilverfromChinatoIndiahasbecomealmostexhaustingfortheCelestialEmpire.HencethestrongdecreesoftheEmperoragainsttheopiumtrade,respondedtobystillstrongerresistancetohismeasures.Besidesthisimmediateeconomicalconsequence,thebriberyconnectedwithopiumsmugglinghasentirelydemoralizedtheChineseStateofficersintheSouthernprovinces.justastheEmperorwaswonttobeconsideredthefatherofallChina,sohisofficerswerelookeduponassustainingthepaternalrelationtotheirrespectivedistricts.Butthispatriarchalauthority,theonlymorallinkembracingthevastmachineryoftheState,hasgraduallybeencorrodedbythecorruptionofthoseofficers,whohavemadegreatgainsbyconnivingatopiumsmuggling.ThishasoccurredprincipallyinthesameSouthernprovinceswheretherebellioncommenced.Itisalmostneedlesstoobservethat,inthesamemeasureinwhichopiumhasobtainedthesovereigntyovertheChinese,theEmperorandhisstaffofpedanticmandarinshavebecomedispossessedoftheirownsovereignty.
Itwouldseemasthoughhistoryhadfirsttomakethiswholepeopledrunkbeforeitcouldrousethemoutoftheirhereditarystupidity.
Thoughscarcelyexistinginformertimes,theimportofEnglishcottons,andtoasmallextentofEnglishwoollens,hasrapidlyrisensince1833,theepochwhenthemonopolyoftradewithChinawastransferredfromtheEastIndiaCompanytoPrivatecommerce,andonamuchgreaterscalesince1840,theepochwhenothernations,andespeciallyourown,alsoobtainedashareintheChinesetrade.ThisintroductionofforeignmanufactureshashadasimilareffectonthenativeindustrytothatwhichitformerlyhadonAsiaMinor,PersiaandIndia.InChinathespinnersandweavershavesufferedgreatlyunderthisforeigncompetition,andthecommunityhasbecomeunsettledinproportion.
ThetributetobepaidtoEnglandaftertheunfortunatewarof1840,thegreatunproductiveconsumptionofopium,thedrainofthepreciousmetalsbythistrade,thedestructiveinfluenceofforeigncompetitiononnativemanufactures,thedemoralizedconditionofthepublicadministration,producedtwothings:theoldtaxationbecamemoreburdensomeandharassing,andnewtaxationwasaddedtotheold.ThusinadecreeoftheEmperor,datedPeking,Jan51853,wefindordersgiventotheviceroysandgovernorsofthesouthernprovincesofWuchangandHanyangtoremitanddeferthepaymentoftaxes,andespeciallynotinanycasetoexactmorethantheregularamount;forotherwise,saysthedecree,\"howwillthepoorpeoplebeabletobearit?\"And\"Thus,perhaps,\"continuestheEmperor,\"willmypeople,inaperiodofgeneralhardshipanddistress,beexemptedfromtheevilsofbeingpursuedandworriedbythetax-gatherer.\"Suchlanguageasthis,andsuchconcessionsweremembertohaveheardfromAustria,theChinaofGermany,in1848.
Allthesedissolvingagenciesactingtogetheronthefinances,themorals,theindustry,andpoliticalstructureofChina,receivedtheirfulldevelopmentundertheEnglishcannonin1840,whichbrokedowntheauthorityoftheEmperor,andforcedtheCelestialEmpireintocontactwiththeterrestrialworld.CompleteisolationwastheprimeconditionofthepreservationofOldChina.ThatisolationhavingcometoaviolentendbythemediumofEngland,dissolutionmustfollowassurelyasthatofanymummycarefullypreservedinahermeticallysealedcoffin,wheneveritisbroughtintocontactwiththeopenair.Now,EnglandhavingbroughtabouttherevolutionofChina,thequestionishowthatrevolutionwillintimereactonEngland,andthroughEnglandonEurope.Thisquestionisnotdifficultofsolution.
TheattentionofourreadershasoftenbeencalledtotheunparalleledgrowthofBritishmanufacturessince1850.Amidthemostsurprisingprosperity,ithasnotbeendifficulttopointouttheclearsymptomsofanapproachingindustrialcrisis.NotwithstandingCaliforniaandAustralia,notwithstandingtheimmenseandunprecedentedemigration,theremustever,withoutanyparticularaccident,induetimearriveamomentwhentheextensionofthemarketsisunabletokeeppacewiththeextensionofBritishmanufactures,andthisdisproportionmustbringaboutanewcrisiswiththesamecertaintyasithasdoneinthepast.But,ifoneofthegreatmarketssuddenlybecomescontracted,thearrivalofthecrisisisnecessarilyacceleratedthereby.Now,theChineserebellionmust,forthetimebeing,havepreciselythiseffectuponEngland.Thenecessityforopeningnewmarkets,orforextendingtheoldones,wasoneoftheprinciplecausesofthereductionoftheBritishtea-duties,as,withanincreasedimportationoftea,anincreasedexportationofmanufacturestoChinawasexpectedtotakeplace.Now,thevalueoftheannualexportsfromtheUnitedKingdomtoChinaamounted,beforetherepealin1834ofthetradingmonopolypossessedbytheEastIndiaCompany,toonly?00,000;in1836,itreachedthesumof?,326,388;in1845,ithadrisento?,394,827;in1852itamountedtoabout?,000,000.ThequantityofteaimportedfromChinadidnotexceed,in1793,16,167,331lbs.;butin1845,itamountedto50,714,657lbs.;in1846,to57,584,561lbs.;itisnowabove60,000,000lbs.
Theteacropofthelastseasonwillnotproveshort,asshownalreadybytheexportlistsfromShanghai,of2,000,000lbs.abovetheprecedingyear.Thisexcessistobeaccountedforbytwocircumstances.Ononehand,thestateofthemarketatthecloseof1851wasmuchdepressed,andthelargesurplusstocklefthasbeenthrownintotheexportof1852.Ontheotherhand,therecentaccountsofthealteredBritishlegislationwithregardtoimportsoftea,reachingChina,havebroughtforwardalltheavailableteastoareadymarket,atgreatlyenhancedprices.Butwithrespecttothecomingcrop,thecasestandsverydifferently.Thisisshownbythefollowingextractsfromthecorrespondenceofalargetea-firminLondon:
\"InShanghaitheterrorisdescribedasextreme.Goldhadadvancedinvalueupwardsof25percent.,beingeagerlysoughtforhoarding;silverhadsofardisappearedthatnonecouldbeobtainedtopaytheChineseduesontheBritishvesselsrequiringportclearance;andinconsequenceofwhichMr.ConsulAlcockhasconsentedtobecomeresponsibletotheChineseauthoritiesforthepaymentofthesedues,onreceiptofEastIndiaCompany\'sbills,orotherapprovedsecurities.Thescarcityofthepreciousmetalsisoneofthemostunfavourablefeatures,whenviewedinreferencetotheimmediatefutureofcommerce,asthisabstractionoccurspreciselyatthatperiodwhentheiruseismostneeded,toenabletheteaandsilkbuyerstogointotheirinteriorandeffecttheirpurchases,forwhichalargeportionofbullionifpaidinadvance,toenabletheproducerstocarryontheiroperations.\"
Atthisperiodoftheyearitisusualtobeginmakingarrangementsforthenewteas,whereasatpresentnothingistalkedofbutthemeansofprotectingpersonandproperty,alltransactionsbeingatastand.
\"ifthemeansarenotappliedtosecuretheleavesinAprilandMay,theearlycrop,whichincludesallthefinerdescriptions,bothofblackandgreenteas,willbeasmuchlostasunreapedwheatatChristmas.\"
NowthemeansforsecuringthetealeaveswillcertainlynotbegivenbytheEnglish,AmericanorFrenchsquadronsstationedintheChineseseas,butthesemayeasily,bytheirinterference,producesuchcomplicationsastocutoff-alltransactionsbetweenthetea-producinginteriorandtheteaexportingseaports.Thus,forthepresentcrop,ariseinthepricesmustbeexpected——speculationhasalreadycommencedinLondon——andforthecroptocomealargedeficitisasgoodascertain.Noristhisall.TheChinese,readythoughtheymaybe,asareallpeopleinperiodsofrevolutionaryconvulsion,tosellofftotheforeignerallthebulkycommoditiestheyhaveonhand,will,astheOrientalsareusedtodointheapprehensionofgreatchanges,settohoarding,nottakingmuchinreturnfortheirteaandsilk,excepthardmoney.Englandhasaccordinglytoexpectariseinthepriceofoneofherchiefarticlesofconsumption,adrainofbullion,andagreatcontractionofanimportantmarketforhercottonandwoollengoods.EventheEconomist,thatoptimistconjurerofallthingsmenacingthetranquilmindsofthemercantilecommunity,iscompelledtouselanguagelikethis:
\"WemustnotflatterourselveswithfindingasextensiveamarketasformerlyforourexportstoChinaItismoreprobable,therefore,thatourexporttradetoChinashouldsuffer,andthatthereshouldbeadiminisheddemandfortheproduceofManchesterandGlasgow.\"
Itmustnotbeforgottenthattheriseinthepriceofsoindispensableanarticleastea,andthecontractionofsoimportantamarketasChina,willcoincidewithadeficientharvestinWesternEurope,and,therefore,withrisingpricesofmeat,corn,andallotheragriculturalproduce.Hencecontractedmarketsformanufacturers,becauseeveryriseinthepricesofthefirstnecessariesoflifeiscounterbalanced,athomeandabroad,byacorrespondingreductioninthedemandformanufactures.FromeverypartofGreatBritaincomplaintshavebeenreceivedonthebackwardstateofmostofthecrops.TheEconomistsaysonthissubject:
IntheSouthofEngland\"notonlywilltherebeleftmuchlandunsown,untiltoolateforacropofanysort,butmuchofthesownlandwillprovetobefoul,orotherwiseinabadstateforcorn-growing.\"Onthewetorpoorsoilsdestinedforwheat,signsthatmischiefisgoingonareapparent.\"Thetimeforplantingmangel-wurzelmaynowbesaidtohavepassedaway,andverylittlehasbeenplanted,whilethetimeforpreparinglandforturnipsisrapidlygoingby,withoutanyadequatepreparationforthisimportantcrophavingbeenaccomplished
oat-sowinghasbeenmuchinterferedwithbythesnowandrain.Fewoatsweresownearly,andlate-sownoatsseldomproducealargecrop.
Inmanydistrictslossesamongthebreedingflockshavebeenconsiderable.Thepriceofotherfarm-producethancornisfrom20to30,andeven50percent.higherthanlastyear.OntheContinent,cornhasrisencomparativelymorethaninEngland.RyehasriseninBelgiumandHollandafull100percent.Wheatandothergrainsarefollowingsuit.
Underthesecircumstances,asthegreaterpartoftheregularcommercialcirclehasalreadybeenrunthroughbyBritishtrade,itmaysafelybeauguredthattheChineserevolutionwillthrowthesparkintotheoverloadedmineofthepresentindustrialsystemandcausetheexplosionofthelong-preparedgeneralcrisis,which,spreadingabroad,willbecloselyfollowedbypoliticalrevolutionsontheContinent.Itwouldbeacuriousspectacle,thatofChinasendingdisorderintotheWesternWorldwhiletheWesternPowers,byEnglish,FrenchandAmericanwar-steamers,areconveying\"order\"toShanghai,NankingandthemouthsoftheGreatCanal.Dotheseorder-mongeringPowers,whichwouldattempttosupportthewaveringManchudynasty,forgetthatthehatredagainstforeignersandtheirexclusionfromtheEmpire,oncethemereresultofChina\'sgeographicalandethnographicalsituation,havebecomeapoliticalsystemonlysincetheconquestofthecountrybytheraceoftheManchuTatars?TherecanbenodoubtthattheturbulentdissensionsamongtheEuropeannationswho,atthelaterendofthe17thcentury,rivaledeachotherinthetradewithChina,lentamightyaidtotheexclusivepolicyadoptedbytheManchus.Butmorethanthiswasdonebythefearofthenewdynasty,lesttheforeignersmightfavourthediscontentexistingamongalargeproportionoftheChineseduringthefirsthalf-centuryorthereaboutsoftheirsubjectiontotheTatars.Fromtheseconsiderations,foreignerswerethenprohibitedfromallcommunicationwiththeChinese,exceptthroughCanton,atownatagreatdistancefromPekingandthetea-districts,andtheircommercerestrictedtointercoursewiththeHongmerchants,licensedbytheGovernmentexpresslyfortheforeigntrade,inordertokeeptherestofitssubjectsfromallconnectionwiththeodiousstrangers.InanycaseaninterferenceonthepartoftheWesternGovernmentsatthistimecanonlyservetorendertherevolutionmoreviolent,andprotractthestagnationoftrade.
AtthesametimeitistobeobservedwithregardtoIndiathattheBritishGovernmentofthatcountrydependsforfulloneseventhofitsrevenueonthesaleofopiumtotheChinesewhileaconsiderableproportionoftheIndiandemandforBritishmanufacturesdependsontheproductionofthatopiuminIndia.TheChinese,itistrue,arenomorelikelytorenouncetheuseofopiumthanaretheGermanstoforsweartobacco.ButasthenewEmperorisunderstoodtobefavourabletothecultureofthepoppyandthepreparationofopiuminChinaitself,itisevidentthatadeath-blowisverylikelytobestruckatonceatthebusinessofopium-raisinginIndia,theIndianrevenue,andthecommercialresourcesofHindostan.Thoughthisblowwouldnotimmediatelybefeltbytheinterestsconcerned,itwouldoperateeffectuallyinduetime,andwouldcomeintointensifyandprolongtheuniversalfinancialcrisiswhosehoroscopewehavecastabove.
SincethecommencementoftheeighteenthcenturytherehasbeennoseriousrevolutioninEuropewhichhadnotbeenprecededbyacommercialandfinancialcrisis.Thisappliesnolesstotherevolutionof1789thantothatof1848.ItonlythatweeverydaybeholdmorethreateningsconflictbetweentherulingpowersandtheirsubjectstheStateandsociety,betweenthevariousclasses;conflictoftheexistingpowersamongeachotherreachingthatheightwheretheswordmustbedrawn,andtheultimaratioofprincesberecurredto.
IntheEuropeancapitals,everydaybringsdespatchesbigwithuniversalwar,vanishingunderthedespatchesofthefollowingday,bearingtheassuranceofpeaceforaweekorso.Wemaybesure,nevertheless,thattowhateverheighttheconflictbetweentheEuropeanpowersmayrise,howeverthreateningtheaspectofthediplomatichorizonmayappear,whatevermovementsmaybeattemptedbysomeenthusiasticfractioninthisorthatcountry,therageofprincesandthe,furyofthepeoplearealikeenervatedbythebreathofprosperity.NeitherwarsnorrevolutionsarelikelytoputEuropebytheears,unlessinconsequenceofageneralcommercialandindustrialcrisis,thesignalofwhichhas,asusual,tobegivenbyEngland,therepresentativeofEuropeanindustryinthemarketoftheworld.
Itisunnecessarytodwellonthepoliticalconsequencessuchacrisismustproduceinthesetimes,withtheunprecedentedextensionoffactoriesinEngland,withtheutterdissolutionofherofficialparties,withthewholeStatemachineryofFrancetransformedintooneimmenseswindlingandstockjobbingconcern,withAustriaontheeveofbankruptcy,withwrongseverywhereaccumulatedtoberevengedbythepeople,withtheconflictinginterestsofthereactionarypowersthemselves,andwiththeRussiandreamofconquestoncemorerevealedtotheworld.
THECASEOFTHELORCHAARROWNewYorkDailyTribuneJan23,1857
byKARLMARX
THEMAILSoftheAmericawhichreachedusyesterdaymorningbringavarietyofdocumentsconcerningtheBritishquarrelwiththeChineseauthoritiesatCanton,andthewarlikeoperationsofAdmiralSeymour.
TheresultwhichacarefulstudyoftheofficialcorrespondencebetweentheBritishandChineseauthoritiesatHong-KongandCantonmust,wethink,produceuponeveryimpartialmind,isthattheBritishareinthewronginthewholeproceeding.Theallegedcauseofthequarrel,asstatedbythelatter,isthatinsteadofappealingtotheBritishConsul,certainChineseofficershadviolentlyremovedsomeChinesecriminalsfromalorchalyinginCantonriver,andhauleddowntheBritishflagwhichwasflyingfromitsmast.But,assaystheLondonTimes,\"thereare,indeed,mattersindispute,suchaswhetherthelorchawascarryingBritishcolours,andwhethertheConsulwasentirelyjustifiedinthestepsthathetook.\"Thedoubtthusadmittedisconfirmedwhenwerememberthattheprovisionofthetreaty,whichtheConsulinsistsshouldbeappliedtothislorcha,relatestoBritishshipsalone;whilethelorcha,asitabundantlyappears,wasnotinanyjustsenseBritish.Butinorderthatourreadersmayhavethewholecasebeforethem,weproceedtogivewhatisimportantintheofficialcorrespondence.First,wehaveacommunicationdatedOct.21,fromMr.
Parkes,theBritishConsulatCanton,toGovernorGeneralYeh,asfollows:
\"Onthemorningofthe8thinst.theBritishlorchaArrow,whenlyingamongtheshippinganchoredbeforethecity,wasboarded,withoutanypreviousreferencebeingmadetotheBritishConsul,byalargeforceofChineseofficersandsoldiersinuniform,who,inthefaceoftheremonstranceofhermaster,anEnglishman,seized,boundandcarriedawaytwelveChineseoutofhercrewoffourteen,andhauleddownhercolours.IreportedalltheparticularsofthispublicinsulttotheBritishflag,andgraveviolationofthenintharticleoftheSupplementaryTreaty,toyourExcellencythesameday,andappealedtoyoutoaffordsatisfactionfortheinsult,andcausetheprovisionsofthetreatytobeinthiscasefaithfullyobserved.ButyourExcellency,withastrangedisregardbothtojusticeandtreatyengagement,hasofferednoreparationorapologyfortheinjury,and,byretainingthemenyouhaveseizedinyourcustody,signifyyourapprovalofthisviolationofthetreaty,andleaveherMajesty\'sGovernmentwithoutanyassurancethatsimilaraggressionsshallnotagainoccur.\"
ItseemsthattheChineseonboardthelorchawereseizedbytheChineseofficersbecausethelatterhadbeeninformedthatsomeofthecrewhadparticipatedinapiracycommittedagainstaChinesemerchantman.TheBritishConsulaccusestheChineseGovernor-Generalofseizingthecrew,ofhaulingdowntheBritishflag,ofdecliningtoofferanyapology,andofretainingthemenseizedinhiscustody.TheChineseGovernor,inaletteraddressedtoAdmiralSeymour,affirmsthat,havingascertainedthatnineofthecaptiveswereinnocent,hedirected,onOct.10,anofficertoputthemonboardoftheirvesselagain,butthatConsulParkesrefusedtoreceivethem.Astothelorchaitself,hestatesthatwhentheChineseonboardwereseized,shewassupposedtobeaChinesevessel,andrightlyso,becauseshewasbuiltbyaChinese,andbelongedtoaChinese,whohadfraudulentlyobtainedpossessionofaBritishensign,byenteringhisvesselonthecolonialBritishregistersmethod,itseems,habitualwithChinesesmugglers.Astothequestionoftheinsulttotheflag,theGovernorremarks:
\"IthasbeentheinvariablerulewithlorchasofyourExcellency\'snation,tohauldowntheirensignwhentheydropanchor,andtohoistitagainwhentheygetunderway.Whenthelorchawasboarded,inorderthattheprisonersmightbeseized,ithasbeensatisfactorilyprovedthatnoflagwasflying.Howthencouldaflaghavebeenhauleddown?YetConsulParkes,inonedespatchafteranother,pretendsthatsatisfactionisrequiredforthisinsultofferedtotheflag.\"
FromthesepremisestheChineseGovernorconcludesthatnobreachofanytreatyhasbeencommitted.OnOct.12,nevertheless,theBritishPlenipotentiarydemandednotonlythesurrenderofthewholeofthearrestedcrew,butalsoanapology.TheGovernorthusreplies:
\"EarlyonthemorningOfOct.22,IwrotetoConsulParkes,andatthesametimeforwardedtohimtwelvemen,namely,LeongMing-taiandLeongKee-fu,convictedontheinquiryIhadinstituted,andthewitness,Wu-A-jin,togetherwithninepreviouslytendered.
ButMr.ConsulParkeswouldneitherreceivethetwelveprisonersnormyletter.\"
Parkesmight,therefore,havenowgotbackthewholeofhistwelvemen,togetherwithwhatwasmostprobablyanapology,containedinaletterwhichhedidnotopen.Intheeveningofthesameday,GovernorYehagainmadeinquirywhytheprisonerstenderedbyhimwerenotreceived,andwhyhereceivednoanswerto,hisletter.Nonoticewastakenofthisstep,butonthe24thfirewasopenedontheforts,andseveralofthemweretaken;anditwasnotuntilNov.1thatAdmiralSeymourexplainedtheapparentlyincomprehensibleconductofConsulParkesinamessagetotheGovernor.Themen,hesays,hadbeenrestoredtotheConsul,but\"notpubliclyrestoredtotheirvessel,norhadtherequiredapologybeenmadefortheviolationoftheConsularjurisdiction.\"Tothisquibble,then,ofnotrestoringinstateasetofmennumberingthreeconvictedcriminals,thewholecaseisreduced.
TothistheGovernorofCantonanswers,first,thatthetwelvemenhadbeenactuallyhandedovertotheConsul,andthattherehadnotbeen\"anyrefusaltoreturnthementotheirvessel.\"WhatwasstillthematterwiththisBritishConsul,theChineseGovernoronlylearnedafterthecityhadbeenbombardedforsixdays.Astoanapology,GovernorYehinsiststhatnonecouldbegiven,asnofaulthadbeencommitted.Wequotehiswords:
\"Noforeignflagwasseenbymyexecutiveatthetimeofthecapture,andas,inadditiontothis,itwasascertainedontheexaminationoftheprisonersbytheofficerdeputedtoconductit,thatthelorchawasinnorespectaforeignvessel,Imaintainthattherewasnomistakecommitted.\"
Indeed,theforceofthisChinaman\'sdialecticsdisposessoeffectuallyofthewholequestion——andthereisnootherapparentcase——thatAdmiralSeymouratlasthasnoresourcelefthimbutadeclarationlikethefollowing:
\"ImustpositivelydeclineanyfurtherargumentonthemeritsofthecaseofthelorchaArrow.IamperfectlysatisfiedofthefactsasrepresentedtoyourExcellencybyMr.ConsulParkes.\"
Butafterhavingtakentheforts,breachedthewallsofthecity,andbombardedCantonforsixdays,theAdmiralsuddenlydiscoversquiteanewobjectforhismeasures,aswefindhimwritingtotheChineseGovernoronOct.30:
\"ItisnowforyourExcellency,byimmediateconsultationwithme,toterminateaconditionofthingsofwhichthepresentevilisnotslight,butwhich,ifnotamended,canscarcelyfailtobeproductiveofthemostseriouscalamities.\"
TheChineseGovernoranswersthataccordingtotheConventionof1849,hehadnorighttoaskforsuchaconsultation.Hefurthersays:
\"Inreferencetotheadmissionintothecity,Imustobservethat,inApril1849,hisExcellencythePlenipotentiaryBonhamissuedapublicnoticeatthefactorieshere,totheeffectthathetherebyprohibitedforeignersfromenteringthecity.Thenoticewasinsertedinthenewspapersofthetime,andwill,Ipresume,havebeenreadbyyourExcellency.AddtothisthattheexclusionofforeignersfromthecityisbytheunanimousvoteofthewholepopulationofKwangtong.Itmaybesupposedhowlittletotheirlikinghasbeenthisstormingofthefortsandthisdestructionoftheirdwellings;and,apprehensiveasIamoftheevilthatmayhencebefalltheofficialsandcitizensofyourExcellency\'snation,IcansuggestnothingbetterthanacontinuedadherencetothepolicyofthePlenipotentiaryBonham,astothecorrectcoursetobepursued.AstotheconsultationproposedbyyourExcellency,Ihavealready,somedaysago,deputedTcheang,PrefectofLei-chow-fu.\"
AdmiralSeymournowmakesacleanbreastofit,declaringthathedoesnotcarefortheConventionofMr.Bonham:
\"YourExcellency\'sreplyrefersmetothenotificationoftheBritishPlenipotentiaryof1849,prohibitingforeignersfromenteringCanton.Now,Imustremindyouthat,althoughwehaveindeedseriousmatterofcomplaintagainsttheChineseGovernmentforbreachofthepromisegivenin1847toadmitforeignersintoCantonattheendoftwoyears,mydemandnowmadeisinnowayconnectedwithformernegotiationsonthesamesubject,neitheramIdemandingadmissionofanybuttheforeignofficials,andthisonlyforthesimpleandsufficientreasonsaboveassigned.
\"OnmyproposaltotreatpersonallywithyourExcellency,youdomethehonourtoremarkthatyousentaprefectsomedaysago.I
amcompelledthereforetoregardyourExcellency\'swholeletterasunsatisfactoryintheextreme,andhaveonlytoaddthat,unlessI
immediatelyreceiveanexplicitassuranceofyourassenttowhatI
haveproposed,Ishallatonceresumeoffensiveoperations.\"
GovernorYehretortsbyagainenteringintothedetailsoftheConventionof1849:
\"In1848therewasalongcontroversialcorrespondenceonthesubjectbetweenmypredecessorLenandtheBritishPlenipotentiary,Mr.Bonham,andMr.Bonhambeingsatisfiedthataninterviewwithinthecitywasutterlyoutofthequestion,addressedalettertoLeuintheAprilof1849,inwhichhesaid,\'AtthepresenttimeIcanhavenomorediscussionwithyourExcellencyonthissubject.\'Hefurtherissuedanoticefromthefactoriestotheeffectthatnoforeignerwastoenterthecity,whichwasinsertedinthepapers,andhecommunicatedthistotheBritishGovernment.TherewasnotaChineseorforeignerofanynationwhodidnotknowthatthequestionwasnevertobediscussedagain.\"
Impatientofargument,theBritishAdmiralhereuponforceshiswayintotheCityofCantontotheresidenceoftheGovernor,atthesametimedestroyingtheImperialfleetintheriver.Thustherearetwodistinctactsinthisdiplomaticandmilitarydrama——thefirstintroducingthebombardmentofCantononthepretextofabreachoftheTreatyOf1842committedbytheChineseGovernor,andthesecond,continuingthatbombardmentonanenlargedscale,onthepretextthattheGovernorclungstubbornlytotheConventionof1849.FirstCantonisbombardedforbreakingatreaty,andnextitisbombardedforobservingatreaty.Besides,itisnotevenpretendedthatredresswasnotgiveninthefirstinstance,butonlythatredresswasnotgivenintheorthodoxmanner.
TheviewofthecaseputforthbytheLondonTimeswoulddonodiscrediteventoGeneralWilliamWalkerofNicaragua.
\"Bythisoutbreakofhostilities,\"saysthatjournal,\"existingtreatiesareannulled,andweareleftfreetoshapeourrelationswiththeChineseEmpireaswepleasetherecentproceedingsatCantonwarnusthatweoughttoenforcethatrightoffreeentranceintothecountryandintotheportsopentouswhichwasstipulatedforbytheTreatyOf1842.WemustnotagainbetoldthatourrepresentativesmustbeexcludedfromthepresenceoftheChineseGovernor-General,becausewehavewaivedtheperformanceofthearticlewhichenabledforeignerstopenetratebeyondtheprecinctsofourfactories.\"
Inotherwords,\"we\"havecommencedhostilitiesinordertobreakanexistingtreatyandtoenforceaclaimwhich\"we\"havewaivedbyanexpressconvention!Wearehappytosay,however,thatanotherprominentorganofBritishopinionexpressesitselfinamorehumaneandbecomingtone.Itis,saystheDailyNews,a\"monstrousfact,thatinordertoavengetheirritatedprideofaBritishofficial,andpunishthefollyofanAsiaticgovernor,weprostituteourstrengthtothewickedworkofcarryingfireandsword,anddesolationanddeath,intothepeacefulhomesofunoffendingmen,onwhoseshoreswewereoriginallyintruders.WhatevermaybetheissueofthisCantonbombardment,thedeeditselfisabadandabaseone——arecklessandwantonwasteofhumanlifeattheshrineofafalseetiquetteandamistakenpolicy.\"
Itis,perhaps,aquestionwhetherthecivilizednationsoftheworldwillapprovethismodeofinvadingapeacefulcountry,withoutpreviousdeclarationofwar,foranallegedinfringementofthefancifulcodeofdiplomaticetiquette.IfthefirstChinesewar,inspiteofitsinfamouspretext,waspatientlylookeduponbyotherPowers,becauseitheldouttheprospectofopeningthetradewithChina,isnotthissecondwarlikelytoobstructthattradeforanindefiniteperiod?ItsfirstresultmustbethecuttingoffofCantonfromthetea-growingdistricts,asyet,forthemostpart,inthehandsoftheimperialists——acircumstancewhichcannotprofitanybodybuttheRussianoverlandtea-traders.
WithregardtothereporteddestructionofaChinesefortbytheAmericanfrigatePortsmouth,wearenotyetsufficientlyinformedtoexpressadecidedopinion.
PARLIAMENTARYDEBATESONTHECHINESEHOSTILITIESNewYorkDailyTribuneMarch16,1857
byKARLMARX
THEEARLofDerby\'sresolution,andthatofMr.Cobden,bothofthempassingcondemnationupontheChinesehostilities,weremovedaccordingtonoticesgiven,theoneonthe24thFebruary,intheHouseofLords,theotheronthe26thofFebruary,intheHouseofCommons.ThedebatesintheLordsendedonthesamedaywhenthedebatesintheCommonsbegan.TheformergavethePalmerstonCabinetashockbyleavingitinthecomparativelyweakmajorityof36votes.Thelattermayresultinitsdefeat.ButwhateverinterestmayattachtothediscussionintheCommons,thedebatesintheHouseofLordshaveexhaustedtheargumentativepartofthecontroversy-themasterlyspeechesofLordsDerbyandLyndhurstforestallingtheeloquenceofMr.
Cobden,SirE.Bulwer,LordJohnRussell,andtuttiquanti.
TheonlylawauthorityonthepartoftheGovernment,theLordChancellor,remarkedthat\"unlessEnglandhadagoodcasewithregardtotheArrow,allproceedingsfromthelasttofirstwerewrong.\"DerbyandLyndhurstprovedbeyonddoubtthatEnglandhadnocaseatallwithregardtothatlorcha.ThelineofargumentfollowedbythemcoincidessomuchwiththattakenupinthecolumnsofTheTribuneonthefirstpublicationoftheEnglishdispatchesthatIamabletocondenseithereintoaverysmallcompass.
WhatisthechargeagainsttheChineseGovernmentuponwhichtheCantonmassacresarepretendedtorest?TheinfringementofArt.9oftheSupplementalTreatyOf1843.ThatarticleprescribesthatanyChineseoffenders,beinginthecolonyofHongKong,oronboardaBritishman-of-war,oronboardaBritishmerchantship,arenottobeseizedbytheChineseauthoritiesthemselves,butshouldbedemandedfromtheBritishConsul,andbyhimbehandedovertothenativeauthorities.
ChinesepirateswereseizedintheriverofCantononboardthelorchaArrow,byChineseofficers,withouttheinterventionoftheBritishConsul.Thequestionarises,therefore,wastheArrowaBritishvessel?Itwas,asLordDerbyshows,\"avesselChinesebuilt,Chinesecaptured,Chinesesold,Chineseboughtandmanned,andChineseowned.\"
Bywhatmeans,then,wasthisChinesevesselconvertedintoaBritishmerchantman?BypurchasingatHongKongaBritishregisterorsailinglicence.ThelegalityofthisregisterreliesuponanordinanceofthelocallegislationofHong-Kong,passedinMarch,1855.ThatordinancenotonlyinfringedthetreatyexistingbetweenEnglandandChina,butannulledthelawofEnglandherself.Itwas,therefore,voidandnull.
SomesemblanceofEnglishlegalityitcouldbutreceivefromtheMerchantShippingAct,which,however,waspassedonlytwomonthsaftertheissueoftheordinance.AndevenwiththelegalprovisionsofthatActithadneverbeenbroughtintoconsonance.Theordinance,therefore,underwhichthelorchaArrowreceiveditsregister,wassomuchwastepaper.ButevenaccordingtothisworthlesspapertheArrowhadforfeiteditsprotectionbytheinfringementoftheprovisionsprescribed,andtheexpirationofitslicence.ThispointisconcededbySirJ.Bowringhimself.Butthen,itissaid,whetherornottheArrowwasanEnglishvessel,ithad,atallevents,hoistedtheEnglishflag,andthatflagwasinsulted.Firstly,iftheflagwasflying,itwasnotlegallyflying.Butwasitflyingatall?OnthispointthereexistsdiscrepancybetweentheEnglishandChinesedeclarations.Thelatterhave,however,beencorroboratedbydepositions,forwardedbytheConsuls,ofthemasterandcrewofthePortugueselorchaNo.83——
Withreferencetothesedepositions,TheFriendofChinaofNov.13
statesthat\"itisnownotoriousatCantonthattheBritishflaghadnotbeenflyingonboardthelorchaforsixdaysprevioustoitsseizure.\"Thusfallstothegroundthepunctilioofhonourtogetherwiththelegalcase.
LordDerbyhadinthisspeechthegoodtastealtogethertoforbearfromhishabitualwaggishness,andthustogivehisargumentastrictlyjudicialcharacter.Noefforts,however,onhispartwerewantedtoimpregnatehisspeechwithadeepcurrentofirony.TheEarlofDerby,thechiefofthehereditaryaristocracyofEngland,pleadingagainstthelateDoctor,nowSirJohnBowring,thepetdiscipleofBentham;
pleadingforhumanityagainsttheprofessionalhumanitarian;defendingtherealinterestsofnationsagainstthesystematicutilitarianinsistinguponapunctilioofdiplomaticetiquette;appealingtothe\"voxpopulivoxdei\"againstthegreatest-benefit-ofthe-greatest-numberman;thedescendantoftheconquerorspreachingpeacewhereamemberofthePeaceSocietypreachedred-hotshell;aDerbybrandingtheactsoftheBritishnavyas\"miserableproceedings\"and\"ingloriousoperations,\"whereaBowringcongratulatesituponcowardlyoutrageswhichmetwithnoresistance,upon\"itsbrilliantachievements,unparalleledbravery,andsplendidunionofmilitaryskillandvalour\"——
suchcontrastswerethemorekeenlysatiricalthelesstheEarlofDerbyseemedtobeawareofthem.Hehadtheadvantageofthatgreathistoricalironywhichdoesnotflowfromthewitofindividuals,butfromthehumourofsituations.ThewholeParliamentaryhistoryofEnglandhas,perhaps,neverexhibitedsuchanintellectualvictoryofthearistocratovertheparvenu.
LordDerbydeclaredattheoutsetthathe\"shouldhavetorelyuponstatementsanddocumentsexclusivelyfurnishedbytheverypartieswhoseconducthewasabouttoimpugn,\"andthathewascontent\"toresthiscaseuponthesedocuments.\"NowithasbeenjustlyremarkedthatthosedocumentsaslaidbeforethepublicbytheGovernment,wouldhaveallowedthelattertoshiftthewholeresponsibilityuponitssubordinates.SomuchisthisthecasethattheattacksmadebytheparliamentaryadversariesoftheGovernmentwereexclusivelydirectedtoBowring&Co.,andcouldhavebeenendorsedbythehomeGovernmentitself,withoutatallimpairingitsownposition.IquotefromhisLordship:
\"IdonotwishtosayanythingdisrespectfulofDr.Bowring.Hemaybeamanofgreatattainments;butitappearstomethatonthesubjectofhisadmissionintoCantonheispossessedwithaperfectmonomania(Hear,hear,andalaugh).IbelievehedreamsofhisentranceintoCanton.Ibelievehethinksofitthefirstthinginthemorning,thelastthingatnight,andinthemiddleofthenight,ifhehappentobeawake(alaugh).Idonotbelievethathewouldconsideranysacrificetoogreat,anyinterruptionofcommercetobedeplored,anybloodshedalmosttoberegretted,whenputinthescalewiththeimmenseadvantagetobederivedfromthefactthatSirJ.BowringhadobtainedanofficialreceptionintheYamunofCanton(Laughter).\"
NextcameLordLyndhurst:
\"SirJ.Bowring,whoisadistinguishedhumanitarianaswellasplenipotentiary(laughter),himselfadmitstheregisterisvoid,andthatthelorchawasnotentitledtohoisttheEnglishflag.
Now,markwhathesays:\'Thevesselhadnoprotection,buttheChinesedonotknowthis.ForGod\'ssakedonotwhisperittothem.\'(Hear).Hepersevered,too,forhesaidineffect:WeknowtheChinesehavenotbeenguiltyofanyviolationoftreaty,butwewillnottellthemso;wewillinsistuponreparationandareturnofthementheyhaveseizedinaparticularform.Ifthemenwerenotreturnedintheform,whatwastobetheremedy?
Why,toseizeajunk-awarjunk.Ifthatwasnotsufficient,seizemoreuntilwecompelledthemtosubmit,althoughweknewtheyhadtherightontheirsideandwehadnojusticeonours(Hear)Wasthereeverconductmoreabominable,moreflagrant,inwhich——Iwillnotsaymorefraudulent,butwhatisequaltofraudinourcountry——morefalsepretencehasbeenputforwardbyapublicmanintheserviceoftheBritishGovernment?(Hear)
ItisextraordinarythatSirJ.Bowringshouldthinkhehadthepowerofdeclaringwar.Icanunderstandamaninsuchapositionhavingnecessarilyapowerofcarryingondefensiveoperations,buttocarryonoffensiveoperationsuponsuchaground——uponsuchapretence——isoneofthemostextraordinaryproceedingstobefoundinthehistoryoftheworldItisquiteclearfromthepaperslaidonthetableyesterdaythatfromthefirstmomentatwhichSirJ.Bowringwasappointedtothestationhenowfills,hisambitionwastoprocurewhathispredecessorshadcompletelyfailedtoeffect——namelyanentrywithinthewallsofCantonbentonlyuponcarryingthisobjectofgainingadmissionwithinthewallsofCantonintoexecution,(he)has,fornonecessarypurposewhatever,plungedthecountryintowar;andwhatistheresult?Property,tothelargeamountOf$1,500,000,belongingtoBritishsubjects,isnowimpoundedinthecityofCanton,andinadditiontothatourfactoriesareburnedtotheground,andallthisisonlyowingtothemischievouspolicyofoneofthemostmischievousofmen——Butman,proudman,Drestinalittlebriefauthority,Mostignorantofwhathe\'smostassured,Thisglassyessence,likeanangryape,PlayssuchfantastictricksbeforehighheavenAsmaketheangelsweep.\"
Andlastly,LordGrey:
\"IfyourLordships,willrefertothepapers,youwillfindthatwhenSirJohnBowringappliedforaninterviewwithCommissionerYeh,theCommissionerwasreadytomeethim,butheappointedforthatpurposethehouseofthemerchantHowqua,withoutthecity
SirJohnBowring\'sdignitywouldnotallowhimtogoanywherebuttotheofficialresidenceoftheCommissionerIexpect,ifnootherresult,atleastthegoodresultfromtheadoptionoftheresolution——theinstantrecallofSirJ.Bowring.\"
SirJ.BowringmetwithsimilartreatmentatthehandsoftheCommons,andMr.Cobdenevenopenedhisspeechwithasolemnrepudiationofhis\"friendoftwentyyears\'standing.\"TheliteralquotationsfromthespeechesofLordsDerby,LyndhurstandGreyprovethat,toparrytheattack,LordPalmerston\'sAdministrationhadonlytodropSirJ.
Bowringinsteadofidentifyingitselfwiththat\"distinguishedhumanitarian.\"Thatitowedthisfacilityofescapeneithertotheindulgencenorthetacticsofhisadversaries,butexclusivelytothepaperslaidbeforeParliament,willbecomeevidentfromtheslightestglanceatthepapersthemselvesaswellasthedebatesfoundeduponthem.
CanthereremainanydoubtastoSirJ.Bowring\'sCCmonomania\"withrespecttohisentranceintoCanton?Itisnotprovedthatthatindividual,astheLondonTimessays,\"hastakenacourseentirelyoutofhisownhead,withouteitheradvicefromhissuperiorsathomeoranyreferencetotheirpolitics?\"Why,then,shouldLordPalmerston,atamomentwhenhisGovernmentistottering,whenhiswayisbesetwithdifficultiesofallsorts——financialdifficulties,Persianwardifficulties,secret-treatydifficulties,electoralreformdifficulties,coalitiondifficulties——whenheisconsciousthattheeyesoftheHouseare\"uponhimmoreearnestlybutlessadmiringlythaneverbefore,\"whyshouldhesingleoutjustthatmomenttoexhibit,forthefirsttimeinhispoliticallife,anunflinchingfidelitytoanotherman——andtoasubaltern,too——atthehazardofnotonlyimpairingstillmorehisownposition,butofcompletelybreakingitup?WhyshouldhepushhisnewfangledenthusiasmtosuchapointastoofferhimselfastheexpiatorysacrificeforthesinsofaDr.Bowring?OfcoursenomaninhissensesthinksthenobleViscountcapableofanysuchromanticaberrations.ThelineofpolicyhehasfollowedupinthisChinesedifficultyaffordsconclusiveevidenceofthedefectivecharacterofthepapershehaslaidbeforeParliament.
ApartfrompublishedpaperstheremustexistsecretpapersandsecretinstructionswhichwouldgofartoshowthatifDr.Bowringwaspossessedofthe\"monomania\"ofenteringintoCanton,therestoodbehindhimthecool-headedchiefofWhitehallworkinguponhismonomaniaanddrivingit,forpurposesofhisown,fromthestateoflatentwarmthintothatofconsumingfire.
DEFEATOFTHEPALMERSTONMINISTRYNewYorkDailyTribuneMarch25,1857
byKARLMARX
Afterhavingragedforfournights,theChinesedebatessubsidedatlastinavoteofcensurepassedbytheHouseofCommonsonthePalmerstonMinistry.Palmerstonretortstothecensurebya\"penaldissolution.\"HepunishestheCommonsbysendingthemhome.
Theimmenseexcitementprevailingonthelastnightofthedebates,withinthewallsoftheHouseaswellasamongthemasseswhohadgatheredintheadjoiningstreets,wasduenotonlytothegreatnessoftheinterestsatstake,butstillmoretothecharacterofthepartyontrial.Palmerston\'sadministrationwasnotthatofanordinaryCabinet.Itwasadictatorship.SincethecommencementofthewarwithRussia,Parliamenthadalmostabdicateditsconstitutionalfunctions;norhadit,aftertheconclusionofpeace,everdaredtoreassertthem.Byagradualandalmostimperceptibledeclension,ithadreachedthepositionofaCorpsLegislatif,distinguishedfromthegenuine,Bonapartisharticlebyfalsepretencesandhighsoundingpretensionsonly.ThemereformationoftheCoalitionCabinetdenotedthefactthattheoldparties,onthefrictionofwhichthemovementoftheParliamentarymachinedepends,hadbecomeextinct.Thisimpotenceofparties,firstexpressedbytheCoalitionCabinet,thewarhelpedtoincarnateintheomnipotenceofasingleindividual,who,duringhalfacenturyofpoliticallife,hadneverbelongedtoanyparty,butalwaysusedallparties.IfthewarwithRussiahadnotintervened,theveryexhaustionoftheoldofficialpartieswouldhaveledtotransformation.NewlifewouldhavebeenpouredintotheParliamentarybodybytheinfusionofnewblood,bytheadmissiontopoliticalrightsofatleastsomefractionsofthemassesofthepeoplewhoarestilldeprivedofvotesandrepresentatives.Thewarcutshortthisnaturalprocess.PreventingtheneutralizationofoldParliamentaryantagonismsfromturningtothebenefitofthemasses,thewarturnedittotheexclusiveprofitofasingleman.InsteadofthepoliticalemancipationoftheBritishpeople,wehavehadthedictatorshipofPalmerston.Warwasthepowerfulenginebywhichthisresultwasbroughtabout,andwarwastheonlymeansofinsuringit.WarhadthereforebecomethevitalconditionofPalmerston\'sdictatorship.TheRussianwarwasmorepopularwiththeBritishpeoplethantheParispeace.Why,then,didtheBritishAchilles,underwhoseauspicestheRedandisgraceandtheKarssurrenderhadoccurred,notimprovethisopportunity?Evidentlybecausethealternativelaybeyondhiscontrol.
HencehisParistreaty,backedbyhismisunderstandingswiththeUnitedStates,hisexpeditiontoNaples,hisostensiblesquabbleswithBonaparte,hisPersianinvasion,andhisChinesemassacres.
Inpassingavoteofcensureuponthelatter,theHouseofCommonscutoffthemeansofhisusurpedpower.Itsvotewas,therefore,notasimpleParliamentaryvote,butarebellionaforcibleattemptattheresumptionoftheconstitutionalattributesofParliament.ThiswasthefeelingwhichpervadedtheHouse,andwhatevermayhavebeenthepeculiarmotivesactuatingtheseveralfractionsoftheheterogeneousmajority——composedofDerbyites,Peelites,Manchestermen,Russellites,andso-calledIndependents——allofthemweresincereinassertingthatitwasnovulgaranti-Ministerialconspiracywhichunitedtheminthesamelobby.Such,however,wasthegistofPalmerston\'sdefence.Hecoveredtheweaknessofhiscasebyanargumenturnadmisericordiam,bypresentinghimselfasthevictimofanunprincipledconspiracy.NothingcouldbemorehappythanMr.
Disraeli\'srebukeofthisplea,socommontoOldBaileyprisoners.
\"TheFirstMinister,\"hesaid,\"isofallmenthemanwhocannotbearacoalition.Why,sir,heisthearch-typeofpoliticalcoalitionswithoutavowedprinciples.SeehowhisGovernmentisformed.ItwasonlylastyearthateverymemberofhisCabinetinthisHousesupportedabillintroduced,Ithink,byalatecolleague.ItwasopposedintheotherHousebyamemberoftheGovernmentwho,toexcusehisapparentinconsistency,boldlydeclaredthatwhenhetookofficetheFirstMinisterrequirednopledgefromhimonanysubjectwhatever(Laughter).YetthenobleLordisalarmedandshockedatthisunprincipledcombination!ThenobleLordcannotbearcoalitions!ThenobleLordhasactedonlywiththoseamongwhomhewasbornandbredinpolitics(Cheersandlaughter).ThatinfantHercules(pointingatLordPalmerston)wastakenoutoftheWhigcradle,andhowconsistenthasbeenhispoliticallife!(Renewedlaughter).Lookingbackuponthelasthalfcentury,duringwhichhehasprofessedalmosteveryprinciple,andconnectedhimselfwithalmosteveryparty,thenobleLordhasraisedawarningvoiceto-nightagainstcoalitions,becausehefearsthatamajorityoftheHouseofCommons,rankinginitsnumberssomeofthemosteminentmembersoftheHouse-menwhohavebeencolleaguesofthenobleLord-maynotapproveapolicywithrespecttoChinawhichhasbeguninoutrage,andwhich,ifpursued,willendinruin.(Loudcheers).
That,sir,isthepositionofthenobleLord.AndwhatdefenceofthatpolicyhavewehadfromthenobleLord?HashelaiddownasingleprincipleonwhichourrelationswithChinaoughttodepend?Hasheenumeratedasolitarypoliticalmaximwhichshouldguideusinthismomentofperilandperplexity?Onthecontrary,hehascoveredaweakandshamblingcasebysaying——what?——
thatheisthevictimofaconspiracy.(Cheersandlaughter).Hedidnotenterintoanymanlyorstatesmanlikedefenceofhisconduct.HereproducedpettyobservationsmadeinthecourseofthedebatewhichIthoughtreallyhadbecomeexhaustedandobsolete,andthenheturnedroundandsaidthatthewholewasaconspiracy!Accustomedtomajoritieswhichhavebeenobtainedwithouttheassertionofasingleprinciple,whichhave,indeed,beentheconsequenceofanoccasionalposition,andwhichhave,infact,originatedinthenobleLord\'ssittingonthatbenchwithoutthenecessityofexpressinganopinionuponanysubject,foreignordomestic,thatcaninteresttheheartofthecountryorinfluencetheopinionofthenation,thenobleLordwillatlastfindthatthetimehascomewhen,ifhebeastatesman,hemusthaveapolicy(cheers);andthatitwillnotdo,theinstantthattheblunderingofhisCabinetisdetected,andeverymanaccustomedtoinfluencetheopinionoftheHouseunitesincondemningit,tocomplaintothecountrythatheisthevictimofaconspiracy.\"(Cheers).
Itwould,however,bequiteamistaketopresumethatthedebateswereinterestingbecausesuchpassionateinterestshingeduponthem.Therewasonenight\'sdebateafteranothernight\'sdebate,andstillnodivision.Duringthegreaterpartofthebattlethevoicesofthegladiatorsweredrownedinthehumandhubbubofprivateconversation.
Nightafternighttheplacemenspokeagainsttimetowinanothertwenty-fourhoursforintrigueandundergroundaction.ThefirstnightMr.Cobdenmadeacleverspeech.SodidBulwerandLordJohnRussell;
buttheAttorney-Generalwascertainlyrightintellingthemthat\"hecouldnotforonemomentcomparetheirdeliberationsortheirargumentsonsuchasubjectasthiswiththeargumentsthathadbeendeliveredinanotherplace.\"Thesecondnightwasencumberedbytheheavyspecialpleadingsoftheattorneysonbothsides,theLord-Advocate,Mr.
WhitesideandtheAttorney-General.SirJamesGraham,indeed,madeanattempttoraisethedebate,buthefailed.Whenthisman,thevirtualmurdereroftheBandiera,sanctimoniouslyexclaimedthat\"hewouldwashhishandsoftheinnocentbloodwhichhadbeenshed,\"ahalf-suppressedironicallaughre-echoedhispathos.Thethirdnightwasstillduller.
TherewasSirF.Thesiger,theAttorney-Generalinspe,answeringtheAttorney-Generalinre,andSergeantSheeendeavouringtoanswerSirF.
Thesiger.TherewastheagriculturaleloquenceofSirJohnPakington.
TherewasGeneralWilliamsofKars,listenedtowithsilenceonlyforafewminutes,butafterthosefewminutesspontaneouslydroppedbytheHouseandfullyunderstoodnottobethemantheyhadtakenhimfor.
Therewas,lastly,SirSidneyHerbert.ThiselegantscionofPeelitestatesmanshipmadeaspeechwhichwas,indeed,terse,pointed,antithetical,butgirdingattheargumentsoftheplacemenratherthanproducingnewargumentsofhisown.ButthelastnightthedebaterosetoaheightcompatiblewiththenaturalmeasureoftheCommons.
Roebuck,Gladstone,PalmetstonandDisraeliweregreat,eachinhisownway.
Thedifficultpointwastogetridofthestalking-horseofthedebate,SirJ.Bowring,andtobringhomethequestiontoLordPalmerstonhimself,bymakinghimpersonallyresponsibleforthe\"massacreoftheinnocents.\"Thiswasatlastdone.AstheimpendinggeneralelectioninEnglandwillinthemainrevolveuponthispoint,itmaynotbeamisstocondense,inasshortacompassaspossible,theresultsofthediscussion.ThedayafterthedefeatoftheMinistry,andthedaybeforetheministerialannouncementofthedissolutionoftheHouseofCommons,theLondonTimesventureduponthefollowingassertions:
\"thenationwillberatheratalosstoknowtheprecisequestiontobeansweredHasLordPalmerston\'sCabinetforfeitedtheconfidenceofthePeopleonaccountofaseriesofactscommitted\'ontheothersideoftheworldsixweeksbeforetheywerehereevenheardof,andbypublicservantsappointedunderaformeradministration?\"
(ItwasatChristmaswhenMinistersheardofthematter,andtheywereatthattimeasignorantaseverybodyelse).
\"Infact,hadthesceneofthenarrativebeenthemoon,orhaditbeenachapterfromtheArabianNights,thepresentCabinetcouldnothavelesstodowithitIsLordPalmerston\'sadministrationtobecondemnedanddisplacedforwhatitneverdidandcouldnotdo,forwhatitonlyheardofwheneverybodyelseheardofit,forwhatwasdonebymenwhomitdidnotappointandwithwhomithasnot,asyet,beenabletoholdanycommunication?\"
TothisimpudentrodomontadeofaFaFerwhichhasallalongvindicatedtheCantonmassacreasasupremestrokeofPalmerstoniandiplomacy,wecanopposeafewfactspainfullyelicitedduringaprotracteddebate,andnotoncecontrovertedbyPalmerstonorhissubordinates.In1847,whenattheheadoftheForeignOffice,LordPalmerston\'sfirstdispatchontheadmissionoftheBritishHong-KongauthoritiesintoCantonwascouchedinmenacingterms.However,hisardoursweredampedbyEarlGrey,hiscolleague,thethenSecretaryfortheColonies,whosentoutamostperemptoryprohibitiontotheofficerscommandingthenavalforces,notonlyatHongKong,butatCeylon,orderingthem,undernocircumstances,toallowanyoffensivemovementagainsttheChinesewithoutexpressauthorityfromEngland.Onthe18thAugust,1849,however,shortlybeforehisdismissalfromtheRussellCabinet,LordPalmerstonwrotethefollowingdispatchtotheBritishPlenipotentiaryatHongKong:
\"LetnotthegreatofficersofCantonnortheGovernmentofPekindeceivethemselvesTheforbearancewhichtheBritishGovernmenthashithertodisplayed,arisesnotfromasenseofweakness,butfromconsciousnessofsuperiorstrength.TheBritishGovernmentwellknowsthatifoccasionrequiredit,BritishmilitaryforcewouldbeabletodestroythetownofCanton,notleavingonesinglehousestanding,andcouldthusinflictthemostsignalchastisementuponthepeopleofthatcity.\"
ThusthebombardmentofCantonoccurringin1856,underLordPalmerstonasPremier,wasforeshadowedin1849bythelastmissivesenttoHong-KongbyLordPalmerston,asForeignSecretaryoftheRussellCabinet.AlltheinterveninGovernmentshaverefusedtoallowanyrelaxationoftheprohibitionputupontheBritishrepresentativesatHong-KongagainstpressingtheiradmissionintoCanton.ThiswasthecasewiththeEarlofGranvilleundertheRussellMinistry,theEarlofMalmesburyundertheDerbyMinistry,andtheDukeofNewcastleundertheAberdeenMinistry.Atlast,in1852,Dr.Bowring,tillthenConsulatCanton,wasappointedPlenipotentiary.Hisappointment,asMr.
Gladstonestates,wasmadebyLordClarendon,Palmerston\'stool,withouttheknowledgeorconsentoftheAberdeenCabinct.WhenBowringfirstmootedthequestionnowatissue,Clarendon,inadispatchdatedJuly5,1854,toldhimthathewasright,butthatheshouldwaittilltherewerenavalforcesavailableforhispurpose.EnglandwasthenatwarwithRussia.WhenthequestionoftheArrowarose,Bowringhadjustheardthatpeacehadbeenestablished,andinfactnavaforceswerebeingsentouttohim.ThenthequarrelwithYehwaspicked.OntheiothofJanuary,afterhavingreceivedanaccountofallthathadpassed,ClarendoninformedBowringthat\"HerMajesty\'sGovernmententirelyapprovedthecoursewhichhasbeenadoptedbySirM.Seymourandyourself.\"Thisapprobation,couchedinthesefewwords,wasnotaccompaniedbyanyfurtherinstructions.Onthecontrary,Mr.Hammond,writingtotheSecretaryoftheAdmiralty,wasdirectedbyLordClarendontoexpresstoAdmiralSeymourtheGovernment\'sadmirationof\"themoderationwithwhichhehadacted,andtherespectwhichhehadshownforthelivesandpropertiesoftheChinese.\"
Therecan,then,existnodoubtthattheChinesemassacrewasplannedbyLordPalmerstonhimself.UnderwhatcolourshenowhopestorallytheelectorsoftheUnitedKingdomisaquestionwhichIhopeyouwillallowmetoanswerinanotherletter,asthishasalreadyexceededtheproperlimits.
RUSSIAANDCHINANewYorkDailyTribuneApril7,1857
byKARLMARX
InthematteroftradeandintercoursewithChina,ofwhichLordPalmerstonandLouisNapoleonhaveundertakentheextensionbyforce,nolittlejealousyisevidentlyfeltofthepositionoccupiedbyRussia.Indeed,itisquitepossiblethatwithoutanyexpenditureofmoneyorexertionofmilitaryforceRussiamaygainmoreintheend,asaconsequenceofthependingquarrelwiththeChinese,thaneitherofthebelligerentnations.
TherelationsofRussiatotheChineseEmpirearealtogetherpeculiar.
WhiletheEnglishandourselves——forinthematterofthependinghostilitiestheFrencharebutlittlemorethanamateurs,astheyreallyhavenotradewithChina——arenotallowedtheprivilegeofadirectcommunicationevenwiththeViceroyofCanton,theRussiansenjoytheadvantageofmaintaininganEmbassyatPeking.Itissaid,indeed,thatthisadvantageispurchasedonlybysubmittingtoallowRussiatobereckonedattheCelestialCourtasoneofthetributarydependenciesoftheChineseEmpire.NeverthelessitenablesRussiandiplomacy,asinEurope,toestablishaninfluenceforitselfinChinawhichisbynomeanslimitedtopurelydiplomaticoperations.BeingexcludedfiomthemaritimetradewithChina,theRussiansarefreefromanyinterestorinvolvementinpastorpendingdisputesonthatsubject;andtheyalsoescapethatantipathywithwhichfromtimeimmemorialtheChinesehaveregardedallforeignersapproachingtheircountrybysea,confoundingthem,andnotentirelywithoutreason,withthepiraticaladventurersbywhomtheChinesecoastsseemevertohavebeeninfested.Butasanindemnityforthisexclusionfromthemaritimetrade,theRussiansen.oyaninlandandoverlandtradepeculiartothemselves,andinwhichitseemsimpossibleforthemtohaveanyrival.Thistraffic,regulatedbyatreatymadein1787,duringthereignofCatharineH.,hasforitsprincipal,ifnotindeeditssoleseatofoperations,Kiachta,situateonthefrontiersofsouthernSiberiaandofChineseTartary,onatributaryoftheLakeBaikal,andaboutahundredmilessouthofthecityofIrkutsk.Thistrade,conductedatasortofannualfair,ismanagedbytwelvefactors,ofwhomsixareRussiansandsixChinese,whomeetatKiachta,andfixtherates——sincethetradeisentirelybybarter——atwhichthemerchandisesuppliedbyeitherpartyshallbeexchanged.Theprincipalarticlesoftradeare,onthepartoftheChinese,tea,andonthepartoftheRussians,cottonandwoollencloths.Thistrade,oflateyears,seemstohaveattainedaconsiderableincrease.Thequantity.ofteasoldtotheRussiansatKiachta,didnot,tenortwelveyearsago,exceedanaverageoffortythousandchests;butin1852itamountedtoahundredandseventy-fivethousandchests,ofwhichthelargerpartwasofthatsuperiorqualitywellknowntocontinentalconsumersascaravantea,incontradistinctionfromtheinferiorarticleimportedbysea.TheotherarticlessoldbytheChineseweresomesmallquantitiesofsugar,cotton,rawsilkandsilkgoods,butalltoverylimitedamounts.TheRussianspaidaboutequallyincottonandwoollengoods,withtheadditionofsmallquantitiesofRussianleather,wroughtmetals,fursandevenopium.Thewholeamountofgoodsboughtandsold-whichsecminthepublishedaccountstobestatedatverymoderateprices-reachedthelargesumofupwardoffifteenmillionsofdollars.In1857owingtotheinternaltroublesofChinaandtheoccupationoftheroadfromtheteaprovincesbybandsofmaraudingrebels,thequantityofteasenttoKiachtafellofftofiftythousandchests,andthewholevalueofthetradeofthatyearwasbutaboutsixmillionsofdollars.Inthetwofollowingyears,however,thiscommercerevived,andtheteasenttoKiachtaforthefairOf1855
didnotfallshortofahundredandtwelvethousandchests.
Inconsequenceoftheincreaseofthistrade,Kiachta,whichissituatedwithintheRussianfrontier,fromamerefortandfair-ground,hasgrownupintoaconsiderablecity.Ithasbeenselectedasthecapitalofthatpartofthefrontierregion,andistobedignifiedbyhavingamilitarycommandantandacivilgovernor.AtthesametimeadirectandregularpostalcommunicationforthetransmissionofofficialdispatcheshaslatelybeenestablishedbetweenKiachtaandPeking,whichisdistantfromitaboutninehundredmiles.
Itisevidentthat,shouldthependinghostilitiesresultinsuppressionofthemaritimetrade,Europemightreceiveitentiresupplyofteabythisroute.Indeed,itissuggestedthaevenwiththemaritimetradeopen,Russia,may,uponthecompletionofhersystemofrailroads,becomeapowerfulcompetitorwiththemaritimenationsforsupplyingthEuropeanmarketswithtea.TheserailroadswillsupplydirectcommunicationbetweentheportsofCronstadtandLibauandtheancientcityofNijniNovgorodintheinteriorofRussia,theresidenceofthemerchantsbywhomthetradeatKiachtaiscarriedon.ThesupplyofEuropewithteabythisoverlandrouteiscertainlymoreprobablethantheemploymentofourprojectedPacificRailroadforthatpurposeSilk,too,theotherchiefexportofChina,isanarticleofsucsmallbulkincomparisontoitscost,astomakeitstransportstionbylandbynomeansimpossible;whilethisChinestrafficopensanoutletforRussianmanufactures,suchasitcannotelsewhereattain.
Wemayobserve,however,thattheeffortsofRussiaarebynomeanslimitedtothedevelopmentofthisinlandtrade.ItisseveralyearssinceshetookpossessionofthebanksofthRiverAmur,thenativecountryofthepresentrulingraceinChina.Hereffortsinthisdirectionreceivedsomecheckaninterruptionduringthelatewar,butwilldoubtlessbereviveandpushedwithenergy.ShehaspossessionoftheKurilIslandsandtheneighbouringcoastsofKamchatka.Alreadyshemaintainsafleetinthoseseas,andwilldoubtlessimproveanyopportunitythatmayoffertoobtainaparticipationinthemaritimetradewithChina.This,however,isoflittleconsequencetohercomparedwiththeextensionofthatoverlandtradeofwhichshepossessesthemonopoly.
WHOSEATROCITIES?NewYorkDailyTribuneApril10,1857
byKARLMARX
AFEWYEARSsince,whenthefrightfulsystemoftortureinIndiawasexposedinParliament,SirJamesHogg,oneoftheDirectorsoftheMostHonourableEastIndiaCompany,boldlyassertedthatthestatementsmadewereunfounded.Subsequentinvestigation,however,provedthemtobebaseduponfactswhichshouldhavebeenwellknowntotheDirectors,andSirJameshadlefthimtoadmiteither\"wilfulignorance\"or\"criminalknowledge\"ofthehorriblechargelaidattheCompany\'sdoors.LordPalmerston,thepresentPremierofEngland,andtheEarlofClarendon,theMinisterofForeignAffairs,seemjustnowtobeplacedinasimilarunenviableposition.AtthelateLordMayor\'sbanquet,thePremiersaid,inhisspeech,whileattemptingtojustifytheatrocitiescommittedupontheChinese:
\"IftheGovernmenthad,inthiscase,approvedofunjustifiableproceedings,theyhadundoubtedlyfollowedacoursewhichdeservedtoincurthecensureofParliamentandofthecountry.Wewerepersuaded,however,onthecontrary,thattheseproceedingswerenecessaryandvital.Wefeltthatagreatwronghadbeeninflictedonourcountry.Wefeltthatourfellowcountrymeninadistantpartoftheglobehadbeenexposedtoaseriesofinsults,outragesandatrocitieswhichcouldnotbepassedoverinsilence(Cheers).Wefeltthatthetreatyrightsofthiscountryhadbeenbroken,andthatthoselocallychargedwiththedefenceofourinterestsinthatquarteroftheworldwerenotonlyjustified,butobligedtoresentthoseoutrages,sofarasthepowerintheirhandswouldenablethemtodoso.Wefeltthatweshouldbebetrayingthetrustwhichthecitizensofthecountryhadreposedinusifwehadnotapprovedoftheproceedingswhichwethoughttoberight,andwhichwe,ifplacedinthesamecircumstances,shouldhavedeemeditourdutytohavepursued(Cheers).\"
Now,howevermuchthepeopleofEnglandandtheworldatlargemaybedeceivedbysuchplausiblestatements,hisLordshiphimselfcertainlydoesnotbelievethemtobetrue,ofifhedoes,hehasbetrayedawilfulignorancealmostasunjustifiableas\"criminalknowledge.\"EversincethefirstreportreachedusofEnglishhostilitiesinChina,theGovernmentjournalsofEnglandandaportionoftheAmericanPresshavebeenheapingwholesaledenunciationsupontheChinese——sweepingchargesofviolationoftreatyobligations——insultstotheEnglishflag——degradationofforeignersresidingontheirsoil,andthelike;
yetnotonesingledistinctchargehasbeenmadeorasinglefactinstancedinsupportofthesedenunciations,savethecaseofthelorchaArrow,and,withrespecttothiscase,thecircumstanceshavebeensomisrepresentedandglossedoverbyParliamentaryrhetoricasutterlytomisleadthosewhoreallydesiretounderstandthemeritsofthequestion.
ThelorchaArrowwasasmallChinesevessel,mannedbyChinese,butemployedbysomeEnglishmen.AlicencetocarrytheEnglishflaghadbeentemporarilygrantedtoher,whichlicencehadexpiredpriortothealleged\"insult\".Sheissaidtohavebeenusedtosmugglesalt,andhadonboardofhersomeverybadcharacters——Chinesepiratesandsmugglers——whom,beingoldoffendersagainstthelaws,theauthoritieshadlongbeentryingtoarrest.WhilelyingatanchorinfrontofCanton——withsailsfurled,andnoflagwhateverdisplayed——
thepolicebecameawareofthepresenceonboardoftheseoffenders,andarrestedthem——preciselysuchanactaswouldhavetakenplaceherehadthepolicealongourwharvesknownthatriver-thievesandsmugglersweresecretedinanativeorforeignvesselnearby.But,asthisarrestinterferedwiththebusinessoftheowners,thecaptainwenttotheEnglishConsulandcomplained.TheConsul,ayoungmanrecentlyappointed,and,asweareinformed,apersonofaquickandirritabledisposition,rushesonboardinpropriapersona,getsintoanexcitedparleywiththepolice,whohaveonlydischargedtheirsimpleduty,andconsequentlyfailsinobtainingsatisfaction.ThenceherushesbacktotheConsulate,writesanimperativedemandforrestitutionandapologytotheGovernor-GeneraloftheKwangtungProvince,andanotetoSirJohnBowringandAdmiralSeymouratHongKong,representingthatheandhiscountry\'sflaghavebeeninsultedbeyondendurance,andintimatinginprettybroadtermsthatnowisthetimeforademonstrationagainstCanton,suchashadlongbeenwaitedfor.